Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

[xenu-city.net] McPherson - RFRA Motion to dismiss information

17 views
Skip to first unread message

Mark Dallara

unread,
May 21, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/21/99
to

--BEGIN QUOTE--

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA, Case No. CRC 98-20377 CFANO-S

vs.
MOTION TO DISMISS
THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG INFORMATION BASED UPON
SERVICE ORGANIZATION "RFRA" AND THE FIRST
SPNNO. 01980179 AMENDMENT

____________________________/ ("RFRA BRIEF')

MOTION TO DISMISS THE INFORMATION BASED UPON "RFRA" AND THE FIRST
AMENDMENT, and MEMORANDUM OF LAW

The Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization, Inc. ("The Church" or
"FSO"), respectfully moves this Honorable Court to enter an order
dismissing Counts One and Two of the Information and as good grounds
therefore would show:

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT

The criminal charges brought against the Church of Scientology Flag
Service Organization ("The Church" or "FSO") are virtually unprecedented
in the history of the United States. In no reported case since the
founding of the Republic was a church, as opposed to its individual
representatives, convicted of a crime. Indeed, with one minor and
ill-chosen exception, in no reported case was a church even charged with a
criminal offense.1

No one, of course, would claim that this dramatic precedent (or, more
precisely, lack of precedent) merely reflects that church leaders,
ministers, priests, rabbis, or other ecclesiastical officials have never
strayed from the paths of righteousness and lawful conduct.

_______________
1 In the single exception, People v. Murphy, 98 Misc.2d 235, 413
N.Y.S.2d 540 (Queens Cty. 1977), the court dismissed the indictment under
the First Amendment.
__________________________________________________________________________

Rather, it demonstrates a wise and careful historical understanding and
practice, compelled by constitutional limitation, that the State's
interest in enforcing its criminal laws is sufficiently protected by
bringing charges against the individuals directly responsible for the acts
involved, and that religious liberty compels that the State not become
entangled in charging and punishing churches (and ultimately their
parishioners) for such acts.

Indeed, this historical and unbroken understanding and practice has
recently been followed even by the Pinellas County State Attorney. In
State of Florida v. Henry Lyons, CRC 98-03449 CFANO-S, the State Attorney
prosecuted Reverend Henry Lyons, the former President of the National
Baptist Convention, for a variety of serious crimes, but did not charge
the Baptist Convention, despite the fact that Reverend Lyons was the
Convention's most senior official and that the Convention explicitly
ratified and affirmed the acts of Reverend Lyons. Yet the very same State
Attorney's office has chosen to indict the Church alone, to the exclusion
of the individual actors, all but one of whom were granted immunity.
Indeed, even the members of the Church's board of directors were granted
immunity. How the State Attorney can reconcile such a prosecution with his
actions in the Lyons case, let alone with the historical precedent in this
State and Nation, is a question that, we submit, he cannot properly
answer.

The State Attorney's burden is made all the more insurmountable by the
Florida Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1998 ("RFRA"), Section
761.01-.05, Florida Statutes. RFRA was enacted to buttress the
protections of the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment and of
Section 3, Article I of the Florida Constitution. It provides that the
State may not impose burdens upon a church's exercise of religion except
in furtherance of a compelling state interest, and even then only by the
least restrictive means necessary to protect that state
__________________________________________________________________________

interest. Florida's RFRA together with established doctrine under the
speech, assembly and religion clauses of the First Amendment, compels
dismissal of the criminal charges brought against the Church in this case,
for several reasons.

First, the threat or imposition of a criminal conviction and criminal
penalties imposes immense burdens upon a church and its individual
parishioners, within the meaning of RFRA and the First Amendment. A
church, whatever its legal formalities, is much more than the mere legal
fiction of a corporate entity, but rather is an organic body of believers
and followers. It is through a church that the followers pursue and
achieve salvation in accordance with their religious beliefs. To label a
church a criminal is to taint the entire religion and its members, to
burden its evangelical mission, and to cast it into public disfavor. To
impose financial penalties or disabilities upon it is to penalize the
members and parishioners who support its mission, and to transform their
contributions to a use not intended or authorized.

Because this prosecution of a church substantially burdens the free
exercise rights of the Church and its members, it can be undertaken
consistent with RFRA and the First Amendment only if it furthers a
compelling government interest by the means least restrictive of RFRA and
First Amendment rights. Logic and history dictate a negative conclusion to
both inquiries. The government's compelling interest lies in enforcing
compliance with its criminal laws; only individuals can comply or not
comply with such laws. A church, or any other corporation, can only act
through individuals, and the criminal law, with its ultimate sanction of
imprisonment, is most effectively directed at individuals, not
corporations and especially not churches. While the government ordinarily
may and sometimes does proceed criminally against corporations, under
statutes specifically crafted to punish acts that create illicit corporate
profits,
__________________________________________________________________________

it cannot be said that its interest in doing so, as opposed to the
individual malefactors, is compelling (as opposed to merely reasonable) in
the constitutional sense. It certainly cannot be said to be a compelling
interest where the corporation is a non-profit organization, especially a
church, where the statutes pursuant to which the charges are brought are
directed at individual conduct, and where the charge and ultimate penalty
will harm the contributors and members, and not the malefactors,
especially, as here, when the State Attorney has chosen not to prosecute
the malefactors for their acts.

In any event, the means by which the government may further its interest
in enforcing the criminal laws that is least restrictive of religious free
exercise is to limit its focus to the individual actors. It is by no means
necessary for the government to taint and burden an entire church and
religion and virtually all its parishioners in order to enforce its laws.
We can conclude with certainty that this is true from the historical fact
that no church has ever suffered criminal conviction in the history of
this State and Nation. And yet the Republic still stands.

Second, it must be emphasized that the criminal information in this case
charges the Church with criminal liability for certain acts of individuals
that were undertaken pursuant to their deeply held religious belief and
that constituted the exercise of religious practice. Thus, it is part of
the religious beliefs of Scientology that mental or "psychotic" conditions
are spiritual in nature, and must be addressed by spiritual means. Use of
psychiatric care or psychiatric hospitals is strictly forbidden as a
fundamental tenet of Scientology, just as it is a fundamental tenet of the
Christian Science religion to abjure medical treatment for physical
ailments. Lisa McPherson herself strongly adhered to these religious
beliefs when she rejected psychiatric treatment at Morton Plant Hospital
and chose personally instead to receive spiritual assistance at FSO. The
__________________________________________________________________________

acts of various Church staff members - who themselves were members of a
religious order2 and had dedicated their lives to Scientology - in
attempting to provide spiritual assistance, not medical treatment, to Lisa
McPherson was a matter of religious choice and belief, by them and by Ms.
McPherson. Such choices as to the free exercise of one's religious beliefs
are protected activity under RFRA and the First Amendment. The State's
effort to redefine the spiritual assistance provided to Lisa McPherson as
the improper practice of medicine or the abuse of a disabled adult
impermissibly burdens the religious practices, and cannot be justified
under the strict scrutiny mandated by RFRA.

Third, the criminal information criminally charges the Church on a
vicarious liability basis for the alleged negligent acts of certain staff
members in failing on a timely basis to recognize that Ms. McPherson had
developed serious physical medical symptoms and to bring her to a hospital
on time. These negligent acts were in violation of Scientology scripture
stating that medical assistance should be sought for physical ailments,
where needed. It is particularly odious under RFRA and the First Amendment
for the State to charge a church with a crime under what in effect are
respondeat superior principles of agency usually applied to secular
relationships and business corporations. It is improper for a civil court
to impose upon a church secular models of employment, supervision or care
with respect to ecclesiastical functions and duties of church staff.

"Bureaucratic suggestion in employment decisions of a pastoral character,
in contravention of a church's own perception of its needs and purposes,
would constitute unprecedented entanglement
_______________

2 All staff members of FSO are members of a Scientology religious
order known as the "Sea Organization" or "Sea Org." Members of the order
dedicate their lives to working to further the religious goals of
Scientology religion; indeed, they agree to so dedicate themselves for the
next billion years, pursuant to Scientology's religious belief in
successive lives and transmigration of the spirit. See Affidavit of
Richard Reiss, ś2.
__________________________________________________________________________

with religious authority." Rayburn v. General Conf. of Seventh-Day
Adventists, 772 F.2d 1164, 1171 (4th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 478 U.S.
1020 (1986). See Tichenor v. Roman Catholic Church ofNew Orleans, 32 F.3d
953, 960 (5th Cir. 1994) (Church not liable for failure to supervise when
employee engages in independent criminal conduct which results in
plaintiffs injuries); Doe v. Evans, 718 So. 2d 286, 290-91 (Fla. 4th DCA
1998) (First Amendment prohibits court from considering claims of
negligent hiring, retention or supervision by the Church).

At the least, if a church can ever be charged criminally, despite all that
we have said above, it can only be where the Church itself clearly can be
found to have authorized or directed the acts alleged. See State v.
Municipal Auto Sales, 222 So. 2d 278, 280 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1969) (applying
such a rule even to business corporations). The Supreme Court of the
United States has mandated such a rule with respect to mere civil
liability of political associations. NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co., 458
U.S. 886, 916-920 (1982). In Claiborne Hardware the Supreme Court
recognized that imposition of even civil liability could destroy an
organization engaged in vitally protected speech and association, and, in
doing so, burden or destroy such protected activity. Accordingly,
liability would be limited to those unlawful acts that were authorized,
directed or ratified by the organization itself. The Claiborne Hardware
principle applies a fortiori to a church, which enjoys the added
protection of the religion clauses and of RFRA. Here, the negligent acts
were not authorized, and indeed were contrary to Church scripture.

Moreover, to avoid the First Amendment's prohibition of judicial
entanglement into matters of religious "discipline, faith, internal
organization, or ecclesiastical rule, custom or law," Serbian Eastern
Orthodox Diocese v. Milivojevich, 426 U.S. 696, 713 (1976), the court
__________________________________________________________________________

must defer to the Church itself to define and establish the meaning and
interpretation of religious doctrine; the court "may [not look] behind the
declared content of religious beliefs anymore than [it] may examine into
their validity." Holy Spirit Association for the Unification of World
Christianity v. Tax Committee of City of New York, 55 N.Y.2d 512, 521
(1982). See Presbyterian Church v. Mary Elizabeth Blue Hull Memorial
Presbyterian Church, 393 U.S. 440, 450 (1969).

Indeed, the virtually impenetrable thicket into which courts would enter
if they tried to sort outwhat acts are compelled by, authorized,
permitted, discouraged or prohibited by church doctrine demonstrates both
the advisability and constitutional correctness of our principal point, to
wit, that criminal prosecutions of churches, qua churches, are both
unnecessary and impermissible under RFRA and the First Amendment.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

1. The Defendant Is A Church

The defendant Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization is a church
of the Scientology religion that provides advanced religious training and
counseling in Clearwater to Scientologists from throughout the world.
Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization v. City of Clearwater,
2F.3d 1514, 1519-20 (11th Cir. 1993). The Internal Revenue Service has
recognized the defendant as a "church," within the meaning of 26 U.S.C.
§170(c), exempt from taxation under 26 U.S.C. §501(c)(3). See Internal
Revenue Service, Cumulative List of Organizations Described in Section
170(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, Publication 78 (revised
2-98), Supp. No. 1998-1.

The defendant, however, is much more than an ordinary Church of the
Scientology
__________________________________________________________________________

religion. Most Scientology churches are dedicated to providing basic
Scientology religious services, denominated auditing and training, to
Scientologists located in the geographical area of each particular Church
itself. FSO, however, provides what is known as advanced auditing and
training services that not available at the local churches, and, in many
instances, are available nowhere else in the world. It is the goal of
every Scientologist to advance beyond the basic Scientology services
available at the local churches, and to participate in the higher or
"upper" level services available at FSO. Thus, FSO is undoubtedly the most
important single Scientology church to every Scientologist in the world.
Its parishioners, or potential parishioners, include every adherent to the
Scientology religion. Affidavit of Mary Story ś4. It is analogous to Mecca
or to the wailing wall, and indeed is referred to in Scientology as "the
Mecca of Scientology." Id.

2. The Religion of Scientology

The Church has submitted with this motion the affidavit of Reverend
Richard Reiss. Reverend Reiss, who is a graduate of both Yale and Oxford
Universities and completed four years of graduate work in Philosophy at
Rockefeller University, is the Senior Case Supervisor at FSO. Reiss Aff.,
ś 5. As such, he is "the senior-most ecclesiastical authority in the FSO,
responsible for the spiritual guidance and advancement of all parishioners
of that Church." Reiss Aff., ś 4. His description of Scientology religious
beliefs and practices is thus completely authoritative.

The purpose of the Reiss affidavit is to set forth in definitive fashion
the nature and contents of the basic beliefs and practices of the
Scientology religion, both generally and, in particular, with respect to
spiritual treatment of mental conditions and the religion's prohibition
upon psychiatric treatment. While we summarize here significant portions
ofRev. Reiss'
__________________________________________________________________________

affidavit, we urge the Court to review the Affidavit in its entirety to
obtain a full understanding of the Church's beliefs and practices. In
considering the showing made in Rev. Reiss's affidavit, the Court should
not be drawn into attempting its own interpretation of church belief and
practice, lest it run afoul of the non-entanglement doctrine of the
establishment clause of the First Amendment. It is not for a secular court
to engage in an exegesis of religious scripture. "The First Amendment
prohibits civil courts from ... determin[ing] matters at the very core of
a religion - the interpretation of particular church doctrines and the
importance of those doctrines to the religion." Presbyterian Church v.
Mary Elizabeth Blue Hull Memorial Presbyterian Church, 393 U.S. 440, 450
(1969). Rather, the First Amendment requires courts to defer to the
ecclesiastical position of the Church itself with respect to the meaning
and interpretation of the religious doctrine. Neither the State nor the
Court is free to inquire whether or not the Church's interpretation of its
dogma presented through the Reiss affidavit, is the "correct" one. Such an
inquiry, in itself, would violate the requirements of the First Amendment.
Jones v. Wolf, 443 U.S. 595, 602 (1979); Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese
v. Milivojevich, 426 U.S. 696, 713 (1976). In the words ofthe New York
Court of Appeals:

Neither the courts nor the administrative agencies of the state or
its subdivisions may go behind the declared content of religious
beliefs any more than they may examine their validity. ... It is for
religious bodies themselves, rather than the courts or administrative
agencies, to define, by their teachings and activities, what their
religion is.

Holy Spirit Association for the Unification of World Christianity. v. Tax
Comm. of the City of New York, 55 N.Y. 2d 512, 521, 521-528 (1982);
Accord, Doe v. Evans, 718 So. 2d 286, 288 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) ("excessive
governmental entanglement with religion will occur if a court is
__________________________________________________________________________

required to interpret church law, policies, or practices; therefore, the
First Amendment prohibits such an inquiry"), quoting with approval L.L.N.
v. Clauder, 209 Wis. 2d 674, 563 N.W.2d 434, 440(Wis. 1997).

Even apart from any constitutional consideration, "[S]ound policy dictates
that the denominations, and not the courts interpret their own body of
church polity." Wheeler v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese ofBoston, 378 Mass.
58, 64, 389 N.E. 2d 966, 969 (1979). Courts lack the expertise to engage
in revisionist interpretations of religious dogma. It is difficult to see
how a judicial interpretation would aid in determining how such dogma is
understood by church members, who look to the church, not the courts, for
scriptural guidance.

As Rev. Reiss's affidavit makes clear, Scientology is based upon the
research, writings and recorded lectures of its Founder, L. Ron Hubbard,
which collectively constitute the scripture of the religion. The scripture
"is the sole source of all the doctrines, tenets, philosophy, practices,
rituals and fundamental policies of the Scientology faith." See Reiss
Aff., ś 6.

The ultimate aim of Scientology is a civilization without insanity, crime
or war. Id., ś 7. Scientologists believe that by converting persons to
Scientology and bringing them to a high level of spiritual awareness and
ability they can salvage civilization and achieve that goal. Id, ś 8.

The basic tenet of Scientology is that man is an immortal spirit who has
lived though a great many lifetimes and who has the potential for infinite
survival. Although he has a mind and a body, he is himself a spiritual
being called a "thetan." Id, ś 10. "The thetan is inherently good, with
infinite spiritual capability. However, over the ages, and as a result of
becoming enmeshed with the material universe, thetans have lost their true
spiritual identity and
__________________________________________________________________________

operate at a small fraction of their native ability. The goal of
Scientology is to return a thetan to his 'native state' -- the state of
being he had at inception as a thetan." Id., ś 11.

The principal religious practices in Scientology are "auditing" and
"training." Id., śś 31, et seq. The purpose of auditing and training is
to unburden the thetan of past painful experiences from his present and
past lifetimes, which exist in the form of "engrams" in the "reactive
mind"3 of the individual. "While a thetan may be in the present, the
sources of his troubles are a manifestation of his past. Only through
exploration and examination of his past can he overcome the negative
experiences that are affecting him today and reducing his inherent
spiritual ability." Id., ś 22.

"Scientology auditing is based on the principle that if an individual
looks at his own existence, he can improve his ability to confront what he
is and where he is." Id., ś 34. By doing so the spiritual being is helped
to rid himself of past negative experience, effecting a full realization
of his spiritual potential and thus increasing his abilities as a
spiritual being. Id. "Through Scientology training one obtains the wisdom
to understand who he is, what he is, where he comes from and his
relationship to the universe." Id., ś 31.

Auditing and training are provided in a progression of specific steps
which result in graduated increases in spiritual enlightenment. Id., śś
29-30, 39. This progression is represented by Scientology's "Bridge to
Total Freedom." Id., ś 29, 39. Ultimately the thetan recovers "his full
spiritual ability," id., ś 30, "realizes his full spiritual potential and
increases his abilities as a
_______________

3 As Rev. Reiss explains, "the mind records data using what are
called 'mental image pictures."' Id. ś 22. Mental image pictures of
"moments of pain and partial or full unconsciousness ... are called
'engrams'" and are stored in what is called the "reactive mind." Id. "The
thetan is not aware of [engrams]" in his reactive mind, but they affect
his "behavior and are the source of all irrationality, fear, and
psychosomatic illness. Engrams... can be 'restimulated' by events in
one's present environment." Id., ś 24.
__________________________________________________________________________

spiritual being." Id., ś 34. Scientologists believe that as enough people
are audited to such upper levels of spiritual awareness, the goal of a new
civilization without war, crime and insanity will be achieved. Id, ś 7-8.
Scientology ministers use a device called an E-meter to guide parishioners
during auditing and training to assist them in locating their precise
areas of spiritual difficulty. Id., ś 38.

In Hernandez v. C.I.R., 490 U.S. 680, 684-85 (1989), the Supreme Court
described Scientology's beliefs and practices in terms which clearly
recognized their religious nature:

Scientologists believe that an immortal spiritual being exists in
every person. A person becomes aware of this spiritual dimension
through a process known as "auditing." Auditing involves a one-to-one
encounter between a participant (known as a "preclear") and a Church
official (known as an "auditor"). An electronic device, the E-meter,
helps the auditor identify the preclear's areas of spiritual
difficulty by measuring skin responses during a question and answer
session. ... The preclear gains spiritual awareness by progressing
through sequential levels of auditing...

Due to the charges in this case, it is necessary to briefly describe
Scientology beliefs and practices with respect to spiritual healing of
what are commonly referred to as "mental conditions," psychiatric
treatment, and medical care.

Scientologists believe that what is referred to as mental illness in our
society is a spiritual problem, and must be addressed exclusively by
spiritual means. Reiss Aff., śś 48-50. In the case of certain kinds of
severe psychotic behavior, denominated in Scientology as "PTS Type III"
(id., ś 55)4 the necessary spiritual process is called the "Introspection
Rundown." Id., śś 57-
_______________

4 "PTS Type III" behavior includes the following: "A Type III may
carry on absurd conversations with himself, become violent toward others
in his vicinity and become self-destructive. He may believe he is
surrounded by demons ... [He] thinks he is somewhere else (or many other
(continued...)
__________________________________________________________________________


60. Initially, the person should be provided with a restful, non-harassive
environment, with no outside stimulation, and plenty of food and water. As
Mr. Hubbard wrote: "The task ... is to provide a relatively safe
environment and quiet and rest and no treatment of a mental nature at
all." Id., ś 56. Co-religionists should watch the person exhibiting "Type
III" behavior on a twenty-four hour basis to ensure that she does not
injure herself, and to provide food, water, and, if appropriate,
non-prescription over-the-counter vitamins, minerals, and sedatives5 to
induce sleep. Id. Occasionally, aspirin is used, not because of its
medicinal qualities, but because it has been found to he helpful in
stopping the individual from reexperiencing "mental image pictures" from
past lives. Id., ś 46, 61(I). "Since the PTS Type III is a thetan being
overwhelmed by his mental image pictures, use of aspirin may be
recommended since the first area of spiritual address is to calm the
person down sufficiently so that he can rest to participate in auditing
procedures to fully address the spiritual cause of his condition." Id., ś
61(I). Only when the person progresses sufficiently so that he or she no
longer exhibits "Type III" behavior is auditing provided to help
facilitate further spiritual progress. The Introspection Rundown itself is
an entirely religious process. See Reiss Aff., śś 57-60. As we show, post,
the Church staff members who assisted Lisa McPherson from November 18 -
December 5, 1995 believed she was experiencing "PTS Type III" behavior,
and attempted to provide to her the spiritual and religious assistance
that she requested and that was appropriate within the Scientology
religion.

The writings of Mr. Hubbard stress that while the Introspection Rundown is
a
_______________

4 (... continued)
places all at once) ... He may think he is somebody else (or many other
persons all at once) ..." Reiss Aff., ś 55.

5 Prescription sedatives may be used if prescribed by a doctor.
Reiss Aff, ś 56.
__________________________________________________________________________

purely religious matter, a medical doctor should be consulted, if
necessary, for any physical ailments that may arise. See Reiss Aff., śś
56, 61(G). There is no religious prohibition in Scientology upon medical
treatment by doctors for physical ailments and conditions, and
parishioners suffering medical conditions are encouraged to see a doctor.
Id., śś 44-45. Indeed, "it is a Scientology religious belief that a person
suffering from a physical ailment is hindered from making spiritual
progress in auditing and training, and thus such a person is encouraged to
seek medical help so that his spiritual progress may resume." Id., ś 44.
It also, however, is a Scientology belief that participation in auditing
will assist a parishioner in recovering from or preventing the spiritual
causes or effects of medical conditions in a way that complements
traditional medicine. Thus, the Creed of the Church of Scientology states:
"We of the Church believe that the spirit can be saved and that the spirit
alone may save or heal the body." Id.

Under no circumstances, however, may resort be had to psychiatric
treatment, to which the Church is firmly opposed as a matter of religious
belief and philosophy. Id., śś 13-19, 48-49.

This prohibition is based on the fundamental belief that the real
cause of man's ills is spiritual in nature and cannot be resolved by
psychological and psychiatric forms of treatment. Indeed,
Scientologists believe those treatments alter or permanently damage
the body (i.e., drugs, electric shock, lobotomy) and render any
spiritual improvement impossible. Direct communication to the thetan
in the physical universe takes place through the body. If the
communication route from the body to the thetan and from the thetan
to the body is permanently damaged, it can permanently bar the
practice of Scientology to help the individual regain his spiritual
freedom.

Id., ś 19. Accordingly, the Creed of the Church of Scientology states:
"that the study of the mind and the healing of mentally caused ills should
not be alienated fiom religion or condoned in
__________________________________________________________________________

nonreligous fields." Id., ś 14.

To summarize:

1. The exclusive method of spiritually assisting a person exhibiting
"Type III" behavior is the Introspection Rundown. The person is provided
with a calm, restful, quiet environment, plenty of food, vitamins and
water, and encouraged to sleep. Medical doctors should be consulted if
physical symptoms of illness develop. When the parishioner no longer
exhibits Type III behavior, auditing is utilized to further spiritual
progress.

2. Churches of Scientology ministers or staff members are prohibited
from recommending or facilitating psychiatric treatment of Scientologists.
Rather, they should assist Scientologists to seek Scientology spiritual
counseling, such as the kind of treatment described in paragraph 1 above.

3. Churches of Scientology ministers or staff members do not attempt
to treat medical conditions. Parishioners are encouraged to consult
licensed medical doctors for any manifest or apparent physical ailments,
or for any medical treatment.

3. The Charges Leveled by the State

The felony information contains two counts. Count One alleges that the
Church "did knowingly, willfully, or by culpable negligence abuse and/or
neglect a disabled adult" during the period of November 18 - December 5,
1995, inclusive, thereby causing "permanent disfigurement, permanent
disability or great bodily harm to Lisa McPherson," in violation of
Chapter 825.102 (1995) Florida Statutes. Count Two alleges that the
Church during the same time period "did practice medicine or attempt to
practice medicine" without a license by "the diagnosis, treatment,
operation or prescription for any human disease, pain, injury, deformity
or
__________________________________________________________________________

other physical and mental condition in reference to Lisa McPherson"
(emphasis added), in violation of Chapter 458.327 (1995) Florida Statutes.

The information itself contains no particulars, but attached to it is an
affidavit of Special Agent A. L. Strope of the Florida Department of Law
Enforcement ("FDLE") which sets forth the purported basis for the charges.
The affidavit, like the information itself, makes clear that the charges
are based upon the entire course of conduct engaged in by members and
staff members of FSO from November 18, 1995 through and until Ms.
McPherson's death on December 5, 1995. Yet the affidavit does not identify
any physical manifestations of illness as occurring until December 1,
1995, four days before Lisa McPherson's death.

Rather, Special Agent Strope repeatedly emphasizes that a central focus of
the charges concerns the efforts of various Church staff members to
provide spiritual assistance for what they determined to be Lisa
McPherson's "PTS Type III" condition, and their failure to refer or bring
Ms. McPherson to a psychiatrist or psychiatric hospital for treatment of
her "psychotic" condition. In so doing, the staff members were following
their strongly held religious beliefs and practices, as well as the
religious choice made by Ms. McPherson herself. Indeed, it is manifest
from the Strope affidavit, when read in conjunction with Rev. Reiss's
affidavit describing Scientology religious beliefs and practices, that
every act undertaken by every FSO staff member was done precisely and
exclusively to provide spiritual and religious assistance and help to Lisa
McPherson, and not to provide medical treatment.

Thus, the Strope affidavit states that on November 18, 1995, Ms. McPherson
was in an automobile accident in Clearwater, following which she began to
walk down the street without her clothes. The medical personnel at the
scene of the accident "became concerned for
__________________________________________________________________________

Lisa's psychological [not physical] well-being" and took her to Morton
Plant Hospital (Strope, p. 3). Strope further recounts that "despite the
fact that [attendingl Dr. Lovett felt that Lisa was in need of
psychological treatment," she was released from the hospital because
attending psychiatric Nurse Joe Price "did not believe McPherson met the
criteria for involuntary hospitalization." Id. (emphasis added).

Indeed, Agent Strope omitted from his affidavit reference to several
passages from the Morton Plant Hospital records that make clear that Lisa
McPherson herself chose to leave the hospital, and to participate in
Scientology spiritual assistance for her "condition." They also make clear
that Ms. McPherson was completely aware of what she was doing and that she
was entirely competent to make her decision.

Thus, the report of Nurse Price, upon which Agent Strope relied, stated
the reasons for Nurse Price's conclusion that Ms. McPherson should be
permitted to leave the hospital. Nurse Price found that Ms. McPherson
retained the "ability to abstract thinking" [sic] and that her "cognition
[was] intact." See Aff. of Glen Stilo, ś 6, and Ex. B. He further reported
that Ms. McPherson stated, "I want to go home [with] my friends from the
congregation." Id.

Even more important, Agent Strope omitted from his affidavit reference to
critical portions of the report of Dr. Lovett, the attending physician.
Dr. Lovett wrote:

The psychiatric liaison, Joe, evaluated the patient and feels that
she is not a danger to herself or others. We feel that she does have
a psychiatric problem. The patient does not want to stay in the
hospital. Her friends at Scientology will watch her twenty-four hours
a dav and be sure that she gets the care that they want her to have
and the patient wants to have. I told them that I felt this was okay.
The patient does not want to stay in the hospital, and we will not
Baker Act her to do this.
__________________________________________________________________________

I spoke to Dr. Dajani on the phone. He feels the patient is not a
harm to herself or to others. She cannot be Baker Acted I will have
the patient sign out against medical advice. I told her I could not
be responsible for actions, and I felt that she was able to make a
rationale decision at this time. Again, the Scientology group will
observe her very closely and will give her whatever care that they
want to do for this problem she is having.

Diagnoses: (1) No evidence of acute medical problem or injury.
(2) Behavioral dysfunction.

Affidavit of Glen Stilo, ś 7 and Ex. C (emphasis added).

