Hamcrest matchers wrapping Async

[pmowrer]

Hi!

I thought I'd share a post about an experiment of mine wrapping the
functionality of the Async class in Hamcrest matchers:

http://www.patrickmowrer.com/2010/08/19/improving-readability-of-asynchronous-tests-in-flexunit4-using-hamcrest-matchers

Though I have little idea of what's planned for Async going forward, I
did stumble on a post here from June that suggested creating something
like this. If it's anything the community finds interesting, I'd be
happy to continue working on it. As it stands right now, its not
finished nor polished, and I'd be happy to take any feedback on how to
improve on it and make it more consistent with FlexUnit.

-Patrick

[Kris]

Looks interesting. Have you seen morefluent http://bitbucket.org/loomis/morefluent?  It has support for both synchronous and asynchronous event dispatching. It also supports hamcrest matchers.

Regards,
Kris

[pmowrer]

Hi Kris,

That looks very nice! Though I've been using your Mockito project,
this other project of yours unfortunately didn't turn up in my search
for this type of thing a few weeks ago.

-Patrick

On Aug 31, 10:22 am, Kris <kris.karczmarc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks interesting. Have you seen morefluenthttp://bitbucket.org/loomis/morefluent? It has support for both synchronous

[Kris]

No problem :). Here is a short list of my projects: http://bitbucket.org/loomis.

[Michael A. Labriola]

Now that 4.1 is almost out the door, the three of us plus David should arrange a chat. I would like to explain the changes I am considering for async in 4.2 that would enable all of you to make this stuff even easier and cleaner.

 

Notice: This transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmission by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail or telephone and delete the original transmission. Thank you.

[David Wolever]

On 31-Aug-10, at 10:47 AM, Michael A. Labriola wrote:

Now that 4.1 is almost out the door, the three of us plus David should arrange a chat. I would like to explain the changes I am considering for async in 4.2 that would enable all of you to make this stuff even easier and cleaner.

Oohh! Easier and cleaner sounds good.

[Drew Bourne]

@Patrick, I rather like the look of that.

@Mike, could I be in on that chat too? Async is my biggest bugbear
with FlexUnit.

cheers,
Drew

[Michael A. Labriola]

Indeed

Drew Bourne <first...@gmail.com> wrote:

cheers,
Drew

[pmowrer]

Thanks Drew, I appreciate that!