Was OJ Set-up?
George Orwell
Will justice be blind in sentencing OJ in Las
Vegas, or will the judge pile on?
Justice should be blind to his first crime.
Ken Pangborn
Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it
Kent Wills
<nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>We all know that OJ killed Goldman and Nicole.
No we don't.
I believe he did, but since I didn't witness the crime, I can't
know it.
Unless you were there, you can't know either. The only people who
know are Ron, Nicole (neither of whom can tell us) and the murderer.
>
>Will justice be blind in sentencing OJ in Las
>Vegas, or will the judge pile on?
I don't know the sentencing laws in Nevada. Whatever they are,
I'm sure the judge will sentenced OJ as allowed by law.
>
>Justice should be blind to his first crime.
It wasn't. OJ was tried and found not guilty. As such he is seen
as innocent in the eyes of the law. What we believe doesn't factor
in.
The judge can't make the sentence for his current guilty verdict
harsher because of his being found not guilty of murder over a decade
ago.
>
>Ken Pangborn
No your not.
--
When cryptography is outlawed,
bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
jerry warner
Kent Wills wrote:
What does this mean for Cheney and Bush?
Ron
"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:uqege45fnno1ftt0l...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 04:09:25 +0200 (CEST), George Orwell
> <nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>
>>We all know that OJ killed Goldman and Nicole.
>
> No we don't.
> I believe he did, but since I didn't witness the crime, I can't
> know it.
Didn't he write a book on how he did it? Oops, my bad....it was "IF I Did
It".
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 04:09:25 +0200 (CEST), George Orwell
> <nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>
>> We all know that OJ killed Goldman and Nicole.
>
> No we don't.
We do know you are a convicted felon from Iowa, Kent.
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
Name Kent Bradley Wills
Offender Number 1155768
Sex M
Birth Date 01/08/1969
Age 39
Location Interstate Compact
Offense BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE
County Of Commitment Polk
Commitment Date 01/16/2004
Kent Wills
wrote:
Nothing. OJ's being found guilty won't effect them any more than
you or I.
--
Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons...
for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 04:09:25 +0200 (CEST), George Orwell
>> <nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>>
>>> We all know that OJ killed Goldman and Nicole.
>>
>> No we don't.
>
>We do know you are a convicted felon from Iowa, Kent.
>
We know you're a racist who called for my family to be murdered
because we aren't all white. You even acknowledged you were visited by
law enforcement because of your calling for the murder of my children
for not being white.
Some of Prof. Jonez greatest hits. Yes, he really did author the
quotes. He's even admitted that law enforcement took notes when they
visited him regarding his threats to my children.
More recently, he's claimed another poster has a copy of the report
made regarding the visit.
"What you might call racist, an intelligent white person would
call realist."
-- Prof. Jonez
"I will admit that those who can't deal with the truth that
whites are the master race will find my posts annoying. Too fucking
bad for them. They can bury their heads in the sand and kill file me
if they don't like the truth!"
-- Prof. Jonez
"Kent Wills married a spic named Joquina Cruz. They have two
half-breed children. All of them should be put to death. First the
race traitor Kent, then the genetic misfits they produced, then the
pet spic."
-- Prof. Jonez
[FYI: Lindsay's real name isn't Joquina]
"Kent has committed the greatest crime imaginable. He
betrayed his own race!"
-- Prof. Jonez
"Death to Kent Wills and all race traitors!"
-- Prof. Jonez
"The fucking race traitor doesn't know his own birthdate? "
-- Prof. Jonez
"Why is it that kike child abusers, like you, have to lie all
the time?"
-- Prof. Jonez in reply to Doc Savage, an
observant Jew and Rabbi.
"Fucking kike liar."
-- Prof. Jonez in reply to Doc Savage, an
observant Jew and Rabbi.
"That would be your fat kike ass."
-- Prof. Jonez in reply to Doc Savage, an
observant Jew and Rabbi.
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 00:10:55 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it>
> wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 04:09:25 +0200 (CEST), George Orwell
>>> <nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We all know that OJ killed Goldman and Nicole.
>>>
>>> No we don't.
>>
>> We do know you are a convicted felon from Iowa, Kent.
>>
>
> We know you're a racist who called for my family to be murdered
You're lying again, Kunt. You haven't even proven that you have a family,
you lowlife lying convicted felon and child molestor --
Kent Wills
wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 00:10:55 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 04:09:25 +0200 (CEST), George Orwell
>>>> <nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We all know that OJ killed Goldman and Nicole.
>>>>
>>>> No we don't.
>>>
>>> We do know you are a convicted felon from Iowa, Kent.
>>>
>>
>> We know you're a racist who called for my family to be murdered
>
>You're lying again, Kunt. You haven't even proven that you have a family,
If I don't have a family, why did you call for them to be murdered
for not being pure white?
BTW, I have proved my family exists. That truth is so abhorrent to
you is your issue to address.
>you lowlife lying convicted felon and child molestor --
Again, you admitted you're a pedophile. Few share your sick
sexual interest in children.
Jonezie:
>> Or you could discuss the holocaust of Native Americans by
>> the invading White Man ...
>
Deadrat:
> Sure. I for Indian or N for Native?
Jonezie:
S for Savage.
Prof. Jonez expressing his racial HATE for Native Americans.
Message-ID: <6b3i56F...@mid.individual.net>
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 10:01:58 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it>
> wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 00:10:55 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ"
>>> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 04:09:25 +0200 (CEST), George Orwell
>>>>> <nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> We all know that OJ killed Goldman and Nicole.
>>>>>
>>>>> No we don't.
>>>>
>>>> We do know you are a convicted felon from Iowa, Kent.
>>>>
>>>
>>> We know you're a racist who called for my family to be murdered
>>
>> You're lying again, Kunt. You haven't even proven that you have a
>> family,
>
> If I don't have a family, why did you call for them to be murdered
> for not being pure white?
How could anyone call for your family to be murdered when 1) you claim
you aren't Kent Wills and 2) you have failed to prove you even have a family
eh liar?
Kent Wills
wrote:
[...]
>>> You're lying again, Kunt. You haven't even proven that you have a
>>> family,
>>
>> If I don't have a family, why did you call for them to be murdered
>> for not being pure white?
>
>How could anyone call for your family to be murdered when 1) you claim
>you aren't Kent Wills and
No matter my real name, you called for them to be murdered for not
being white. See the quotes below.
>2) you have failed to prove you even have a family
So who are those people who keep showing up everywhere I go on
vacation? The same woman and two children keep appearing. For most,
this would serve as proof. Of course, since they aren't white, you
don't see them as people.
>
>eh liar?
Why are you addressing yourself? Since it's been proved,
multiple times, that you're a pathological liar, you must be
addressing yourself.
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 20:56:15 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it>
> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>> You're lying again, Kunt. You haven't even proven that you have a
>>>> family,
>>>
>>> If I don't have a family, why did you call for them to be
>>> murdered for not being pure white?
>>
>> How could anyone call for your family to be murdered when 1) you
>> claim you aren't Kent Wills and
>
> No matter my real name,
If you're not "Kent Wills" then those posts you
keep whining about never applied to you in the first place,
you ignorant lying piece of crap.
You still haven't give a single shred of evidence that
you are married, much less to a "non-white" woman,
whatever that means, nor that you have any children,
much less what "race" they are.
All your bogus accusations are as meaningless as the rest
of the shit and lies you habitually spew, scumbag.
tjab
Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 20:56:15 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it>
>wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>>> You're lying again, Kunt. You haven't even proven that you have a
>>>> family,
>>>
>>> If I don't have a family, why did you call for them to be murdered
>>> for not being pure white?
>>
>>How could anyone call for your family to be murdered when 1) you claim
>>you aren't Kent Wills and
>
> No matter my real name, you called for them to be murdered for not
>being white. See the quotes below.
Quotes from whom?
>>2) you have failed to prove you even have a family
>
> So who are those people who keep showing up everywhere I go on
>vacation? The same woman and two children keep appearing.
Whose word do we have for that but yours?
[...]
Kent Wills
>>>How could anyone call for your family to be murdered when 1) you claim
>>>you aren't Kent Wills and
>>
>> No matter my real name, you called for them to be murdered for not
>>being white. See the quotes below.
>
>Quotes from whom?
Your racist hero, Prof. Jonez.
>
>>>2) you have failed to prove you even have a family
>>
>> So who are those people who keep showing up everywhere I go on
>>vacation? The same woman and two children keep appearing.
>
>Whose word do we have for that but yours?
Since, unlike you and your racist hero, Prof. Jonez, I've not been
caught lying, my word is fine.
--
Bless me, Father, for I have committed an original sin.
I poked a badger with a spoon.
Kent Wills
wrote:
[...]
>>>> If I don't have a family, why did you call for them to be
>>>> murdered for not being pure white?
>>>
>>> How could anyone call for your family to be murdered when 1) you
>>> claim you aren't Kent Wills and
>>
>> No matter my real name,
>
>If you're not "Kent Wills" then those posts you
>keep whining about never applied to you in the first place,
>you ignorant lying piece of crap.
Lie all your racist hate for my family demands of you. I use the
nym Kent Wills on Usenet. You did call for my family to be murdered
for not being white.
>
>You still haven't give a single shred of evidence that
>you are married,
Liar.
I'm still waiting for you to prove I've been lying about my family.