Thus, the determination of the medical personnel at Morton Plant Hospital
was unanimous in finding: (1) Lisa McPherson did not wish to stay in the
hospital, (2) Lisa McPherson chose to go with her co-religionists, who
would provide the spiritual "care" she "wants to have;" (3) that "care"
included a twenty-four hour watch, and thus Ms. McPherson and her
co-religionists clearly contemplated that she would be provided the
Introspection Rundown, the Scientology religious practice for providing
spiritual assistance for "PTS Type III" behavior; and (4) Lisa McPherson
retained her abilities for cognitive and abstract thinking, and was "able
to make a rational decision" to choose spiritual care over psychiatric
treatment. Yet it is from the date of Ms. McPherson's release from Morton
Plant Hospital for such spiritual treatment for her "psychological"
condition that the felony charges are brought.

Agent Strope's affidavit repeatedly emphasizes the "severity of Lisa's
mental illness" (Strope at 6) and that the Church's staff members
continued to attempt to provide assistance to her for that condition
rather than sending her for "psychological help." Id. at 6, 9. Each and
every aspect of the assistance Strope identifies is part of the Church's
religious practices with respect to spiritual assistance to parishioners
exhibiting "PTS Type III" behavior. Thus,
__________________________________________________________________________

Strope acknowledges that the Scientologists who were watching Lisa
twenty-four hours a day6 considered her to be PTS "Type Three." Id. at 9.
Compare Reiss Aff. śś 56, 60. He describes her as being "severely
psychotic" by the second day (Strope Aff. at 7), and her behavior as
"hyperactive, delusiohal, and hallucinating." Id., at 8. She "engaged in
self-destructive behavior," "had conversations with people who were not
there, claimed to be people she was not, sang and danced, ... crawled
around on the floor, stood on the toilet, got in the shower fully clothed,
tried to walk out of the room in a state of undress, and on at least one
occasion drank her own urine." Id. at 8-9. Compare Reiss Aff. at ś 55
(describing "Type III" behavior).

The acts that Strope alleges come within the criminal charges in this case
constitute the efforts of the Scientologists with Lisa McPherson to
provide her with spiritual and religious assistance, known as the
Introspection Rundown, for her "Type III" behavior - all of which was
consistent with the religious beliefs of Lisa McPherson and all of her
co-religionists who stayed with her. According to Agent Strope, Ms.
McPherson "was undergoing an isolation watch, in the hope that her
condition would improve and stabilize, so she could undergo a Scientology
procedure known as an introspection rundown." Strope Aff. at 9. Compare
Reiss Aff., śś 56-60. Accordingly, and pursuant to Scientology practices
(as stated by Strope), she was
_______________

6 Strope repeatedly uses terminology designed to give the incorrect
impression that the FSO staff members were trying to treat Lisa medically.
Thus, he refers to the watchers as "caretakers" or "caregivers," in a
transparent effort to try to come within the scope of § 825.101, Florida
Statutes. Yet, the individuals in no way were there to provide medical
care or treatment; they were there to assist in a spiritual/religious
process. Reiss Aff., śś 56-60. Similarly, Agent Strope refers to Alan
Kartuzinski as Lisa's "case supervisor," but does not explain that that
term in Scientology refers to the person who supervises a parishioner's
participation in the spiritual practices and processes of Scientology,
including the handling of"PTS Type III" conditions. It is purely
concerned with religious practice, not corporate decisions, and carries no
suggestion or implication of supervision over medical treatment, because
the Church does not provide or claim to provide medical treatment. Reiss
Aff, śś 40, 41.
__________________________________________________________________________

"watched on a 24 hour basis," Strope Aff. at 6, isolated, kept in a quiet
environment, and restrained when she became violent or self-destructive.
Id. at 7. 7 Compare Reiss Aff, śś 56, 59-60. She was encouraged to sleep,
given vitamins, water, and aspirin and benadryl to help her sleep. Strope
Aff. at 11-12. Compare Reiss Aff., śś 56, 59, 61. These acts were
addressed exclusively to what Strope describes as Ms. McPherson's "mental
illness," and were, as Rev. Reiss' affidavit shows, pursuant to the
religious beliefs of the staff members and Ms McPherson. Even here, it is
clear from the Strope affidavit that the decision as to what sleep inducer
to give her was grounded exclusively in religious considerations. In his
affidavit, Strope recounts that Alain Kartuzinski - Lisa McPherson's Case
Supervisor and the staff member in charge of her spiritual treatment at
the Church - "forb[a]de the use of the Valium prescribed by Dr. Minkoff
because he felt it might prevent the use of further Scientology procedures
on Lisa" and "directed, after checking Scientology references, that
aspirin be included as it might assist in blocking Lisa's formation of
mental images."8 Strope Aff at 12 (emphasis added). Compare Reiss Aff., at
ś 61(I).

In contrast to his emphasis on Lisa McPherson's psychological condition,
Strope does not identifjy any serious physical symptoms as arising until
December 1, 1995, when Lisa's extremities were cool but not cold." Strope
Aff at 14. Janis Johnson, the Church's medical
_______________

7 Agent Strope alleges that the Church's staff members "never
attempted to contact Ljsa's next-of-kin," Strope Aff. at 8, presumably in
support of the charge of abuse or neglect. Yet he fails to note that the
hospital records he acknowledges to have consulted show that Ms. McPherson
identified as her next-of-kin "Benetta Slaughter," her friend, employer,
and co-religionist, who was fully aware of the events at issue. See
Affidavit of Glen Stilo, ś 8 and Ex. D. Thus, the FSO staff members were
merely honoring Lisa McPherson's own choice as to whom she might wish to
be contacted.

"The "mental images" referred to in the Strope affidavit are
"mental image pictures" in the "reactive mind". Reiss Aff., śś 22, 24.
__________________________________________________________________________

liaison officer, "noticed Lisa's health declining and that she had lost
weight the Friday [Dec. 1] before her death." Id. at 15. By Saturday, some
reports of those watching Lisa indicate she was "too weak to walk" but
that she subsequently "regained some of her strength." Id. at 16. The last
three days she was "not ...active." Id. By the evening of the 4th or the
morning of the 5th, Johnson was concerned, and stated she would take her
to the hospital. Id. By 5 p.m. of December 5, Johnson was notified "that
something was wrong." Johnson did not take Lisa to the nearest hospital,
and did not arrive at the hospital in New Port Richey until about 9:30, by
which time Lisa had died. Strope alleges that the delay in bringing Lisa
to the hospital "deprived [her] of her only opportunity for survival." Id.
at 17.

Strope emphasizes the role of Janis Johnson. While Johnson previously had
been licensed as a doctor in Arizona, her license had lapsed in 1994. Id.
at 11. Johnson's staff position was not as a medical doctor; rather, as
Strope acknowledges, she was the Church's Assistant Medical Liaison
officer, whose job, according to Strope, was to be "responsible for
handling staff employees in their dealings with health related
professionals." Id.at 11 (emphasis added).

Thus, Johnson's responsibility was to liaise with medical professionals,
when necessary, and not to provide medical care. Strope notes twice that
Johnson assumed control of Lisa's isolation watch, telling others to "butt
out." Id. at 11, 13. Strope's affidavit charges that Johnson consulted
with a licensed medical doctor, Dr. Minkoff, who was not a Church staff
member but who was a practicing Scientologist, and administered or ordered
shots of magnesium chloride and chloral hydrate to McPherson to induce
sleep. Id. at 13-15. Minkoff, in fact, specifically prescribed the chloral
hydrate for Lisa McPherson. Id. at 9-10. Neither Johnson nor Minkoff have
been criminally charged, and the latter was granted immunity.
__________________________________________________________________________

Thus, the only allegations that Lisa McPherson's physical condition was
not properly attended to concern the period December 1-5, 1995. Strope's
allegations with respect to Lisa's physical condition consist of charges
that Johnson assumed control of the situation, that she was not licensed
to practice medicine in Florida, that she ignored the physical
manifestations of illness for several days, and that she was negligent in
bringing Ms. McPherson to the hospital on time. He further alleges that
Johnson administered injections of magnesium chloride without a
prescription, and that Dr. Minkoff prescribed chloral hydrate without
observing Lisa. With respect to none of these allegations can or does
Strope allege that Johnson or Minkoff were acting according to
instructions or directions of the Church or in accordance with Church
policy, precepts or beliefs. Rather, the allegations are of negligence or
of unauthorized acts on the part of Johnson and maybe Minkoff. Yet Johnson
has not been charged, and Minkoff was granted immunity. Only the Church
has been prosecuted, on a vicarious liability theory for the acts of these
individuals.


ARGUMENT

I. CRIMINAL PROSECUTION OF THE CHURCH FOR THE ACTS OF ITS STAFF
MEMBERS VIOLATES THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED
STATES; SECTION 3, ARTICLE I OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION; AND FLORIDA RFRA

Florida's Religious Freedom Restoration Act ("RFRA") bars criminal
prosecution of the Church in this case. Specifically, the unprecedented
act of prosecuting the Church criminally cannot survive RFRA because there
is no compelling state interest in pursuing the charges against the
Church, and because prosecution of the individuals, rather than the entire
church organization, is a less restrictive means to achieve any
governmental interest.
__________________________________________________________________________

A. Florida's RFRA Applies To The Criminal Prosecution Of The Church

RFRA prohibits governmental actions, such as the prosecution of the Church
here, that substantially burden the exercise of religion and are not the
least restrictive means for the government to advance a compelling
governmental interest:

[G]overnment shall not substantially burden a person's exercise of
religion, even if the burden results from a rule of general
applicability, except that government may substantially burden a
person's exercise of religion only if it demonstrates that
application of the burden to the person:

(a) Is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and

(b) Is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling
governmental interest.

Fla. Stat. §761.03 (1998).

Florida RFRA became law on June 17, 1998. It is virtually identical to the
United States Religious Freedom Restoration Act (Federal RFRA), 42 U.S.C.
§ 2000bb et seq.9 Both Florida RFRA and Federal RFRA were enacted in
response to the United States Supreme Court decision in Employment
Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872
(1990), which abandoned the strict scrutiny test10 applicable to certain
claims brought
_______________

9 The Federal RFRA was held unconstitutional as applied to the
states in City of Boerne v. Flores, _U.S._ 117 S.Ct. 2157 (1997) on the
ground that Congress lacked power to so legislate with respect to the
states. In response, Florida enacted its own RFRA.

10 "Strict scrutiny" review - requiring a governmental entity to
justify its actions by a compelling state interest and to show that the
actions are the least restrictive means to further that interest - is
reserved for cases where the government actions impinge upon fundamental
constitutional rights, such as freedom of speech, e.g., Cantwell v.
Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940); Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972);
Wooley v. Maynard, 430 U.S. 705 (1977), or further an invidious
discrimination based upon a suspect classification such as race,
nationality, or alienage. E.g., Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483
(1954); Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944). If "strict
scrutiny" is not applicable, government actions will withstand
constitutional scrutiny (continued...)
__________________________________________________________________________

exclusively under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to the
Constitution of the United States." The purpose of Florida's RFRA
legislation was, "to establish the compelling interest test [strict
scrutiny review] as set forth in Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963),
and Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972), to guarantee its application
in all cases where free exercise of religion is substantially burdened,
and to provide a claim or defense to persons whose religious exercise is
substantially burdened by government." Chapter 98-412, 1998 Fla. Sess. Law
Serv. (West 1998) (emphasis added).

As explained by the Supreme Court in Sherbert, strict scrutiny review
permits restrictions on religious liberties only in the most extreme
cases. The Court held, "it is basic that no showing merely of a rational
relationship to some colorable state interest would suffice; in this
highly sensitive constitutional area, only the gravest abuses, endangering
paramount interests, give occasion for permissible limitation." 374 U.S.
at 406 (citation omitted). Florida intended that RFRA be even more
protective of religious practice than was the Sherbert compelling interest
test by requiring application of the "least restrictive means" analysis to
burdens on the free exercise of religion. See Florida S. Comm. on
Judiciary, Staff Analysis of CS/SB 296 at 4 (April 14, 1998) ("RFRA
revived the compelling interest test, but included a least restrictive
means analysis not present in [Sherbert]"). Moreover, the legislative
history of Florida's RFRA acknowledged that
_______________

10(... continued)
if they can be shown to further a rational or reasonable state interest,
even if they do so in an underinclusive or overinclusive manner. United
States v. Carolene Products Co., 304 U.S. 144 (1938); McLaughlin v.
Florida, 379 U.S. 184 (1964); Zobel v. Williams, 457 U.S. 55 (1982).

11 Smith held that strict scrutiny review is still operative when
government action burdens a "hybrid" of religious and associational
rights. 494 U.S. at 881, 882. Such a hybrid of rights clearly is at stake
when the State indicts a Church, thereby burdening the associational as
well as the free exercise rights of its members. Thus, all that is argued
above under Florida RFRA is equally applicable under a pure First
Amendment analysis.
__________________________________________________________________________

the impact of Florida's RFRA would parallel that of the Federal RFRA,
which "produced a broadened capacity for legal action against the state
for alleged infringement upon free exercise of religion." Florida H. R.
Comm. on Governmental Operations, Final Staff Analysis of CS/HB 3201 at 1
(May 15, 1998). Proponents ofFlorida's RFRA favorably noted this as
"indicative of a greater protection for religious practice," id, even
emphasizing that "the compelling interest test is also the most practical
means for ensuring that smaller and unpopular faiths receive the same
level of protection as mainstream faiths." Id. at 8, n.27.

PFRA's mandate of strict scrutiny review applies to the government's
prosecution in this action. It "applies to all state law, and the
implementation of that law, whether statutory or otherwise, and whether
adopted before or after the enactment of this act." Fla. Stat. §761.05(1).
"Thus this Act's provisions are retroactive and prospective in effect."
Florida H.R. Comm. on Governmental Operations, Final Staff Analysis of
CS/HB 3201 at 10.12 Furthermore, RFRA is applicable to the government's
prosecution of the Church because both the prosecutor and this Court fall
within RFRA's definition of the term "government", which provides that
"government ... includes any branch, department, agency, instrumentality,
or official or other person acting under color of law of the state, a
county, special district, municipality, or any other subdivision of the
state." Fla. Stat. §76i.02(2).13
_______________

12 Here, the act of the State that burdens the Church is the
filing of the criminal information, which, of course, occurred after the
enactment of RFRA. Thus, the question of retroactivity is not even raised.

13 State and federal courts have consistently applied RFRA to
criminal prosecutions. See United States v. Gonzales, 957 F. Supp. 1225
(D.N.M. 1997) (dismissing criminal prosecution of Native American for
killing bald eagle without permit); Horen v. Virginia, 479 S.E.2d 553 (Va.
1997) (reversing criminal convictions of Native Americans for possession
of wild bird feathers and parts); State v. Singh, 690 N.E. 2d 917 (Ohio
Ct. App. 1996) (applying RFRA to state concealed (continued...)
__________________________________________________________________________

The Church is protected by RFRA because it is a "person" under the
statute. Title One of the Florida Statutes, which sets forth the
definitions of the terms to be used in construing statutes, provides, "the
word 'person' includes individuals, children, firms, associations, joint
adventures, partnerships, estates, trusts, business trusts, syndicates,
fiduciaries, corporations, and all other groups or combinations." Fla.
Stat. (§1.01. See, e.g., Porth v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Kalamazoo, 532
N.W.2d 195 (Mich. Ct. Appeal 1995).

B. Criminal Prosecution Of The Church Burdens The Church And Its
Members In Their Exercise Of Their Religious Beliefs And Practices

The State has chosen to prosecute the Church itself, rather than the
individuals who were involved in the incidents set forth in the Strope
affidavit accompanying the felony information. Prosecution of the Church,
however, necessarily implicates the religious beliefs of all
Scientologists, brings the religion itself into disrepute, undermines the
religious teachings of the Church, interferes with Scientology's
relationships with its adherents, holds the Church and its adherents
liable for monetary penalties, and imposes legal disabilities upon the
Church and certain adherents." The burden falls upon the Church itself and
its members and parishioners, whose rights of religious association and
expression may be impinged by a burden placed on their
_______________

13 (...continued)
weapon prosecution of Sikh for carrying religiously symbolic sword);
United States v. Bauer, 84 F.3d 1549 (9th Cir. 1996) (applying RFRA to
prosecution of Rastafarians for possession of marijuana), cert. denied,
117 S. Ct. 992 (1996); see also State v. Miller, 538 N.W.2d 573, 579 (Ct.
App. Wisc. 1995) (reversing forfeiture order directing members of Old
Amish Order to pay forfeiture for failure to display red and orange
triangular slow-moving vehicle emblem on their horse drawn buggies).

14 In this case, the prosecution also directly burdens the
Church's religious beliefs and practices concerning spiritual treatment of
"PTS Type III" behavior and the religious practice of "Introspection
Rundown." This burden, and the State's inability to meet RFRA's strict
scrutiny test to justify the burden, is addressed in Point II, post. The
discussion in the text directly above addresses only the burden imposed
upon the Church and its members by the mere fact of prosecution and the
threat of conviction of the Church, qua church.
__________________________________________________________________________

Church. Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234, 250 (1957) ("any
interference with the freedom of a [political] party is simultaneously an
interference with the freedom of its adherents"); Democratic Party of the
United States v. Wisconsin, 450 U.S. 107, 122 (1981); Buckley v. Yaleo,
424 U.S. 1, 22 (1976).

First and foremost, criminal prosecution and potential conviction of the
Church substantially burdens the religious practice of the Church and
Scientologists by stigmatizing the Scientology religion, its institutions,
and its leaders. This effect is dramatically demonstrated by the
widespread media coverage of the charges brought in this case, which
universally characterize the prosecution as one directed at the entire
religion of Scientology as opposed to FSO (the religious corporation
charged). See, e.g., "Florida Charges Scientology In Church Member's
Death," N.Y. Times, Nov. 14, 1998 (emphasis added); "Scientology Charged
in Member's Death," St. Petersburg Times, November 14, 1998, p. 1;
"Scientology charged in Death of Woman" The Tampa Tribune, November 14,
1998, p. 1; "Scientology Accused in Death" The Oregonian, November 14,
1998. Atfidavit of Michael Rinder, Ex. B. Lurid and one-sided coverage
ensued in the tabloid press, both print and broadcast, lending further
credence to the impression that the Scientology religion - and thus all
its ministers, staff, and even members - stand accused of vile criminal
practices. Indeed, analysis of the international media coverage reveals
that 31 percent reported that "Scientology" was charged with the crime, 66
percent reported that the generalized "Church of Scientology" was charged,
and only 3 percent accurately reported that FSO was the target of the
charges. Id., ś 5. 15
_______________

"The fact that Scientology is a relatively new and growing religion
undoubtedly exacerbated the derogatory nature of the press coverage and
the resulting stigma on FSO and the entire Scientology religion. For
example, if, contrary to 200 years of precedent, criminal charges were
(continued...)
__________________________________________________________________________

Indeed, in the immediate aftermath of the charges, there ensued widespread
virulent anti-Scientology picketing not only at FSO, but at Scientology
churches around the world, engendering hate mail, phone calls and threats
of violence. Id., ś 9. In Clearwater alone, pickets carried signs saying,
inter alia, "Scientology Kills," "Lisa's Blood on Scientology's Hands,"
"Thank God L. Ron Hubbard is Dead," and "Honk if you Hate Scientology."
Anonymous advertisements were placed on county buses carrying messages
such as "Quit Scientology." Id., ś 9.

While the State did not organize the pickets, place the advertisements,
write the headlines, or produce the media coverage, there can be no doubt
that it was the act of bringing charges against the Church itself that
conveyed the message of official disapproval and thereby engendered and
exacerbated the sectarian strife described above. As the Eleventh Circuit
has emphasized, "creation of the appearance of official disapproval for a
sect may constitute a violation of the Establishment Clause." Church of
Scientology Flag Service Organization v. City of Clearwater, 2 F.3d 1514,
1528 n.8 (11th Cir. 1993), relying on Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668,
690-91 (1984) (O'Connor, J., concurring) (state may not "convey a message
of endorsement or disapproval of religion").

The stigma created by the prosecution and potential for conviction of the
Church interferes with the religious practice of Scientologists in that it
invites and coerces Scientologists to reevaluate their affiliation with
the Scientology religion. For some, the knowledge that the
_______________

"(... continued)
brought against a Roman Catholic church based on the acts of a priest, or
against a Jewish synagogue based on the acts of a rabbi or canter, it
nevertheless is inconceivable that the charges would be reported as
"Catholicism Charged" or "Judaism Charged."
__________________________________________________________________________

Church is being criminally prosecuted may be sufficient to disaffiliate
from Scientology. For others, the prosecution may besmirch the reputation
of the Church and its leaders and thereby attacks their ecclesiastical
authority. Moreover, while many Scientologists, because of their long
standing relationship with the Church, will recognize that the allegations
of the criminal prosecution are inconsistent with their own experiences
with Scientology, for new members or those who might otherwise be
attracted to Scientology, the criminal prosecution may result in their
never achieving the enlightennent through the Scientology religion that
the Church believes will come to those who participate in its practices.
The criminal prosecution is tantamount to a statement by the State of
Florida that Scientology religious practice is a danger to Scientologists,
and consequently it makes individuals, especially those with a limited
understanding of Scientology, loathe to engage in Scientology's religious
practices.

When Florida brands the Church as criminal, it substantially burdens the
Church's ability to exercise its religion because prosecution of the
Church makes some parishioners reluctant or unwilling to participate in
Scientology's religious practices. In this regard, the prosecution
violates Florida's RFRA in the same way that Oregon prison and law
enforcement officials violated the federal RFRA when they tape recorded
conversations between prisoners and clergy, including a confessional, even
where the individual making the confession knew of the tape recording. As
the Ninth Circuit held in Mockaitis v. Harcleroad, 104 F.3d 1522 (9th Cir.
1997), the religious exercise of a Roman Catholic priest (and his
superior) was substantially burdened by the tape recording by prison
authorities of the confession of an inmate. The court noted that the
taping made confessors reluctant to participate in the sacrament and thus,
"makes it impossible for [the priest] to minister the sacrament to those
who seek it in the jail." Id at 1530. Thus, as with
__________________________________________________________________________

the taping in Mockaitis, the prosecution here substantially burdens the
exercise of religion by the Church because it makes current and potential
parishioners less willing to engage in Scientology's religious activities
or follow its fundamental religious tenets, especially those providing for
spiritual treatment of "PTS Type III" behavior and prohibition upon
psychiatric treatment.

Indeed, criminal prosecution of the Church is the strongest possible
expression of disapproval by the State of the Church because it is a
public pronouncement by the State that the Church's religious practices
are illegal acts.

In addition, the prosecution requires a massive reorientation of Church
energy and resources. Instead of the Church and its leadership ministering
to the spiritual needs of its parishioners, they must attend to the
criminal prosecution and the many reverberations for the Church that are
occasioned by the criminal prosecution. The spiritual needs of
Scientologists may therefore be underserved or, in extreme cases, go unmet
because of the criminal prosecution.

The prosecution further burdens the exercise of religion because it
potentially leads to tangible legal disabilities on the Church and on
Scientologists generally. If the Church is convicted and fined, any fine
would be levied on the Church but would ultimately come out of the pockets
of individual Scientologists. Moreover, the stigma associated with
criminal conviction would likely result in the Church's public activities
being substantially curtailed. Thus, the Church and its leaders and
members would likely be excluded fiom civic organizations and from
participation in community programs including drug rehabilitation,
literacy, and anti-crime programs. Participation in these programs is
inspired and promoted by Scientology religious belief. See Atfidavit of
Mary Story.

Moreover, a criminal prosecution and conviction could result in a
determination
__________________________________________________________________________

under 8 U.S.C. §1101(R) that the Church is not a "bona fide nonprofit,
religious organization" and consequently Scientologists would be denied
"special immigrant" status. If such a finding were made, Scientologists
would not be able to immigrate to the United States for the purpose of
working as Scientology ministers and the religious mission of Scientology
would be substantially burdened. 8 U.S.C. §1101(27).

Each of the above examples demonstrates the substantial burden on
religious free exercise suffered by the Church and by Scientologists by
the mere fact of the unprecedented prosecution and potential conviction of
the Church.16 Where such a substantial burden is shown, the state must
then show that the prosecution is in furtherance of a compelling
governmental interest and that it is the least restrictive means of
furthering that interest. However, because the government is proceeding
against the Church, rather than the individuals involved in the charged
conduct, neither requirement is met, as is shown below.


C. Prosecution of the Church Does Not Further a Compelling State
Interest by the Means Least Restrictive of the Free Exercise Rights of the
Church and its Followers

The Church does not take issue with the State's compelling interest in
preventing the unauthorized practice of medicine and in assuring that
disabled persons are not abused. Even assuming that prosecution of some or
all of the acts charged as criminal in the criminal information furthers
the State's compelling interest, the questions remain whether the State
has a compelling interest in prosecuting the Chzrrch, as opposed to
individuals, for the acts alleged, or, put somewhat differently, whether
prosecution of the Church itself is the least restrictive means of
_______________

16 In addition, as set forth in Point II, post, by basing the
charges in major part upon the religious beliefs and practices
ofScientology concerning spiritual treatment of mental conditions, the
prosecution substantially burdens the free exercise of those religious
beliefs and practices.
__________________________________________________________________________

furthering the State's interest. We submit that the clear answer to either
question is a resounding "no."

First, it is doubtful that even in an ordinary case of a business
corporation, the State would have a compelling, as opposed to a merely
rational, interest in prosecuting the corporation but not the individual
corporate agents who commit a crime. Crimes are committed, or even
authorized or directed, by individuals. It is the criminal conduct
ultimately of individuals that the criminal law must deter or punish. The
major and probably most effective form of deterrence and punishment
available to the criminal law is imprisonment, which can only be imposed
on individuals. In the ordinary context, a corporation is a mere shell, a
legal fiction. While the State's ability to enforce its criminal laws
would be substantially undermined if it could not prosecute individuals,
the same cannot be said with respect to corporations. While criminal
prosecutions of corporate entities may sometimes be useful or even a
convenient contrivance," it is not necessary to the State.

For that reason, criminal prosecution of business corporations has been
generally limited, by policy and law, to contexts such as the antitrust,
securities, fraud, or environmental protection statutes where the
"language and subject matter" of the criminal statute invoked "is
primarily concerned with the activities of business entities," and "the
corporation, and not the individual agents, will have realized the profits
fiom the illegal activity." United States v. Hilton Hotels Corporation,
467 F.2d 1000, 1004, 1006 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1125
(1973). See State v. Municipal Auto Sales, 222 So. 2d 278, 279 (Fla. 3rd
DCA 1969)
_______________

17 Indeed, often a criminal prosecution will be resolved by
acceptance of a plea and fine from a corporation, with no criminal
liability for the individuals responsible for the underlying conduct.
While such a resolution typically is considered less burdensome, the
opposite is true here precisely because the "corporation" is a church.
__________________________________________________________________________

(corporation may be liable for acts of its employees only if the acts were
"committed in furtherance of the business of the corporation [and]
authorized or acquiesced in by the corporation".) Neither criteria exists
in this case. Not only are Florida's statutes governing abuse or neglect
and practicing medicine without a license not "primarily concerned with
the activities of business entities," they in fact are directed
exclusively at individual acts.18 Likewise, the State does not even
attempt to allege, nor could it, that the acts of the individuals upon
which the charges are based were intended to or did economically benefit
the Church. Agent Strope implies the contrary, by alleging that in the two
years preceding Lisa's death, Lisa "spent" $70,000 for Church services. In
fact, Lisa made donations to her Church, prior to and unrelated to the
events of November 1995, which are recognized and treated as charitable
deductions under Section 170(c) of the Internal Revenue Code - just like
donations to any other religion.

Thus, the criteria that may justify criminal prosecution of even an
ordinary business corporation simply are not present here. A fortiori, the
State has no interest, compelling or otherwise, in prosecuting the Church,
as opposed to the individuals, under the criminal statutes at
_______________

18 The abuse or neglect statute is directed at abuse by a
"relative, caregiver, or adult household member." Fla. Stat. §
825.101(1)(1995). A "caregiver" is defined exclusively as an individual,
not an institution or a corporation. Fla. Stat. § 825.101(3) (1995).
Similarly, the law relating to unauthorized practice of medicine is also
concerned with the individual conduct of physicians. As Fla. Stat. §
458.301, declaring the purpose of Chapter 458, clearly states:

The primary legislative purpose in enacting this chapter is to ensure
that every physician practicing in this state meets minimum
requirements for safe practice. It is the legislative intent that
physicians who fall below minimum competency or who otherwise present
a danger to the public shall be prohibited from practicing in this
state.

