PANG TELETHON--THE LETTER FROM THE CREATOR OF UNCLE MIS
Anonymous
der...@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Marshall Dermer) wrote:
> In article <mitch_man-070...@ppp019.po.centuryinter.net>
> mitc...@centuryinter.net (Mitch Manthey) writes:
> >Okay, can somebody please tell me who the hell "Pang" is, who "Sammy
> >Escape" is, ect, ect.
>
> As best as I can tell, Mr. Pangborn is being harassed by various
> people who post anonymously. These people apparently are otherwise
> unemployed for if they had well-paying jobs, they would likely be working
> and not spending so many hours trying to intimidate Mr. Pangborn and
> making these groups difficult for all of us to use.
>
> --Marshall Lev Dermer
> Associate Professor of Psychology
> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Associate Professor Lev Dermer was asked by Ken Pangborn to post the article above so that we would be impressed by his
being able to lie to someone from his ole alma mater. Ken just happened to forget to mention to his pal that he was banned from
posting by AOl because of his own net abuse. He also forgot to mention that he had contacted the employer of Stacy Alexander's
husband to try to get him fired over the fact that Stacy posted por-choice articles on Usenet in opposition to Ken Pangborn's B.S.
He also failed to mention that he is under investigation for his abuse by the ASTC, the police and by the Florida State Bar Association.
Another thing that Ken Pangborn didn't mention to the kindly associate professor when he, like a coward, went squealing and whining to ask if he's post in
his defense is that he posted a lot of false information about David Moore online...things like Dave's alleged dishonorable discharge from the military, things
saying that Dave had beaten his wife. Pangborn failed to tell this Wisconsin school teacher that he had claimed that Turin made anonymous posts that he never made.
Ken Pangborn neglected to tell his professor THE TRUTH. Ken Pangborn failed to mention the fact that he accused Turin of
being a criminal, that he accused Stacy of being married to someone besides John, that he accused Dave of many, many things that Dave did NOT do.
pa...@aol.com
nob...@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous) wrote:
> Associate Professor Lev Dermer was asked by Ken Pangborn to post the article above so that we would be impressed by his being able to lie to someone from his ole alma mater.
Pretty hefty allegation there David. Got omething beside your MOUTH to back
up your claim he is lying?
> Ken just happened to forget to mention to his pal that he was banned from
posting by AOl because of his own net abuse.
Yeah, I know. You've been making that claim now for nine months, and Spazzy
has been making it for two years. Why is it that YOU keep going through ISP's
like most people go through clean pairs of socks and *I* am STILL on AOL
clown? Gee and I learn yesterday that your gal Spazzy was AGAIN barred from
Dejanews. Why don't YOU explain that?
> He also forgot to mention that he had contacted the employer of Stacy Alexander's husband to try to get him fired over the fact that Stacy posted por-choice articles on Usenet in opposition to Ken Pangborn's B.S.
Nope. NOT TRUE! Another one of your PARANOID DELUSIONS! I have told her I
did as a warning that two COULD play the game SHE plays! Didn't work though.
Threats NEVER work with a sociopath.
> He also failed to mention that he is under investigation for his abuse by the ASTC, the police and by the Florida State Bar Association.
No HE didn't forget to tell anything. While YOU have BOMBARDED both
organizations with literally thousands of pages of your raging bullshit, BOTH
have given them the attention they were due and SHREDDED them for paper
recycling. BTW, you and Spazzy are both now in the bit bucket at dozens of
official locations as "WHACKOS."
> Another thing that Ken Pangborn didn't mention to the kindly associate professor when he, like a coward, went squealing and whining to ask if he's post in his defense is that he posted a lot of false information about David Moore online...things like Dave's alleged dishonorable discharge from the military, things saying that Dave had beaten his wife.
TRY, David, TRY to get it accurate. I posted that you were cashiered from
the Maris and given a GENERAL Discharge that was later upgraded to an
Honorable, for the convinience of the service. As to the SPOUSE ABUSE, that
came from PUBLIC RECORDS bub! Your divorce in 29 Palms California. BTW, in
you making a STINK about it, I hear the file has become the most popular file
in courthouse history with over 1900 people calling to verify the contents.
You are a HIT David. YOU are the IDIOT who puts his dirty linen in public.