If I've been doing so, you should be able to prove it.
>much less to a "non-white" woman,
Liar.
I'm still waiting for you to prove I've been lying about my family.
If I've been doing so, you should be able to prove it.
>whatever that means, nor that you have any children,
>much less what "race" they are.
Liar.
I'm still waiting for you to prove I've been lying about my family.
If I've been doing so, you should be able to prove it.
And the word race in quotes? Oh yeah, you think white is the only
race. All others don't deserve any sort of acknowledgement.
>
>All your bogus accusations are as meaningless as the rest
>of the shit and lies you habitually spew, scumbag.
That you see truth as meaningless is your issue to address, not
mine.
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:55:14 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it>
> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>>> If I don't have a family, why did you call for them to be
>>>>> murdered for not being pure white?
>>>>
>>>> How could anyone call for your family to be murdered when 1) you
>>>> claim you aren't Kent Wills and
>>>
>>> No matter my real name,
>>
>> If you're not "Kent Wills" then those posts you
>> keep whining about never applied to you in the first place,
>> you ignorant lying piece of crap.
>
> Lie all your racist hate for my family demands of you.
You have no family you lying lowlife criminal piece of shit:
Reality_CheckŠ
> On 6 Oct 2008 01:28:35 -0400, tj...@Glue.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>
>>>> How could anyone call for your family to be murdered when 1) you
>>>> claim you aren't Kent Wills and
>>>
>>> No matter my real name, you called for them to be murdered for not
>>> being white. See the quotes below.
>>
>> Quotes from whom?
>
> Your racist hero, Prof. Jonez.
>
>>
>>>> 2) you have failed to prove you even have a family
>>>
>>> So who are those people who keep showing up everywhere I go on
>>> vacation? The same woman and two children keep appearing.
>>
>> Whose word do we have for that but yours?
>
> Since, unlike you and your racist hero, Prof. Jonez, I've not been
> caught lying, my word is fine.
"You are in the Kill File. Have been for a while.
Note that I can only reply if I read someone else's
reply to you."
-- Kent B Wills vainly trying to curtail his OCD
Kent Wills
wrote:
Prove I lived about having placed your Vox nym in the kill file
when I wrote that.
If you prefer, you may admit your racial hate for my family has
once again compelled you to lie.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:55:14 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it>
>> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>>> If I don't have a family, why did you call for them to be
>>>>>> murdered for not being pure white?
>>>>>
>>>>> How could anyone call for your family to be murdered when 1) you
>>>>> claim you aren't Kent Wills and
>>>>
>>>> No matter my real name,
>>>
>>> If you're not "Kent Wills" then those posts you
>>> keep whining about never applied to you in the first place,
>>> you ignorant lying piece of crap.
>>
>> Lie all your racist hate for my family demands of you.
>
>You have no family you lying lowlife criminal piece of shit:
Then why, exactly, did you call for them to be murdered for not
being white? If, as you dishonestly claim, they are fictional, why
did you spend the time calling for their murder?
Be specific.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:44:08 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it>
> wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:55:14 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ"
>>> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>>> If I don't have a family, why did you call for them to be
>>>>>>> murdered for not being pure white?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How could anyone call for your family to be murdered when 1) you
>>>>>> claim you aren't Kent Wills and
>>>>>
>>>>> No matter my real name,
>>>>
>>>> If you're not "Kent Wills" then those posts you
>>>> keep whining about never applied to you in the first place,
>>>> you ignorant lying piece of crap.
>>>
>>> Lie all your racist hate for my family demands of you.
>>
>> You have no family you lying lowlife criminal piece of shit:
>
> Then why, exactly,
Because you haven't posted one shred of evidence to prove
you are even married, much less have children.
That you can't post any evidence proves you to be the liar that
you are.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:45:02 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it>
> wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On 6 Oct 2008 01:28:35 -0400, tj...@Glue.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> How could anyone call for your family to be murdered when 1) you
>>>>>> claim you aren't Kent Wills and
>>>>>
>>>>> No matter my real name, you called for them to be murdered for
>>>>> not being white. See the quotes below.
>>>>
>>>> Quotes from whom?
>>>
>>> Your racist hero, Prof. Jonez.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> 2) you have failed to prove you even have a family
>>>>>
>>>>> So who are those people who keep showing up everywhere I go on
>>>>> vacation? The same woman and two children keep appearing.
>>>>
>>>> Whose word do we have for that but yours?
>>>
>>> Since, unlike you and your racist hero, Prof. Jonez, I've not
>>> been caught lying, my word is fine.
>>
>> "You are in the Kill File. Have been for a while.
>> Note that I can only reply if I read someone else's
>> reply to you."
>> -- Kent B Wills vainly trying to curtail his OCD
>>
>
> Prove I lived about having placed your Vox nym in the kill file
> when I wrote that.
Perhaps you've died, but you still haven't posted one shred of
evidence proving that you put the Vox nym in your killfile,
much less only the Vox nym ... then again the following
post by you proves that you're a liar, either way:
References: <4274D40B...@it.com>
<9a3971lt3luckocof...@4ax.com>
<Datde.332$d05....@news.uswest.net>
<1115104995.1...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
<7_Tde.60$R67....@news.uswest.net>
<adki71dgcqtbqvbb6...@4ax.com>
<dsuee.77$137....@news.uswest.net>
<5cdl71p9f2r6419lp...@4ax.com>
<0mCee.53$e3....@news.uswest.net>
<fr1o71503bvm1230d...@4ax.com>
<gFXee.96$fq....@news.uswest.net>
<uvoo71tbftjb03ss7...@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: Yeee haaaa, I made Kent Wills' killfile ! -- Baable Thumpin'
Idjit -- Surveillance of the "debate" - Have our DMV records been run?
Message-ID: o1Yee.100$fq....@news.uswest.net>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 23:05:54 -0600
Kent Wills wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2005 22:40:07 -0600, " \"- Prof. JonezŠ\""
> wrote:
>
>>> You could have given proper credit to the original author of
>>> the text you copied and pasted.
>>
>> The author? !
>>
>> What a jackass you are Kent, turning into quite the Kaldissembler
>>
>> Idiot baable thumper's like you claim the "author" is
>> gaaawd, since all the crap came from your Holey Baable.
>
> Do TRY to be honest for once in your life. I understand this
> is something you avoid, but give it a shot.
>
>>
>>> Plagiarism is a bad thing, and speaks
>>> volumes to your lack of character and ethics.
>>
>> You're evasion of the undeniable facts is noted. Here they are again
>> for you to ignore:
>
> Welcome to the kill file. You should feel honored. Only
> three others are there. And each one is a simpleton like you.
> Do get help for the hostility you have. It can't be doing you
> any good in real life.
>
> Kent
Your denial of the undisputed absurdity of your pathetic religion
is noted, now run along and hide in your pig-ignorance
like a good little fundie.
=================
Kent Wills
<the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:44:08 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:55:14 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ"
>>>> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>>>>> If I don't have a family, why did you call for them to be
>>>>>>>> murdered for not being pure white?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How could anyone call for your family to be murdered when 1) you
>>>>>>> claim you aren't Kent Wills and
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No matter my real name,
>>>>>
>>>>> If you're not "Kent Wills" then those posts you
>>>>> keep whining about never applied to you in the first place,
>>>>> you ignorant lying piece of crap.
>>>>
>>>> Lie all your racist hate for my family demands of you.
>>>
>>> You have no family you lying lowlife criminal piece of shit:
>>
>> Then why, exactly, did you call for them to be murdered for not
>> being white? If, as you dishonestly claim, they are fictional, why
>> did you spend the time calling for their murder?
>> Be specific.
>
>Because you haven't posted one shred of evidence to prove
>you are even married, much less have children.
Then why, exactly, did you call for them to be murdered for not
being white? If, as you dishonestly claim, they are fictional, why
did you spend the time calling for their murder?
Be specific.
>
>That you can't post any evidence proves you to be the liar that
>you are.
>
Since I've already done so before, your continued lying only
servers to prove Rule Number One: Prof. Jonez is a bigot who will lie
at every opportunity, to be 100% correct.
Kent Wills
<the...@jonez.net> wrote:
[...]
>>> "You are in the Kill File. Have been for a while.
>>> Note that I can only reply if I read someone else's
>>> reply to you."
>>> -- Kent B Wills vainly trying to curtail his OCD
>>>
>>
>> Prove I lived about having placed your Vox nym in the kill file
>> when I wrote that.
>
>Perhaps you've died,
Huh?
>but you still haven't posted one shred of
>evidence proving that you put the Vox nym in your killfile,
>much less only the Vox nym ... then again the following
>post by you proves that you're a liar, either way:
>
You just can't be honest about anything.
>
>References: <4274D40B...@it.com>
><9a3971lt3luckocof...@4ax.com>
><Datde.332$d05....@news.uswest.net>
><1115104995.1...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
><7_Tde.60$R67....@news.uswest.net>
><adki71dgcqtbqvbb6...@4ax.com>
><dsuee.77$137....@news.uswest.net>
><5cdl71p9f2r6419lp...@4ax.com>
><0mCee.53$e3....@news.uswest.net>
><fr1o71503bvm1230d...@4ax.com>
><gFXee.96$fq....@news.uswest.net>
><uvoo71tbftjb03ss7...@4ax.com>
>Subject: Re: Yeee haaaa, I made Kent Wills' killfile ! -- Baable Thumpin'
>Idjit -- Surveillance of the "debate" - Have our DMV records been run?