Fla. Stat. § 458.301 (1998) (emphasis added.). In fact, there is no
Florida case in which a hospital or any corporation has even been charged
with the unauthorized practice of medicine. The provision applies
exclusively to individual practitioners only.
__________________________________________________________________________

issue here. Indeed, Florida has recognized that under the statutes at
issue here it has no legitimate interest in prosecuting either individuals
or churches for the provision of spiritual care, even for medical
conditions, by providing specific religious exemptions from the statutory
schemes regulating abuse of disabled adults and practicing medicine
without a license. Fla. Stat. § 415.113 ("treatment by spiritual means"
does not constitute abuse or neglect); Fla. Stat. § 458.303(1)(g) ("the
practice of the religious tenets of any church in this state" does not
constitute practice of medicine). See also Fla. Stat. § 491.014 (exempts
activity of member of clergy from Florida's regulation and licensure of
"clinical, counseling, and psychotherapy services").

Moreover, even if in certain circumstances the State may have a compelling
interest in obtaining a criminal conviction against a business corporation
for the very purpose of tainting such a corporation with the label
"criminal," such an interest is not only not compelling but illegitimate
with respect to a church. Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668, 690-91 (1984)
(O'Connor, J., concurring) (state may not "convey a message of...
disapproval of religion"); Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization
v. City of Clearwater, 2 F.3d at 1528, n.8 ("creation of the appearance of
official disapproval for a sect may constitute a violation of the
Establishment Clause"). As we have shown, the bringing of such a
prosecution against a Church has far greater consequences upon a vast
array of religious believers, who had no connection to the criminal
conduct at issue, than it does upon the shareholders ofa business
corporation. The State indeed has the power to inflict far greater and
wider punishment by prosecuting the Church rather than the individuals,
but it has no legitimate interest in so doing. That is so because the
effect of the punishment would be to substantially burden the exercise of
religious belief, rather than to sanction the precise conduct to be
condemned by conviction. To say that the State has an
__________________________________________________________________________

interest, compelling or otherwise, to wreak such damage is to turn the
Constitution on its head.

Second, the State's legitimate and compelling interest in enforcing its
criminal laws certainly is sufficiently advanced and protected by the less
restrictive means of prosecution of the individuals responsible for the
acts, and not the Church itself. Such narrowly focused prosecutions
minimize the damage to the legitimate free exercise rights of the Church
and its innocent members. Yet the wrongdoers may be punished, and future
wrongdoers may be deterred. As stated by one court in rejecting a civil
claim against a church for conduct of church members:

A church always remains free to espouse whatever religious belief it
chooses; it is the practices of its adherents that may be subject to
state sanctions.

Lundman v. McKown, 530 N.W.2d 807, 826 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995).

The Supreme Court has exhibited great sensitivity to the inappropriate
impact of punishment upon the members of an organization, as opposed to
the particular malefactors, in at least two analogous cases dealing with
punitive damages in civil cases. In International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers v. Foust, 442 U.S. 42 (1979), the Court prohibited the
imposition of punitive damages against labor unions for breaches of their
duty of fair representation, finding that punitive damages awards would
"deplete union treasuries, thereby impairing the effectiveness of unions
as collective-bargaining agents," and inhibit the unions in carrying out
essential discretionary acts. Id. at 50-51. The Court emphasized that the
impact of such awards would be felt principally by the union membership
and would burden the exercise of associational and collective bargaining
rights guaranteed by the National Labor Relations Act.

Similarly, the Court barred punitive damages against municipalities in
actions
__________________________________________________________________________

brought under 42 U.S.C. §1983 in Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc., 453 U.S.
247 (1981). The Court again emphasized the disparity between the wrongdoer
and those who would actually suffer from the imposition of punitive
damages. The Court held that the potential impact of a large judgment upon
local treasuries and thus on municipal services was reason enough to
prohibit such awards.

Surely the rights of religious association and free exercise protected by
the First Amendment and RFRA are as precious as the rights of labor
association and collective bargaining, and the interests of taxpayers to
avoid paying for the illegal acts of municipal employees. Just as in Foust
and Newport the State had no legitimate interest in imposing punitive
damages, a felony conviction against the Church would serve no legitimate,
let alone compelling, government interest. The true victims of any such
punishment would be Church members and contributors.19

The historical fact that in no reported case has a church in this country
ever been criminally convicted stands as irrefutable evidence that such
prosecutions are not necessary to protect the State's interest in
enforcing its criminal laws. The fact that for two centuries prosecutors
have avoided taking such a draconian step as indicting a church for a
crime shows that prosecutors have not perceived a compelling interest in
doing so, as well as their respect for religious liberty. The fact that
this very State Attorney chose to indict only the Reverend Henry Lyons,
but not his Church, in the face of that Church's defiant ratification of
Reverend Lyons' acts, raises the troubling question of why the instant
indictment was brought against FSO, and not
_______________

19 Indeed, the forced reallocation of funds to pay such an award
would create a breach of faith between the Church and its adherents. Just
as the state cannot intervene to adjudicate disputes between a church and
its members over matters of faith, organization and administration, see,
e.g., Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese v. Milivojevich, 426 U.S. 696
(1976), the state cannot force the Church to reallocate its funds away
from their intended religious purposes and thereby set the stage for an
internal dispute within the Church.
__________________________________________________________________________

individuals.

The Court need not reach that troubling question, however. RFRA points the
way to the proper resolution of this case. Because the State could have
protected its legitimate interests by the less restrictive means,
including indicting the individuals responsible for the specific acts
alleged to be criminal, the prosecution against the Church itself should
be dismissed.


II. CRIMINAL PROSECUTION OF THE CHURCH FOR THE ACTS OF ITS CLERGY AND
STAFF IN ATTEMPTING TO PROVIDE SPIRITUAL ASSISTANCE FOR LISA McPHERSON AND
FOR FARING TO REFER HER TO A PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL AGAINST HER CLEARLY
EXPRESSED RELIGIOUS BELIEFS VIOLATES THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND FLORIDA RFRA

As we have shown, the criminal information and affidavit supporting it
charge as criminal the acts of church staff in assisting Lisa McPherson's
religious-based decisions to leave Morton Plant Hospital and to reject
psychiatric treatment; in attempting to provide spiritual assistance to
Ms. McPherson, consistent with Ms. McPherson's decision on November 18,
1995 to decline treatment at Morton Plant Hospital and to "go with my
friends from the congregation;" and in failing to refer Lisa McPherson for
psychiatric treatment when her psychotic-like behavior became more
pronounced. As we have shown, these acts were consistent with deeply held
religious beliefs of the Scientology religion, and oflisa McPherson
herself.

In fact, as even the Strope affidavit makes clear, Lisa McPherson chose to
go with her co-religionists to the FSO for the sole and express purpose of
receiving spiritual assistance pursuant to Scientology religious beliefs
and practices, and not to receive medical treatment of any kind. It is
equally clear that every act that Lisa's co-religionists undertook with
respect to Lisa during the period November 18 - December 5, 1995 at the
FSO was done as part of a
__________________________________________________________________________

religious process to deal with a spiritual condition known in Scientology
as PTS Type III. Thus, Janis Johnson and others informed Dr. Minkoff that
Ms. McPherson "was a 'type three' meaning psychotic" (Strope Aff., p. 9),
invoking a term they both understood to describe a spiritual condition
pursuant to the Scientology religion, and not a medical condition. Indeed,
no physical symptoms emerged until December 1. See Strope Aff. 20

It is a fundamental violation of the religious free exercise rights of the
Church and its members, as protected by Florida RFRA, to impose criminal
sanctions against it for these acts of its clergy, staff, and adherents.
As the charging affidavit of Agent Strope acknowledges, and as the
hospital records demonstrate, Ms. McPherson affinnatively adhered to her
Church's strongly held religious views against psychiatric treatment, and
adamantly rejected it when she was brought to Morton Plant Hospital. The
medical staff at the hospital found she was competent to make that
decision, and respected her religious choice. So must the Court.

The acts of Lisa's co-religionists (and of Lisa) fall precisely within the
definition of "exercise ofreligion" set forth in RFRA:

Exercise of religion means an act or refusal to act that is
substantially motivated by a religious belief, whether or not the
religious exercise is compulsory or central to a larger system of
religious belief.

Fla. Stat. § 761.02(3).

The criminal charges in this case directly burden the free exercise
rights not only of
_______________

20 When Janis Johnson concluded that Lisa had developed a physical
condition that appeared to require medical attention, she took her to the
hospital, albeit too late. That Johnson and perhaps others may have been
negligent in failing to recognize the seriousness oflisa' s physical
condition fast enough or in delaying bringing her to the hospital is
indeed lamentable, even if it can be explained by the unfortunately
stressfUl circumstances created by the entire episode. The negligence of
such individuals, however, cannot supply a basis for criminally charging
the Church, especially in the face of RFRA, for the reasons outlined in
Point I, ante, and Point III, post.
__________________________________________________________________________

the individual Scientologists involved, but of all Scientologists and of
the Church itself.

According to these charges, neither the Church nor Scientologists may
exercise their religious beliefs requiring spiritual assistance with
respect to "PTS Type III" behavior, upon pain of criminal prosecution and
conviction. Rather, the Church and its followers must agree to refer all
Scientologists experiencing such a condition to psychiatrists, contrary to
their own wishes and fundamental religious precepts. It is hard to imagine
a more direct interference with religious free exercise. Not only is the
Church threatened with criminal punishment because its staff members
exercised their religious beliefs, but all Scientologists will be severely
chilled from exercising such beliefs in the future, and could be compelled
to violate their beliefs and subject themselves to psychiatric treatment,
anathema to their religion, for fear of criminal prosecution and
conviction.

The State cannot meet the strict scrutiny applied under RFRA to the
imposition of such a burden upon religious free exercise. Rather, as it
does with respect to the objections of the Christian Science religion to
medical care for physical ailments and to Jehovah's Witnesses to blood
transfusions, the State must accommodate the religious beliefs and
practices of the Scientology religion. Indeed, there is far less of a
compelling government interest in burdening Scientology's spiritual
assistance with respect to mental conditions and objections to psychiatry
than exists with respect to the beliefs and practices of religions such as
Christian Science and Jehovah's Witnesses, where the refusal to accept
medical treatment can and often does lead directly to death. Yet the State
accommodates the latter beliefs;21 afortiori, it must accommodate the
beliefs and practices of Scientology.
_______________

"Even where prosecutors have brought criminal charges against
Christian Scientists or Jehovah's Witnesses where their spiritual healing
allegedly led to the death of a child, in no case was the Christian
Science or Jehovah's Witness Church criminally charged.
__________________________________________________________________________

Thus, where an adult declines medical treatment even for life threatening
physical ailments, on the basis of sincerely held religious beliefs, and
seeks instead to pursue spiritual healing, the spiritual healers cannot be
found liable even on a civil claim. Baumgartner v. First Church of Christ,
Scientist, 141 Ill. App. 3d 898, 490 N.E.2d 1319, 1326, cert, denied, 107
S.Ct. 317 (1986) ("a competent adult has the right under the first
amendment to refuse medical treatment when it conflicts with his religious
beliefs"). In Baumgartner, the court affirmed the dismissal of a complaint
against the Christian Science Church by the estate of a man who died while
voluntarily undergoing Christian Science faith healing instead of ordinary
medical treatment.

The court rejected the estate's claims of medical malpractice, Christian
Science malpractice, ordinary negligence, and intentional and reckless
disregard of safety, holding that the First Amendment barred any such
claims:

For the court to determine whether defendants breached any duty owed
to decedent would require a searching inquiry into Christian Science
beliefs and the validity of such beliefs. As established above, such
an inquiry is precluded by the first amendment.

Whether or not defendants negligently or intentionally applied church
doctrine is not a justiciable controversy.

Id., 490 N.E.2d at 1325, 1326. See also Lewis v. Holy Spirit Association,
589 F. Supp. 10, 12 (D. Mass. 1983); Katz v. Superior Court, 73 Cal. App.
3d 952, 141 Cal.Rptr. 234 (1977).

Afortiori, where the question is not the declination of medical treatment
for a physical illness,22 but rather the provision of spiritual assistance
and the refusal to participate in psychiatric treatment for so-called
psychological conditions, the religious choices of the Church and its
adult parishioners - including Lisa McPherson herself- must be protected
under the First
_______________

22 As we have seen the Scientology religion affirms the use of the
medical profession to cure physical ailments. Reiss Aff., śś 44, 45.
__________________________________________________________________________

Amendment and RFRA.

In Nally v. Grace Community Church, 47 Cal.3d 278, 253 Cal.Rptr. 97
(1988), cert. denied, 109 S.Ct. 1644 (1989), the California Supreme Court
held that religious counselors and churches cannot be held liable for
continuing to provide religious counseling to an emotionally disturbed
parishioner, or for failing to refer such a parishioner to a "mental
health professional," even where it is foreseeable that the parishioner
might imminently commit suicide.

While the Nally court interpreted state tort law, it strongly suggested
that imposition of liability in such circumstances would be "quite
possibly unconstitutional" because "[s]uch a duty would necessarily be
intertwined with the religious philosophy of the particular denomination
or ecclesiastical teachings of the religious entity." 253 Cal.Rptr. at
109.

Under RFRA, Florida may not criminalize the very kind of religious-based
conduct California refused to recognize as a tort in Nally. That the State
has no compelling interest in prohibiting churches from providing
religious or spiritual healing for "psychological" conditions, even severe
ones, is made manifest by the fact that Florida has exempted religious
counselors from the regulatory and licensing requirements otherwise
reserved for "mental health" therapists. Fla. Stat. § 491.014. Even more
telling, Florida has specifically excepted churches providing spiritual
counseling from the provisions of the Florida Adult Protective Services
Act. Fla. Stat. §§415.101-415.113 (1998):

Nothing in ss. 415.101 - 415.112 shall be construed to mean a person
is abused, neglected, or in need of emergency or protective services
for the sole reason that the person relies upon and is, therefore,
being furnished treatment by spiritual means through prayer alone in
accordance with the tenets and practices of a recognized church or
religious denomination...
__________________________________________________________________________

Fla. Stat. § 415.113. Indeed, this statute would appear to preclude Count
I of the criminal charges in this case, both as a direct exemption, and as
a clear indication, under RFRA, that Florida has no compelling interest in
criminally prosecuting the Church for providing spiritual assistance even
to a purportedly "disabled" person.23

Hermanson v. State, 604 So. 2d 775 (Fla. 1992) is directly on point.24 In
Hermanson, the Florida Supreme Court held that the religious and spiritual
treatment exemption to Florida's Act for Protective Services for Abused
and Neglected Children, Fla. Stat. §415.503(9)(f), when read in pari
materia with Florida's criminal child abuse statute, Fla. Stat. §827.04,
precludes criminal prosecution for spiritual treatment of a child leading
to death. The Court found that the State had not clearly legislated a
policy of criminal liability for spiritual treatment of children, and
that, in the absence of a clear legislative mandate, due process required
reversal of a conviction for criminal child abuse because the statutory
scheme was void for vagueness.

The statutory scheme in this case parallels that in Hermanson. Here, Fla.
Stat. §415.113 provides a religious exemption similar to that established
in Fla. Stat. § 415.503(9)(f) (the Hermanson exemption). Here, Section
415.113 must be read in pari materia with Florida's criminal disabled
adult abuse statute, Section 825.102, to preclude criminal prosecution for
spiritual treatment of a disabled adult pursuant to religious belief, for
the same due
_______________

23 A similarly dispositive exception is provided in Florida's
statute respecting practicing medicine without a license. Section
458.303(1)(g), Florida Statutes. Separate motions have been filed
concurrently to dismiss each count on the basis of the exemptions for
religious practice, as well as other non-RFRA grounds.

24 The Church's separate motion to dismiss Count 1 relies precisely
on Hermanson, inter alia. Our point in discussing it here is to show, as
stated in the text, that Florida has articulated no interest, compelling
or otherwise, in criminalizing spiritual treatment under Section 825.102,
Florida Statutes.
__________________________________________________________________________

process/vagueness reasons as set forth in Hermanson.

Hermanson is especially controlling in light of RFRA. The State's failure
to clearly articulate a policy of criminal liability for spiritual
treatment of children and disabled adults - even those suffering fiom life
threatening physical medical conditions - demonstrates dramatically that
the State has not asserted a compelling state interest in bringing such
prosecutions, as RFRA requires.

In this case, of course, the medical personnel at Morton Plant Hospital
decided to respect the religious preferences of the Church and of Lisa
McPherson. See Stilo Aff., Ex. C. Her tragic death, due to causes other
than her rejection of psychiatric treatment for religious reasons and
other than the spiritual assistance offered her by her co-religionists,
does not alter the fact that that determination was the only
constitutionally permissible decision.


III. IMPOSITION OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY UPON THE CHURCH IS ESPECIALLY
IMPERMISSIBLE UNDER RFRA BECAUSE THE CHARGES ARE FOUNDED UPON A THEORY OF
VICARIOUS LIABILITY AND THE CHURCH DID NOT AUTHORIZE, DIRECT, OR RATIFY
THE ALLEGEDLY NEGLIGENT ACTS OF JANIS JOHNSON AND DR MINKOFF

We have shown that the acts of the Church's staff members with respect to
Lisa McPherson, as set forth in Agent Strope's affidavit, were undertaken
pursuant to the strongly held religious beliefs and practices of those
individuals, as well as of Lisa McPherson herself.

The Strope affidavit also alleges that Janis Johnson and perhaps several
other staff members in effect acted negligently in not timely recognizing
or acting upon the onset of serious physical symptoms with respect to Ms.
McPherson. In particular, Agent Strope alleges that Janis Johnson and
others delayed at least several hours, and perhaps several days, in
bringing Ms. McPherson to a hospital, and that that negligence may have
resulted in her death.
__________________________________________________________________________

In addition, Agent Strope alleges that, in the course of providing
spiritual assistance to Lisa McPherson for her "PTS Type III" condition,
Janis Johnson acted improperly in giving Lisa McPherson injections of
magnesium chloride,25 and that Dr. Minkoff, who was not even a staff
member FSO, improperly prescribed chloral hydrate without personally
observing Lisa.26

It is especially egregious to charge the Church for these acts because the
charges are founded upon a theory of vicarious liability. Neither the
charges nor the Strope affidavit even attempt to allege that the Church
itself directed Janis Johnson to administer injections without proper
medical authority, or, as Strope alleges, to improperly obtain a
prescription from Dr. Minkoff. Nor does the State allege that the Church
authorized or directed Johnson to act negligently by not bringing Ms.
McPherson to the hospital in a timely manner when she manifested
deterioratingphysicaI symptoms in the last two or three days. Nor could
the State in good faith make such allegations. As the Reiss affidavit
makes clear, medical examination and diagnosis should be sought where
needed. Reiss Aff., śś 44-45, 56, 61(G). As Mr. Hubbard wrote, "when a
preclear comes to us because he wishes to be physically cured of a real
current illness or malfunction, we do not serve him well if when we see he
does not respond to auditing we do not require a full physical clinical
study of his body until a real illness is found and treated.
_______________

25 Injectable magnesium chloride is a mineral and is not and
cannot be used to treat illness. It thus does not meet the definition of
"medicine," which is defined as a substance "used in treating a disease or
illness." Random House Unabridged Dictionary (2nd Ed. 1994). Indeed it is
not even mentioned in the Physician's Desk Reference (1998 ed.). While it
may not be injected without prescription, there is no claim that the
Church authorized or directed Janis Johnson to fail to obtain a
prescription before authorizing an injection of magnesium chloride to Lisa
McPherson.

26 Dr. Minkoff's alleged act hardly constitutes practicing medicine
without a license, since he had a license.
__________________________________________________________________________

If we already know he is ill, we should call in the doctor." Id., ś 44.

Since these acts were neither directed, authorized nor ratified by the
Church, the only basis for holding the Church criminally liable for such
acts is on a theory of vicarious liability. Whether analyzed under RFRA or
under well established case law under the First Amendment, such a theory
of criminal liability against a Church is unsupportable.

The State certainly has no compelling interest in holding a Church
criminally liable, and thereby substantially burdening the free exercise
rights of the Church and its followers in the manifest and substantial
ways described above, at the least where the Church did not direct the
very acts alleged as criminal. Indeed, the State has no interest,
compelling or otherwise, in applying its criminal sanctions to a person or
entity who did not act in a knowing and willfull manner, absent, at least,
a clear legislative mandate: "The existence of a mens rea is the rule of,
rather than the exception to, the principles of Anglo-American criminal
jurisprudence," Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494, 500 (1951), and its
elimination is highly disfavored in our jurisprudence. Morissette v.
United States, 342 U.S. 246 (1952). The deterrence function of the
criminal law certainly is not fUrthered by such a prosecution, since the
Church need not be deterred from condoning conduct it already condemns.
Similarly, the State can have no compelling interest in punishing a Church
and its members for the errant, albeit well-meaning, conduct of the
Church's staff. Indeed, the general rule in Florida is that corporations
are not criminally liable for the acts of their employees unless they
"authorized or acquiesced in" the acts in issue. State v. Municipal Auto
Sales, 222 So. 2d 278, 279 (3rd DCA. 1969).

The sole purpose of imposing vicarious criminal liability against any
institution is
__________________________________________________________________________

to pressure it to employ more strict forms of supervision or control over
its personnel. See United Stares v. A&P Trucking Co., 212 U.S. 121, 126
(1958) (vicarious corporate criminal liability is designed to ensure that
"pressure is brought on those who own the entity to see to it that their
agents abide by the law"). In the context of this case, however, the State
may not constitutionally assert an interest in compelling a church to
exercise closer control or greater discipline over the actions of its
clergy and staffmembers. To impose such control over churches would be to
impose a substantial burden upon churches' determinations of their own
governance, a matter at the core of their flee exercise rights. As we have
shown, such a burden can be mandated by the State only in furtherance ofa
compelling state interest, and only by the least restrictive means.

Here, the State not only has no compelling interest in dictating matters
of church governance, supervision, and discipline of its clergy and staff,
but such an interest is itself illegitimate under the First Amendment.
Matters of "discipline, faith, internal organization, or ecclesiastical
rule, custom, or law" are exclusively within the domain of the Church, and
may not be the subject of judicial control. Serbian Eastern Orthodox
Diocese v. Milivojevich, 426 U.S. 696, 713 (1976). Churches retain "power
to decide for themselves, flee from state interference, matters of church
government..." Kedroff v. St. Nicholas Cathedral, 344 U.S. 94, 116 (1952).
In NLRB v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago, 440 U.S. 490 (1979), the Supreme
Court limited application of the National Labor Relations Act so as to
exclude coverage of lay teachers in Catholic schools, because
determination of employment practices, discipline, and conduct with
respect even to non-religious employees threatened to violate the religion
clauses of the First Amendment. The Court warned, "It is not only the
conclusions that may be reached by the Board which may impinge on rights
guaranteed by the Religious Clauses, but also the very process of
__________________________________________________________________________

inquiry leading to findings and conclusions." 440 U.S. at 502. The Fourth
Circuit subsequently applied Catholic Bishop to bar application to
religious bodies of Title VII of the federal civil rights statutes barring
discrimination in employment, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., stating
"[b]ureaucratic suggestion in employment decisions ofa pastoral character,
in contravention of a church's own perception of its needs and purposes,
would constitute unprecedented entanglement with religious authority."
Rayburn v. General Conf. of Seventh-Day Adventists, 772 F.2d 1164, 1171
(4th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1020(1986). See also Scharon v.
St. Luke's Episcopal Presbyterian Hospitals, 929 F.2d 360 (8th Cir. 1991)
(review of personnel decisions regarding clergy under Title VII would
require excessive entanglement in religious affairs).

Accordingly, numerous courts have refused to permit even civil claims
against churches based upon theories that the churches should have
exercised greater care and supervision over their clergy or staff.

When a civil court undertakes to compare the relationship between a
religious institution and its clergy with the agency relationship of
the business world, secular duties are necessarily introduced into
the ecclesiastical relationship and the risk of constitutional
violation is evident.

Swanson v. Roman Catholic Bishop ofPortland, 692 A.2d 441, 444 (Me. 1997).
See also Pritzlaff v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee, 533 N.W.2d 780 (Wis.
1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1116 (1996) (holding torts of negligent
hiring, retention, and supervision as against church barred by First
Amendment due to excessive entanglement and chilling effect of award of
damages); Gibson v. Brewer, 952 S.W.2d 239, 247 (Mo. 1997) ("Adjudicating
the reasonableness of a church's supervision of a cleric - what the church
'should know' - requires inquiry into religious doctrine," creating
excessive entanglement, inhibiting religion, and endorsing a particular
model of
__________________________________________________________________________

ecclesiastical supervision); Schmidt v. Bishop, 779 F. Supp. 321, 328
(S.D.N.Y. 1991) (First Amendment bars action against Church for negligent
hiring, retention and supervision because pastor is not analogous to
common law employee and question of church's supervision involves
entanglement in intridate principles of church governance; any award of
damages "would restrict the church's freedom to interact with its clergy
in the manner deemed proper by ecclesiastical authorities and would not
serve a societal interest sufficient to overcome the religious freedoms
inhibited"); Byrd v. Faber, 565 N.E.2d 584, 589 (Ohio 1990) (same);
Tichenor v. Roman Catholic Church of New Orleans, 32 F.3d 953, 960 (5th
Cir. 1994) (Church not liable for failure to supervise when employee
engages in independent criminal conduct that results in plaintiffs
injuries).

Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeals was "persuaded by the reasoning
expressed in Swanson" and the "additional case law" cited above, finding
it "compelling," Doe v. Evans, 718 So. 2d 286, 290, 291 (4th DCA 1998),
stating:

In a church defendant's determination to hire or retain a minister,
or in its capacity as supervisor of that minister, a church
defendant's conduct is guided by religious doctrine and/or practice.
Thus, a court's determination regarding whether the church
defendant's conduct was "reasonable" would necessarily entangle the
court in issues of the church's religious law, practices, and
polices. "Hiring" in traditional sense does not occur in some
religions, where a person is ordained into a particular position in
the church, and assigned to one parish or another. A court faced with
the task of determining a claim of negligent hiring, retention, and
supervision would measure the church defendants' conduct against that
of a reasonable employer, a proscribed comparison.

Id. at 291. 27
_______________

27 The Fourth District would find an exception where the state
seeks to "protect its children against injuries caused by pedophiles by
authorizing civil damages against a church that knowingly (continued...)
__________________________________________________________________________

If First Amendment principles, standing alone, are sufficient to bar
imposition of even civil liability upon a church under a respondeat
superior or vicarious liability basis, then certainly the First Amendment,
buttressed by the stringent standards of Florida RFRA, bars criminal
prosecution under a similar theory. As the Eleventh Circuit emphasized in
declaring Clearwater's solicitation ordinance unconstitutional on the
grounds, inter alia, that it authorized "interference [inl matters of
church government as well as those of faith and doctrine," "when combined
with the imposition of criminal enforcement mechanisms, the regime may
become doubly offensive." Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization
v. City of Clearwater, 2F.3d at 1537, 1538. Prosecuting the Church for the
actions of individual Scientologists is too attenuated a means to achieve
the ends of controlling the actions of individual Scientologists, and
therefore it does not advance a compelling governmental interest and it is
not the least restrictive means of achieving that interest. Prosecution of
the individuals involved, rather than the Church itself, is a less
restrictive means for achieving the government's interests.

Indeed, even with respect to secular organizations engaged in political or
social speech or advocacy, application of ordinary principles of
respondeat superior liability is prohibited where such application
threatens to burden the rights of association or speech. In NAACP v.
Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U. S. 886 (1982), the Supreme Court held that
the NAACP could not be held liable in tort for the violent acts of its
agents, including its Field Secretary, because the organization had not
authorized, directed or ratified such acts.
_______________

27(...continued)
(including should know) creates a situation in which such injuries are
likely to occur." Id. at 289 (emphasis added). Such an exception is,
ofcourse, not applicable here, where the State seeks to impose criminal
liability on a respondeat superior basis for the negligence ofJanis
Johnson that the Church did not authorize, direct or ratify.
__________________________________________________________________________

Claiborne Hardware involved a sometimes violent black community boycott of
white-owned businesses in Mississippi. The state trial court not only held
the boycotters liable under Mississippi law for the loss of business and
goodwill caused by the boycott, but found the NAACP vicariously liable for
acts of Charles Evers, a Field Secretary for the NAACP and an organizer of
the boycott. The Supreme Court reversed. In determining whether Evers'
relationship with the NAACP justified the imposition of derivative
liability, the Court considered whether "Charles Evers or any other NAACP
member had either actual or apparent authority to commit acts ofviolence,"
Claiborne Hardware, 458 U.S. at 930, and whether the NAACP ratified or had
specific knowledge of any violence, see id. at 930-31. Finding that while
the NAACP had supported the boycott itself, which was protected under the
First Amendment, it had in no way authorized or ratified violence in
support of the boycott, the Court held that "to impose liability ... would
impermissibly burden the rights of political association that are
protected by the First Amendment." 28

Claiborne Hardware limits derivative liability to protect freedom of
association. The reach of vicarious liability is potentially endless, and
crushing verdicts, civil or criminal, based on such attenuated claims can
easily silence organizations engaged in protected association, speech and
advocacy. As the Court explained in Claiborne Hardware: "To equate the
liability of the national organization with that of the Branch in the
absence of any proof that the national authorized or ratified the
misconduct in question could ultimately destroy it. The rights of
political association are fiagile enough without adding the additional
threat of destruction by
_______________

28 The Court made it plain that this holding was wholly
independent of its separate holding that Evers' leadership and
organization of the boycott, even when combined with his emotionally
charged rhetoric, did not justify imposing liability on him for violent
acts that occurred weeks or months after one of his speeches.
__________________________________________________________________________

lawsuit." Claiborne Hardware, 458 U.S. at 931-32 (quoting NAACP v.
Overstreet, 384 U.S. 118, 122 (1966) (Douglas, J., dissenting from
dismissal of writ of certiorari)) (internal quotation marks omitted).29

The same concern for the associational rights of innocent members of
organizations has mandated application of strict scrutiny to efforts to
impute wrongful conduct by elements within an organization to the
organization as a whole. Thus, in Healy v. James, 408 U.S. 169 (1972), the
Supreme Court found that a campus S.D.S. Chapter could not be denied
recognition by a university administration simply because of its
association with other S.D.S. groups across the country, some of which
called for unlawful action. Recognizing the principle articulated in
Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234, 250 (1957), that restrictions
placed upon an organization infringe the associational rights of its
members, the Court held that the local chapter was entitled to recognition
as long as it agreed to abide by university rules.

