Dear all,
Please find via this link an interesting paper on various types of participatory video and their usefulness to a local seed innovation system in Bangladesh. The paper was presented at the Innovation Asia and Pacific Symposium in Nepal (May 2009).
More information including an abstract can be found below.
The following link gives you the PDF directly (66,3 KB download)
http://innovation-asia-pacific.net/home/media/Chowdhury-et-al-Scripted-and-scriptless-PV-for-web.pdf
Other information about the symposium, including a wide range of interesting appers, can be found at http://innovation-asia-pacific.net.
Best wishes,
Dorine
Dorine
Rüter
ETC Foundation
| P.O. Box 64 | 3830 AB
Leusden | The
Netherlands |
|
Telephone: +31 (0) 33 432 6033 | Fax: +31 (0) 33
494 0791 |
| Email:
d.ruter AT etcnl.nl | Internet: www.etc-international.org |
| Skype: dorineruter
| Weblog:
www.ruter.nl/blog |
|
Personal bookmarks: http://del.icio.us/DorineRuter |
P Save a tree. Do not print this message if not really necessary.
Assessment of scripted and scriptless participatory video on usefulness for
local seed innovation system in Bangladesh
Ataharul Huq Chowdhury and Michael Hauser
University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, Working Group
Knowledge Systems and Innovations, Gregor Mendel Strasse 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria (atah...@yahoo.com)
Abstract
Recent experiences in participatory video (PV) raised the question of how to best use it for facilitating
a self-sustaining local seed innovation system with farmers. A major assumption was that the
presence or absence of a script (pre-structured message) may be a major factor determining the
potential of PV for stimulating seed innovation. Embedded in a mini-process of participatory action
research, two styles of video production were tested and assessed together with farming communities
in Bogra District, Bangladesh. Under the script-based style, the video was developed using a script,
and the camcorder was kept under control of the professionals. Under the scriptless style, an open
structure was adopted and the camcorder was handed over to the farmers. Both styles were
assessed with farmers and process facilitators through three stakeholder workshops using a
combined Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Strengths, Weaknesses. Opportunities, Threats
(SWOT) analysis. In addition, qualitative interviews were conducted with the members of the video
facilitation team and participant farmers. The process of video facilitation (i.e. the role of the
outsiders) differs between the two styles whereby, using a script, the issue of “goal orientation” (i.e.
how to show a specific message better) seems to be more dominant. Under the scriptless style, the
process seems to be more inclusive, but random and hence less goal-oriented. Because of its
random structure, it can be used as a monitoring tool to capture most significant change in local seed
innovation development. Moreover, potentials for stimulating self-sustaining seed innovation at village
level appeared to be higher under scriptless PV processes. Scripted video is useful as a capacitybuilding
tool and for disseminating sustainable technologies or local knowledge across geographical
scales. However, scriptless video may be difficult to institutionalize in the context of Bangladesh.
Also, the process and outcome (the film) underlying scriptless videos are of limited geographical
relevance and may not be replicable elsewhere. This research has raised several critiques about the
usefulness of the two styles of PV, which can be seen as an entry point to investigate their
potentialities within a specific seed-development process.
Keywords: participatory video, local seed innovation system, innovation process, Bangladesh, South
Asia