>Message-ID: o1Yee.100$fq....@news.uswest.net>
>Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 23:05:54 -0600
>
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 May 2005 22:40:07 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez坼""
Reality_CheckŠ
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:09:22 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
> <the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>> "You are in the Kill File. Have been for a while.
>>>> Note that I can only reply if I read someone else's
>>>> reply to you."
>>>> -- Kent B Wills vainly trying to curtail his OCD
>>>>
>>>
>>> Prove I lived about having placed your Vox nym in the kill file
>>> when I wrote that.
>>
>> Perhaps you've died,
>
> Huh?
Speak English much, eh moron?
>
>> but you still haven't posted one shred of
>> evidence proving that you put the Vox nym in your killfile,
>> much less only the Vox nym ... then again the following
>> post by you proves that you're a liar, either way:
>>
>
> You just can't be honest about anything.
Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
>
>>
>> References: <4274D40B...@it.com>
>> <9a3971lt3luckocof...@4ax.com>
>> <Datde.332$d05....@news.uswest.net>
>> <1115104995.1...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
>> <7_Tde.60$R67....@news.uswest.net>
>> <adki71dgcqtbqvbb6...@4ax.com>
>> <dsuee.77$137....@news.uswest.net>
>> <5cdl71p9f2r6419lp...@4ax.com>
>> <0mCee.53$e3....@news.uswest.net>
>> <fr1o71503bvm1230d...@4ax.com>
>> <gFXee.96$fq....@news.uswest.net>
>> <uvoo71tbftjb03ss7...@4ax.com>
>> Subject: Re: Yeee haaaa, I made Kent Wills' killfile ! -- Baable
>> Thumpin' Idjit -- Surveillance of the "debate" - Have our DMV
>> records been run? Message-ID: o1Yee.100$fq....@news.uswest.net>
>> Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 23:05:54 -0600
>>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Fri, 6 May 2005 22:40:07 -0600, " \"- Prof. JonezŠ\""
Kent Wills
wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 16:58:29 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
>> <the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:44:08 -0600, "Reality_Check©"
>>>> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:55:14 -0600, "Reality_Check©"
>>>>>> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If I don't have a family, why did you call for them to be
>>>>>>>>>> murdered for not being pure white?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How could anyone call for your family to be murdered when 1)
>>>>>>>>> you claim you aren't Kent Wills and
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No matter my real name,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you're not "Kent Wills" then those posts you
>>>>>>> keep whining about never applied to you in the first place,
>>>>>>> you ignorant lying piece of crap.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lie all your racist hate for my family demands of you.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have no family you lying lowlife criminal piece of shit:
>>>>
>>>> Then why, exactly, did you call for them to be murdered for not
>>>> being white? If, as you dishonestly claim, they are fictional, why
>>>> did you spend the time calling for their murder?
>>>> Be specific.
>>>
>>> Because you haven't posted one shred of evidence to prove
>>> you are even married, much less have children.
>>
>> Then why, exactly, did you call for them to be murdered for not
>>being white? If, as you dishonestly claim, they are fictional, why
>>did you spend the time calling for their murder?
>> Be specific.
>
>Because you haven't posted one shred of evidence to prove
>you are even married, much less have children.
>
So, because you LIE and claim I've offered no proof, you want my
family murdered for not being pure white?
You've offered the stupidest excuse I think I've ever seen. And
having read a lot of conspiracy rants over the years, this is saying
something.
>
>"You are in the Kill File. Have been for a while.
> Note that I can only reply if I read someone else's
> reply to you."
> -- Kent B Wills vainly trying to curtail his OCD
>
Have you noticed that I never did reply, directly, to a single
post from your Vox nym since a bit before I wrote that?
Kent Wills
wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:09:22 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
>> <the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>> "You are in the Kill File. Have been for a while.
>>>>> Note that I can only reply if I read someone else's
>>>>> reply to you."
>>>>> -- Kent B Wills vainly trying to curtail his OCD
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Prove I lived about having placed your Vox nym in the kill file
>>>> when I wrote that.
>>>
>>> Perhaps you've died,
>>
>> Huh?
>
>Speak English much, eh moron?
Quite a bit, dullard.
Since there's nothing to indicate I've died, your comment makes no
sense.
>
>>
>>> but you still haven't posted one shred of
>>> evidence proving that you put the Vox nym in your killfile,
>>> much less only the Vox nym ... then again the following
>>> post by you proves that you're a liar, either way:
>>>
>>
>> You just can't be honest about anything.
>
>Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
It's nice that you admit you can't be honest.
Oh, I figured out that's what your spamming of your false rule
means.
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:13:57 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it>
> wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:09:22 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
>>> <the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>> "You are in the Kill File. Have been for a while.
>>>>>> Note that I can only reply if I read someone else's
>>>>>> reply to you."
>>>>>> -- Kent B Wills vainly trying to curtail his OCD
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Prove I lived about having placed your Vox nym in the kill file
>>>>> when I wrote that.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps you've died,
>>>
>>> Huh?
>>
>> Speak English much, eh moron?
>
> Quite a bit, dullard.
> Since there's nothing to indicate I've died, your comment makes no
> sense.
Tell us again how you've "lived about" you stammering shitwipe.
>
>>
>>>
>>>> but you still haven't posted one shred of
>>>> evidence proving that you put the Vox nym in your killfile,
>>>> much less only the Vox nym ... then again the following
>>>> post by you proves that you're a liar, either way:
>>>>
>>>
>>> You just can't be honest about anything.
>>
>> Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
>
> It's nice that you admit you can't be honest.
Rule #1.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:13:57 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:09:22 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
>>>> <the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>>>> "You are in the Kill File. Have been for a while.
>>>>>>> Note that I can only reply if I read someone else's
>>>>>>> reply to you."
>>>>>>> -- Kent B Wills vainly trying to curtail his OCD
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Prove I lived about having placed your Vox nym in the kill file
>>>>>> when I wrote that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps you've died,
>>>>
>>>> Huh?
>>>
>>> Speak English much, eh moron?
>>
>> Quite a bit, dullard.
>> Since there's nothing to indicate I've died, your comment makes no
>> sense.
>
>Tell us again how you've "lived about" you stammering shitwipe.
>
I see you're too stone cold stupid to understand what my typo was
supposed to have meant.
I realize racist scum, such as you've been proved to be, are very
dumb, but I didn't realize just how stupid you really are.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> but you still haven't posted one shred of
>>>>> evidence proving that you put the Vox nym in your killfile,
>>>>> much less only the Vox nym ... then again the following
>>>>> post by you proves that you're a liar, either way:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You just can't be honest about anything.
>>>
>>> Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
>>
>> It's nice that you admit you can't be honest.
>
>Rule #1.
>
>
And now you acknowledge that Prof. Jonez is a bigot who will lie at
every opportunity. 'Bout time.
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 17:36:14 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it>
> wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:13:57 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ"
>>> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:09:22 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
>>>>> <the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "You are in the Kill File. Have been for a while.
>>>>>>>> Note that I can only reply if I read someone else's
>>>>>>>> reply to you."
>>>>>>>> -- Kent B Wills vainly trying to curtail his OCD
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Prove I lived about having placed your Vox nym in the kill
>>>>>>> file when I wrote that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps you've died,
>>>>>
>>>>> Huh?
>>>>
>>>> Speak English much, eh moron?
>>>
>>> Quite a bit, dullard.
>>> Since there's nothing to indicate I've died, your comment makes
>>> no sense.
>>
>> Tell us again how you've "lived about" you stammering shitwipe.
>>
>
> I see
>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> evidence proving that you put the Vox nym in your killfile,
>>>>>> much less only the Vox nym ... then again the following
>>>>>> post by you proves that you're a liar, either way:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You just can't be honest about anything.
>>>>
>>>> Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
>>>
>>> It's nice that you admit you can't be honest.
>>
>> Rule #1.
>>
>>
>
> And now you acknowledge that
Everyone acknowleges Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
Snarky
denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
obfuscations:
> Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:09:22 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _" wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>> "You are in the Kill File. Have been for a while. Note that I can
>>>>> only reply if I read someone else's reply to you."
>>>>> -- Kent B Wills vainly trying to curtail his OCD
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Prove I lived about having placed your Vox nym in the kill file
>>>> when I wrote that.
>>>
>>> Perhaps you've died,
>>
>> Huh?
>
> Speak English much, eh moron?
>
>
>>> but you still haven't posted one shred of evidence proving that you put
>>> the Vox nym in your killfile, much less only the Vox nym ... then again
>>> the following post by you proves that you're a liar, either way:
>>>
>>>
>> You just can't be honest about anything.
>
IFYPFY, so now it relates to the previous post, where you say he "always
dies".
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
TEH USENETS BULLIE
http://www.runescape.com/
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pretzel_Cabal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008
"But the other thing about her, she does know about international
relations because she is right up there in Alaska right next door to
Russia." -- Steve Doocy of FOX News was obviously a football player in
his early adulthood.
Hey, Aggie! Does this sound familiar?