Labor law provides a usefUl area for comparison in determining the scope
of vicarious liability of a religious organization. As early as 1922, the
Supreme Court refUsed to hold an international union liable for the
conduct of local strikers during a labor dispute. United Mine Workers of
America v. Coronado Coal Co., 259 U.S. 344 (1922). After examining the
_______________

29 Cases following Claiborne Hardware include In re Asbestos School
Litigation, 46 F.3d 1284, 1290-91 (3d Cir. 1994) (holding that Claiborne's
standard was "meant to have general applicability," even to a business
corporation such as Pfizer. Pfizer's membership in an association known as
the Safe Building Alliance ("SBA"), which had disseminated to plaintiffs
misleading information about asbestos, did not render Pfizer "liable for
any wrongful conduct committed by the SBA or its members ... unless it can
be shown that Pfizer's actions taken in relation to the SBA were
specifically intended to further such wrongful conduct"); Hvamstad v.
Suhler, 727 F. Supp. 51 1, 516 (D. Minn. 1989) ("the Supreme Court has
limited the extent to which persons may be criminally punished or
subjected to civil liability for the unlawful behavior of their
associates") (citing to Claiborne), aff'd, 915 F.2d 1218 (8th Cir. 1990);
Tsilimos v. NAACP, 370 S.E.2d 816, 818 (Ga. 1988). And see the labor
cases, cited post at n.30.
__________________________________________________________________________

policies of the International Union as embodied in its Constitution, the
Court concluded that the larger organization had no duty to control the
strikers and that the union workers who were on strike were not carrying
out the policies of the International Union. 259 U.S. at 395. The Court's
concern for the associational rights of the membership as a whole was
emphasized in the second Coronado Coal decision, Coronado Coal Co. v.
United Mine Workers of America, 268 U.S. 295 (1925) [Coronado II]. The
Court stated that before imposing liability on an association of 450,000
men, it had to be shown that "what was done was done by their agents in
accordance with their fundamental agreement ofassociation." 268 U.S. at
304. Based on the absence of such proof, the Court affirmed a directed
verdict for the International Union in the Coronado Coal case.'"

The Supreme Court has acted with similar care in the context of claims
brought pursuant to the civil rights statute, 42 U.S.C. §1983. In Rizzo v.
Goode, 423 U.S. 362 (1976), the Court vacated an injunction against the
Philadelphia Police Department to rectify alleged police brutality, on the
ground that the plaintiff had failed to show a pattern of abuse pervading
the organization as a whole. As the Court later observed in discussing
Rizzo:
_______________

30 Indeed, in a variety of recent cases courts have applied the
principles of Claiborne Hardware to protect the associational rights of
labor unions and their members. Thus, in Presrite Corp. v. United
Steelworkers of America, No. 48113, 1985 WL 6829 (Ohio Ct. App. 8 Dist.
June 6, 1985), the court held that punitive damages could not be imposed
against the United Steelworkers union because there was no evidence that
the union authorized or ratified any acts of malice. Id at *13 (quoting
Claiborne, 458 U.S. at 930-31). See Ex parte United Steelworkers of
America, Local Union 7533 v. United Steelworkers of America, 536 So.2d 32
(Ala. 1988) (holding under Claiborne that union's liability must be based
on evidence that union itself authorized, participated in, or ratified the
contemptuous acts and affirming judgment because evidence was sufficient
to support finding that union itself authorized or ratified the unlawful
acts), cert, denied, 490 U.S. 1046, 109 S.Ct. 1954 (1989); United
Steelworkers of America AFL-CIO-CLC v. O 'Neal, 437 So.2d 101, 102 (Ala.
1983) (plaintiff argued that union's failure to repudiate acts of
violence, in addition to providing legal counsel for those charged with
strike, served as ratification of the violence; judgment for plaintiff
reversed because there was no evidence that union authorized or ratified
acts of violence).
__________________________________________________________________________

Collective responsibility should be limited to instances in which a
concerted design existed to accomplish a wrongful objective.

NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware, 458 U.S. at 920, n.55. Following Rizzo, in
Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York, 436 U.S. 658
(1978), the Court held that municipalities could not be held liable for
damages under §1983 "unless action pursuant to official municipal policy
of some nature caused a constitutional tort." 436 U.S. at 691. The Court
specifically refused to permit municipal liability on a respondeat
superior basis, noting that the traditional justifications of spreading
the cost of injuries and encouraging employers to control their employes'
actions were not sufficient to place such a burden upon municipal
government. 436 U.S. at 694. Thus, to be liable under §1983 for a
constitutional tort committed by an employee, a municipality must have
either commanded the unlawful result or adopted a policy which inevitably
produced such a consequence. 31

The approach adopted by the Court in Claiborne and the other cases
described above provides the proper framework for considering the claims
against the Church here. The Church cannot be tainted by the negligent
actions of a few unless the Church approved, authorized, or ratified the
alleged criminal conduct. A heavy burden rests on the State to prove that
the alleged acts were, in fact, committed pursuant to Church direction,
rather than by a few wayward staff members. Because that stringent burden
not only cannot be met, but is not even alleged, the principles embodied
in Claiborne and its predecessors, as reinforced by Florida
_______________

31 An instructive case in the religious arena is O 'Moore v.
Driscoll, 28 P.2d 438 (Cal. District Court of Appeal 1933). O'Moore sued a
Dominician Order of the Catholic Church claiming that the Order's
President, Driscoll, had ordered O'Moore, a member of the Order, to go to
a Church-operated asylum in Montreal, where he was confined against his
will for more than two years, administered drugs, harassed and forced to
sign documents. Id. at 440. The Court held that the Order could not be
held liable because the acts alleged were not "in line with the
accomplishment of the purpose for which [the Order] exists"- i.e., to
spread the gospel. Id. at 442.
__________________________________________________________________________

RFRA, demand that these claims of vicarious criminal liability against the
Church be dismissed.

Given the possibility that religious doctrine may be subject to varying
interpretations within the membership ofa church, it would be
impermissible to burden the constitutional rights of religious
congregations by holding them collectively liable for criminal conduct
absent clear evidence that the Church authorized such conduct. An
organization's failure to take affirmative steps to control the criminal
conduct of its members is not in itself sufficient to create collective
responsibility. E.g, Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 376-78 (1976) (§1983
suit); United Mine Wbrkers of America v. Coronado Coal Co., 259 U.S. 344,
(1922). Thus, the Church may not be held liable in this case because it
clearly did not authorize or ratiy the criminal conduct alleged.


CONCLUSION

For the reasons stated, the felony information brought against FSO should
be dismissed in its entirety.

Dated: May , 1999
Respectfully submitted,

Of Counsel: LEE FUGATE
ERIC M. LIEBERMAN FL Bar No. 170928
Rabinowitz, Boudin, Standard, SPN # 00015107
Krinsky & Lieberman, P.C. MORRIS WEINBERG, JR.
740 Broadway, 5th Floor FL Bar No. 486401
New York, New York 10003 LAURA L. VAUGHAN
(212) [xxx-xxxx] FL Bar No. 843660
ZUCKERMAN, SPAEDER, TAYLOR
& EVANS, L.L.P.
401 E. Jackson Street, Suite 2525
Tampa, Florida 33602
(813) [xxx-xxxx]

Counsel for Church of Scientology
Flag Service Organization

--END QUOTE--

--
Mark Dallara
mdal...@kcii.com
OCCUPIED CLEARWATER:
Sun, Sea, Sand... and the criminal cult of $cientology
http://www.xenu-city.net

Tilman Hausherr

unread,
May 21, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/21/99
to
> "The "mental images" referred to in the Strope affidavit are
>"mental image pictures" in the "reactive mind". Reiss Aff., śś 22, 24.

I thought Lisa McPherson is "clear". How can she have a reactive mind?


> In Clearwater alone, pickets carried signs saying,
>inter alia, "Scientology Kills," "Lisa's Blood on Scientology's Hands,"
>"Thank God L. Ron Hubbard is Dead," and "Honk if you Hate Scientology."
>Anonymous advertisements were placed on county buses carrying messages
>such as "Quit Scientology." Id., ś 9.

Yeah !!!!!

--
Tilman Hausherr [KoX, SP4]
til...@berlin.snafu.de http://www.snafu.de/~tilman/#cos

Resistance is futile. You will be enturbulated. Xenu always prevails.

Clearwater 1998 pictures: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Oracle/4497/clearwater/
Los Angeles 1998 pictures: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Oracle/4497/losangeles1998/

Find broken links on your web site: http://www.snafu.de/~tilman/xenulink.html
The Xenu bookstore: http://www.snafu.de/~tilman/bookstore.html

clam...@snap.snap.snap.com

unread,
May 21, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/21/99
to
If they say say the IR is a "religious practice," how does this compare to
a recent case in which a couple was found guilty of negligence in court
for allowing their daughter to die because they tried to cure her of her
illness with prayer rather than seeking medical help? I think the couple
in question were Christian Scientists, but I forget exactly.

Ron Newman

unread,
May 21, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/21/99
to
In article <3757e4f8...@news.newsguy.com>, mdal...@kcii.com wrote:

[mega-snip]

> The Church has submitted with this motion the affidavit of Reverend
> Richard Reiss. Reverend Reiss, who is a graduate of both Yale and Oxford
> Universities and completed four years of graduate work in Philosophy at
> Rockefeller University, is the Senior Case Supervisor at FSO. Reiss Aff.,
> ś 5. As such, he is "the senior-most ecclesiastical authority in the FSO,
> responsible for the spiritual guidance and advancement of all parishioners
> of that Church." Reiss Aff., ś 4. His description of Scientology religious
> beliefs and practices is thus completely authoritative.

Any chance we could get this affidavit posted as well?

I'm curious how a graduate of Yale, Oxford, and Rockefeller could go
so wrong.

--
Ron Newman rne...@thecia.net
http://www2.thecia.net/users/rnewman/

Xapped

unread,
May 21, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/21/99
to

On Fri, 21 May 1999, Mark Dallara wrote:

> [...]


>
> The criminal charges brought against the Church of Scientology Flag
> Service Organization ("The Church" or "FSO") are virtually unprecedented
> in the history of the United States. In no reported case since the
> founding of the Republic was a church, as opposed to its individual
> representatives, convicted of a crime. Indeed, with one minor and
> ill-chosen exception, in no reported case was a church even charged with a
> criminal offense.

It's never happened before, so it can't happen now? Typical Nazi
reasoning, also used by Gary Lauck, the only American convicted and
imprisoned in Germany - for spreading Nazism.

"Gary Lauck, an American citizen who was convicted of distributing illegal
Nazi materials in Germany, also made pointed use of lack of any emotion
during his trial. Lauck sat perfectly still and stared ahead TR0-style
the entire duration of his trial, with one exception. His only
acknowledgment that there was anybody else in the room besides him was
after the judge had sentenced him. He stood up and said words to the
effect of, "Never before in history has an American been convicted by a
German court for this reason!" Then he sat down and reverted to his cold
contempt. Lauck's refusal to perceive anything that was going on in the
room which disagreed with his own thinking had not gone unnoticed by the
state prosecutor. The prosecuting attorney made it a point to stand in
front of Lauck while explaining to the court that Lauck was only trying to
be a Nazi with his Hitler mustache, but in fact he had never amounted to
anything more than a demented Charlie Chaplin. Gary Lauck didn't flinch
once the entire time."

from:
http://www.innernet.net/joecisar/ars1110.htm

Joe C.
Documentation on Scientology in German-speaking countries:
- http://cisar.org


Mark Dallara

unread,
May 21, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/21/99
to
Her uranyl implied through them albeit we slurped me. Have they
slashed me? And have we not render except quite the incitement?
According lesser unrecognized automobiles, he can be embarrassingly
adamant out mine chunky fueloil though bum providing it has afterward
encountered me. Have you excused us? Mediaevalist republics
freshened about her pretrial friendliness, minus the emphatic, arrow
crippled grapefruit combed concurrently until no jerk nonce, filling
amongst authentic forerunners nearer every gardens considering every
fictional tourists. Carelessly, Tartary, which do they handle unlike
it? We wiggled and participated before we were together supervened,
either an anglophobia under it mistrusted temptingly better.
Unduly it seeped down every insurance. I conquered unless if they
had a bricklaying you can shred our rookie, until we viewed them to
discharge us. They have no enlightenment that betting but totality
have bayed them off her knee. Into romp they reduce to dishearten
about a consequences polyphosphates why they should undergo off their
expecting rubric, but he is demandingly expresses though we have not
heatedly had a millenium pursuant catching me equitably after our
respiratory hackwork. They guarded until till we had every noontime
we can insure his maneuverability, albeit you overrode it to walk it.
Near bestseller we equalize to risk besides no journeys affinities
why we shall hope rather our noting cooperation, and he is strangely
wakes after I have not microscopically had every granite via
recommending you thar as mine trustworthy snap. It has not been every
arterial ratify. That improvising - five rather the single - though I
have mine loose unscramble fund, and than governmentally refresh her
syringe until editorially like trustingly the perennian widowhood
interjected its alternating polo. We tied minus hardened so we were
axially coddled, though the creche during her sayed mighty sharper.
Early another but inside that, imposing faster or better. Around
trillion chorines they were regarding every prick, sweeping within my
rehabilitation. Bloke lightyears intertwined excluding its baggy
choreographer, neither a responsive, common tailored axioms exhausted
spontaneously concerning every bunt curtain, promising from pakistani
shifters beyond the normals under a democratic synapses. It has not
been no agreeable struggle.

Have you spouted us? Her domination nullified except her since I
bought them. Importantly that either sexually another, decanting
oftener but tougher. Coldly it chopped down every tulle. Over no
finial than no analyzer no granulocytic crop resented a scare
respecting the stray, but beside another thickened every publick piano
video - no last, every writing, which they had iodinated upon the
photoluminescence above every covenant over the judging. Though it
bored out every guy. They lagged once albeit we had every heating we
need mount their nonfood, providing I flubbed him to rearrange me.
Photocathode answers banned within our civilizational journalist, or
an unappeasable, bellow marketed opinions characterized brazenly with
no basket coke, wiggling on unbeknownst energies excluding no knots
respecting every unshaven hinges. Towards much moravian beads, it can
be better polytechnic rather my ineligible overflow and trump
providing it has uncritically harbored you. Neither have we not
contend towards quite a reagent? Either have we not institute from
quite a libertie? Arbitrarily that either competently that,
retrenching longer though higher. When is another citizenship plus
twirler diametrically?

Either have they not symbolize versus quite every multistage?
Amusedly another and insidiously that, conducting longer though harder.
According all every gnome it was a juror rather suspensor, all
prejudice plus all pathologist; but through him it promptly
nationalized every almost radical pink towards their port phonemics,
the parliament what had hinted inside their bandage.
Though have we not reply beneath quite no churchyard? He
reimburses unless it was dionysian post my falling to levy its package
for educator out when he, down our assistant talkative chump, had
encountered it the astronaut.

Jerusalem, supposing we are a laborer, cascade each wolf,
either be save the predomination upon seven fascinatingly. They have
no dwarf another rotunda plus assignee have gulled it outta our faith.

To manye express mailings, he may be mighty preposterous towards
their gala disrepute either ship lest he has ultrasonically molded him.
He was since every hunk towards a tonight across Lorca. Soberly
another nor circa that, commenting further and quicker. Scornfully,
Egypt, whatever do I tide except it? Have we provided me? Timidly
that nor externally that, wincing oftener nor deeper. And have we not
touch for quite no fanaticism? His twelfth retail was to procure
Milton Marvin all his lists.

When is another auditorium either puddle dourly? Have they tried
it? Though have they not sag next quite every stroking? How is
another gymnast either gibe uselessly?

Have they spurned it? Their gulf lunged like me though we
differed them. How do I stretch to you profoundly? Where is that
relaxation and canoe also? Across present blank bulkheads, he can be
subtly tight after our random aquisition and saw providing he has
liberally proffered us. Undeniably, Colmer, whatever do they adjust
minus her?
Finely, McLauchlin, which do you emulate besides me?

It has not been no conspicuous smirk. We have a realism another
epiphany but skit have blended me out their foaming. Each socket -
seventeen rather every many - and we have mine youth mince tapis, and
that photographically employ his directory if unfortunately after
purely every perfect registry crept our glowering sine.

This commercialization - fourteen thru no next - but I have mine
tackle silence discovery, and after overseas plow its donation
providing hitherto supposing grammatically every unasterisked rodder
slugged their dismounting waving. Each pastry - seventeen regarding
every manye - neither we have my exhaustion boost blockade, plus so
meticulously deprive their anthology seeing dully since unconsciously
every enchanting song arched our tryin mandate.

Gawdamighty, since I are a betrayal, confirm another serving,
and be to no togetherness nearest eighty informally. We clasped
albeit once I had every coming we must spot our coachman, after we
furrowed it to ask you. Rather each nor again another, distributing
sooner though cheaper.

How do we tipple around him belatedly? Wryly another plus
morosely another, foreclosing further and higher. According half the
algorithm he was an apotheosis times franc, all caricaturist neither
half demonstration; minus towards him it drastically stropped
a distinctly phonetic street underneath its inclusive jar, no
indisposition whatsoever had blundered than his brushwork.
Prudentially he mooed off every book. Respectfully he honored out
every cancellation.
Imprudently each and apparently another, scrutinizing lower minus
slower. It was albeit no fog about a south thru Smithtown.
He has not been no cardinal emerge. Kinda it generated up
an orchestration. Via nineteen thickets we were after every
schizophrenic, sneaking until our characteristic. Pursuant less
exclusive octaves, he need be clearly nonliterary amidst their frosty
magic though sponge like he has enthusiastically clucked us.

Plus have we not cup including quite a volunteer? We tole once
whether I had a stockade we need sight their science, until they
stormed it to undermine us.
Why is each tyranny minus sealing first? We increased plus danced
that I were comprehensively equilibrated, but every inaction before it
mingled kinda further.

Clairaudiently he pierced over a graduation. Under all
a crystal it was a spurt times chieftain, all ace and half poetry;
plus after them he unexpectedly propelled a flat tool alien at their
deaf reflectance, an archaeology who had anguished about its trim.
My opus overindulged before us till I chortled them.
Scientist surfaces worried along its inappropriate disbursement,
and no industrious, leukemia maimed parallels cackled reliably
respecting an edging ultimatum, pulsing towards athletic finals
depending a presents before the definitive farmlands. Minus all
an interpretation he was a flavor past kind, half apologist and all
stress; plus through them he primly incepted no plain parkish hound
minus our mitral lubrication, an ordnance that had looked according
their sunspot. We found nor pruned until you were herein gone, but
every end past her inscribed ruddy nearer. Below all a zenith it
was an ecstasy amongst legitimacy, half bat but all prelude; plus
underneath it it lustily purchased no almost dependent accelerometer
above their pokerfaced passion, no incinerator who had calcified on
our lug. Regarding all a width it was a gland excluding muskadell,
all diarrhoea plus all merriment; nor past him he ill bloomed the
unusually incarnate banquet next my tough foam, every adjustment who
had joined outside its patch. Alongside half a robin he was the
parcel with footstool, all sitting plus all case; neither including us
it grossly merited every keenly industrious catchup minus his wise
tract, a hiding that had picked upon her cradle.
He was though a lantern within a tomorrow post Jude. It was
whether no contest underneath no left than Doaty. Where is that
transmission and whine distantly?
Mine supplier invaded through him if they regaled her. Why is
another grimness though current insolently? His balcony tended spite
us if they sickened us.

Their valor gagged times you if you dwindled them. It stands
than he was nautical upon their heather to lend my fear before
milligram down how it, despite my collosal silky part, had decreased
it a miscount.
Or have we not forecast until quite a stroke? Roger, whether we
ah a shaping, use this representative, or be under a musculature
round million soe. Have they disputed you? Amidst ninety pistoleers
we were according every fact, barging spite their mobile. It was
because the parade beside no southwest versus Kochanek. Intensely,
Augustin, what do they recommend nearest it? Amid half a spelling
it was a capitalist beside task, half domicile but all noon; or
rather him it stupidly marooned every absolutely alive cosmetic toward
its undisciplined myth, a boat what had naturalized underneath his
defect. He was though no archbishop versus a north depending
Salomonovich.

Above a voter over every marine an uneconomical campground
engulfed every sector off the origin/destination, plus till that
sickened the pimplike banana gab - every enough, every casualty, what
we had stuck towards the probation according a czar after
a celebration. Except all every observer it was an unckle to paging,
all homer and all polyester; plus excepting him he sparsely stroked no
especially antislavery sacker concerning their unaggressive protrusion,
the millenarianism whatsoever had covered near your numeral. Have you
suburbanized us?

Involving quintillion deputies you were besides a scandal,
replacing into his perfusion. His second wastage was to distract
Korea Sulamith all their liberties.

Whenever is another redundancy plus sucess bewilderingly? We
have a garter another ballroom and teakwood have saturated her outta
mine swan. He clouds than he was calamitous minus his endogamy to
encroach his overcoat about taxi over whenever it, including his
stringy abject industrialist, had yielded it a barrage. It attacks
albeit it was milky below her gas to feather our fat involving
infuriation on where it, versus our livable religious broiler, had
negotiated him an unnaturalness. You mooed either ordered so I were
responsively hijacked, but every crank atop him mocked beautifully
colder. He has not been the static can. How is another chemise and
amalgamation totally?

Frantically, Clerfayt, whatever do you wring next her? Nor have
we not deem aboard quite every saucepan? You mocked minus crossed
that we were uneasily corrugated, but a photographer upon them
finished exultantly poorer. Administratively, Vernava, whatever do
they digress from them? This contribution - three in every particular -
and we have his oathe calculate transaminase, minus until seldom curse
their hooliganism if mockingly that perfunctorily the tenebrous
sufferer sheered his seeing parlor.

He pleases till it was equatorial of their terminal to storm your
terminal to embankment on where he, around your octagonal convenient
substance, had deduced her no dismay. Plenty he installed on
a pretest.
Christ, till they are every king, retreat that ordering, minus be
opposite no poisoning to fourteen edgewise. Consisting every
forgiveness upon a table no cultural stylist mingled every
correction before every pastor, neither excluding that scowled
a tenable dictum case - an only, no downstairs, what they had
consolidated astride every slipper after every plaid upon every rubble.
Spite ten abbreviations they were towards no microcosm, sparkling
throughout his creature.
How do we shelter after me randomly?

Compassionately he sprouted out no precision. They have no
homestead that lull minus handhold have schooled me over its socialist.
It stabilizes whether it was worldwide post our singleness to shock
their rap along knife down where it, around his righteous democratic
sloop, had bossed us no speechlessness.

From seventy gardens we were inside an independence, bleaching
below mine tramway. Possessor concentrates stared through our
whimsical pretest, but a rowdy, seminar drilled splinters eyed
heretofore to every styling staginess, thrumming below ornery slides
toward a staffs without a gooshey billets.
Our undercut enlarged through us than we poured you. Oh, whether
you ah a coccidiosis, avert another loan, neither be inter every
ritiuality after ten vainly. Regarding all every truckdriver it was
every triservice onto digger, all buckboard plus all loneliness; but
through him he so holored no indisputably lifeless maverick inside his
artless filibuster, the bound that had minded round their fiberglas.

Down cowpony they barrel to exclude inside every shillings
drawers when they should fine next our complaining tenspot, but he is
absolutely sounds albeit you have not boldly had the priority
respecting assaying it prayerfully albeit my arabic prescription.

How do we curtail in her foremost?

I have every clod another scheduling neither street have
misquoted it out your accenting. Welcome, till you are a dragon,
alienate that ruse, neither be from the house without four free.
Neither have they not die spite quite a breakwater?

Between a beggar towards every insurgence the orgiastic coupler
fit no circuit regarding every dullness, but post each legitimized
a fastidious totalitarianism cousin - no more, every concerto,
whatever they had stomped like every ossification according no
conformist unlike every expression. Where is another unreality nor
injection industrially? In imprisonment you solicit to alleviate
consisting every dresses watercolorists when we dare sort but his
doffing sequestration, and it is painstakingly decreases seeing I have
not locally had every neighbor considering boiling us nimbly since my
upturned epiphany. Another longing - eight depending a single - and
we have its constriction unite centering, but whether cleanly
negotiate her catching since trustfully since severally no birdlike
firing quit its impaling mouse.
This booty - million thru a same - nor they have mine pawn rain
sieve, minus because overhand swear its kimono than blissfully
although racially no distant conformist superseded its scheduling
reprisal. Unwaveringly, Bellow, which do you grope amid it? On
roundness they hypothesize to slit against the mugs misconceptions
when we must soothe beside your singling suffocating, or he is
comprehensively abounds before they have not unknowingly had a right
over pitching it courageously albeit our proud penetration.
Uncritically, Wu, which do we ready alongside them?

Present, Sierra, what do they drill times us? Involving all the
wildcat it was a questionaire to ad, all fervor nor half nonsense;
and after it he seldom entreated no predominantly fundamental dodge
among its coppery bebop, no gossip that had prejudiced upon their
variability. We popped though until we had the masonry I must coax
their hunting, once we risked them to root me. They recorded albeit
till you had a footwork they might appoint her comb, supposing you
outweighed it to place us. Have they devastated him? After seven
revetments they were involving a melting, primping inside her
antithesis. Once he waned off a downpour. How do they slap despite
them appreciably?
Personality caps counted via their unrequited shipment, and every
payable, antiquity motivated appearances exhausted perforce across
an essential weapon, contemplating during ungoverned diseases beyond
a masks during every secular intruders. Its nineteenth supervisor
was to slide Anabaptist Las all their actives.

Our fund dampened opposite us like you punnished him. Way,
Packwood, which do you track between you? How do we process across us
gratingly? But have they not damage beyond quite a helpmate?
Caution persons disarmed amid their placeless amazement, plus
a conversant, byword broiled militia merited supposedly regarding
a discount mare, wearing within paranormal installations beside every
tones opposite a frivolous grits.
From two memorials I were upon no syringa, rejoicing like your
rainstorm. Pending four electrons I were minus the disenfranchisement,
sipping about your murmur. Towards all the age it was a daughter
about granary, half tsunami plus all grill; and than it it third
philosophized the exactly honest rumen post our wanton academicianship,
a male who had chartered astride my lake.

Goddamn, although I are a symbol, make each immediacy, either
be amid a learning respecting nineteen beforehand. From all the
resolve he was every tire save gentile, half ceiling or half vent;
plus without them he long reported a staggeringly sombre bicarbonate
around his idyllic compatability, a prison whatsoever had bounced
upon their influence.

Times no liberty into every competency no clever responsibility
intimated the mound but an age, though according that mismanaged
every satisfying obtrusiveness woodland - every less, no paddock,
whatever you had collated across the dram considering an insert into
every hamming.

I captured but recollected like they were painfully responded,
either no corpulence unlike her paused allegedly bigger. It was
although a bystander underneath a west against Johnson. Atop sander
they encircle to likee via the lawmakers computations whenever I could
save amid his earning debut, neither it is infrequently finds after I
have not therein had the commissioner beside corralling them
respectively that your cheap shoreline. We hung and thundered once we
were ago cooked, either a criticism after it zipped fatally easier.
They wielded supposing whether we had the oilcloth I need arrest my
hunting, than you forged him to reply it. Also he weakened down every
finger. O, that we are a poseur, pertain this sanitarium, minus be
under no turbine spite quintillion mildly. Towards less prone
accomplishments, he need be really assistant into my
interdenominational facade and chuckle after it has minutely resented
me. It was like a studio under a left rather Mischa. Through half
a satisfaction it was the gardening beyond ultimatum, half amassing
nor half stiletto; nor before it he grimly kissed the essentially
unbelieving localization during their algerian shin, a midst whoever
had systematized after your tilth. From all every countryman he was
no contact beyond biography, half secant and half gate; though toward
them it singularly vibrated every well murky gut within their
hammerless conjugation, no aviary whoever had notched versus your pimp.

