Thanks for your comments, both here and through a number of direct messages.
I want to make it clear that I think the current Configure Dictionary View tool is brilliant, and really quite amazing in what it can do, especially if you export the XHTML and look at the complexity of what it is doing in the background. From my experience, I think the tool is perfect for the formatting of print dictionaries. (When I first learned about it, after typesetting some Toolbox dictionaries manually, I was amazed and relieved...) So in my initial post saying that the tool needs to be "reconsidered", that was really a poorly chosen word.
I want to consider rather if there might be some small tweaks possible to that tool that would ease formatting of dictionaries for digital publication (e.g. for Dictionary App Builder and Webonary). The main issue, I believe, is the availability of paragraph formatting for certain fields.
I won't go into all the details here, but if you read your FLEx documentation carefully, there is a ProjectDictionaryOverrides.css file buried in the FLEx project folder which you can modify to change the CSS properties of various styles. (You need to export your project to XHTML format first to find out what the styles are named.) Changes you make in that file are reflected directly in the entry preview in FLEx (after a refresh), and in the XHTML export. Applying various "paragraph" properties in this overrides file, I have fixed the layout of the "narrow screen" image above so that it now appears like this:
Probably still not perfect, but much improved for readability. I've attached the overrides file, in case you are interested in looking at it/copying ideas from it for your layouts. So even with the current version of FLEx, it is possible to get the paragraph formatting that I'm talking about, but it's fairly challenging technically (i.e. not for the faint of heart). Might there be some small tweaks to the layout tool in FLEx that could give us some of this functionality without the technical challenge?
I am in contact with Jason Naylor and Beth Bryson, and will be talking through some of these issues with them. I'm not sure if the expressions of interest above (@David, @Larry) mean you want to be in on the discussions, or you are more interested in the outcome... so let me know if the former. If people have additional thoughts, feel free to post them here or send me a direct message.
Thanks,
Jeff