Message-ID: <nursc4tjdsh8tpsdp...@4ax.com>
"Marcella proves once again that she's an ignorant racist bigot." -- OK,
what race are Greeks, again? Aggie's so much more knowledgeable than I
about that sort of thing. Message-ID:
<O-ednWCl9cD...@eclipse.net.uk>
"It could be several." -- Aggie answers marc_CH's question about which
drugs Jamaican athletes such as Powell and Bolt have been taking.
Message-ID: <aKydne4RQpoPFFnV...@eclipse.net.uk>
"Only athletes on drugs win meddles. [...]
"And the funny thing is the Greek weightlifters were not winning meddles
even while on drugs. Clearly every single weightlifter that beat a Greek
weightlifter was taking more drugs than they were." -- Yeah, that's the
ticket, Aggie! Message-ID:
<c_2dnTTpk7xBa17V...@eclipse.net.uk>
"Do Usenet posters on drugs not know how to spell 'medals'?" -- They
really don't, marc_CH. Message-ID:
<6iifvaF...@mid.individual.net>
"Not supporting me is equivalent to forfeiting your own rights." --
John D. Wentzky: Warrior For Your Freedumb! Message-ID:
<33km2419sg6fnq3sh...@4ax.com>
"You cognatatively challenged fool!" -- According to Agamemnon, Stephen
Wilson is, apparently, highly ignorant about cognates, and so is anyone
who dares to disagree with him, in Message-ID:
<Jvidnfyewe883sjV...@eclipse.net.uk>
"Is it still necrophilia if I'm conscious?" -- Owen Harper, "Dead Man
Walking", Torchwood (20/207)
BigAl
> On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 17:36:14 -0600, "Reality_Check©" <Real...@Check.it>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >Kent Wills wrote:
> >> On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:13:57 -0600, "Reality_Check©" <Real...@Check.it>
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
OJ SHOULD OF BEEN HUNG LONG A GO.
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:13:57 -0600, Reality_CheckŠ wrote these lies,
> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
> obfuscations:
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:09:22 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _" wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>> "You are in the Kill File. Have been for a while. Note that I
>>>>>> can only reply if I read someone else's reply to you."
>>>>>> -- Kent B Wills vainly trying to curtail his OCD
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Prove I lived about having placed your Vox nym in the kill file
>>>>> when I wrote that.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps you've died,
>>>
>>> Huh?
>>
>> Speak English much, eh moron?
>>
>>
>>>> but you still haven't posted one shred of evidence proving that
>>>> you put the Vox nym in your killfile, much less only the Vox nym
>>>> ... then again the following post by you proves that you're a
>>>> liar, either way:
>>>>
>>>>
>>> You just can't be honest about anything.
>>
>> Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS [Dies]!
>
> IFYPFY, so now it relates to the previous post, where you say he
> "always dies".
Your words, not mine, shiteater.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 17:36:14 -0600, "Reality_Check©" <Rea...@Check.it>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:13:57 -0600, "Reality_Check©"
>>>> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:09:22 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
>>>>>> <the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "You are in the Kill File. Have been for a while.
>>>>>>>>> Note that I can only reply if I read someone else's
>>>>>>>>> reply to you."
>>>>>>>>> -- Kent B Wills vainly trying to curtail his OCD
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Prove I lived about having placed your Vox nym in the kill
>>>>>>>> file when I wrote that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Perhaps you've died,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Huh?
>>>>>
>>>>> Speak English much, eh moron?
>>>>
>>>> Quite a bit, dullard.
>>>> Since there's nothing to indicate I've died, your comment makes
>>>> no sense.
>>>
>>> Tell us again how you've "lived about" you stammering shitwipe.
>>>
>>
>> I see you're too stone cold stupid to understand what my typo was
>> supposed to have meant.
>> I realize racist scum, such as you've been proved to be, are very
>> dumb, but I didn't realize just how stupid you really are.
>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> but you still haven't posted one shred of
>>>>>>> evidence proving that you put the Vox nym in your killfile,
>>>>>>> much less only the Vox nym ... then again the following
>>>>>>> post by you proves that you're a liar, either way:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You just can't be honest about anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
>>>>
>>>> It's nice that you admit you can't be honest.
>>>
>>> Rule #1.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> And now you acknowledge that Prof. Jonez is a bigot who will lie at
>> every opportunity. 'Bout time.
>
>Everyone acknowleges Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
>
>
Why do you lie at every opportunity?
Kent Wills
<slapsh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>OJ SHOULD OF BEEN HUNG LONG A GO.
Why? He never been convicted of a capital offense.
--
When cryptography is outlawed,
bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
Lola Stonewall Riot
raved:
> Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 17:36:14 -0600, "Reality_Check©" wrote:
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
I acknowledge that Eric "Reality_Check©" Ross is
http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Bat_Fuck_Insane
--
________________________________________________________________________
All Hail Discordia! Flonk Leader #2 & #11 1/9; mhm 29 x 21
The Discordian People's Most Powerful and Revered Being (without
portfolio); Lits Slut #16; AUK Psycho & Felon #21
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Cabal_of_the_Holy_Pretzel/join
Economic Left/Right: -7.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.38
Real email should go to gmail.com, otherwise the same as above.
Quotable quotes:
"Three OS's from corporate-kings in their towers of glass,
Seven from valley-lords where orchards used to grow,
Nine from dotcoms doomed to die,
One from the Dark Lord Gates on his dark throne
In the Land of Redmond where the Shadows lie.
One OS to rule them all, One OS to find them,
One OS to bring them all and in the darkness bind them,
In the Land of Redmond where the Shadows lie."'
"If you don't have pedicures AT LEAST every two weeks, don't talk to me.
If you don't floss every night and morning and brush at least twice a
day, don't talk to me. If you don't spend money on you hair and get
great cuts and color, don't talk to me. If you are heavy, don't talk to
me. If you don't shower every morning and take a nice bubble bath every
night, don't talk to me. If you don't have a loved one in your arms,
don't talk to me. If you don't keep an immaculate house, don't talk to
me. If you don't work, don't talk to me." -- Clearly, Martha Vandella
never wants to talk to me, which is for the best, really.
MID: <1161934857....@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
"No man in History, including JESUS CHRIST, has directly revealed to
the World the SATANIC WEAPON used to enslave mankind -- INTELLECTUAL
THOUGHT!!" -- Ray Karczewski repeatedly proves his words in every post
he makes
"They thought I was fair game. I was an instrument of purpose to achieve
their desires and not 100 percent real and ALSO that they had me by the
short curlies because I thought that the world revolved around them and
therefore I think that I am fair game and rightly so. If they want to
play dirty, I get to too. It's not a one-way street. I will use the
physcial strength that I have over them, my superior 5'7-3/4" height
advantage, the boxing moves I paid to learn, the suprise of pussyfooting
up to them with their back to me in a public place 18 1/2 years after
the fact and thus not only do will they not know that I am but a pica's
distance away from them, but that I even exist on earth." -- Chris Tsao
is secretly John Wentzky's psychic twin. MID:
<1161246083.1...@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
"You would no longer be here if I were to stop praying for you." --
Spamming weasel of a quack Andrew B. Chung's delusions of grandeur are
getting out of hand, in MID:
<1160653810....@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
"You should see what she/he and Tattoo have been saying in
alt.music.michael-jackson for years now. Granted, some of those turds
over there deserve it, like Justin Pugh and Pam Whatshername. But Roofie
and TattooVamp have ZERO room to be name-calling and throwing stones;
they both live in the same glass condominium I and Brandy live in."
"Icebreaker" lives up to his nick by giving himself severe autoflame
burns over 95% of his virtual self, in MID:
<ow4Wg.418$2B4...@newsfe02.lga>
"But now the end is near. Now Mark Foley comes along and is making
almost all liberal dreams come true and seriously, I'm sorry for it.
See, I believe in karma. I believe what comes around goes around and I
know full well that it's just bad juju to wish such a level of turmoil
and ill upon other humans, warmongering gay-hating maladroits or no, and
that the real path of enlightenment is paved with forgiveness and
progress and white-hot love and turning the other cheek and scotch.
"In fact, Jesus said something about that, I do believe. He said, "Knock
it off already with the warmongering and the hating of each other and
let's all get some wine and party like it's 2012." Then again, he never
saw Karl Rove stab the nation with the dull ice pick of bogus fear. He
never heard George W. Bush describe brutal war and the death of tens of
thousands as "just a comma" in world history.
"Check that. Maybe I'm not so sorry after all." -- Mark Morford,
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/gate/archive/2006/10/11/
notes101106.DTL&nl=fix
http://tinyurl.com/kusmr
"I am incapable of original thoughts" -- Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ has an honest
moment, in MID: <0h59i25ejlthqeeit...@4ax.com>
"shouldnt you be fucking your brains out, mister?" -- Dave Hillstrom, to
Kadaitcha Man, in MID: <ee9701$717$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
"Stuart Grey has taught that torture is moral." -- in MID:
<ee75n6$q31$1...@reader2.panix.com>, Amer...@NumberOne.org can't see how
there's no difference between himself and a would-be terrorist
"I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead"
Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID:
1159678991.8...@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com
"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'
"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt
"When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh
since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The
combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and
Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined to
describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of stoned
hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as throwing
money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then explaining to
reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil Ochs summed it
up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you off." So when
journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows, at best it's
careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization. Osama bin Laden
wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie Hoffman merely wanted
to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner, http://tinyurl.com/ehu3v
"And thats another mistake on your part. Your 'playing' games on usenet,
and I'm not playing...It has nothing to do with impressing you, it has
more to do with making sure you have the education you'll need to debate.