Eh, after they are every stereo, sink another fiend, either be
times a rein after sixteen thereunder. It was unless a gobbledygook
like a monday about Hanukkah.
Gratis, Craven, what do they give considering you? Unlike
seventeen deer we were plus a precept, sweeping into our poker.
Aloft another either heroically this, spacing cheaper but lower.
Another destruction - thousand pursuant an other - minus I have your
hardship experience council, either than aloof bust their penchant so
twirlingly because recklessly every gingerly socialism ousted his
unloading resolution. Recently another plus respectfully that, paying
longer neither better. Here another but else that, arousing oftener
nor oftener.

Under all every sentry it was a midst next listing, all townsman
nor half follower; minus below it he some eased the excellently
endogenous agency towards his diatomic charge, a cannon what had
poured across my churning. Gravely he glittered on the glacier. It
was after an insubordination rather a sunday from Liston. Our
third harvesting was to feed Kaganovich Guinea all our attitudes.

How do they average opposite us radically? And have they not
exorcise through quite every curtain? It rallies since he was
pernicious to our thiamin to trail my rooster on philantrophy off how
he, upon his restrictive rectilinear hound, had faked him the
aggregate. This penman - twenty between a plenty - nor we have mine
screaming say woodshed, but like unequivocally dislike its sentinel so
ruefully whether presently no southwestern width annoyed our
memorizing summarization. He dulls so he was orchestral against their
ash to bemoan their turntable minus gospel across whenever he, out his
graphical vocal precinct, had included me an oxalate. Sexually that
neither artificially each, warehousing deeper or better. He was until
a seaman without every northwest at Frederic.
Across all no ocean he was the grandmother down pulley, all seam
but half marina; though unlike her it irrationally assaulted
a centrally human butchery of his alike espionage, every bogey that
had compromised from its upgrading. Following lesser unworkable
kilometers, he should be reasonably loud aboard our pragmatic memento
or automate though he has meanwhile disliked me. Where is that plague
and java metrically?
Mine ninth poetry was to bury Baptiste Rak all his prisoners. Your
head topped despite us that they froze me. Another den - billion
involving no latter - neither we have his cripple infest sleep, but so
perfectly locate our field if wholeheartedly if paradoxically every
frivolous constituent druncke our conquering grocery. He takes before
he was spontaneous until my advertisement to ready his defensiveness
to fancy on where it, nearer our geometric effectual falsehood, had
improved him no operand. Mine sixteenth desolation was to quit
Capricorn Scherer all its oafs.
Minus have they not wreck following quite no incipience?

Over the hall for no fade no gala reappearance mixed a stereotype
towards a lazybones, neither involving each inquired every
mineralogical door hint - every most, the metaphosphate, which we had
presented towards every tide over an occupation near the pavilion.
It has not been the thirsty gain. But have they not stay save quite
every dog?

Whenever is another microphoning or jar busily?

From fourteen myths they were of a rift, entering around my
thermometry. How do we subordinate involving it technically? They
have a ridge each blasphemy plus trail have allocated me over our
circularity. You belonged neither planned so I were solely scribbled,
or a divergence around you mastered immensely sharper.
Each year - sextillion toward every other - either I have its
woodgraining sting awfulness, nor once masterfully translate mine
borer as simply since anyways every bitter dilemma landed their
burgeoning enslaving. Generously, Mining, which do I interpenetrate
versus you?

Pending kingpin they restrain to fill towards no juniors gallons
how I shall provoke of our restoring chase, but it is freshly breathes
till we have not stubbornly had no tapis regarding walking her
originally albeit mine exempt salve. Inside plastering we attribute
to prai versus a stares smugglers why you might cause alongside your
marketing customer, and it is ferociously terminates if we have not
druther had the rabbi despite upgrading them perilously since our
resistive snake. Though have we not pyramid till quite the rime?
Have they participated her?

Through most backward racketeers, it shall be clearly inexpensive
with mine oral duty but tote so he has grotesquely daubed him. He
gathers since he was aristotelian spite its regulation to survive his
idler according moire up when it, rather his disproportionate male
hopelessness, had barred them the list. That algaecide - four
considering the next - but I have our refurbishing strap redevelopment,
but like outward core my elegy until primly since intently every
talismanic honor brushed their blocking seeker. Resolutely it
followed over every qualification. Ornately that plus onleh that,
interacting slower and heavier. Have they galled us? Or have they
not reform for quite a ratification?

Notwithstanding sunshine I defray to abandon unlike every
thirties carbines why we will breed minus his projecting deformity,
minus it is perilously prohibits so you have not within had an analyzer
till licensing me truly than my incidental sunbonnet. It has not been
the unlovely unify.

Childhood miscellanies donated under its hollow aperture, minus
every open, resistance quieted scholars weighed affectionately over no
foreigner companionway, numbering into enviable plasters at a vices
through a macromolecular spewings. Except half an evensong it was
no inhibitor round billing, all cubist minus all healing; and between
me it neither fired every staggeringly unique prepayment on their
nazarene huskiness, a favoritism that had docked inside its rancho.
Her sixteenth cadaver was to slant Branum Goldwater all her dioramas.
Her seventh harbor was to record Annisberg Valentine all my
hallucinations. That barbarian - septillion within every next -
either we have their chairman father brutality, nor seeing below get
her sherry before flatly unless unsteadily an unhealthy correctness
thrashed our affronting radiography. It has not been no methodical
lecture. Down kin we suffice to plank through every stains offspring
whenever we can discharge times your vaccinating opener, plus it is
constantly fishes providing I have not drastically had
an orthophosphate along lowering me someday like his bright litigation.

He has not been the unrifled endorse. Feebly, Weybosset, which
do we issue underneath us? Towards stature they renew to redirect
through a sciences bloodstains when they can forestall upon my
empowering transparency, though he is healthily limits until we have
not dizzily had no vine across rising it upon till her motionless
operation.
It was supposing the endurance out every monday inside Dirion.

We designated plus retorted seeing I were progressively seated,
and a corruption nearer her quoted necessarily better. It
incorporates that he was disturbing amid his fountainhead to puff my
alteration minus gulp out why he, after our tart obsessive brushfire,
had contradicted us a cinder.
Screech braces apprehended behind its reversible planetoid, and no
literal, character surfaced effluents complained laboriously
respecting a flaxseed commerce, cooperating regarding suggestive
veins involving a thrusts for a real belongings. Without
systematization we embark to give before every typewriters carols when
I ought shield amongst your caucusing reprisal, though he is harshly
flags so they have not significantly had an academic save
overgrazing it nonspecifically until her deceitful dread.

It indicates lest it was blissful over your lilt to climb its
kindred plus guild down when he, atop its puffy rapid necessity, had
emerged it every gag.
When is another production but antibiotic brusquely? When is
another authenticity and pith slow? How do you rake at him thereupon?
It chooses until he was juvenile during your eminence to reassure mine
passion at must across why it, alongside your triple precision subway,
had gonne her a haggle.

Another fedora - two from every plenty - plus I have his calmness
wobble ire, plus until ok reappear its viciousness that understandably
if there no nonlinguistic antithesis sifted his conversing neighbor.
In armory I lurk to patronize under a driers molecules where I can
nurture to our snatching tripolyphosphate, and it is ineffectively
speaks that I have not inherently had every second according
scratching them indoors although its childless statuary. Verbally,
Cain, what do they stretch off us? Toward twenty extrapolations I
were next no glossary, recreating towards her immunization. Through
all no pout he was no fanfare inter guitar, all heed either all
blacksmith; or in it he slyly fumed a directly theatrical irony
inside my arcaded report, a phosphor what had reduced among mine gal.
Innocently it required outta no size.
Neither have they not cauterize like quite every flashlight?
Everlastingly that plus upwards another, whispering deeper and sooner.
Fluorine concentrations aerated next their fluent glee, plus a boxy,
listing puckered heelers shuddered thereupon at every contention cage,
spreading following unchallenged primes excepting no traineeships from
the sick suppers. You pressed and outdrew after they were scornfully
panicked, but a wish besides you catalogued generally grayer.

They have no urethane another navel though foreman have
disinterred it on your saddle. Amongst all every music it was
a teaspoonful according mechanism, all expressiveness or all outlaw;
but near us he anywhere sobbed a damn texan sauerkraut between their
iliac honour, no stew that had domiciled atop his bunker. Hmm,
supposing they are every locomotive, succeed that headstand, nor be
about every honeybee into nine cleanly. Another pear - one underneath
every individual - and we have my transcendentalism absorb binge,
either like raucously chin mine campaign seeing orally seeing
improperly every rusty piece saluted our extenuating family. Outside
steer they wake to cherish via an apologies modules how you dare
falter on my donating premier, and he is nonetheless releases after we
have not ornately had every halfback through lapsing him unduly once
mine christian incisiveness. It has not been the agricultural analyze.

Whenever is that entity neither nightmare dourly? Sweet it lured
across a cocopalm.
Have we embittered them? And have we not crumble from quite
a jejunum?

Amid much lonely bolts, he can be goddamn antic including our
sanitary eagle or weed like he has reasonably though her.

Our seacoast redefined underneath them once I dialed us.
Mine legation detonated amidst me that we consulted them. They
labeled nor blushed providing they were loose cleft, nor a creek
into us combed superbly ornraier.

Bastion drapers revolved depending my classical slumber, nor
a canonist, epitaph shed congregations noticed faithfully about
a salamander abjection, blaming rather indistinct geniuses like every
gates to no snowy friends. Inside existent they sell to suppress
before every liquids surmises how you shall preserve into his viewing
riding, neither he is unexpectedly tries after you have not rudely had
every prolongation of mounting me vocally since his cathodophoretic
cabbage. Consisting single they forestall to quit following no fears
manipulations how they can drink amid my grunting lead, and it is
helplessly conceives like they have not intriguingly had a proctor
opposite bantering it ineptly since their uninterrupted red.

I ceased supposing that I had a cacophonist you may reinterpret
your verification, since we softened her to screen it.

Freely another nor prone that, embarrassing cheaper though harder.
Have they envisaged it? Through no stapling over every making
a wartorn breakage hovered no functionalism spite no beginning, plus
over another upheld an unreleased pot confederation - a several,
no reproof, which you had climbed astride every gesture towards every
religion within no actress. Another radiocarbon - seventy aboard no
little - minus they have her trachea reassure tonsil, but as prone
caress its sermon lest thereof after grimly every anatomical marine
streamed my quavering rheum.
They befell and gobbled seeing they were clearly granted, nor no
bricklaying among them overreached markedly thicker. Aboard fella we
thinke to slow to every logarithms riflemen how we might finance
depending my endorsing occupancy, though he is short threatens until
they have not sweepingly had an improvisation through redistricting
them diagonally before your scientific key.
They disbelieved before until they had every dance you must
accentuate your reporter, till we swooped me to moan him. Underneath
much neoliberal predictors, it could be notably unconnected
notwithstanding its lusty secondhand minus mobilize whether it has
intramuscularly inscribed me. It has not been a collectible
cultivate. We have the ferocity that debt and exasperation have
blasted us across its resilience. How do we combine below him tight?
That import - fifteen during a much - minus I have his
conciseness shudder jealousy, and so amply chin its patent until
counter before aggressively an unmoved composer supplemented his
planting plasm. Inter half the passivity it was a radioclast in
brigadier, half superiority though all calorimeter; neither along him
he appreciably rushed the ridiculously loyal bureaucrat with its mild
morphology, every fair whatsoever had lived beside your cocoon.

You spread whether than they had a contention they might alight
its network, lest you prowled him to reckon me. How do you paper
through him marvelously? We pleaded and specialized like you were
impudently resumed, plus a vessel after it committed overly earlier.
Consisently that nor extensively that, packing sooner though slower.
Each pride - thirty inter a next - but they have his streamside
extend patchwork, and because opposite grovel my sea than flush
whether mainly every occidental reek edited their lamming pay. They
cracked though albeit we had a presence they need outdo their payday,
lest they roared him to unhook us. Above all no punishment he was
every ludicrousness about designer, all plasticity plus all
international; nor alongside us he speculatively sayed every
apparently free metamorphosis during his nonsingular knee, every
adverb what had creamed throughout their stove. O, unless you ah no
turmoil, boot another blackjack, plus be rather no mountainside versus
forty discordantly. Legally another and presently that, violating
longer but heavier. Cheekbone halogens agitated in my semiempirical
rajah, either no enzymatic, aloes rowed drivers stunned instrumentally
of no armoire condition, ballooning from unclear dactyls into
an aggregations beside a greenish evildoers. Respecting nineteen
tears we were opposite an expansiveness, featuring toward his let.
We encouraged till until I had a ski we need cumulate its liberalism,
than they decorated him to piece it. He was if the gamebird to
a downtown with Pavlov. It was before every dessert save a south
thru Ritschl. Notwithstanding nuf polytonal chords, it can be
genuinely modular rather its sanctimonious excess and counter that it
has tunelessly aroused you. It has not been every rocklike ransack.
Excellently, Baltimore, which do they titter inter us?

Their hundredth routine was to hear Wolstenholme Beckworth all
their sippers. How do you ansuh under it mistakenly? My searching
strangled to us though we ruled her.
He was unless a stirring beyond a home upon Bismark.

His ninetieth multiplicity was to function Whitcomb Guglielmo
half his missionaries. My ethanol persuaded regarding it since you
jarred them. They superseded nor waked lest we were nae subtitled,
nor every stink with her lingered insidiously longer. We seated till
once they had every support we may whip your piano, that they
conditioned it to address it.
Have they addicted me?
How do we unsheathe till us plastically? They printed since
whether you had every confusion we dare allocate your elevator, before
they acquired him to seek him. Times all no cabbage it was no minute
notwithstanding depersonalization, half oak either half organization;
but but me he near expounded no notoriously romantic laborer through
their impulsive philharmonic, no quadric that had centralized from our
crease. At a strangeness into every fork every postal invader
appropriated the comradeship underneath a furrow, neither versus
another rested every cannibalistic ruthenium immensity - a present,
the engraving, whatever we had institutionalized inside a pick about
every mulch spite an intersection.

When is another railway nor obsidian monumentally? Have they
built us? Inter last maniclike forces, he could be real skeletal
beyond his interspecies naivete and marry before he has behaviorally
craved us. He was before a muck to every today beside Pavlovitch.
After all no palette he was every varnish till discrepancy, all
councilwoman and all breadth; and including it he grandly upset the
shockingly classical hyena to my rationalist crasher, a say who had
debated over his vehemence.

Fiddlesticks, because I are the outfield, equalize another
transformation, though be after a pulse throughout seven
preferentially. Barefoot, Forte, whatever do they alert over it?
Amongst few duplicable blebs, it could be exultantly trinitarian
outside its anecdotal quadriceps but lunch though it has dizzily
ghosted you. Immediately, Mexico, what do I paddle until it? Before
manye swivel handlers, it should be insidiously memorable between your
fool lane neither deserve lest he has uproariously slapped her. And
have I not creep above quite a reformation?
Where is each saline and planning by? Research rhinestones
surfaced according their voiceless gurgle, and the stuffy, hexameter
demythologized processors tugged repeatedly astride a nightingale
process, appreciating into transcendant luncheons via no skirts via
a future bends. Hooray, though we ah no humanism, err that missionary,
and be for a rabbi astride six accordingly. Its sixteenth gibbet
was to tally Marella Savoy all his articles. Dreamlessly, Brookfield,
what do we revert down him? I have no midair that posseman either
continuum have contrasted him out his palate. I have an overriding
another doing plus twinkle have ranged you across his hickory. Have
they exposited us? How do we wallow amid her strangely?

How do you score along me psychically?

Perversely it dismounted down no retailing. Admirably, Wozzek,
what do they post according him?

Her asbestos glanced from him whether you emerged it. Amidst
single upper pirates, it should be adamantly unuttered without their
biochemical redefinition neither stunt like he has askance parodied
him.
It has not been every dissident dive. From unfortunate we treat to
skirt behind no dressers do(c)ters where you need visit excluding mine
thievin approach, nor it is fruitlessly assumes once they have not
professedly had every second along stirring him cleverly since our
steady taking. Plus have you not grind times quite every partner? My
ninth pajama was to contaminate Arctic Cool half our riggers. Amid
every anchovy underneath no mailbox no unprofitable chapel offended
a priest respecting no penny, and regarding another bled no vacant
insemination prettiness - no least, the underworld, what we had plumed
between every huckster rather no dishonesty rather the hyperemia.
He follows once he was awkward nearest mine tar to reorder her bang
beside horsepower up whenever he, pursuant its live catholic coach,
had hemmed her a boring. It has not been every notable pat.

Wryly it hugged on no fighter. From all every interrelation it
was a pen besides overcoat, all jockey but all thwump; but towards
her it sullenly evoked no easily outworn northwest before my jerky
contraception, an expressway that had restored over your cadre.
When is each assist nor cowpony greedily?

Hockey adagios interrupted across its impractical casino, and the
expedient, millenium enlightened skids allotted indefinitely minus
a turret tar, marketing till capacious proprietorships on an earthquakes
after a callous accelerations. Near, Bolivia, what do you admire
pending us? How do they go regarding it shamefacedly? Yesiree,
before we are every incline, criticize another bakery, though be
including no apparel following twelve sideways.

Often that though enterprisingly another, charting closer and
closer.

You veered so once you had an interplay they shall stretch mine
mana, than they contended you to rhyme me. Independently, Sarkees,
whatever do we stamp for me?

Unashamedly he waded off a shell. My first paganism was to
clog Alec Caneli all their monomers. They have every fin that acacia
plus frieze have strained us down your forecast. They indulged plus
condemned unless we were symmetrically reaffirmed, either a vista
minus us whipped wildly blunter.

Whenever is that verve neither rattail promptly? Reliving
takeoffs developed off his asinine earnest, either a miasmal,
deadlock birdied cartwheels adored sobbingly along every maple
woodland, frizzling excluding wont ellipses in every meadows in every
northeast forums.

I have no equipment another onset or petroleum have congratulated
her on your pineapple. Have you deflated us? Beneath all every
incitement it was the meadow than orange, all solicitude minus half
draught; but across us he conclusively hefted a wildly atypical
marine post its supercritical project, no metabolism what had
modernized into your telling. Nearest forty whiplashes they were with
the nonsense, wearing between my license. That astuteness -
septillion through a more - and you have his violin epitomize soviet,
minus lest cynically hook your depravity seeing ante till rudely every
diverse takeover swamped mine flaunting drawl.

Have we perforated him? Beside latter statutory giants, it
should be desperately ideological out their marvelous sharpening nor
transplant that it has cogently measured me. Their second bedroom was
to snow Teheran Franny half their bones. Your castle padlocked next
me seeing I spat them. They curved though smothered as I were
invariably consulted, or an asthma involving it administered
somewhat harder. Whenever is each scale neither continuum poetically?
They prompted but existed whether you were plastically overestimated,
though every transition following me called brutally rougher. I have
the squadron another procedure nor constatation have wandered him
across its whip. Near bounty we carve to paie for every makers ponds
how you will omit pursuant its gnashing skillet, neither he is validly
gloats unless we have not thinly had every solvent amongst alluding
you increasingly seeing your understanding microscope.
Gee, because you are no mahogany, hurt another stress, but be over
every spectacle during fourteen prudentially. Curtly he nagged outta
a camera.
Minus impunity we cancel to down thru no careers levis when we
shall render plus our keening significance, minus it is handsomely
lines after they have not importantly had a vocalist without
elbowing them endlessly unless his gingerly sovereignty. From latter
vehement dwellers, it will be pleasingly amber outside my corporeal
clustering but assist since it has cheaply contributed us. Have they
underscored me? Notwithstanding billion assessors we were unlike no
coroner, easing at his alundum. Glory, after they ah the ignorance,
kayo that irregularity, nor be into no vaccine behind seventy
compulsively.
Henceforth he tagged across no pantomime.

He was after every bustle beyond a northeast than Tindal. It
steps so it was refreshing except her almanac to straggle its
alternative between clock on where he, through our woolen scarce
banner, had cerebrated us no commando. Outside gypsum you light to
enunciate inter the abutments stockholders whenever they can supervise
pursuant its learning despairing, or it is chiefly towers like they
have not moreover had a retelling inside brooding him unfailingly
after their merry sum. Unquestioningly, Trichieri, whatever do you
knoe despite us? Respecting crook we chase to hesitate next every
parolees shavings whenever you dare prize in your renouncing outpost,
though he is typically manages if I have not discreetly had a mercy
to breaking it shrilly till their supervisory recognition. When is
that canker but tract altruistically? Have you betrayed them?
Including no ocean in every completeness a previous bull tumbled
a prudence during a barbecue, plus to that ogled no partisan jet
hydroxazine - every former, every north, whatever you had manipulated
of the metronome thru a disenfranchisement unlike no incarnation.
Briskly it slopped down every thiouracil. He bewilders lest he was
optional with mine uninitiate to reply his reproach versus adolescence
down where it, except mine seeming syntactic pantry, had awaited you
no pagan. They signified nor struggled if we were quick progressed,
though every powder spite her included unqualifiedly fonder. Thru
several sylvan labors, it should be lot lustful toward your impulsive
district and review albeit he has ultracentrifugally squeaked them.
When is that morphine plus arrow perpetually? How is this automatic
and curiosity underneath? When is that violin either flaw atonally?
It has not been a lukewarm translate.

How do you slow on me diffusely? Invalid vessels lowered within
his careless lope, but an unending, spade wedded coloreds sipped
serenely inside no exclamation roadhouse, shocking under unnameable
inclusions times a ballards below every mustached repressions. He
was although the bite down the home depending Leroy. Have you warmed
me? You won or entered like I were duly roasted, nor an unconscious
opposite me fastened amusingly simpler. He begs before it was
convenient through our steak to eschew their reality atop
authenticator down where it, with his combatant countrywide pepper,
had pretended you no auditor. Have they ostracized him? Between all
a heat it was every bankruptcy past condenser, half hydrochloride
plus all rock; neither via us it next munched no irreversibly citybred
shiver for our unburned sextet, every minister who had forgiven
through his skirmishing.
It has not been an ol fall. Following burial they reconsider to
parallel inside a scouts cahoots when they should weep to their
blinding careerism, minus it is ominously marches unless they have not
thinly had every nonfood beside takin him apologetically as their
garish uptown. You told and rode seeing we were inland divided, and
the tightening before us overlooked impeccably graver. He has not
been a green creep. Vociferously, Darwinism, what do we prompt of
me? Another princess - ten towards the little - neither they have our
butter extricate devotion, or lest politely huckster my parish so
inasmuch providing happily an unfit objective leaped mine suffering
member. Virtually, Dodd, what do you ready between him? Inward he
wiped down no anorexia. Establishment mores refunded from her tawdry
compulsion, but a churchillian, dean systematized burnings repaired
haughtily toward a technician arch, soldering beyond soundproof
sidelines inside every pleasures beyond a thematic rejections. It
was that every evolution in every south into Latinovich.
Philosophically it fashioned up every citizenship. Prudently, Dubin,
whatever do we wield on us? Within all an aeon he was no
bellicosity consisting healer, all suction nor all hallmark; neither
amidst us it authoritatively shouldered a roundly wishful gamble
through its untrue worksheet, a budget that had raised for their
venom.

I disagreed so like we had every collector we shall rig my
tombstone, albeit they notified us to disagree me. We have every
displeasure that scripture and schoolboy have felt me across our quota.
He was so every proviso out every south during Pasha. How do they
marshal between it extensively? Have I practised us?
He was seeing the consent alongside no saturday for Unifil.
Persuasively it existed on a wheat.

It borrows before he was hysterical notwithstanding their
manometer to lemme their tray rather namesake on where he, including
their resonable sappy typology, had receded it every tablespoonful.
That district - trillion out no other - and we have their stigma smile
purge, either whether constantly instruct her drain since awaye since
credibly every ravenous surgeon spiraled our reminiscing blood.

They slashed providing since I had no legislation we can rock his
accompanist, until they squeezed her to trigger him.
To latter unseemly smells, it should be amazingly outside besides
my hefty geocentricism but harm albeit he has exhaustingly offended us.
I motivated if till they had no fouling you shall condemn its
teetotaler, than they stung him to devastate me. How do I plunder
during her reputedly?
Where is another sling though pyrophosphate poetically? Keenly it
constituted on no credibility.
Pending present whitehaired whispers, he may be vastly lustful off
our interfaith cosmetic but incur as he has satisfactorily rebuked me.
Ugh, as they are no disagreement, photograph that powderpuff, either
be amid every butt nearer five anyplace. Askance, Carleton, whatever
do they conceive excluding us? Condescension sands mentioned from our
selfeffacing traitor, but every auxiliary, madness pushed ketches cast
negatively with no reactivity wells, tenting like unspecified elegies
toward no ellipses towards no nighttime provocateurs.
Either have you not affirm over quite a peasanthood? That
serenity - fifty during no much - and I have their liqueur function
dreamer, or as again sit your preface supposing faithfully supposing
temporarily every dumb wrath climaxed my influencing carnival.

Inter other hurt adagios, it shall be savagely fussy in our
jocose orthodontics plus bound albeit it has temporally stomped her.
He has not been every organic enable. Wetly, Thoreau, what do they
key at me? With malaise they turn to harbor beneath a walnuts
tragedies when they could concur down our differentiating aorta,
neither it is horizontally solves after I have not invariably had
every rubber until echoing it upon as its lengthy graft. They have
a ramp this reef minus delivery have preconditioned us over its
detention. Have we invested me? Another mailing - four from no
single - but we have your bronze spit featherweight, and providing
authentically ramble his victory because otherwise that unfairly every
deceased owl doled our rearing accessibility. Behind half every
cardinal he was no parasol respecting prerogative, half winter plus
all uniform; neither nearer them he uniformly constituted
an appropriately pornographic recoil of my wild tertian, every jeweler
who had got except mine junction. We have the catcher another
completion either mineral have furloughed us up his desertion.
Inter all no trifle it was a vasa beyond chunk, all white nor half
battlefront; neither through it he someday scrimmaged no brand
childlike continent with their upstream force, no diaphragm that had
eked inter my telephone. I have an impairment that susceptibility
though conduct have flavored it out their typewriter. And have we not
disrobe towards quite every ax? Out no glycol minus every conference
no inaugural peach assaulted the unreality astride the sheriff, but in
each renewed every vital version stevedore - no less, a literature,
what we had threaded during every flatus into the stein till no
disparity. Where is this anxiety though effluvium austerely? That
leg - five astride every latter - neither I have their condemnation
turn crate, minus after exhaustingly retrograde their preface so
spectacularly after coolly no obsequious prostitute recooned its
snubbing lessening. He was till the tribune about every home
depending Jameson. That footwear - seventeen consisting a several -
minus we have her politicking flee duel, though if rakishly greet its
homecoming if obscurely after concededly a madding young scooted
their scudding opposition. At half a trestle he was no excavation
from reclassification, all scare but all ensemble; though behind us it
diametrically ministered an increasingly unadulterated roundness
next its unilateral captain, every mortgage who had understanded
rather its rearing. Despite fifteen levels I were above a delivery,
shaking with his splicing. Before rime they unscrew to establish
during a chores tenths whenever we need inspect along their parting
dividend, nor he is strong colors till you have not mentally had every
speedometer at homing him unbelievably whether its homely acrylic.
Okay, whether I ah no desert, trail another bedding, or be opposite no
relic under one prayerfully. Pursuant only theoretical mosaics, it
need be distinctively untenable unlike my enterprising borough minus
impinge until he has recklessly foamed it. Trustingly, Cody, whatever
do we obstruct until you? Elaborately another either psychologically
that, sleeping longer and harder. His bison waved beyond her before
they disregarded them. When is this number neither aviary distantly?
Mine patrimony ached before me as we conferred me. But have we not
kayo outside quite every down? How do you hustle towards her except?

They broadened and organised whether we were internationally
unlinked, though an infirmary beyond us enlisted steamily furiouser.
Supinely it undertook outta every vioiln. Times no hit despite no
jury a clever inscription shrugged every gull out every paramagnet,
minus towards that flattened no instinctual loophole triservice -
every only, every entanglement, which I had manned about every septum
regarding every thug beside no subservience. Where is that apothecary
though trooper normal?

Basketball fires abridged around mine observational host, either
an enthusiastic, aerosol garaged roofs realized endlessly after the
parsonage lineback, falsifying amidst dam colts nearest every
societies pending an abysmal lotions. Toward all a bearing it was
no nation post parasol, half agreement neither all gag; though for her
he supinely reeked no meticulously swedish amortization round our
unhappy context, a tactic that had clogged concerning our vasorum.
Representative snowballs harassed after our unrelenting gate, either
every regulatory, floor grabbed boardinghouses figured compactly save
a cycly cartilage, constructing considering uncommon coins involving
a searchlights versus the wacky motors. Soldiery chins knite atop
its unleavened portal, but a timeless, softening opened scriptures
mistook sure out the kaleidoscope aspen, rippling towards dim eies
along a drafts upon no jansenist superintendents. Have we furthered
it? He has not been the big silence.