> Pangborn failed to tell this Wisconsin school teacher that he had claimed that Turin made anonymous posts that he never made.
Turin did take part in a FEW of the anonymous posts. FEW.
> Ken Pangborn neglected to tell his professor THE TRUTH. Ken Pangborn failed to mention the fact that he accused Turin of being a criminal, that he accused Stacy of being married to someone besides John, that he accused Dave of many, many things that Dave did NOT do.
Sorry I didn't accuse Turin of being a criminal. That's one more of your
paranoid inventions. And, dipwad, I not only said that Stacy had been married
before she married John Edward Freed, but I copied HE posts to the net that
SHE ran off whining about her EX Lincoln Johnson in. We also posted some of
her HATE posts to her own brother and the vile allegations she made against
him. As far as the allegations against Dave, AT LEAST *I* David, unlike
YOU.. sissy-britches, have stood out in the open to make my allegations and
can defend ALL of mine. YOUY on the other hand have been a snivelling little
coward, HIDING in the dark shadows of the net displaying your YELLOW streak
for the world to see. Making scurrilous allegations and then running for
cover deying you made them.
>
-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum
Star Traveler
(Anonymous) wrote:
> In article <6nul6n$1d4$1...@uwm.edu>,
> der...@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Marshall Dermer) wrote:
> > In article <mitch_man-070...@ppp019.po.centuryinter.net>
> > mitc...@centuryinter.net (Mitch Manthey) writes:
> > >Okay, can somebody please tell me who the hell "Pang" is, who "Sammy
> > >Escape" is, ect, ect.
> >
> > As best as I can tell, Mr. Pangborn is being harassed by various
> > people who post anonymously. These people apparently are otherwise
> > unemployed for if they had well-paying jobs, they would likely be working
> > and not spending so many hours trying to intimidate Mr. Pangborn and
> > making these groups difficult for all of us to use.
> >
> > --Marshall Lev Dermer
> > Associate Professor of Psychology
> > University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Yes, it does appear that way. But, there's nothing wrong with posting
anonymously -- you just have to realize that whatever is said, stands on
its own merits. So, if the ideas presented cannot stand on their own and
be "self-supporting" then ignore the anonymous poster and the ideas
presented.
You shouldn't focus on the anonymous poster, but whether the ideas are
valid or not in their own right.
> Associate Professor Lev Dermer was asked by Ken Pangborn to post the
article above so that we would be impressed by his
> being able to lie to someone from his ole alma mater. Ken just happened
to forget to mention to his pal that he was banned from
> posting by AOl because of his own net abuse. He also forgot to mention
that he had contacted the employer of Stacy Alexander's
> husband to try to get him fired over the fact that Stacy posted
por-choice articles on Usenet in opposition to Ken Pangborn's B.S.
> He also failed to mention that he is under investigation for his abuse
by the ASTC, the police and by the Florida State Bar Association.
> Another thing that Ken Pangborn didn't mention to the kindly associate
professor when he, like a coward, went squealing and whining to ask if
he's post in
> his defense is that he posted a lot of false information about David
Moore online...things like Dave's alleged dishonorable discharge from the
military, things
> saying that Dave had beaten his wife. Pangborn failed to tell this
Wisconsin school teacher that he had claimed that Turin made anonymous
posts that he never made.
> Ken Pangborn neglected to tell his professor THE TRUTH. Ken Pangborn
failed to mention the fact that he accused Turin of
> being a criminal, that he accused Stacy of being married to someone
besides John, that he accused Dave of many, many things that Dave did NOT
do.
But, if I was to venture a guess as to who this anonymous poster is, I
would say it's David Moore. You see, it's very unusal for another person
to be *that offended* at accusations about another person (of which
accusations, they probably don't know too much about).
So, if Mr. Anonymous Person appears to be very offended about the alleged
problems directed to David Moore, it stands to reason that "Mr. Anonymous"
is David Moore (or a good friend of David Moore -- take you pick).
----------
But, it really doesn't matter whether it's David Moore or not -- because
obviously it's *concerning* David Moore. And we can go from there and see
if there is anything valid about these things.
On the Internet/UseNet, anyone can say anything. It's up to you, the
reader, to make sense out of it -- or just call it "nonsense". And there's
a lot of that nonsense out there, too.
Star Traveler