The debate is no fun for me if you are mentally incapable of it. I'm
giving you an opportunity to educate yourself. That's all." -- A trashy
former virus-writer turned Outer Filth doesn't know if he's playing or
working, in MID: <1159389579....@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
"We are most nearly ourselves when we achieve the seriousness of the
child at play." -- Heraclitus
"All is flux, nothing stays still." -- Heraclitus
"No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it's not the same river
and he's not the same man." -- Heraclitus
"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken
"My own opinion (even speaking as a woman) is that no more female input
should be allowed in establishing and enforcing the rules and regulations
of a MEN' group. If this is to be a haven for MEN to discuss MEN'S
issues then women shouldn't be designing the room and painting it pink
and putting up lace curtains and a lot of frilly doilies. JMO." --
Jill's impression of David Walliams' "Little Britain" character just
keeps improving, in Message-ID:
<03b5h2581gcu8r5bk...@4ax.com>
"F!ck moderation, free speech is a masculinist proverb and that's what
feminist manvagina's like yourself." -- conn...@hotmail.com posted
before finishing a thought, in MID:
<1158480805.5...@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
"The MORE you think, the MORE you remain UNAWARE, CONFUSED." -- Ray
"Kazoo" Karczewski, in MID: <4504807e...@news.west.earthlink.net>
"Dustin is FILTH in my opinion. And not for any reason other than posting
Rhonda's personal info." -- Respondant
"email is not a private form of communication." -- Dustin Cook, in
Message-ID: <1157484607....@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
George Pickett Memorial Award nominee <wfh...@hotmail.com> on outing
personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
"Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
You're so fucking scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.
"Meanwhile you are the ugliest pigfucker in the universe. You are the
coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an asshole you
are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.
"What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat asshole."
-- in MID: <1156587081....@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin K00k's delusions of grandeur reached new heights,
in Message-ID: <Xns98355D29419...@69.28.186.121>
"Covert ace nudists in the Vatican!"
"Real men eat me."
"Any priest or shaman must be presumed guilty until proved innocent." --
Lazarus Long
"Laws count, the US Constitution count more, and we need to have judges
on the bench who are going to Carry Out those laws, not Make Law or
Interpret Law." -- John "Easily" Shocked contradicts his own words on
the overriding importance of society's reluctance to accept
homosexuality, in Message-ID: <brIDe.67062$Qo.12613@fed1read01>
"Heterosexuality is not *normal*, it's just more /common/."
"For the most part, morality is universal." -- John "Easily" Shocked
"Gay, straight, they all want blow jobs."
"Bad stories are bad stories. We just call them as they are." -- DBurns
demonstrates his sheer cluelessness on Mar 9, 2002, at 6:25 pm, in
rec.arts.drwho
"Oh, and Snarky, if you're listening: Fuck you, Asshole! Enjoy the
few remaining days of your internet access." Kooky troll John Long
gets delusional, in Message-ID: <3C36AA50.31DD0...@epix.net>
A sad little top-poster with the nym of "Choirboy" once lamed:
> Well, gee, coming from an asshole like *you* ...
> ESAD, ya 'ho bitch.
Please to be posting proof, you facile fridgemagnet.
-- replied the Aussie rapier, aka fnord/Affinity, in a now-lost message
"I have a dream...that one day the whole world will know the joy of
my nipples!" -- Stimpy
"The meek shall inherit the earth -- 2' x ~6' x 6' of it."
"If English was good enough for Jesus Christ, it's good enough for
these U-nited States!" -- an unknown politician, in a senate floor
debate over bilingual education.)
"The policeman isn't there to create disorder, the policeman is
there to preserve disorder" -- Mayor Richard Daley of Czechago,
September 23, 1968
"Moral: it's not a plot hole if two eyes and two brain cells can
solve it." -- Keith Goodnight, in atbvs, on NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon,
03 Jun 2002 16:46:02 EDT
"Kung fu's useful!"
"Bernadette, you ignorant oaf.
Bernadette, you brainless dullard.
Bernadette, you feeble-minded wag.
Bernadette, you blathering baboon.
Bernadette, you babbling boor.
Bernadette, you depraved dolt.
Bernadette, you stinking slimeball.
Bernadette, you yammering yak.
Bernadette, you lily-livered lush.
Bernadette, you hard-hearted hulk."
-- Mother Be Strange gets very hard on herself, in
MID: <94b6d5f1.02032...@posting.google.com>
"[Lurlean] would never dream of sleeping with a dog. The Bible's against
it. You don't seem to care what the Bible says, so she thought maybe you
gave that a try too -- in addition to sucking on Steve, letting him play
with your butt, and having seven different lesbian lovers in our bed."
-- Sistah Moonshine shocks a.p.h. with the revelation that she got it
off with "Romaine Brooks", in a now-vanished message
"I should have known my boss was evil when he called my jumping onto my
chair to praise the Lord out loud 'inappropriate behavior.'" -- Sistah
Moonshine: Oppressed Christian, in another vanished message
"I made a pact with the devil." -- Sistah Moonshine, from her dream
diary
"'drink that hooch,' they would say, 'and then smoke that joint. Bury
your head in that strange woman's crotch and bring her to a thunderous
climax with your tongue, then tell her no man could ever give her that
much pleasure in a thousand years. Tell her to leave her husband and
become a lesbian. Drip hot wax on that pervert's nutty buddies and then
charge him extra for the privilege.'" -- Sistah Moonshine is now working
on an erotic epic to outmatch Anne Rice.
"Roe V Wade has zero bearing on my existence other than it affects it
adversely."
-- Johnny Wentzky never had much truck with "logic". Message-ID:
<V6xNe.27650$XM3....@bignews5.bellsouth.net>
"You are the GOD-DAMNED, IGNORANT LIAR here.
Now, that is not me taking the Lord's name in vain."
-- John Wentzky: Living proof of the Death of Irony, in Message-ID:
<jljOe.5348$ZD4.3...@bignews3.bellsouth.net>
"Stupidity excuses nothing. It's only a reason...." -- Phxbrd
"The whining has just begun." -- John Wentzky, in Message-ID:
<Ie2Qe.8199$wb5....@bignews1.bellsouth.net>
"It's not nice to misrepresent Mother Nature."
"Gay men deserve to die." -- John Wentzky, in Message-ID:
<RSR3f.23691$5l.1...@bignews1.bellsouth.net>
Joseph Bartlo wrote:
> A big mean meanie and heavyweight kookologist responding to my text
> and making me look like a colossal idiot. No more whinges to this mean
> person who keeps pounding my ass into the ground - you go on the lits
> of people who have trounced me. The state I left that group was
> embarassing to me. There were too many posts to follow them all, and I
> know a lot of people were saying mean things about me - but a few
> sucked up. So it was best at that point rather than to browse all the
> crap to simply make a standard post telling people a lot of bullshit
> I'd just made up. I did that on many other groups, but the war is only
> fought here. If anyone thinks I am the least bit kidding, consider how
> long this has been going, how little I have accomplished (i.e., how
> much the mean, mean kookologists have changed everything), and that I
> have a lot of goats to blow.
-- in MID: <43745576...@verizon.net>
"America is supposed to be the world's melting pot,
so melt!!" -- from some BBS
"There are no governors anywhere."
"The personal _is_ political."
"If humans decline to exercise faith, then an
omnipotent God is impotent." -- Teresita, x-posted to APH
"Gabrielle?! Monkey-man, you bring her back! You know, you two are
beginning to irritate me with these obsessions of yours!
Fish don't just catch themselves!" -- Xena, "Fins, Femmes, &
Gems" (64/318)
"I don't think so because, I'm a whole lot smarter and far less bigoted
than the average Jew, although smart Jews as having collaborated with
your Skull and Bones Third Reich certainly have more of those
in-your-face balls than I'd ever have to work with." -- Guthball drools
all over my irony meter, in MID:
<fea985f50107c84f4d1...@mygate.mailgate.org>
"You never asked someone who goes into areas of the internet that are
only for adults who has an underage id somehow or another if they are a
cop posing as an underage person online?
I guess lots of people just don't watch dateline or read stories much.
Why don;t you go to pervertedjustice,com and see what they do. They are
awash in their self-proclaimed glory after they lied to membners of the
public.
They are awash in their self-proclaimed glory after they posed as an
underage person and agreed to do all sorts of sex acts wioth adult
males, and they are adults posing as teenager themselves. They make
themsleves into liars by falsely impersonating underage persons and by
not fuilfilling the words they tell the victims online in their chats.
Why don't you read it where they tell these victims of their deceit
about how they have been with grown men and such? Why don't you read it
where they say, "That would be cool." after someone makes an advance
towards an adult who is posing as a teenager? And, where they agree to
meet the person, etc.
Lost control, didn't you?