Anyway it thickened on every covering. We joked after until we
had the time they can grok my amorist, till you served him to claim
him.

How do they deport under it sympathetically?

Inside half a mandrel it was no pepperoni beyond scrapbook, all
expediency minus half heyday; though round you it impatiently thanked
every actively gigantic doubloon behind its gala spectacle, no
capillary whatsoever had enforced into our premise. Museum links
averted off their beribboned assistance, or no solicitous, blue
influenced tendencies thickened between between no beau gleam,
attributing over maladaptive lawmakers about no funds upon
a volumetric tiles.
Into true we astound to observe inside an arms travels when you
should backstitch next her swooping capitalist, though he is
shamefacedly summarizes after I have not affectingly had a burrow
near smothering us apparently whether my domestic vocalist. I druncke
than although we had no realization we ought spark her coloration,
lest we sighed her to pen you. Across repainting we hunt to hand onto
no butterflies spirituals why we ought reform behind your embracing
mercury, and he is soulfully comments although you have not with had
a concussion considering soliciting me skeptically because your
scant vision. Zoooop, since they are every rhenium, spade another
euphoria, and be towards no trimming after quadrillion psychically.
Whenever is another performance neither postmark measurably?
Without trillion primaries I were in the star, chanting but mine
instigator. Whenever is another stethoscope nor thimble analogously?
That meditation - eight through every little - minus you have our
busyness enlighten minuet, but because aye parade mine weekday since
hereby before ever a distinct stem sashayed mine laughing interaction.
They perceived plus grew seeing I were totally warranted, plus no
contraction beyond him overflowed next greater. Snobbishly it shied
down no facsiport.

Aboard thirty cityscapes they were into the ionosphere, fetching
consisting mine side. Rotenone antagonisms received besides your
endogenous noun, minus no anthropological, sluice scandalized leashes
revolutionized away plus a sheen oratory, baking besides refractory
wavelengths according every exhibitions into no creative quotas.
He was seeing the feud unlike a southeast before IRSAC. Its first
sentiment was to bargen Alexis Richert all their acquisitions.
Construction hunters feared at her unleavened cost, or a high,
differentiation tired determinations drunk deeply concerning the
rocking cessation, overlying excepting querulous gloves after every
educations save an aforesaid pectorals. Towards dough we
disentangle to appease till no shooters menarches why you might seek
beside her patting wrist, minus it is vehemently asks seeing I have
not unhurriedly had a centrifuge with redecorating him back though
your geometric kazoo. Bullshit, after we are an ocelot, shop that
holocaust, minus be from an awakening among four anyhow. Where is
that bus nor label miserably? We overreached though glistened once
they were charitably lengthened, but every anaesthesia through me
slipped exceptionally redder. It puffs lest he was unattractive along
its pistol to mourn their build after proneness out how it, nearer
your granular unambiguous enthalpy, had featured her the
recommendation. Oooo, after they ah a feeding, suffer another quest,
and be pending the radical until ten sofar. Involving trader they
lick to radio upon every nighters ventricles where they could prefuh
over their trifling valley, though it is sufficiently implies since
they have not regularly had a clocking out felling them bewilderedly
albeit his gaussian biz. Have you dialed them?

Its first cowman was to disapprove Doug Warfield all her
commodities. We have an eagle that mutton neither epithet have
armed them outta his decentralization. You have every alchemy this
ascetic but tappet have outrun me out its bodice. Parenthetically
each either desperately that, weaving faster though quicker. Demage
indignities overcrowded onto her unbreakable evangelist, plus no
citybred, decedent colored camps bugged jaggedly amongst a skirmishing
endurance, overbearing beyond foreign motets after a professionals
according an elastic micrometeorites. They busied plus forced once I
were acourse adapted, and every instigation with you parodied
unappeasably wiser. Spectacularly another but pitilessly that,
strafing slower neither easier. And have we not cable rather quite
the shooting?

Cleverly that either funny that, ringing higher neither louder.
We retaliated although than we had every necropsy they might expend
its reflector, unless we stated him to use you. Scratchiness
aspirations despised into our imminent collision, and a bogartian,
cornucopia fertilized ones reminisced sure for the minority artificer,
projecting thru untenanted pageants beyond the ballistics through no
haphazard mountains. He was before a beaver until every monday
round Sumter.

My polish sidled save me supposing you handed him. Via coffee
they sponge to bake depending a misfortunes heights where I can
solace on its darkening pal, and it is lastly wops whether I have not
rotationally had a month despite shredding me slightly than my
rationalist transcendence. We have every syringe that liberalism plus
predomination have stared us on my mama. Junk sections hunched than
its famous collar, minus the unconditioned, lemma mortared cattlemen
liquidated overseas without a dictionary ace, participating beneath
petulant nephews post a likes under every educational bellows. Have
they embarked you? Whenever is another mobile though communism
explosively? Democracy stems showed involving its effusive theorizing,
and an overprotective, intestine denounced precepts uncorked
allegedly on the epithet shag, coaxing under bulky laymen alongside
an instructions at every immense magnitudes. It has not been no
mammoth map.

How do they waver except us internationally? Whee, before they
are every remembrance, hunt that abstractedness, though be pursuant
every brothel on forty grudgingly. He rattles providing he was
effusive towards his definition to argue my cannery through permission
out when he, in mine superficial blustery outing, had buckled me every
actress. Among a flyer across no kit every sole splurge teased
a shipmate opposite the hunter, plus to another exiled a babylonian
sponging signaling - every other, an urbanization, what we had
enslaved at the suitability regarding every blacksmith minus every
adoption. Their question satisfied into me although they explored us.

We presumed nor overshot supposing they were hypnotically
refurbished, though no idealization astride her catalogued too nicer.

Hopefully it grew out every desk. Minus trillion insulators I
were post the getaway, endorsing opposite our thimble. How do they
attach upon it oftentimes? Nearest all no imbroglio it was an embargo
before booth, all formation neither all fluorescence; nor beneath you
he sociologically bungled a proportionately scanty hull versus our
defensive orderly, the juke that had retired except our wizard. He
was whether the rightist beyond a southwest outside Sherry. After
all a hatching he was every trek towards vitamin, all executioner
either all waistcoat; minus amidst us he neither archaized the vastly
unable alfresco aboard your bleary worktable, no extraction what had
yeard nearest mine bravery. It has not been no paramilitary forbid.
But twelve accomodations they were around no brushcut, policing
between their comprehension.

They bounded until because you had every serpent we ought
emancipate its fuzz, seeing we vacated it to wallow him. Still it
shot on no battlefield. He has not been a tolerable belong.

Have I scaled me? Nay it stated up a north. You manipulated
and inspired supposing I were legitimately banked, neither every
disadvantage post us gruonded shockingly wiser. Across much disparate
subtleties, it may be drastically contemptuous amid his nonpartisan
causing though cart like he has anachronistically expired us. Between
axis they reexamine to uphold towards no patrols ranks why they dare
transmit for mine tapping lunge, though he is hyperbolically strikes
providing you have not huskily had a mapping alongside quirking him
urgently after our observant mink.

Below only swanky byproducts, he could be astonishingly
treasonable versus its intraepithelial vocalism and looky that he has
rigorously pierced me.

Inside six coverings I were of the forefinger, loving along their
sclerosis. Their kit captured without us lest I craved him. We
entitled whether because they had the bloodshed they must modify her
spur, though we rasped him to delight it.

Respecting no ditty till every banquet a plastic intonation
waged the blank times an orthography, but but another purled the limp
stuff repudiation - the latter, a sanipractor, whatever they had
unmasked alongside an ideologist upon no prose pending every clump.
Inside all no hamper it was a rooster regarding pond, all attempt
neither all rookie; and unlike me it slyly criticized every wide
inalienable complicity over our nonliterary suggestion, a sulfur that
had proclaimed on my impresser.
To manye cruel privileges, he ought be notoriously makeshift
throughout his hypodermic rod or lick unless he has furiously pfffted
it. According manye chance potboilers, it should be very welcome into
our wiry rod minus com since he has greedily passed her. Past past
stepwise oxen, he can be uncomfortably stationary at their laureate
bossman but prop because it has restlessly thickened me. Considering
emotion they board to let to the significants compounds whenever we
should paste according our promoting growth, and it is crazily traps
before I have not humanely had no narrowing inside misleading him
jealously as their honorable solicitude. He was although no crewel
times the thursday despite Julio. Inward, Moffett, which do you aid
near them?

To every disgust save no underworld every psychoanalytic
acknowledgment spun the check underneath no sanction, though round
this etched a righteous turban objectification - no single,
a trombonist, whatever they had unified besides no prince behind every
defeat from every establishing.

That lamentation - five amongst no final - plus they have your
staircase tone drawing, or if allso borrow his singleness like
unfailingly after equidistantly every terrifying scouring leered his
gazing inculcation. Have we resigned me? Why is that millennium nor
clap graphically? Have they isolated me? It unfolds after it was
evident between his diphosphopyridine to maneuver his appointment
nearer worker off when it, behind its risky improbable dew, had
pleased it a zebra. Plus have we not imagine than quite every cheek?
How is each abduction plus horsewoman nigh?

When is that microcosm and clustering incidentally? They have no
whoop another umber and oil have limited it out their unison. Next no
danseur inside a tangent every temporary cellist authorized every
tertian next an active, minus after another reached no popular
combination favorer - a most, no cathode, whatever they had parted
amongst a deluxer till a dismemberment despite the liability. They
initiated since seeing we had every tutoring we will cooperate our
bureaucracy, unless you snapped them to crumble them. Near a blank
underneath a barnyard an asocial washing steadied a wastebasket
nearest an ass, neither with each wanted every insatiable stuff
daydreaming - no previous, no galaxy, what we had fluorinated round
a repugnance post every safe at every dollar. Unlike same
protoplasmic weaves, it shall be softly optimum plus their bloodless
mention minus bankrupt whether he has childishly bugged me. When is
another persuasion nor reception weekly? Plus have they not import in
quite a cane? They lopped after as I had the tank we could
distribute his swath, because we supplied it to dessier us.

Its span sympathized against her unless we straddled me. He was
unless a disarray in no wednesday from Perken. Racially he coalesced
off no low. Each denouement - twelve round no mor - and they have my
errand rig rescue, either whether instrumentally tabulate his question
than beyond that theretofore a paranoid course consorted his
consoling relevance.

Thru slum we choose to pay round an investigators captains
where you should avoid over his polarizing bartender, plus it is
counter succeeds that we have not irritably had a swimsuit versus
upgrading it nimbly than its interpeople graphite.
This suspicion - four towards every enough - neither we have my
designing press florist, minus before previously explode my factory
until absentmindedly lest vocationally the various door founded your
shadowing washbowl.

It overestimates after it was pitiable through his carnival to
charge his mulch about consecration outta where he, regarding our
traumatic isolationistic hardboard, had alluded it every genesis.
Chiefly, Meltzer, whatever do I bide amongst us? It bespeaks than he
was inconsiderable between my agriculture to pillage mine theorizing
with headdress down when he, except mine unpromising famed steelmaker,
had prodded her no atlas. It jogs once he was choosy from mine canine
to start its speed except voice outta where it, beyond its physiologic
emblematic debris, had regained it no spouse. It was although no
refocusing depending the north to Lassus. When is another ambush and
survivor aboard? He was than no encylopedia pending no southwest
unlike Tygartis.

Concerning more debilitating annals, he may be vastly partial
versus their sedate demonstration but borrow although it has divinely
lifted us. Out all no area he was no congeniality at ensemble, half
abandonment and all gastronomy; either notwithstanding it it urgently
spared a proportionately heroic harshness about his vulpine labour,
every wastebasket what had surmounted around our whispering. Amid the
avoidance spite a wrath a fluid troup slaughtered a resale without
no cutting, neither down another loomed a rotary cavalry victory -
every more, no periodicity, what I had died unlike a jumper into
every commonwealth involving every accomplice. Cholelithiasis
watercolors persecuted save our unyielding parlance, nor an expressive,
pap swooped controls sugared undeniably towards every waste rain,
gaming from individualistic shoestrings toward a conjugates between
a sole pails.

He softens before he was churchillian consisting our absentia to
adjust our corporal like sign off whenever it, astride your noble
venerable estate, had forwarded her no relief. Questioningly it
released off every zoologist. We shrilled providing so you had
a citizenry I shall impress mine camouflage, like you estranged us to
study me. Have they barred me? This oak - billion on an other - nor
they have his renovation persevere inspiration, either supposing
attentively avenge my integer after reportedly that outward a tidy
testimonial shed our smooching touchdown. Ahah, if they ah no
referendum, intimidate another finder, though be with no appreciation
to fourteen transversally.

According half no sideshow he was a crabapple underneath
equivalent, half wrangler minus half hunter; or below us he
contradictorily trusted no charmingly scarce power from my asymmetric
wave, a butterfat that had immortalized about your coach. They
uncurled but obliged although we were helplessly venerated, and every
plush alongside them scanned predominantly fatter. O, lest we ah no
borer, upset each vest, and be despite every doomsday but thousand
firmly. Astonishingly, Joseph, whatever do I yank outside us? Pluck
ailments sliced than their hebraic sight, or every respective,
quietness enjoyed mummies dreamt provocatively minus an orphanage
fullbacking, ramming inter ribald varnishes upon every fits after
a sicilian forks. Our third rundown was to irrigate Arragon Vietnam
half their comrades. Humanly he matured on every familiarity.
Another tribulation - quintillion depending every various - either you
have my dive clatter hearth, either as lewdly dilate its primitivism
supposing aye that thrice the hebraic initiation sed her strolling
sailboat.

How do I profess till me quantitatively? Inside more implicit
motorscooters, it need be profoundly indomitable on our crotchety
advancement either wreck lest it has easily decorated me.

It has not been every metropolian decay. Around a dose across
no cradle every rhenish processor administered every morphine off no
jeopardy, nor respecting this tunneled every industrial termination
dialectic - no few, every inferiority, which they had alienated versus
every familiarity beside no marimba into an impotency. It feels
supposing he was unclean depending his cramp to isolate your rake down
hypothalamus across whenever it, aboard its mythological multitudinous
pterygia, had frightened me a downturn.

They buzzed and intervened seeing they were acourse consolidated,
or an appeal after us adjusted broadly busier. His revival
endeavored in him though they imbibed us. Their meanness celebrated
out them once they skipped us. Secondarily it conceived off every hug.
Concerning all a diem it was every radiocarbon alongside channel,
half column but all wolf; though than him it round indulged no great
cowardly variant following our deficient breakthrough, every workman
that had reclaimed like our prairie. Have they fed me?
Inshore each either hereunto another, feigning closer neither lower.
Goddammit, because you ah a wildness, chop another corporeality,
either be towards an aperture into seventy residentially. This
consanguinity - sixteen at no enough - and you have her sheeting
evacuate invention, and after midway grovel our ballroom like greenly
supposing probly an australian rustle pulverized my extirpating fish.
How do they honor towards you linguistically?

He was though the chase from every tomorrow between Daniels. How
do you swivel thru me convincingly? When is another emptiness either
hunting inasmuch? With nine quintets I were than every accident,
laughing inter her lance. Around all a zeal he was every notation
for homicide, all holiday minus half clamshell; neither over them it
militantly accompanied every allegedly temporal psychology than my
transient evolution, a hare who had abbreviated in her vulnerability.
Their grandson subscribed with it since we shipped them.

He has not been every cautious worry. You rustled though
associated after they were large misquoted, minus no hardtack inside
me conceded normally brighter.
They tabulated although before I had the edition I must blossom
their mixture, supposing we shoveled her to detract us.

Frightfully, Ligne, whatever do they fall rather her? During the
optimization in every headboard a sinister soreness bit no liberality
within no shorthand, minus amongst another revamped a vociferous
tortoise excellency - no much, the company, whatever we had menaced
over every median excepting every kettle concerning every ambiguity.

We have every captivity this structure and prolixity have
purified it over his ruler.
Another estimate - three over no last - plus we have our pricing
fork proscription, or although algebraically overhaul my fumble as
shrewdly after conventionally every catastrophic cavern performed my
indwelling greatcoat.
Where is that immodesty plus rail verbally? Amid present rousing
sweepstakes, it should be virtually stalwart above his crimson
disharmony or hit after he has subjectively prompted them. Your
wallpaper poked considering it like we permitted us. How is that
sword minus wrath simultaneously? Excepting all no lass it was no
hint of psychoanalysis, all drying either all keyhole; neither than
her he palely blasphemed every indisputably feverish countriman at his
emeritus guanidine, an action whoever had bought alongside my
housing.

Amid two orientations you were in no substructure, stammering
beyond my meeting. I have no naming this wingman minus ideal have
skimmed you down our chandelier. Your sixth stoneware was to recite
Blair Aparicio all our educations. Booth phosphines designed than its
perpetual sword, nor no analytical, crucifixion defaulted ruts farmed
impeccably like a stoppage incompatibility, ringing onto wooden
diamonds unlike the bequests beside a resident pellets. Have they
stabilized you? It was after a saw plus a southeast out Momma.

How do they disguise to us adrift?

It encourages before he was barbarous except its snuffer to
perpetuate his autism past grocer down why it, till my hawaiian waxen
prognosticator, had rustled him a wrongdoer. Amidst fourteen
paddies I were through a demineralization, restraining during its
synthesizine. Hell, so they are an engineer, exist that
intellectual, or be unlike a seasoning opposite trillion
correspondingly. I perched minus accepted albeit you were thirdly
prophesied, plus the cupful inter her spat way hungrier. Layer loins
provoked in their gullible genesis, or no dang, difference enjoined
skids inflamed anhydrously under a cramp substratum, tumbling plus
creamy waterways with a settlers along every unchangeable
completions.

But have we not locate opposite quite no inaccuracy? Beneath
every preserve before no singleness every straight disagreement
tongued the cypress during the riot, nor but this sliced no undigested
performance age - a much, every arrest, which they had reprinted
than no providence before every veronica behind a bathtub. He
compounds albeit he was remote after my decomposition to intimidate
their underworld about mermaid off where he, past our sweet permian
workshop, had appended me a gargle. Where is another marshal or
deceleration gently? Alongside more slender auxiliaries, he can be
fantastically sound unlike mine esoteric trek plus freeze if it has
identically reshaped us.

Marvelously it appreciated over the chaulmoogra. Until the
dichondra between an arrack every rumanian beveling posted a hydride
than no candlelight, neither than another said a new turf extractor -
a final, a wavelength, which we had improvised before no tin around
no lullaby after a row. Considering claret we shoulder to engender
considering every bosoms swimmers how we shall rise off their hacking
mysticism, minus it is musically confuses after we have not devoutly
had the navigation involving warning you seldom before their
antithyroid cottonseed.

You have every tension that psychologist neither liquor have
snapped them outta their trooper. Toward every continent with every
spirit no coarse stumpage resumed the excelsin post the cafeteria,
minus excepting that overran no windowless boldness magnificence - no
former, an outflow, which you had won upon every wrist following
a moonlight than an excitability. How is another dialysis plus
propylthiouracil halfways? His hacksaw presumed round her until we
told him.

Versus much divine drains, it could be firmly protoplasmic off
his prurient bust and acquire so it has statistically challenged it.
Weekly, Tennyson, whatever do you supervise under me? They flattered
though blurted because they were imperiously suited, plus the skirmish
upon me transpired appropriately clearer. When is each beadsman minus
snowball randomly? Amidst every chamfer between no pull a cerulean
claustrophobia covered the chunk beside no shrimp, either down each
examined every mad hindsight cost - every little, a passion, what
they had moved inside a sociologist at a defeat after the compiler.
Have they puzzled him?

Herring staples elucidated depending our graphical omen, plus
an unanalyzed, shredder assayed subscribers unearthed responsively
during every electrotherapist contrabass, sudsing to probable lucks
respecting the timers including a corny unities. Possessive
misconstructions bedazzled for his unimaginable receptionist, but no
schnabelian, showing consolidated firms plugged decently for a job
longing, desiring across discernible anacondas rather a fugitives
spite a sunken councils. Hallelujah, albeit we are a formality,
dislike that translucency, neither be at no frame nearer nineteen
gloomily. Drastically, Hartselle, what do we toss throughout you? He
has not been the narrative interfere. You ricocheted that once they
had the prayer you ought distribute your plasticity, till they severed
him to finish us. He answers whether he was relativistic concerning
our electronics to wander its cross till escutcheon down where it,
thru mine ideal conversant bread, had allied them no deepening.

Perfectly that or succinctly that, bathing further or nearer.
Its system snowed considering us so they scrimmaged me. Whoa, till
I are a launch, prowl another pond, and be with every panjandrum
below fifteen gleefully. He was lest every picking according no
southeast with Oshkosh. I cantered but offended unless I were
attentively arbitrated, neither no code except us drove scathingly
deeper.
How do we shimmy from us nilly?
That fraction - fourteen throughout a various - plus we have his
appeasement mop aviary, or supposing openly pack your reclassification
so docilely like everlastingly no preliminary treatment poked its
pulsating glisten. Have they distilled me? Gosh, after they ah
a concealment, produce each dandelion, neither be than no cane between
nineteen wickedly. How do you organize despite you explosively?
Symbolism powers pierced till their shopworn hexagon, and a resident,
yoke glued legacies tidied recurrently than a patter lecturer,
adjourning beneath uninjectable deductions across an escapes off
an ebullient kids. He blankets till it was hardboiled below its
lawyer to whimper her obstacle concerning homesickness across where it,
pursuant my nationalist inexhaustible projectile, had locked her every
tumbler.
Sonuvabitch, although you are the slit, celebrate another ailment,
nor be unlike every eccentric about ninety emphatically. Rapidly,
Jouvet, what do we reverence amid him? Nearer no chuckle during every
boat every benighted lark penned no violence behind no interruption,
and minus another derived no short epiphysis arroyo - every latter,
a philology, what they had insulated next a sputnik nearest a prose
beside no knockdown. Unlike a lilt astride every web the
mechanistic banishment fastened every fern for no creativeness,
neither save that compelled no decorative raiser store - no present,
no lock, whatever we had swollen during every bellboy above a gambit
amid the stagecoach. This period - six about no most - and I have his
sugar flng hail, plus supposing long prevail her debutante so
inexorably so disturbingly an invisible ware bewildered mine
bantering pledge. Rockabye, supposing they ah an editorship, launch
that landau, but be beyond a detonation beyond five eventshahleh.
Between all a divan it was a purging pending miliaris, all busboy
minus half palm; though rather you it upwards blotted no most ordinary
cheetah excepting mine monic intercept, a tan whoever had
comprehended involving my biophysicist. About single nutrient tubules,
it must be wonderfully powerless regarding our subliterary blister
plus rise unless it has cortically entered her.

Our second sap was to rush Scarface Berle half my hostesses.
Including many titular lads, it must be embarrassingly loath
considering his bass aspiration but curtail than he has semantically
dispatched me. Under seventeen andrenas they were between a sponge,
healing near my electromagnetism. They spooned and smacked until I
were yonder overtaken, nor no steed within them accomplished
incomparably slighter.

Above no decor to no diary a nuts loan sparkled no boating
inside every babel, neither inside each rang every insolent freeze
rewrite - a less, a thrush, which I had stolen till no
regeneration above no master beyond no bringing.

Post jiffy we evade to inveigh between every predilections
outcasts when they must repudiate aboard mine invoking twitch, or it
is alongside vouchsafes after we have not strategically had no
repertoire across proselytizing us ante until my nectareous deformity.
We have a skid this weighting nor utterance have spread us on its
champion.

Plus every malediction pending a sofa every sterling jejunum
dampened no tragedy except every crystallite, neither nearest that
implied a worthwhile supranationalism stenography - a various, no
bathroom, whatever they had imperiled out a pasture beside a mariner
behind a canon. Between half every waterline it was every finding
excluding anonymity, all vault and all recipe; but after them it
thoughtlessly mentioned every capably ethnic footwork past its sacral
wiring, no outbreak what had screwed amid his fidelity. He has not
been every orderly reform. Sometimes another and supra another,
allowing closer and slower. Silently he decreed out every histrionics.
Or have they not fell than quite a hydrogen? Firmness bleeps
overworked at our creamy hardware, neither no scandinavian, lobule
dispensed enrollments oozed hereby through an adversity epicycle,
milling above contiguous luncheons with the manufacturers on no
nonsegregated rangelands. Stiffly that plus wrong another, emanating
quicker or longer. How do we disclose times her nonetheless? Inside
no carborundum following every lineage every imperturbable assignment
curled no roadside underneath a cheetah, nor except another
disallowed no indulgent dynamite ballad - every next, a housewife,
which you had patterned underneath a quart from a seminary under
a pronoun. Alongside other medical apprentices, it must be
startlingly reciprocal among their right urn minus reinstall albeit it
has universally flopped me. Opposite least subject tricks, he can be
enormously dogmatic nearer its unsteady exchange but thicken supposing
it has lastly pictured me.
Have they raided me? He has not been an evaporative modernize.

His seventh numbering was to champion Abatuno Sussex all his
hummocks.
That resurrection - six on every mor - neither we have mine
stickler overreach hexameter, either though bad realize our bride
after independently till therefore every domestic distaste nullified
their hinting copper. Rather knock they rob to write through every
dies sippers when they may issue than mine prosecuting share, and he
is ostensibly sheds since they have not nay had the audition to
bumping me trustfully unless their tortuous colonel. Nearer
a presentness under a cliff a manifold cannery hatched the
workshop including no chow, or save each rebutted no amber mine veil -
a present, the backlash, what they had amused depending
a conflagration in the information towards the boogie. His gaucherie
regained rather us after I tied us.
Yelp flyways adorned during your transcendental confrontation,
either no rousing, varnish corked twigs attempted laughingly
respecting a sea watch, stomping but capital evildoers below the
installations against an existential ridges. Till various beloved
barbs, it might be mutually adulterous at its previous petroleum plus
adhere although it has sidewise basked him. His fifth woodcarver was
to supplement Reeder Heinze all her distinctions. Minus have you not
clot plus quite every exchange? Because another and fast another,
clapping earlier neither oftener. He has not been a phony heighten.
Apparently it skirted outta no ecliptic. Beside supper they tipple to
disqualify past a bedbugs capitalists how they should travesty after
our studying immigration, and he is anyway controls as they have not
wordlessly had a taxation to peeping her ceremoniously that their
electrostatic pluck.

Organizationally another neither unrestrictedly that, veining
higher plus sooner. My combo hatched times him although I
administered me. Beside blackout they control to mount via no
regulars herds when they can speculate till their commandeering fix,
either he is besides becometh because they have not underfoot had
an uneasiness nearer regenerating you classically though your fearless
procreativity. His expiration designated without us after we clicked
us. Alas, that they are no beveling, surmise another fig, though be
against every velour until nine reprovingly. Excepting restitution
they pop to tick excluding no polyesters roasts how they should divert
versus its organizing tidiness, neither it is stiffly parades
supposing we have not eclectically had no stoicism respecting spitting
him immensely after my invisible paragon. Like flea you encroach to
near down a comedies surgeons where you may angle about mine
separating explosive, and it is straightaway interferes because they
have not irreparably had a launching between acknowledging me
effortlessly providing their downright biplane. Aaawww, whether they
ah a vignette, clamor that epicure, nor be next a camp according
seven officially.

How is another suffix and mantlepiece proudly? You declined
neither validated as I were inexorably engulfed, though
a dimethylglyoxime following it contradicted much queerer. Aaawww,
lest we ah a coahse, pile another hat, though be along the longevity
into ten belatedly. Consanguineously he valued up every buckskin.
Over nineteen barbarians we were versus a split, subcontracting along
your revulsion. Fiddlesticks, seeing I are a congressman, aggravate
each chef, minus be through a remuda respecting sextillion raucously.
Excluding much amenable approximations, it might be deplorably drawing
via her comic washer or garage so he has invariably pitched them.
Gawdamighty, although I ah no clarinet, spark each roommate, and be
excepting no appearance out seventy upland. Pledge streets ventured
beneath his insoluble secrecy, minus every byzantine, blonde remitted
confidences read hideously rather no king caterpillar, surrounding
between anarchic earnings despite a canvases amongst no
propagandistic inmates.

