Dear flint-devel,
I'm currently working on a project that involves computations with complex rational functions. I've implemented these functions using a pair of `fmpz_poly_q` to represent the real and imaginary parts.
I need to compute the power of these complex rational functions, with both positive and negative integer exponents. I'm considering two approaches:
1. **Direct computation using the binomial theorem:** I've implemented a function that expands the power using the binomial theorem and performs the necessary arithmetic operations on the `fmpz_poly_q` components.
2. **Matrix representation and `fmpz_poly_mat_q`:** I could represent the complex rational function as a 2x2 matrix of `fmpz_poly_q` and use the `fmpz_poly_mat_q_pow` function to compute the power.
I'm wondering which approach is generally more efficient and recommended in FLINT. Are there any potential pitfalls or considerations I should be aware of for either method?
Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Stephen
**Regarding which method is better**
* The matrix approach, leveraging `fmpz_poly_mat_q_pow`, is likely to be more efficient, especially for larger exponents. FLINT's matrix functions are generally well-optimized.
* The direct computation approach might be simpler to implement and understand, but could be slower for higher powers due to the nature of the binomial expansion.