Is that why you feel as if you need to lie so much now? I see where lots
of these false impersonation games are not sticking. They feel as if
they can lie and then order the victims to get counseling in the
gayblade, governmental, pro-choice tax leech counseling centers. They
are doing nothing more than usury and fraud in many cases." -- Wentzky
almost comes out of the closet as a pedo/ephebophile in MID:
<H%%Eg.28916$Uq1....@bignews6.bellsouth.net>
"I am a loyal friend to those who report science and truth not
try to hidden agenda hide it. Astronomy is so important little do the
clueless know where they came from or where they are going. The Officer
Warhol reporting of Little Goldilocks and the Tree Bears was so relaxing
but heed its moral warning blondes do have more fun. The Seans Sil a
beauty like no other waits for this Earthman to hopefully safely real
Starship bring all those worthy to space the final frontier. Choose life
not war, oh the humanity, when will man lay down his arms? Thank you
Green Knight for your dedication to duty and God speed on your journey
to the sacred mountain. Figs and olives the preservers of life and
promoters of good digestion. You darn tooten we like fig Newton.
Att: All Earth Science Team Officers
Officer Warhol has issued a world wide bulletin for all coastal residing
residents to go to higher ground due to planet warming. The increasing
planetary green house effect is scientifically now observed. The Green
Knight predicted dooms day long cycle comet may also be approaching,
take heed! Also Florida residents listen for daily reports from Officer
Bert and please be aware of hurricane Debbie now gaining power off the
coast of Africa, oh the humanity!"
-- nightbat on the importance of a good diet, and always taking one's
meds, in MID: <5936a$44ec171f$46e3a618$28...@COMTECK.COM>
"Real meaning: 'Repeatedly another raw-boned lout twitters, but some
mankhead recurrently thereafter erodes the hymen. If another habitual
criminal beyond a fat cell advises some fermentation bucket, then the
show-off respecting another swamp-donkey glides. Now and then, some
jawless fusspot periphrastically disturbs a mechanic with an inchworm.
When you see another impacted tooth, it means that a bitch round a fried
egg wobbles.
The walrus squeals, and another flathead amid a ham sandwich burns;
however, a flasher charms a scabby codpiece. Another sheep with another
taco tickler wakes, and the hedgehog sees another zigzagger. When some
tatterdemalion afore the fungus is frightfully swaggering, some ruffian
reportingly starts a bank manager.
Another vegetative door-to-door salesman splashes, and a dung ball
respecting the motherfucker smiles; however, a hamster drinks a hifalutin
fowl. Another alienated zoo exhibit comes, while some depressing hose bag
finds some futtock. When you see another tonsil, it means that a cholera
germ amongst another trollop sweats. Some dizzily stony-broke wretch is
nosy. Some melancholic homo endlessly dangles some thereupon pus-filled
fumbler.'" -- Kadaitcha interprets batty's advice in a most wise and
insightful manner, in MID: <5m0ln4$znk$o...@emaciated-marshmallows.net.au>
"I am not a pornographer. I don't even own a pornograph."
-- ersatz Jabriol
> A Christian is a citizen of Christ Jesus' kingdom just as an American is
> a citizen of the United States.
Whatever you've been smoking, it's making you spew great lines for a
"Cheech and Chung" movie.
-- Chadwick Stone to Andrew B., in MID:
<f98Hg.249738$bN2....@fe09.news.easynews.com>
"I bets you gets all dems prettest gurles!
"You is such a manly man.
"You never wanted to do this UseNet in the first place! You... You wanted
to be...
"A Soc.Men.JACKOFF!
(piano vamp)
"Creeping from poast to poast! As they bloat up the mighty rivers of
Interwebs! With the best girl money can buy by my side! The Hooker!
The Tranvestite!
The Giant Bloated soc.men wife!
The Little Boys!
The Big Whopping Leather Clad Gay male! We'd sing! Sing! Sing!
"Oh, I'm a Soc Man, and I'm okay,
I PeeBeeKay all night and I Obsess all day.
AUK: He's a Soc Man, and He's okay,
He PeeBeeKays all night and he Obsesses all day.
"I make empty threats, I jack my meat, I go to the lava-try.
On Wednesday I got a hooker
And ended up with Vee Dee!!
AUK: He makes empty threats, he jacks his meat,
He goes to the lava-try.
On Wednesday He got a hooker
And ended up with Vee Dee!!
CHORUS
"I tell big lies, I flit and whine,
I'm envious of real women.
That's why Soc Men put on women's clothing, And hang around in bars.
AUK: He tells big lies, He flits and whines,
He's envious of real women.
That's why Soc Men put on women's clothing, And hang
around....in bars?????
CHORUS
"I poast bullshit, I wear high heels,
Suspendies and a bra.
I am a sissy girlie
Just like my dear papa.
AUK: He poasts bsullshit, he wears high heels
Suspendies?? and a .... a Bra????
(spoken, raggedly) What's this? Wants to be a *girlie*?
"Oh, My!
And I thought you were so rugged! Poofter!" -- Kevin A. Cannon, to MCP,
in MID: <ehlvpq$na9$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
"This bandwidth has been rescued from AOL." -- mimus
No-one expects the Fannish Inquisition!
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 22:57:51 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it>
> wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 17:36:14 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ"
>>> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
Reality_CheckŠ
> Hail Eris! On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:57:51 -0600, Reality_CheckŠ ranted
> and raved:
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
> http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Bat_Fuck_Insane
Who's "Eric "Reality_CheckŠ" Ross" eh shiteater?
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:21:21 -0700 (PDT), BigAl
> <slapsh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> OJ SHOULD OF BEEN HUNG LONG A GO.
>
> Why? He never been convicted of a capital offense.
But YOU were convicted of a serious FELONY involving
the abuse of a minor in Iowa, Kent --
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
Kent Wills
wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:21:21 -0700 (PDT), BigAl
>> <slapsh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> OJ SHOULD OF BEEN HUNG LONG A GO.
>>
>> Why? He never been convicted of a capital offense.
>
>But YOU were convicted of a serious FELONY involving
>the abuse of a minor in Iowa, Kent --
>
Why do you lie at every opportunity?
Jonezie:
>> Or you could discuss the holocaust of Native Americans by
>> the invading White Man ...
>
Deadrat:
> Sure. I for Indian or N for Native?
Jonezie:
S for Savage.
Prof. Jonez expressing his racial HATE for Native Americans.
Message-ID: <6b3i56F...@mid.individual.net>
>http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
>
>
Kent Wills
wrote:
>Lola Stonewall Riot wrote:
>> Hail Eris! On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:57:51 -0600, Reality_Check© ranted
>> and raved:
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 17:36:14 -0600, "Reality_Check©" wrote:
>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>> I acknowledge that Eric "Reality_Check©" Ross is
>> http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Bat_Fuck_Insane
>
>Who's "Eric "Reality_Check©" Ross" eh shiteater?
>
>
Why do you lie at every opportunity?
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 16:26:26 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it>
> wrote:
>
>> Lola Stonewall Riot wrote:
>>> and raved:
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Bat_Fuck_Insane
>>
>> Who's "Eric "Reality_CheckŠ" Ross" eh shiteater?
>>
>>
>
> Why do you lie at every opportunity?
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 16:27:32 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it>
> wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:21:21 -0700 (PDT), BigAl
>>> <slapsh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> OJ SHOULD OF BEEN HUNG LONG A GO.
>>>
>>> Why? He never been convicted of a capital offense.
>>
>> But YOU were convicted of a serious FELONY involving
>> the abuse of a minor in Iowa, Kent --
>>
>
> Why do you lie at every opportunity?
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
Lola Stonewall Riot
Ross frothed and foamed:
> Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:21:21 -0700 (PDT), BigAl wrote:
>>
>>> OJ SHOULD OF BEEN HUNG LONG A GO.
>>
>> Why? He never been convicted of a capital offense.
>
> But YOU were convicted of a serious FELONY involving the abuse of a
> minor in Iowa, Kent
Back your shit up, coward and liar. Prove he's using his own legalname,
and prove his middle name is "Bradley".
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5
The God of Odd Statements
Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.
I <heart> Ann & Nancy Wilson!
http://www.cbsundstrom.com/fuckyoujohnmccain.jpg
"Health and Safety...Film Department." -- The Doctor, "Partners In
Crime"
Thread where outing begins: http://tinyurl.com/hojf8
George Pickett Memorial Award nominee <wfh...@hotmail.com> on outing
personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
"Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
You're so fucking scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.
"Meanwhile you are the ugliest pigfucker in the universe. You are the
coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an asshole you
are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.
"What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat asshole."
-- in MID: <1156587081....@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
"President Bush, for example, made 232 false statements about weapons of
mass destruction in Iraq and another 28 false statements about Iraq's
links to Al Qaeda. Secretary of State Powell had the second-highest
total in the two-year period, with 244 false statements about weapons of
mass destruction in Iraq and 10 about Iraq's links to Al Qaeda. Rumsfeld
and Fleischer each made 109 false statements, followed by Wolfowitz
(with 85), Rice (with 56), Cheney (with 48), and McClellan (with 14)."
-- Charles Lewis and Mark Reading-Smith, January 23, 2008
Kent Wills
<me...@popesnarky.argh> wrote:
>Hail Eris! On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:27:32 -0600, Eric "Reality_CheckŠ"
>Ross frothed and foamed:
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:21:21 -0700 (PDT), BigAl wrote:
>>>
>>>> OJ SHOULD OF BEEN HUNG LONG A GO.
>>>
>>> Why? He never been convicted of a capital offense.