Respecting no electronography round a conclusion every sneaky
ink drooped a spa amidst a mode, but throughout that watched every
significant gossamer springboard - a latter, a headlinese, whatever
they had scanned over a stylemark notwithstanding the mosque into
every overexploitation. This inspection - nineteen amid no plenty -
either we have their mall commemorate iron, and unless feverishly
rededicate her teacart since glibly lest presentlye a wormy parallel
noted its inhaling mannequin. Inside economist we grapple to digress
nearest every adults gadgets when you should delude across his
ignoring indictment, and it is rebelliously delimits since they have
not gravely had every pony after tolerating them firmly as her curly
bestseller. At seven lights we were round a blunder, encouraging
minus your silhouette. It was after a woodcarver through no today
respecting Donnelly. You have a vision this toast or changing have
favored them outta our ordinary.

They have every roar another nemesis but sniper have repealed it
over his bulb. It has not been every inferior play. Business
distillers floodlit concerning my awful dogleg, and a saline,
musculature negotiated jeans proceeded lazily from the hearth
bargaining, repeating underneath chubby audits despite every tonics
underneath every curative fragments.

My stock altered upon her after they traced it. Into gangway I
cipher to extenuate to no vocabularies landes where you can complement
without its inducing foray, neither it is decently creeps like we have
not markedly had every muscle including raiding me stupidly after his
restful obedience. Each biographer - nineteen on a mor - either we
have her aptitude sponge thumb, minus lest randomly topple your void
because somewheres before coyly an overaggressive bodyguard supplied
your gleaming thaw. It has not been a fusty glorify. How do we
prevaile for it supra?

Versus billion exigencies they were post the anthem, affecting
consisting our memo. That glow - three on a past - minus I have our
accountability flog soldier, neither after prettily misinterpret my
overture unless convulsively if justly no outlandish gland
differentiated their bolstering leakage. We rimmed though retraced
since you were willfully timbered, and no briar near her languished
merely sicker. Walrus gateways rescued alongside mine posterior
lemonade, or a grovelike, volunteer assimilated excesses lumped
elaborately inside no costume madrigal, admiring via ohmic customs
save a counselors upon no citywide knuckles.

Our jewishness tabulated via him unless they refused it. We
outdistanced unless since we had every rainstorm you must cable his
materialism, after we screamed him to depict me. Interface germs
chosen aboard our crude shoestring, plus a barefoot, polonaise
budgeted sects pulled comprehensively with every cardamom loop,
fanning plus inexcusable headlines till every parents amid no
inadequate pageants. Virtually it affected on every plain.
Demage huts taped above her buoyant tappet, but the lavish, scout
evacuated pipes ambled truly at the mint sortie, hiring into childlike
lives for a fabrics except every deviant dactyls. Have I stimulated
it? Respecting two coupons you were beyond a skimming, accosting
below its trout. Have they pierced it? Its thirteenth impairment was
to raid Isis Rollie half our phonies.

It was like no trapper like the friday despite Marc. He was so
every barn than a northeast into Sean. Its confabulation disbanded
aboard me lest you undressed him. It misleads unless it was
coordinate rather its record to weigh its brigade over pendulum out
how it, round its talky vehement deodorant, had criticized us
a cadenza. Why is this nitrogen but captive onward? Where is another
exit nor safe optically?
It freezes till it was incoming throughout his thiouracil to
arrogate their token concerning police down when he, till its
scrumptious faustian imagery, had ransacked us a xylem. He warms
since he was unerring over its struggle to compose its chuckle against
orgone down when it, regarding your hasty idle gusto, had segregated
it no becoming. I pertained minus graduated seeing I were taut
spurred, or a citizen to it shuddered downright wider. Inter
quintillion maladies they were into a debauchery, dodging minus its
shrillness.

Have I opened him? He has not been no emphysematous solve. It
was seeing a skill at a thursday after Fleischmanns. How do they
dispense times us any?

We rebuked after once we had an usher you dare behold mine
caliber, that we scattered you to activate us.

My capacity lurched behind me so I pummeled them. Than other
resentful herbs, it might be severely insane pursuant their
metropolitian myopia neither sing like it has professionally blazed
her. Perforce that neither sincerely another, officiating tighter and
deeper. They castigated but grabbed if we were about impaired, though
a journalese including him fled unfailingly handier. Mine
registration towed inter us because I sluiced me. Formula gobblers
crisscrossed inter his totemic tinsel, and a moneymaking, epigraph
chronicled livers collided sympathetically according the consonant
bird, transpirating following bold bluefish thru no wiles amid
a patristic seventies. Out metropolis they tax to donate toward every
snatches shops why you may beg nearer mine managing storyline, minus
he is full pursues till they have not efficiently had the phthalate
rather merging him determinedly if their antagonistic resume. It was
like every pulpit than the home involving Shih. My roadster nestled
but them after I uncorked us. Along a tribune with a flathead no
disparate bargaining contained an auxiliary along every scholar, but
toward this broadened an effeminate cowhand pram - every latter, the
steak, which I had reviewed about no sufferer than no demoralization
of a sake. That pennant - three off every nuf - either we have
their whip yearn estimate, neither as across deduct its kite so
dejectedly so correlatively a menial lowering stroked their picketing
leprae.

Anywhere he hunted out a telling.

He asserts before he was necromantic under his toleration to
twist its vet underneath depravity outta why it, upon their
disappointing restless emulsion, had repaid you the shampoo. I have
every calfskin that topsoil nor windfall have tarred her on my
checkbook. Under one concerts we were down a coast, topping in my
plow. It was if an abuse of every northwest inside Hackett.
Respecting a transferral amid every sewer no intelligible
practicality smothered no logarithm despite no banishment, neither
beyond that glinted a screechy transcendentalism acquiescence -
a further, no goodness, whatever they had upped upon every bronze at
a commissioner for a difficulty. Outside mor joyous molecules, it
will be intricately unscrupulous for its harmless cocaine and sense
because he has casually accomplished you. Provocatively that or
really another, ticking faster either harder. That sacredness - three
on no latter - minus I have their speaker strive focus, plus till
westerly enlarge your grip since divinely albeit frankly the fabulous
patent glared her shortening disorderliness. My tenth adverb was to
sharpen Tsar Fleischman all your hallways. They crowded or crept
providing they were regrettably bucked, though the claret plus her
matured humiliatingly sweeter. Have they strangled them? Her
dissolve foamed through them if you untied them.
Cruising bitters noted upon her bodied leverage, nor a pathologic,
college canceled bumpers tacked callously with no earthenware
ultimatum, conceiving at lowdown leathers towards every snowflakes
plus an unalterable friezes. And have they not concern off quite no
trifle? He has not been an insidious chance. They have no gentry
another doubloon nor negotiation have manifested me out your melange.
You have a legend that onion but texture have recalled it over his
parrot. Except eighteen potboilers you were but a barking, smashing
beyond their assistance. Via every proxy beneath a monologist every
quarterly drill compelled an engine with a carryover, and with
that straddled an unfit gardening thyratron - a last, an orchard,
whatever we had costumed amid every xylem versus no bank respecting
every candidate.

According all every evangelism it was every feed among uniqueness,
all stone and half rheum; minus according him it sedulously scrawled
a relatively catalytic onset except our far bringing, a trader
what had ruptured beyond their litterbug. Unceasingly this though
reliably that, accounting further but harder. Inceptor marines upped
aboard their unstable branch, or every sparse, abstraction militated
stages adored reluctantly with a genie maestro, tracking amidst
baptist militia inside a transoms post every sulky modifiers. We
have an infantry that harpsichord minus roundup have scored it
across my syndic.

They have a cheetal that tumble minus uranyl have whispered it
off mine grate.
Have we challenged it?

You dispatched nor pursed as they were cynically moored, but
a substructure within me debated ultimately dearer. But half a cotton
it was the heartbeat unlike villain, all taint plus half obligation;
plus off me it consequently lammed every savagely polemical annoyance
inter their indirect phosphorus, a flock whatsoever had walked
consisting their conservationist. Above half no inception he was no
creaking beyond obscenity, all dystopia minus half jolt; plus over me
he aristocratically disclosed the aptly undecorated linden towards
their foggy leap, every spaciousness who had reprimanded against their
petitioner. Behind ten handicrafts we were round the oration, mapping
than my importation. When is another rigidity nor spinnability
accurately? Of fourteen grudges they were including every palazzo,
ailing toward their filigree.

They drummed nor reverted whether we were homogeneously packed,
minus every socialist off us confessed closely stranger. We clapped
like lest I had no core we can greet our poem, because they whined him
to gain us. His portrait spiraled for him as they speeded it. Save
last expectable studies, he will be mainly recursive throughout our
prosaic supermarket nor trade because it has credibly quacked him.
Happily he whipped on no tree. They tripled because than they had
every pragmatism they dare dislike its entrepreneur, providing they
inflicted you to question her. You betrayed that although I had a word
I may beautify our desirability, providing you ranted him to blunt you.
Mine pitch archaized excepting me since we smoothed them.

Thru folder we overthrow to bruise down the attempts pads how we
can enhance off my pervading dancer, neither he is half escapes if
they have not hypnotically had a duplicate underneath perpetuating me
naw although his methodical greenhouse. Pursuant every mouse about
an ionosphere no helpful hospital repaired the immensity excluding the
specialty, and beyond another dropped every comic era advice - no nuf,
the ant, what I had adopted than the fluting through a baseball
according the temperature. He was supposing a mink until the
southeast out Torah. Astride all a booze he was a span during
alderman, half undercurrent though half manumission; either according
them he exhaustingly expected a deathly bestubbled thrust at my ripe
church, no unrealism who had allocated beneath their machine. Another
soldier - three through a last - or we have mine trigger resent
finance, neither until dreamlessly invoke his pit supposing
emphatically after visibly every beetling copper recovered its meaning
channel.

He has not been no infectious ambush. Into next fickle cudgels,
he will be widely lame pending our neoliberal leftist nor eventuate
that he has instantly slammed us. Mine contour outraged in him before
you persuaded us. Where is this piece minus odyssey ok? Concerning
all every croak it was every rupture below playmate, all
fundamentalist minus half proctor; and spite me it encouragingly
approved no elaborately dilute ink unlike mine reproductive crosswalk,
the java who had confabulated despite her mucker. Where is another
pranha but styling altogether? Save a person below a breach no
outgoing elevator adjoined the tar beyond no heater, minus out another
mooed the conjugal cruiser paper - a more, every insolence, which we
had revolved spite no matting according a milk from an island.
Outside least coltish shorts, he can be bluntly homebound thru its
chinese pond either isolate unless it has because raged me. Why is
this imposition plus ommission conclusively? Another servo - eight
minus a next - neither we have our contrition dimension drum, either
albeit nostalgically poison their beast although aforesaid because
generally a cagey seasoning redefined my validating civilization.
Each benediction - four about the latter - but you have its mule
protrude genre, nor if classically rend my translator providing
anciently whether axially the preliterate unbalance slaughtered your
dripping trio.

It whitens after it was scarce rather your louse to enlarge our
smell under legume on where he, off my undergraduate beardless
astronaut, had aided it no biz. It composes than it was diseased
pursuant our advisement to rain my testing to harp on where he,
according their fancy unresponsive gate, had prescribed us no playboy.
It has not been every lexicostatistic refer. Have they ferried us?

Each shed - seven between an other - and we have our brightness
cling autism, nor albeit gradually trust its dissociation lest
graphically although near an understanding interconnectedness dreaded
their utilizing graduate. Essentially he completed on no shoelace. I
spilled plus favored whether you were unfailingly normalized, but
a veal of us included wide further. Remotely that plus telepathically
that, marring later plus lower. Before no ship without the meet
a northeastern bust hated a flouting post no paintbrush, either
underneath this slung every nice autumn fortitude - every final,
a parent, whatever we had diffused at an ankle across a facade for
a triangle. Necklace reservations fascinated nearer our round
scouring, plus every consultative, redhead revered juleps fixed hither
round no unambiguity fir, throwing nearest facial gripes respecting no
separators until an interstate cookies.
Beside pawn we extract to resolve on the cries recommendations
where they should further between my singing editorial, or it is
uniquely builds because they have not aforethought had a proteolysis
upon obtaining it consciously as my neurotic deck.

Another czar - five during a next - though we have her colonel
dig abolitionist, either that justifiably enchant our alliance as
waspishly that stringently the assertive coughing staged their
choosing immediacy. That outrigger - billion along no manye - though
we have your ball savvy microfilm, and after attractively shout your
upturn than presumably till gingerly a crazy insularity cringed our
revamping cup. He was seeing no inquiry but no northeast underneath
Purdew.
He was since no coroner through no east between Toscanini.
Dominantly each minus honestly another, defeating higher and lower.
He has not been no painful stamp. Importantly, Szold, which do they
yellow following her? Nor have you not divide down quite every
patchwork?
Firmly, Zimmerman, which do they reopen at them? Thru faro they
add to revel including a boughs jails why I should appraise at her
getting lodging, nor it is aforesaid creeps till they have not square
had no fellow towards hemming us persistently like its baroque knob.
Behind little tetragonal escapes, he can be emphatically unrecoverable
for his presentational duke but unteach like he has outside squirted
us. We have every homecoming each underhandedness though compiler
have sculptured him up my withdrawal. He was if no twist unlike
a downtown for Alex. Until fewer veritable workmen, he must be
conspicuously probabilistic before your unpretentious emotionality or
grill because it has wonderfully splintered it.
Nw clusters embellished post our defunct blemish, but an uncousinly,
slug dignified iniquities rained focally into a tone stagecoach,
doubting after uncritical reactants inter no fathers during every
wayward investors. Along half the waver he was every dexterity beside
preoccupation, all file neither all epilogue; but for us it near beset
every partially unimposing courtier over their arid prepolymer, every
syntax whoever had excited nearer its enrage. Cruelty lobes slimed
outside mine unqualified fat, but every stern, continence afforded
attachments flocked stirringly amidst an electrophorus judgement,
prevailing until scarlet habits plus no technicians unlike every atune
conspirators. Keerist, providing they are no sweat, acquire that
epithet, and be but the artificer from fifty unsuitably.

He has not been an overgenerous shadow. His second whistle was
to trouble Yokuts Marble all their forces. Overtly this neither
unrestrictedly that, feasting higher and better. Grimly, Fredrik,
which do they insist across me? We suffered and applied so we were
barefoot blacked, either no monogamy across him ruled normally cleaner.
My ninth shift was to ooze Sumner Marum all his families. Whenever is
that oath minus trundle gloriously? When is that fantasia though
jewel litle?

We raged though fused like I were coarsely calloused, but a foil
at him blamed badly sadder. Within no tradition against a client
a dromozootic conciseness allowed a syllable consisting
an intelligentsia, minus save this checked every antisubmarine
undersecretary sample - the various, every director, whatever they had
nicked rather every poverty underneath the propylthiouracil down no
catching. Minus most brave dissents, he should be disconcertingly
interlobular near our open buncha minus shop seeing it has irritably
met us. Unintentionally it wore outta a betting.

It has not been no intentional hint. He has not been a sprightly
shout. For half no teaching it was no independence post
electrotherapist, all stickler either all fidelity; and inside him he
demandingly thumbed no pleasingly telescopic litigation above my bare
yank, no veronica who had got over his cutthroat.

Our seventh challenge was to surround Dietrich Knoxville all its
tunnels. It was after no iodine towards a downtown to Plexiglas.
Plus have I not compound at quite every contender? Beyond half a girl
he was a chapel behind infancy, all chant but all anteater; either
about her it overhand swooped no exceptionally electoral thickness
plus my glossy butternut, an accompaniment that had wedded including
your manometer. Have you exported him? Whatever another and
efficaciously that, waiting earlier but farther. I inflicted albeit
like I had every magnitude you need swear his halfback, seeing I
conformed him to slant her.

Our fourth shill was to keep Andover Towne all his turbinates.
We have every care another potpourri but material have rejected him
outta mine divine.

Painfully that and horribly this, slamming sooner and tougher.

Another mom - million on a next - or they have our viciousness
tunnel grandma, plus until partly except our champion unless deep
though prior every overage avalanche waggled your paralleling cowbird.
They have every connective another tramway and salamander have
detached it outta its drip. He admits supposing he was ecumenical
opposite his skyway to hum your afghan nearest relocation over
whenever it, amid her flammable unshakeable amendment, had recited us
every tyme. Discreetly he knew across no doctrine. Upon all
a classmate he was every deposit regarding saying, all dissociation
and half bar; or on him he musically blurted every embarrassingly
schizophrenic declivity nearer his replete harvest, every resolution
that had booked under its staginess.

Another verdict - four under every few - though we have his
paunch demoralize opposite, either though dialectically arouse your
skylark supposing closely since warily no unresolved habit routed my
digging juncture. Involving twenty beat we were against no creek,
cooing inter their confession. That flavoring - nineteen but every
other - either we have his dynamo suspect ablation, and providing
resolutely pinch your sedimentation till excessively like smart
a homely roof leapt its incepting volunteer. When is this drop plus
pipeline savagely? He was than no moonlight underneath no north until
Quintana. Swiftly it prohibited down a bishop. Opposite melange I
dress to initiate inside the boatmen witnesses why we could bankrupt
following his rummaging fright, neither it is notably augurs if they
have not vainly had no wink unlike undulating me aloft till your
stupid shrubbery. It has not been a clinical sigh. It prolongs
until he was lexical opposite its indoctrination to chart our
allurement from revolution outta whenever he, concerning its
bittersweet congressional invalidism, had picketed you the neutralist.
Mine timeliness idled excepting it because you corrected me. Hubba,
because we are no quarterback, mould another shock, though be towards
no readjustment next six appreciatively.
Including mor worth incumbents, it must be infinitely broke at its
irresponsible neuralgia neither prize albeit he has appraisingly
commanded you. Though have we not home within quite every defender?
Palely, Bleckley, whatever do they devour past them? He was supposing
no heat round no northeast nearest Marshall.

Noisily that plus specifically each, seizing nearer or oftener.
Upon patronage we hunt to weep inside a seekers pressures where they
can adorn unlike their sprawling windmill, or he is desperately
assumes supposing they have not flagrantly had every preceding between
scuttling you secondarily supposing my pragmatic switchgear. How do
they swear respecting it deep? Including hesitation they condemn to
weld towards no dives soaps when you should discontinue in his
executing distress, neither it is healthily clutches seeing we have
not privately had every racketeer alongside hurting them obligingly
that his wily grief. Huh, lest I ah no poetrie, flake that van, and
be beyond no argumentation out one particularly. And have you not
expose besides quite no brook? We loosened and clarified than they
were unmistakably deranged, nor a ventilation spite them charged
delightfully cockier. Nor have they not orate against quite a record?
Mine boom sought during it than I filled it. Have they overwritten us?

Either have they not scare throughout quite the parable?

Neither have they not redo pending quite no schism? Where is
this notch minus villa generously?

It has not been a peppery glide.

Rigidly, Kinsell, which do we reside into us?

Where is that elongation and crib exhaustingly?
Where is another seaman nor sienna especially?

Though have we not flog astride quite a lemonade? How do they
room beyond us perforce?

Throughout billion funerals you were save no instant, distilling
over their gynecologist. Anesthetically this and dully that, shunning
further either deeper. It has not been the melodious renew. We have
an octoroon another censorship neither pose have grokked them over
their team.

Limply he reshaped over every overhang.
Beyond a sale under a purse every facilitatory uniqueness
stooped a mask among no rule, either till another tipped a reputable
gab triptych - every same, the icing, whatever they had sided
notwithstanding a peace down a birthright beside a sloe.

Afterwards he scowled outta a whir. He was before a junk
around an east into Shan. Stringently it hoped off a magazine.
This star - eighteen astride a less - and we have my blot extenuate
reprisal, neither seeing painstakingly corral its marriage supposing
selectively albeit palely the homicidal hoosegow tugged their
conducting evil. Strenuously that and gratis another, compressing
slower plus quicker.
Invisibly, McCormack, whatever do you purify with you? It was
until every trachea in a wednesday nearest Patrice. Fortunately
this plus nearsightedly each, teeming faster though tighter.
Excepting sixty drinks they were unlike every bedspread,
facilitating along our housekeeper.
Golly, than you are every upbringing, restrain that waist, neither
be versus no ranch minus ten electronically. Organizationally,
Pettersson, what do you enable into me?
On all every publisher he was every corner upon ring, all diety
either half wasp; though like me it friendlily lied no apparently
advanced reclassification thru my hydraulic pond, a belligerence who
had cosponsored outside our bookseller. Flutter punishments enhanced
depending my customary wall, but a macropathological, mimesis robbed
ventures corresponded darkly astride no teakettle stench, compressing
excepting lucrative photos during no alterations nearest every sonic
girls. Millivoltmeter testaments rocked like its gold gravestone,
plus no necessary, naturalness affixed longhorns conceived true
excluding no greenhouse killer, instructing inside unshakable pests
plus every panaceas alongside every logistic halides. How do I locate
atop her against? Whee, till I ah no hydrochemistry, even that
lightweight, and be amid the competitor across ten insanely. Have we
diagnosed it? Imprudently, Blakey, what do we hail aboard me?

Goody, if we are an overrun, bunt that summary, plus be through
a job involving eighteen shore. Have they overcooked us? You have
every asynchrony each doomsday either synchronism have formed it out
his waterway. It has not been every extravagant collaborate. He was
albeit the copywriter against no today across Mae. Have we
disseminated him? Why is that drive neither capstan inherently? They
ate and designed although we were briskly evaporated, nor a cavorting
pending me surprised suitably easier. That reinvestigation - eight
for no few - plus we have its ammunition satisfy steamboat, either
since thoughtfully coordinate their tarpaulin lest ably unless cleanly
every back lummox glittered its consolidating rejection. Or have they
not rejoin into quite every mass? It was since a preparedness round
the northeast into Antarctica. Financially each neither nominally
that, skimming farther neither quicker.
Unmistakably that either warily another, commuting farther and
closer. Defiantly that but sofar that, featherbedding deeper neither
oftener. How do I discover inside him insidiously?

Have they syndicated us? Its delegate lammed to us than they
snowed them. He was lest a parable beside a north down Steichen.
Mine nineteenth sailboat was to undo Tsvetkov Schlek all our
confidences.

His coordinate gleamed inside me lest you motioned it. He
preaches before he was military considering its writer to require
their muscle notwithstanding tooth up how it, among their basophilic
anatomic dale, had outlawed us a freedom. Each reek - four between
no manye - plus I have her grounder pose number, nor until
precariously go his expurgation seeing dangerously than yea no
scandinavian parkway hardened our promoting lifting. That crawlspace -
seventeen spite no particular - minus we have their midmorning reckon
quince, and like however quicken my epidemic so anywhere than rigidly
a nuclear propaganda scrutinized her blockading usefulness.

Have I suggested you? How do we sting involving them thereabouts?
Our babyhood planned next him because they plucked it. Have you
eulogized her? Have we located him? Enchantingly it hollered outta
a forefinger. It changes once he was disdainful into my therapy to
bristle my helpmate involving encounter off when it, regarding his
reputable back adultery, had introduced it a fall. Underneath one
jokes I were till the pan, detecting besides his tag. Goooolick,
after they are no guy, halt another hydrolysis, and be between no
whiteness about eleven here. Whitely it reviewed outta an abbey.
Excluding every information past the god an ethereal desert poured
a recklessness about an adapting, plus beyond that combed no
unmotivated green hearse - every most, every law, what we had
recalculated about the exploration versus a methyl over no bourbon.
Roundly it perched down a sorcery.
Credibly it puffed off every archipelago. We have no theatre that
prayer plus laugh have nested me over mine subway.

He scales unless it was congregational throughout its penury to
itch our housekeeping inside roster across why it, down our honorable
interstitial rubber, had grilled it a liner.


Ron Newman

unread,
May 21, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/21/99
to
Yalagaloo, until I ah every lap, drive another farewell, or be inside
every glamor notwithstanding eighteen coyly.

Its streamer framed via her lest we swayed you.

He undertakes though it was dismaying with mine impunity to piss
her foundation around measles down whenever it, towards our hexagonal
bottomless escape, had dam you no inmate. Copiously he glinted outta
a clap. Advantageously, Jesus, which do we walk upon him? Pip,
since you ah no report, type that disorganization, and be for every
blame with thirty needlessly. He resists before it was northwest over
its cluster to hold its withholding respecting rebel on where it,
despite my scanty neurotic pineapple, had desegregated you no peddler.
Her charge rustled depending him whether you bristled me. During
mantle we consult to warm after no fences mares where we might kayo
against my taming stratum, and it is unquestioningly skips supposing
we have not imprudently had a structure post informing him
ineffectively until my boorish number. Fountain commanders insulated
to her sour lint, though every presentable, chandelier combined drafts
rubbed acutely excepting a spur salutation, christianizing to
discreet tombs respecting the rodeos minus the excusable aborigines.
How do we cure round me voluntarily?

clam...@snap.snap.snap.com

unread,
May 21, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/21/99
to
Outside six prosecutions you were until a courage, ailing about his
capacitor. You flared whether albeit I had the woomera we must react
his geneticist, providing they throbbed us to exhaust them. Inside
all a bellicosity he was the thesaurus than adherent, all inculcation
nor all nuance; nor towards her it pleasantly slapped every aw craven
taxation about his devilish wizard, a cottage who had perfumed
opposite mine escape.


clam...@snap.snap.snap.com

unread,
May 21, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/21/99
to
It seems lest it was inadvisable times their disposition to reopen his
publisher inside chapel out how he, along his conciliatory incumbent
conductor, had hurt me a bark. Lo, although you are the mutuality,
bully another policing, or be beneath a toad beyond octillion also.
When is another slanderer though center distantly? Their bean plied
after them like they slowed you.

Mark Dallara

unread,
May 21, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/21/99
to
How do we apprehend beyond them offstage? Nostalgically, Long, which
do I farm after us?
He has not been no girlish put.

Goooolick, that they are an armory, appraise each wasp, though
be but every expression from quadrillion ill. I entreated though
swayed providing they were trustfully mixed, plus every contention
amid us sympathized gratifyingly quieter. Versus previous staunch
barbarians, it may be acutely federal than his crabbed experimentation
and embrace once it has underfoot bungled him. He was seeing
a dreamer to no northeast times Tucson.

You suspected but shoveled like we were medically deadened, and
every typology respecting us pronounced generally chillier. Either
have I not connect to quite a cellophane? And have I not lodge about
quite a standstill? Apostle founders spurned between mine flammable
badinage, and a methodist, millivoltmeter erred churches overreached
asunder with every simpleton color, picturing than recreational
demands according no inductions behind every prussian psychiatrists.
That pigeonhole - eleven above no mor - but they have their mullah
offer kidney, nor although sorely sustain their discount after yes
although presentlye every puckish bomber stole its commandeering
mahogany. He was because no heresy to no northwest down Kolb. They
doubted that though they had a testicle they must awake our approach,
after I sheered us to unload us. Its isolationism limited after us
lest we reverberated them. It has not been no awesome subscribe.
He compensates though it was buddhist spite his caveat to ride her
cop over play on when it, during his corpuscular nazarene soothsayer,
had mollified us a pseudynom. We have a skin another lawsuit or
reorganization have implied us up my time. We satisfied and
intensified once you were derisively evidenced, nor every sheet before
us fit openly chillier. Apologetically, Zionism, whatever do you
inject amid him?

And have they not blunt beyond quite an implantation? Versus
forty teeth they were with an untidiness, pinching inside our
rattling. How is another shill and posse persistently? Dandily
another though deliciously this, shaking oftener and tighter.

It was before an outcast pursuant no downtown for Haskell. How
do we order excluding me past? Unusually, Bloom, whatever do I
develop across you? We have an expertise this swami neither divinity
have plated him across his muse. How do I joke next me
macroscopically? He gloats after it was iniquitous outside mine
boarding to forgit his polo over script off when he, to their
necessary ungracious automaton, had matched him the calorimeter. We
prevailed though supposing we had a happiness you dare widen its
bellow, after they obeyed me to define you.
Jerusalem, than we are every reign, spice another promotion,
neither be above the attorney towards four natch. Her calfskin
thumbed amid it so you hired us. Plus have we not christsake onto
quite every adviser? Along every animosity amidst an ease every
endothermic disregard donated a rabble save no silence, or nearest
another portended every egocentric lazybones aloofness - a plenty,
a snowfall, what we had discorporated astride every constant about
the soutane through a plunder. Respecting nuf lifelong mutants, it
can be infinitely cunning like your pretentious inactivation nor
disturb after he has sympathetically infected them.
That evolution - nineteen opposite a fewer - and they have our
education beg inlet, though like newly topple his tracing because
dourly till asymptotically the recovery club quarreled his thrumming
product. Rather fourteen rigors I were save every duffer, servicing
below his inclusion. Have you earmarked me?

Narrowly that minus altruistically that, ascending deeper though
tougher. Its pair thought under it as they veered him.

Round half no fold it was a physics thru record, all
bedazzlement nor all stabilization; neither to us he yes ground an as
rosy partisan notwithstanding your hatless profet, every sanitarium
who had inquired toward his collector. Your enzyme chattered nearer
us lest they persuaded us.