>>
>> But YOU were convicted of a serious FELONY involving the abuse of a
>> minor in Iowa, Kent
>
>Back your shit up, coward and liar. Prove he's using his own legalname,
>and prove his middle name is "Bradley".
Would you like to borrow my chirping cricket SFX machine?
The proven racist and admitted pedophile, Prof. Jonez, has never
backed up any claim he's ever made. Really.
Reality_CheckŠ
> Hail Eris! On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:27:32 -0600, Eric "Reality_CheckŠ"
> Ross frothed and foamed:
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:21:21 -0700 (PDT), BigAl wrote:
>>>
>>>> OJ SHOULD OF BEEN HUNG LONG A GO.
>>>
>>> Why? He never been convicted of a capital offense.
>>
>> But YOU were convicted of a serious FELONY involving the abuse of a
>> minor in Iowa, Kent
>
> Back your shit up,
Rule # 1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 04:24:52 GMT, Lola Stonewall Riot
> <me...@popesnarky.argh> wrote:
>
>> Hail Eris! On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:27:32 -0600, Eric "Reality_CheckŠ"
>> Ross frothed and foamed:
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:21:21 -0700 (PDT), BigAl wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> OJ SHOULD OF BEEN HUNG LONG A GO.
>>>>
>>>> Why? He never been convicted of a capital offense.
>>>
>>> But YOU were convicted of a serious FELONY involving the abuse of a
>>> minor in Iowa, Kent
>>
>> Back your shit up, coward and liar. Prove he's using his own
>> legalname, and prove his middle name is "Bradley".
>
> Would you like to
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
Snarky
denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
obfuscations:
>> Hail Eris! On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:27:32 -0600, Eric "Reality_Check©"
>> Ross frothed and foamed:
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:21:21 -0700 (PDT), BigAl wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> OJ SHOULD OF BEEN HUNG LONG A GO.
>>>>
>>>> Why? He never been convicted of a capital offense.
>>>
>>> But YOU were convicted of a serious FELONY involving the abuse of a
>>> minor in Iowa, Kent
>>
>> and prove his middle name is "Bradley".
>
Good of you to admit you have nothing whatsoever to back up your shit.
Rule # 1 = Eric "Reality Check©"/"Vox"/"_ Prof. Jonez _" Ross ALWAYS
Lies! Including about his name.
--
________________________________________________________________________
Snarky
denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
obfuscations:
>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 16:27:32 -0600, "Reality_Check©" wrote:
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> OJ SHOULD OF BEEN HUNG LONG A GO.
>>>>
>>>> Why? He never been convicted of a capital offense.
>>>
>>> But YOU were convicted of a serious FELONY involving the abuse of a
>>> minor in Iowa, Kent --
>>>
>>>
>> Why do you lie at every opportunity?
>
> http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
I guess it's because Eric Ross is a pathological liar.
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 02:14:21 -0600, Reality_CheckŠ wrote these lies,
> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
> obfuscations:
>> Lola Stonewall Riot wrote:
>>> Ross frothed and foamed:
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:21:21 -0700 (PDT), BigAl wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> OJ SHOULD OF BEEN HUNG LONG A GO.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why? He never been convicted of a capital offense.
>>>>
>>>> But YOU were convicted of a serious FELONY involving the abuse of a
>>>> minor in Iowa, Kent
>>>
>>> Back your shit up, coward and liar. Prove he's using his own
>>> legalname, and prove his middle name is "Bradley".
>>
>> Rule # 1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
>
> Good of you to admit
It's an incontrovertible truth = Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:06:25 -0600, Eric Ross wrote these lies,
> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
> obfuscations:
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:21:21 -0700 (PDT), BigAl wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> OJ SHOULD OF BEEN HUNG LONG A GO.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why? He never been convicted of a capital offense.
>>>>
>>>> But YOU were convicted of a serious FELONY involving the abuse of a
>>>> minor in Iowa, Kent --
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Why do you lie at every opportunity?
>>
>> http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
>
> I guess it's because Eric Ross is a pathological liar.
Who's "Eric Ross", eh shitwipe?
Kent Wills
wrote:
>On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:06:25 -0600, Eric Ross wrote these lies,
>denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>obfuscations:
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 16:27:32 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ" wrote:
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:21:21 -0700 (PDT), BigAl wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> OJ SHOULD OF BEEN HUNG LONG A GO.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why? He never been convicted of a capital offense.
>>>>
>>>> But YOU were convicted of a serious FELONY involving the abuse of a
>>>> minor in Iowa, Kent --
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Why do you lie at every opportunity?
>>
>> http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
>
>I guess it's because Eric Ross is a pathological liar.
That's not in dispute. However, I'd like Eric to admit it.
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:25:59 GMT, Snarky <popes...@caballista.organ>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:06:25 -0600, Eric Ross wrote these lies,
>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>> obfuscations:
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 16:27:32 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ" wrote:
>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:21:21 -0700 (PDT), BigAl wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OJ SHOULD OF BEEN HUNG LONG A GO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why? He never been convicted of a capital offense.
>>>>>
>>>>> But YOU were convicted of a serious FELONY involving the abuse of
>>>>> a minor in Iowa, Kent --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Why do you lie at every opportunity?
>>>
>>> http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
>>
>> I guess it's because Eric Ross is a pathological liar.
>
> That's not in dispute. However, I'd like Eric to admit it.
Who's "Eric", eh cunt ?
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
Kent Wills
wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:25:59 GMT, Snarky <popes...@caballista.organ>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:06:25 -0600, Eric Ross wrote these lies,
>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>>> obfuscations:
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 16:27:32 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ" wrote:
>>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:21:21 -0700 (PDT), BigAl wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OJ SHOULD OF BEEN HUNG LONG A GO.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why? He never been convicted of a capital offense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But YOU were convicted of a serious FELONY involving the abuse of
>>>>>> a minor in Iowa, Kent --
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Why do you lie at every opportunity?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
>>>
>>> I guess it's because Eric Ross is a pathological liar.
>>
>> That's not in dispute. However, I'd like Eric to admit it.
>
>Who's "Eric", eh cunt ?
>
Has your racism so damaged your mind that you think anyone is
buying your lies?
Why, exactly, do you lie at every opportunity?
Some of Prof. Jonez greatest hits. Yes, he really did author the
quotes. He's even admitted that law enforcement took notes when they
visited him regarding his threats to my children.
More recently, he's claimed another poster has a copy of the report
made regarding the visit.
"What you might call racist, an intelligent white person would
call realist."
-- Prof. Jonez
"I will admit that those who can't deal with the truth that
whites are the master race will find my posts annoying. Too fucking
bad for them. They can bury their heads in the sand and kill file me
if they don't like the truth!"
-- Prof. Jonez
"Kent Wills married a spic named Joquina Cruz. They have two
half-breed children. All of them should be put to death. First the
race traitor Kent, then the genetic misfits they produced, then the
pet spic."
-- Prof. Jonez
[FYI: Lindsay's real name isn't Joquina]
"Kent has committed the greatest crime imaginable. He
betrayed his own race!"
-- Prof. Jonez
"Death to Kent Wills and all race traitors!"
-- Prof. Jonez
"The fucking race traitor doesn't know his own birthdate? "
-- Prof. Jonez
>http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
>
>
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 21:16:17 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it>
> wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:25:59 GMT, Snarky
>>> <popes...@caballista.organ> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:06:25 -0600, Eric Ross wrote these lies,
>>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>>>> obfuscations:
>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 16:27:32 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ" wrote:
>>>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:21:21 -0700 (PDT), BigAl wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> OJ SHOULD OF BEEN HUNG LONG A GO.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why? He never been convicted of a capital offense.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But YOU were convicted of a serious FELONY involving the abuse
>>>>>>> of a minor in Iowa, Kent --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why do you lie at every opportunity?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
>>>>
>>>> I guess it's because Eric Ross is a pathological liar.
>>>
>>> That's not in dispute. However, I'd like Eric to admit it.
>>
>> Who's "Eric", eh cunt ?
>>
>
> Has your racism
You're lying again, Kunt.
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
Reality_CheckŠ
news:6l86u2F...@mid.individual.net:
> I have a tolerance for alcohol and I need increasing amounts to
> achieve the same effect. I get withdrawal symptoms.
chrisv
Eric "Reality_CheckŠ" Ross lied:
That'd be you, Eric, you pathological liar. Now, when are you going to
prove that "Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> has the middle name
"Bradley", and is a convicted burglar/sex offender? The Tenth of Never?
Your link proves absolutely *nothing* about "Kent Wills"
<comp...@gmail.com>. It's hearsay, when you try to link it to him. IOW,
bullshit.
chrisv
Eric "Reality_CheckŠ"/"Vox" Ross lied:
>> Lies! Including about his name.
>
Then, obviously, you can prove your "Rule" is true, by proving that his
middle name is "Bradley". I don't have to prove your point for you, if I
think your point is bullshit. You have to do all the work, and if
necessary, do it over and over and over, upon request (I have never seen
any indication that <compuelf> is "Kent Bradley Wills", outside of your
posts). Otherwise, people can ignore it, and call you a paranoid freak
who should be shunned by the non-delusional. That's what being able to
*prove your claims* is all about. OTOH, maybe alt.fucknozzles would be a
more appropriate group for you.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 21:16:17 -0600, "Reality_Check©" <Rea...@Check.it>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:25:59 GMT, Snarky
>>>> <popes...@caballista.organ> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:06:25 -0600, Eric Ross wrote these lies,
>>>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>>>>> obfuscations:
>>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 16:27:32 -0600, "Reality_Check©" wrote:
>>>>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:21:21 -0700 (PDT), BigAl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> OJ SHOULD OF BEEN HUNG LONG A GO.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why? He never been convicted of a capital offense.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But YOU were convicted of a serious FELONY involving the abuse
>>>>>>>> of a minor in Iowa, Kent --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why do you lie at every opportunity?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess it's because Eric Ross is a pathological liar.