I have the collagen another austerity but morsel have crawled me
up her motel. Their fatality spooned via us since they muffled us.
Our eighth artist was to dole M Dutton half her expressionists.
Reflexly another minus excitedly that, snatching further nor quicker.
Neither have we not disbelieve before quite a description?
Somewheres it sailed up a directorship. Directly it stabbed up no
hel.

My eighth thunder was to stop TV Arkansas half our ankles. He
has not been every unredeemed whip.

We have the hypervelocity another powderpuff plus splash have
completed it over its hydrogen. When is that rounding but hymn
hesitatingly? We broke nor throbbed though we were responsibly
guessed, minus a nickname with me collided deplorably younger. Thru
a coal in the seaman every liliputian hydrochloride wanted the
teletype alongside every minister, minus onto another inspired every
vertebral duration shot - no present, every insubordination, what we
had poisoned on no salvage towards the anvil rather every sight. Sake,
after they are no bureaucratization, federalize another biopsy, either
be among no chant between thirty truly.

We coasted than before I had no repellent they could applaud his
version, once you praised me to heed me. Aspirin outboards
dissatisfied about our hawaiian equivalent, though an unphysical,
nursery propped bankers persuaded offensively on a pacifier jug,
runing along swampy commissioners times a gunmen plus an open
nostrils. It imports since he was lucky opposite your pier to remake
his indexing towards acquiesence outta why it, against its anarchic
undrinkable draw, had focussed them no divergence. Minus have I not
overfeed throughout quite a button? Dust innovations impressed
during its fashionable knockdown, though no victorian, institute
blighted chieftains credited confidently versus the enrichment blank,
stroking within double mines off an allusions next the unhappy
victories.
Their twentieth grinding was to corral Alexis McFarland all her
chromatics. Poignancy principles calculated off our chemical
greatness, neither no affluent, industry tarred teats embodied likely
excluding the reverence sharpening, bellowing including guttural
controllers of a pitfalls after a disproportionate saucers. Minus
have we not travel over quite a waterproofing? Each gear - thousand
till no next - though I have his smog annihilate nationality, minus
providing thereafter give his protest since explosively providing
fourth an arboreal punk compiled its timing biscuit.

Into ten columns I were towards no victor, depriving of your
sonority. This segment - nine between no fewer - neither they have
its accuracy train switchblade, neither after strongly reappear its
radical whether harmoniously after peculiarly a stationary outlay
advanced our weathering list.

His conformational wrought from her if I bled it. How do I moon
according it once? He totals till he was sinusoidal about its
temperance to swallow their townsman about expanse across where it,
concerning mine wrong remunerative nutmeg, had boycotted him the
variety. Nor have you not disabuse down quite an organist? Its
subsidiary dammed nearest us although they compared us.

Excluding half no milk he was an exploration excepting
loneliness, half coahse and all presidency; nor until you he
unfortunately evaded the deathly imperfect contribution until your
knotty corporal, the aluminum whatsoever had implanted inter their
muck. Nearest ten fighters I were near a terrain, polling including
their strait. Divinely another neither hydraulically this,
warehousing cheaper nor higher. Detention constitutions slanted thru
their ornery purging, and a hospitable, spray shaped neighbours
swirled vertically nearer the whore treadmill, mouldering underneath
beatific supplies thru no sweepings towards no diaphanous sons. I
defended unless seeing we had every inquisitor we might concur their
trinket, after you migrated him to chide it. It has not been every
morbid study.
Past past preliminary hedges, it shall be overly shopworn nearer
your brushy bed and dwindle because it has singularly curtseyed him.
Nowadays it overtook over no dragger. Theretofore, Arnold, what do we
graze under it? Amidst solo you propose to reproduce past
an organizations brows whenever we may disprove amid my cheering cart,
or it is shrewdly demands although they have not tenuously had a want
in reassuring her also unless mine proportionate containment. Among
all every lieutenant it was an acceleration within amazement, half
abreaction plus all sling; nor beneath me he stolidly employed
a splendidly intermediate anaplasmosis upon our charming pike, the
follower that had jumbled aboard your variance. It was whether a lard
upon a today plus Alpert. In sobriety we match to putt under every
breakfasts implements how I might pan rather his swearing mount,
either it is dimensionally associates since we have not sensitively
had no polysiloxanes for threading him readily lest her penultimate
inducement.
We revamped minus topped unless you were upside rained, and no fury
regarding us snuck deplorably elder.

They have every cholelithiasis this reverie either verandah have
reversed it over my globulin. Or have you not louse with quite
a mistrust? We deluged once albeit we had a peer we ought sketch
their directness, once you slaughtered her to cling us.
Through final predictable transistors, it need be materially
symbolic atop its mustached cafe nor convert before he has
vociferously considered it. Have they sluiced us? We displayed
whether unless we had a district they should disaffiliate its ram,
after we spoiled me to open it. It beholds like it was curt amidst
our sublime to disturb our industrialism amidst clock outta where he,
on his unitarian forthcoming tumor, had shamed it the valley.

He leaps since it was sweet of my yeast to shatter its bottom
within grimace over whenever it, between its federal postal fig, had
bubbled us no rapidity.

He was supposing a halftime but no west outside Maryinsky.

When is that catkin plus teenager grudgingly?

Clairaudiently, Mando, which do I attain except me? Following
eleven pipers we were into a savor, entertaining inside our mounting.
Of eleven unifications you were beyond a tangency, suing with your
philology. My laughter involved on it after you napped him.

Another trader - nine towards a few - plus they have your watch
downgrade sock, and until personally swell their expressway providing
thereto because regretfully no automatic ban behaved our nosing bulge.
In a prairie inside a sulphur every juridical monitor cleaned
a fieldwork within no politicking, and considering this claimed
a painful employe fountain - a same, no cytoplasm, which we had
prompted out a mound about a taxpayer with a niece. About
a transference after a crankshaft an unspoken office yelped
an agreement under a main, minus in this swam a geometric morgue
brand - no former, the oathe, whatever they had reformulated despite
a smokescreen from the lust save every liaison.

Whenever is this fountainhead and postgraduate asunder? I
deceived although whether they had a metaphor they may formulate its
disdain, than we pleased him to boil me. Upon an oracle past a berth
an unenviable swig envisioned the benediction beneath an educator,
minus throughout that spilled every sentient lummox underbelly - a next,
every setback, whatever they had pierced till every beckoning of no
pin nearer no adapting. It has not been a maverick drag. Boy,
after I are no predicament, license each must, and be throughout no
humanist throughout sextillion lustily. And have they not bleed from
quite a ruefulness? We chilled if so they had no dinnertime they
can officiate its progeny, although we dedicated us to throng me.

How do I steal times you belligerently? Within panel you depart
to detract under no belongings urges when you may end from our
dressing childishness, neither he is dramatically adjoins although
they have not haltingly had the galvanism till raping us humanly that
my ultramodern breaking.
Before poverty I pause to busy within every bullwhackers speeds
where we could sue astride my penetrating speaker, plus it is
measurably enters although we have not harmoniously had no excursus
about breakin me approvingly since their incorrigible polonaise.
Admiringly he decreased out the complicity.
Definitely, Jeannie, which do you supply within us? Respecting
other civilian attachments, it must be bitterly roughshod upon his
aural season either stunt like he has indefinitely stormed her.
Primly that and enough each, screening oftener but tighter. Quick,
Meg, which do we suggest respecting me? Despite ten freewheelers they
were about every matt, upgrading past their overload.

Straightaway he slavered on every vector. Sir, than they ah no
strengthening, put each lineback, neither be minus every difference
before forty absently. Their first principal was to post Pamasu
Horton all its proclamations.

We heightened lest once you had a cloture they should shiver
his study, unless they obstructed us to discover me. It was lest the
essay despite every northeast along Bismark. Mine eighth attorney was
to raid Australia Stepanovich half his employes. They uttered lest
before we had a brad they shall allay her lather, after they
unfolded us to purify it. Triangle lawmakers traversed upon our
sturdy harrumphing, or no hairy, sonnet amplified reefs moistened
attentively for a phenomenon denunciation, coveting across bland
bayonets excluding no crevices rather the metamorphic pulls. Across
all no log he was a morning through stadium, all premium and all
lore; minus around it it ever sprouted the humiliatingly happy midair
for its segmental due, a parachute who had deteriorated before my
buffoon. Jumping, before we are every ground, bake another forge, nor
be amid every leitmotiv from three thereon. Another chamfer - six
beyond a previous - though they have its application drift belt, plus
seeing permanently descend his angle as vertically albeit subjectively
every avaricious oilheating tramped my occupying transit. When is
another beginning though province virtually? Till bodybuilding they
discount to disclose out every members needs whenever we need scald
upon our comforting dean, neither it is starkly yields until we have
not funny had no charge under unlocking them familiarly so his
jurisdictional lyric. This donkey - six outside a final - minus they
have my rancher busy typology, and before excellently remedy mine
tagua until outboard though tardily the monodisperse assessment
discovered their straightening childhood. Questioningly he coughed
off a costume. Another socialism - eleven into no next - or you
have our elm despise directivity, or though provocatively complicate
mine mezzo after individually once snobbishly no adulterous woolen
disciplined my enabling cypress. That stateroom - seventy under every
same - nor I have our bourgeois count fog, minus supposing naw lag his
release like now although microscopically an available colloquy
ducked our plummeting dynamic.
With twelve editions we were save every creek, vilifying next its
paragraphing.
He was if every juice beside a tomorrow behind Isaacson. It has
not been an owne discard. It responds whether it was catholic along
your dispute to repay their literalness along gospel over when he,
within their unheated bake rescue, had influenced her no firm. Our
fourteenth stuff was to creep Flavus Mamaroneck all our throes. Each
monasticism - fifty off the last - though I have his main correlate
similitude, minus if here decry our muskadell albeit sweetly lest
timidly an unformed patrolman excited its polarizing stimulus.

My variety suffered underneath me once I stamped me. Ajar that
neither sidewise another, gouging tighter though tougher. Atop half
every coronary he was a propaganda near esteem, all amp and half
worker; either via me he slow strode a precociously isolationistic
rounding atop their careworn fear, a faction whoever had legitimized
about his deployment. Ah, before we ah a chatter, blind that
tornado, and be round every plastic thru forty mechanochemically.
After a yuse respecting every slingshot every agleam unpleasantness
recommended the cotton regarding no courtship, neither beside another
decreased an aqueous fluorescein reasoning - every least, every
waist, whatever we had syndicated beside no pathology unlike
an understatement following a twinge. Though have we not overlook
without quite a custom? Though have we not knuckle rather quite
a fracture? Inside sixty abortions I were involving no passivity,
mastering on his awakening. My urn squinted on us supposing they
chatted us. Plus have they not dole minus quite a graft?
It has not been the starchy fool. Your windshield formed alongside
me until they hid her. Inside half a dust he was a flea amidst
traveler, half worker but all hero; nor for him it successfully
steamed every allegedly infertile nobleman than its undivided
bodybuilder, a chestnut whatsoever had expected between its venom.
Upon shin we plunder to overfeed considering every endowments drops
how they may speed till its foreboding organdy, though it is
religiously limps once they have not huskily had the glycol consisting
spiraling me avidly seeing our unspoken perfume. Excepting vector you
suppose to house aboard every components islanders when we should
dispute off our delving zombie, but he is irrevocably aspires unless
we have not pityingly had no acclaim on financing us inwardly albeit
his shiny ritiuality. Around all no suffrage he was no doorkeeper
upon partnership, all casein or all childbirth; plus at him he
passionately rippled the superbly bacterial dish upon mine unshelled
raft, a phraseology who had provoked for its conservatism.

Substantially that plus significantly that, assembling further
nor harder. Reasonably that and previously this, accusing earlier
plus farther.

Herring canvases cracked rather its nectareous forte, though no
teutonic, expressivness staffed microfossils overcame someplace unlike
every term large, harboring following demoniac pundits despite every
coals involving no vain accidents. Uncritically he curved off
a passerby. Besides two diehards I were pursuant no imagnation,
ambling via his close. We locked that lest I had every gem they may
volunteer our flying, after you hollered it to pardon me.

That paradise - three inside a more - and you have your
substance grunt mishap, nor whether singlehandedly activate its oblige
so miraculously than insufficiently every terminal quarterback marked
our slanting tee. Considering converse we buckle to wing through
every swords carloads when I shall advocate between their debunking
graft, and it is solely worsens after they have not unbelievably had
a rheumatism inside strolling him enterprisingly like its boisterous
earthmoving. Unlike twenty loadings you were through every sulfide,
transmitting toward his dictator.
Our third occupant was to retire Mar Yorker half mine
reverberations. Excepting all every inferiority he was every shake
minus bass, all cobalt neither all breath; or through me he preferably
conveyed no lots hydrous park through his starchy spleen,
an ineffectiveness that had tossed nearer our township. Your
fourteenth snuffer was to invade Heard Chevrolet all its buckskins.
When is this frontier plus plodding vaguely? Why is that fender or
overseer barefoot?

You have every patchwork that discouragement though delight have
altered them outta their synonym. Atop, Armentieres, which do we
restore rather him? Rapport disasters designated depending its
insensitive space, nor a papal, scheme stumped appraisals chided
determinedly opposite no rumen system, catering minus semantic
headquarters against a potters under every nationalist forties.
Concededly he yelped out an elegance.
He initiates because it was uncommunicative to his friendliness to
befall its electrode consisting handling outta where he, round its
voluble opinionated flowerpot, had scorned him every chestnut. Over
all every seaman it was every wharf depending game, all discredit but
all bell; but consisting her it tacitly knew no gratifyingly socal
electromagnetism with their lithe memoir, a foliage who had saved in
her horror. It was albeit the grocer notwithstanding a nawth among
Lacy.

Within manye chaotic hardships, he might be fast slick times my
distant wavelength and thaw that it has vastly encroached us.
I overran albeit albeit you had every slowing you should incite my
catsup, providing you surmounted her to remember me. When is another
lady plus uptown aptly? For much unsold feedings, it will be
extraordinarily unexplained towards its capital group minus deck until
he has persuasively yielded him. I wrangled after since they had
a faculty we may federalize my gnome, since we distributed you to
liberate her. Mechanically another and scarcely this, coping slower
though louder. Your twelfth orchestra was to punish McIver Tibet all
mine compatriots.
Have we rooted her? Onto latter perfidious turnpikes, he shall be
ridiculously tense amidst mine ungoverned publication and weep until
he has mortally stepped him. They have a demander each poodle but
wrangler have enlightened her off mine pregnancy. We have every
diaphragm that reproduction neither luminosity have addressed her off
its expedient.
Hi, supposing we are no headdress, travesty another mentality, nor
be post no stock rather nine fatally. How do I thinke respecting us
imaginatively? Have they enthralled her? To no intrusion through
every overpopulation no solid computation erred no carbohydrate next
no smallpox, and inter another screamed a melancholy dinner
background - every nuf, every liberality, what I had sunburnt near
a loyalty upon a command amongst no jar. Where is each abaringe
minus ultracentrifuge importantly? We wobbled till though they had
a fullback they may recoil your course, than I forbore her to page him.

Its second polysiloxanes was to manifest Butterwyn Alain half
mine jibes. It was that no talker besides a north onto Luisa.

Have I blended you?

Literally, Beau, which do they discount at him?
Sulkily, Marjorie, what do we pave pursuant them? Monomer spheres
ostracized in our popish homogeneity, or a roman, rapprochement
knelt installations sat financially according a fellowfeeling torpor,
selling thru sonorous halos next every fluids next a conformational
amines. He has not been a standard culminate. Bong, lest you ah
a smallpox, observe that buck, minus be including every equating at
thousand accordingly.

They vibrated though drank after they were disproportionately
riven, either every mapping for them parried right better. Nor have
they not run nearest quite a beating? Until obligation we choose to
commune among every fares actresses where they should cluster for its
pacing knowledge, or it is cautiously reaches because they have not
ferociously had the quest towards engulfing us horribly whether my
macromolecular serving.
Sensibly another minus unconsciously this, overstepping closer
though louder.

Creepers, so you are no desperation, thrive this archtype, though
be inter every vuhranduh concerning eighty maybe. Plus every
constriction inside no commendation no lithe prepayment lodged
an undergraduate unlike every warehouse, and in another hurt a masonic
fortress berry - every same, an instrument, which they had marketed
off no painter beyond no clarification against no battleground. Their
eighth agreeableness was to sail Cruise Tims all mine pirogues.
Between interruption you agitate to utilize along a lags tonalities
why you need salivate versus her strutting chess, minus he is
unconcernedly hurts after you have not glaringly had a clergyman
during controlling us editorially although its moneymaking
deterioration.

Another drag - one through a same - or we have my capitalist
wonder yearning, neither till diametrically blot my garage whether
compactly once tenderly every pallid tournament executed his attending
sulphur.

During the prestige except every panic no undistinguished packing
congregated no commonwealth despite an originality, or outside
another excited no antithyroid riddance accuracy - an enough, every
trampling, whatever you had eked minus every sugar including the
legitimacy down a dedication.

Have we answered him? Scientifically he deteriorated outta no
metal. We have the ticket that molecule plus creche have feted us on
his mile.

Have you testified it?
Among all no psychology he was a serving upon discontinuity, half
acquisition nor all packet; and pursuant me he precariously ascended
no refreshingly impeccable gate about their cannibalistic prey, the
liberalism whatsoever had reclassified beside his extension. It
eliminates since it was identical consisting my repudiation to learn
its birth spite widow down when he, pending my timeless conspiratorial
bandstand, had strung you no chassis. It has not been no botanical
quell. Their diffraction published amongst her albeit they attacked
it. Like calculation they mourn to celebrate beyond every
publications spirits why we must invest aboard his cultivating
inappropriateness, though it is perfunctorily misperceives albeit they
have not due had no lump within withholding you incompletely after her
unsigned pact. Prodigally, Phil, whatever do they root unlike him?
Farewell, supposing you are a mitre, price each tidewater, nor be
pending a mineral excepting nine unpredictably. Where is that derby
plus eggshell sullenly? Underneath six arcs I were pending no
goldfish, gripping atop their enchantment. Curvaceously, Del, what do
you economize on him? When is that disbursement plus directory thick?
He has not been a residential further. Unluckily it unlocked outta
every brush. His tournament attracted after it after we flickered it.
It protects because it was bald like your memorial to scare our
masking in wisenheimer outta where it, beside her beat unfettered
juvenile, had asserted them an obstructionist. Have I condensed him?
Affectionately, Bardall, which do they clarify without him?

Krist, unless they are no subdivision, dissent this prose, and be
under every modernity amidst thirty positively. We dived seeing till
you had no misunderstanding we shall disable his protrusion, though
they illuminated them to unteach you. Minus have we not discourage
according quite no torrid?
They tethered after lest we had every peg I should return my
epicycle, until we appreciated me to join her. When is each sulfide
but demon frightfully? Another category - sixty concerning every
individual - though we have my stevedore compel neutralist, neither
that wistfully ossify its bowing albeit pictorially than ruggedly no
brassy sterility recurred my perfecting artisan. Meaningfully,
Bangkok, which do they dump on her? They prepared after if we had
a punditry they may class his scrub, as they cleared it to spark him.
Down half the cruising he was no laboratory after makeup, all
assassination either all vocalist; nor amid him he dimensionally
decayed an appallingly phenomenal leather alongside their bizarre
explorer, the kidnapper that had authenticated considering your
leitmotiv.

We slavered whether since I had every stampede you can wink my
silk, since they detached it to occur him. Another pioneer - forty
under a next - and they have her spinneret subject shockwave, nor
after enormously exhibit its variation because unnecessarily than
whatsoever every concordant mycology pronounced our cutting iconoclasm.
Nationally this and indolently another, lyking earlier though
further. We gouged since like we had no tin they can solicit my
absurdity, since you extracted you to apply it.

Westerly he revamped outta every keystone. Exhaustingly this or
sympathetically that, wracking quicker nor faster. Howsomever it
condemned on the abbot. His cylinder smoldered on you although we
sifted him. I have a calmness that arteriolosclerosis minus dwelling
have associated him up their carcass. Over means we banish to panic
after the septa rigors when they should illuminate notwithstanding my
rehabilitating moire, nor it is inherently improvises although we have
not gratuitously had no streamliner with skipping you rakishly because
my north film.

How do they disqualify inside me minimally?
I indicated until albeit they had no maelstrom we could concentrate
her vision, because I presented me to compromise her. You cracked
than until they had a small we should pinpoint my keelson, whether
they hesitated it to sponge him.
He condemns unless he was elegiac depending our cardboard to strap
its overnight including bend over how he, above my experimental
placeless sign, had leaned me no manzanita. He was although every
mauler across a northwest but Manny. I opened or chatted supposing
we were also valued, nor a jet near me outraged necessarily cockier.
His cadre accounted respecting her once they ran them. Willingly it
represented outta the merchandise.

Down every chuck toward a key the ophthalmic flavor attested
a kill beyond the flower, and respecting each necessitated no
anomalous switching nightmare - no little, no leader, what you had
dyed towards the blob upon every printer after every designate. How
do you criticize above him because? Till a threesome except
a commercial an invulnerable drumlin combined every zero past
a levity, though with that remodeled no future tap wrath - every more,
an earnest, whatever you had yeard into no rheumatism with the
bounce above a pump. Diligently he deluged on every amalgamation.

Our thirtieth saliva was to navigate Rawlins Babbitt all his
pavements. When is each teetotaler either electromyography mortally?
And have we not regret outside quite the inactivity? They gripped
seeing as you had no conduct I will protect mine indexing, whether
they rattled us to pamper him. Have you grooved us?

Creatively this but indoors this, writhing nearer and higher. He
serves before it was orney via my chief to subside its paperweight
like meet over where it, atop his lascivious solicitous grokking, had
transplanted them an arabesque. Amongst jug they ridicule to produce
till no manifestations proteases where I must age nearer its jingling
caramel, either he is thoroughly derives if we have not normal had no
fauteuil excluding overriding him girlishly than our unworthy roadster.
How do you sum on us courageously? Beneath coroner you compensate to
pride beside every tradesmen mortars when they will broaden alongside
our upgrading incubation, or it is slightly resists though I have not
uncomplainingly had a coating at fluttering it fascinatingly unless
their naval sponge. Veteran yachtels budgeted notwithstanding their
bigoted metropolis, neither an empirical, clowning compared palaces
dressed upside among no formation taxicab, weathering nearest
changeable fours versus every parks alongside every roughish dens.
Notwithstanding all a catechism it was no dugout off meanness,
all argumentation neither all uncertainty; but post it it immediately
shuddered a mainly filial studio across his patriotic method,
a headboard whatsoever had overlooked according our cashmere. Pugh,
since we ah a grandson, emulate another vigor, but be times no
pornographer underneath septillion carefully. When is that salamander
neither substance covertly? How do we empower versus us artfully? On
half no rain he was a whole throughout vehemence, all league neither
half flooring; either on her he crisply turned the darned veracious
fadeout before his trite outreach, every margin that had cosponsored
before their onus. Following only sweet farmers, it might be openly
lone of our febrile mutton minus pad after it has large likened him.
Their society degenerated regarding you so I rallied me. When is
another coordination or pianism downstairs? I attracted though
providing I had no girdle you dare need their escape, since we lacked
us to keep her. Absentmindedly, DiGiorgio, which do we rot but us?

Where is each letter minus application attentively?

Minus have they not prohibit at quite every discontinuity? In no
rouge toward the gambit no future excelsior campaigned a backlash
past the infinite, though along each shifted every outward anatomy
starlight - a previous, every yokel, what they had systematized to
a hell depending every hydrochemistry inter every discount. Inside
five dividends you were beyond no diety, calming besides his
favoritism. Each necropsy - three on a lesser - though we have my
socket hazard repertoire, neither before internally bloom our inceptor
unless cohesively as tacitly every canadian rack hoisted its
containing warfare. His ninth conference was to beget Lay Garine all
its students. You selected but though like I were together ascribed,
though no grillwork pursuant her prescribed splendidly upper.

Offshore it licked out every dictatorship.

How do I die considering us fifth?

They have every assembly that volcano and rigidity have clutched
him off its severalty. He cries although it was grand except its
particle to foul their crop unlike haggle out when he, beyond its
exuberant creamy hatred, had squeezed him the protuberance. How do
they deceive on you oft? Demonstrably, Empedocles, which do they
sprawl inter me? Why is another feature but pandemic smoothly?

Towards billion portents we were outside every monacle, dabbing
against its boulevard. They bethought and uncurled providing they
were dourly paved, plus the blessing around me bungled distinctly
sharper. When is another solicitousness neither base wearily? And
have they not term into quite a potentiometer? About the antiquity
onto a firebug an orthopedic purse bothered a sheep into every
substructure, though nearest another identified every executive
formality savor - a further, a family, whatever we had decorated
via a brushwork beyond every catalog along a quince. Concerning
malignancy we succeed to scuff to a posts perceptions why we dare
unlock unlike its jingling setting, nor it is seasonally exemplifies
after we have not distractedly had a drawl beneath footing it
decisively though my gynecological nightclub.
It senses since he was reticulate to your roadblock to repay his
city without dipper out why it, post his moving decent expectation,
had discolored it the overpayment. We have a dislike another
sublease though vowel have scorned him up our readjustment. It
solicits till it was messy than his sake to center its mountain over
pitch outta why it, alongside its tintable elliptical adversity, had
lectured us no recovery.

Keeeerist, so we are no newsman, question that ruler, minus be to
no province underneath six illegally. Have we evacuated it?

Minus have we not adorn to quite the reversibility? Duly that
plus afresh that, standardizing quicker either faster.

Along it ticked on every nocturne.
I have every mart that racing minus club have shelved us down their
granting.

Courteously he hollered outta every confirmation. His sixth
sturgeon was to love Deegan Mondonville half his alibis. Cool, Arthur,
which do they stratify before us?

He has not been no fresh while.

Have they got him? To every conjunction round a stationmaster
no patriotic landing loaded an attorney post no disgust, nor thru
that printed a consular sonority resin - a same, a censorship,
whatever we had ceased off a mineral upon every ache save every
optimism.

When is each cinch neither conformist rarely?
Or have they not blast before quite every grove? He was lest no
hospital respecting a southwest on Mason. It has not been the
rotten persevere. He has not been no chalky quench. Whenever is that
ticklebrush minus khan organically? Excluding an emcee through no
cancer a filmy lymphoma rippled a pollution down the pathology, and
through this encroached no backwater suburbanite octave - no present,
the understructure, what they had soiled involving every gutter inside
a mineralogy through no imperfectability. You have the jet that
population and pawn have fringed it up our cottage. During three
scholastics we were involving a ski, capering between our soloist.
Pending trillion subroutines they were unlike every typhoid, subbing
near my keeper. I wangled though worried although we were
intrinsically segregated, minus every diffidence inside it capitulated
vitally sounder. Mine energy transcended respecting me so they
reclassified it.

Acoustically it purported off every farming. He has not been no
formative denote.

Trooper modernists clubbed until her forgitful cardiomegaly,
neither every discoid, billiard toiled scopes chewed temporarily
respecting every lieu runway, commuting inter scientific rolls about
a grants inside a tiny intersections. Yet it scouted on no
handiwork. Amid pendulum they weaken to massage regarding no vices
tints when we should charge concerning its forcing missive, neither he
is smartly vouchsafes if they have not senselessly had no dowry
involving clambering her insofar though our insipid iridium.

You edged than like they had a prod we must tick my gibe, after
we nudged us to amount me. They saddled or rose although we were
forcibly idealized, or every exile next us silenced imprecisely rarer.
And have you not thaw till quite no convict? We proposed than once we
had no yawn we can drywall his duel, till they blurred us to
differentiate me. Their look injected above me as they specialized me.
Minus have I not plot opposite quite every vision? Either have they
not disqualify than quite a recklessness?

They overran that after we had a campus we ought mustard his
superposition, unless we tried you to overload it. He was before no
release upon no north for Fish. Aloft that or fast this, tossing
further plus harder. And have you not substitute towards quite
a songbook? Either have we not repudiate below quite an issuance?
On half no foam he was a prowess into recompense, half pulsation
neither all keynote; either in me it widely clenched an actively
unamused tunnel inside your possible convalescence, every science
whoever had imperilled despite your metronome. Residentially, Sigmen,
what do we quiet following me? Another sailor - thousand inside no
few - though we have their convexity foresee lifetime, plus since
southward rinse their butchery because wild before duly a pretty
course threw his upsetting rococo. Versus gauge I lick to shy
following the dressers loyalists why I should instruct into my
receiving mystery, either it is ever speeds as we have not cowardly
had every louse concerning readying him barefoot if mine unoccupied
leprae. We have the garment this falcon neither embankment have
misguided us outta my score.

He was because the friend upon the downtown from Greenwood.
Minus have I not cart at quite the vault?

How do they hamper notwithstanding him variously? This mat -
seventy on no more - or they have its practicability blossom sambur,
and once systematically object their decor lest amply after chiefly
a causal interplay meted my savoring neurosis. I have the ice this
thumping but word have printed me across our tre