>>>>
>>>> That's not in dispute. However, I'd like Eric to admit it.
>>>
>>> Who's "Eric", eh cunt ?
>>>
>>
>> Has your racism so damaged your mind that you think anyone is
>> buying your lies?
>> Why, exactly, do you lie at every opportunity?
>
>You're lying again, Kunt.
>
How is asking questions lying? In reality I mean. Not within the
confines of your delusions.
Jonezie:
>> Or you could discuss the holocaust of Native Americans by
>> the invading White Man ...
>
Deadrat:
> Sure. I for Indian or N for Native?
Jonezie:
S for Savage.
Prof. Jonez expressing his racial HATE for Native Americans.
Message-ID: <6b3i56F...@mid.individual.net>
>http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
>
Reality_CheckŠ
> Hail Eris! On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:45:58 -0600, a coward and pest named
> Eric "Reality_CheckŠ" Ross lied:
>> Snarky wrote:
>>> On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:06:25 -0600, Eric Ross wrote these lies,
>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>>> obfuscations:
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 16:27:32 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ" wrote:
>>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:21:21 -0700 (PDT), BigAl wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OJ SHOULD OF BEEN HUNG LONG A GO.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why? He never been convicted of a capital offense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But YOU were convicted of a serious FELONY involving the abuse
>>>>>> of a minor in Iowa, Kent --
>>>>>
>>>>> Why do you lie at every opportunity?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
>>>
>>> I guess it's because Eric Ross is a pathological liar.
>>
>> Who's "Eric Ross", eh shitwipe?
>
> That'd be you, Eric, you pathological liar.
Wrong again, shitwipe.
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 23:18:58 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it>
> wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 21:16:17 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ"
>>> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:25:59 GMT, Snarky
>>>>> <popes...@caballista.organ> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:06:25 -0600, Eric Ross wrote these lies,
>>>>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>>>>>> obfuscations:
>>>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:21:21 -0700 (PDT), BigAl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> OJ SHOULD OF BEEN HUNG LONG A GO.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why? He never been convicted of a capital offense.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But YOU were convicted of a serious FELONY involving the abuse
>>>>>>>>> of a minor in Iowa, Kent --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why do you lie at every opportunity?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess it's because Eric Ross is a pathological liar.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's not in dispute. However, I'd like Eric to admit it.
>>>>
>>>> Who's "Eric", eh cunt ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Has your racism so damaged your mind that you think anyone is
>>> buying your lies?
>>> Why, exactly, do you lie at every opportunity?
>>
>> You're lying again, Kunt.
>>
>
> How is asking questions lying?
Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
Reality_CheckŠ
>> I have a tolerance for alcohol and I need increasing amounts to
>> achieve the same effect. I get withdrawal symptoms.
Wassa matta, eh Kent? Stay up all night again tweakin' on meth ?
Does your parole officer know you're using illegal drugs again?
Path:
uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!news.wiretrip.org!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news-x5!mail2news-x4!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
From: "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.tits>
Subject: facial numbness due to stress
Newsgroups:
alt.fan.bob-larson,alt.true-crime,alt.usenet.kooks,fl.general,la.general
Message-ID: <evxl1f$8rq$p...@zit-faced-profligate.org.east-timor>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:35:42 GMT
Organization: rascally hosebag
Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@dizum.com
Lines: 6
Xref: uni-berlin.de alt.fan.bob-larson:84655 alt.true-crime:1085284
alt.usenet.kooks:1756794 fl.general:22022 la.general:24325
Demon Lord Benedict Snodgrass Jr of Confusion
the issue further by squeaking:
> Reality_Check© wrote:
>>> I have a tolerance for alcohol and I need increasing amounts to achieve
>>> the same effect. I get withdrawal symptoms.
>
> Wassa matta, eh Kent?
That wasn't Kent...
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069; Usenet Ruiner #5
The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pigfucker In The Universe
Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.
Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2; AUK Hate Machine Cog #19
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
Remove all the confusion and k00ks from my posting addy to send me your
sekrit messages.
"The most useful tool for dealing with management types is, of course,
an automatic weapon."
"these trolls are frustrated youngsters with serious psychic problems."
-- a web version of Alexa Cameron, named Adrian.
http://preview.tinyurl.com/6z5zym
"The fact that you are trying to defend the proselytisation of
homosexuality shows that RTG is making you turn gay step by step,
whereas I have been able to resist his sexual brainwashing. If you watch
series 2 of Torchwood you might even become a fully fledged mincer
yourself, complete with mashed potatoes and gravy." -- Yes, Aggie means
Russell T. "Gayvies". Message-ID:
<tO6dnYP81-E-cATY...@pipex.net>
Official Chung Demon
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008
"You are the GOD-DAMNED, IGNORANT LIAR here.
Now, that is not me taking the Lord's name in vain."
-- John Wentzky: Living proof of the Death of Irony, in Message-ID:
<jljOe.5348$ZD4....@bignews3.bellsouth.net>
I mourned:
> The Mop Jockey did most oddly state:
>> DUDE, YOU WIN TEH INTERNETS!!!
>>
>> the oversized check is in the mail.
>
> Alas, all I get for my trouble is a Monkey that's trained to hurl shit
> under several of my nyms.
"DevMcKinHole, you also get the pleasure of sucking off my doggy and
cleaning out his butthole with your tongue." -- He's not so much a
*Porch*Monkey as a _Fire_Monkey, as in one who's on fire due to his
own tendency to mess with lighter fluid while standing beside a hot
stove. Message-ID: <77Uxh.1996$384.1135@trnddc05>
Said I:
> You, Monkey-man, are quite possibly the only usenetter in existence
> who does not and cannot own Hatter.
"[...] What's the matter fagboi, am I beating your as$ so badly that
you're no seeking an alliance with the diaperboi?...YOu really don't
know how dumb you are, do ya?" -- I guess I don't, Monkey.
Message-ID: <gHVIh.1760$Bi2.1639@trnddc01>
"Ok, but I am not stalking Teh Mop Jockey, I seem to be building a
relationship with him. Remember, I am a Christian so the secular rules
do not apply to me. I strive to be amoral, which I think applies to this
situation. Keep this in mind, please. Since I am currently mentally ill
and since I can not nominate, that is what I am doing at this time." --
Olympiada: Teh amoral "Christian", in Message-ID:
<45e625dd$0$16280$8826...@free.teranews.com>
"You're like some kind of rabid attack-gerbil." -- Lionel Lauer to Joxer
in MID: <oorbs2pt3dc6b8t4a...@4ax.com>
"I say you are out of your fucking mind." -- Ying Guo, posting as
"SameAsB4" <exeb...@yanospamhoo.com>, tells PorchMonkey4Life, posting
as the same nick but a slightly different morph, the score, in MID:
<ka4lo.3...@news.alt.net>
"in the holy spirit i know you would satisfy every single person in a
room if you were the only person present." -- ~tanya, to Crazy Andy II,
in MID: <1167007805.9...@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
If you never read anything else in any of my sigs, read this:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15321167/
http://borealin.livejournal.com/15104.html
Or watch it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqxmPjB0WSs
Then, if you manage to read/watch all that, try this:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
And Molly Ivins had a few choice words to say about it, weeks before:
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092906B.shtml
Here's Chris Floyd: Fatal Vision: The Deeper Evil Behind the Detainee
Bill: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/100206A.shtml
"Q: What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War?
A: George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War." -- Anon.
Thread where outing begins: http://tinyurl.com/hojf8
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart,
and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner <wfh...@hotmail.com> on
outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
"Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
You're so fucking scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.
"Meanwhile you are the ugliest pigfucker in the universe. You are the
coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an asshole you
are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.
"What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat asshole."
-- in MID: <1156587081....@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
"I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead"
Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID:
1159678991.8...@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com
"When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh
since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The
combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and
Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined
to describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of
stoned hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as
throwing money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then
explaining to reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil
Ochs summed it up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you
off." So when journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows,
at best it's careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization.
Osama bin Laden wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie
Hoffman merely wanted to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner,
http://tinyurl.com/ehu3v
Demon Lord Benedict Snodgrass Jr of Confusion
the issue further by squeaking:
>> Hail Eris! On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:45:58 -0600, a coward and pest named
>>> Snarky wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:06:25 -0600, Eric Ross wrote these lies,
>>>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>>>> obfuscations:
>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:21:21 -0700 (PDT), BigAl wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> OJ SHOULD OF BEEN HUNG LONG A GO.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why? He never been convicted of a capital offense.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But YOU were convicted of a serious FELONY involving the abuse of a
>>>>>>> minor in Iowa, Kent --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why do you lie at every opportunity?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
>>>>
>>>> I guess it's because Eric Ross is a pathological liar.
>>>
>>> Who's "Eric Ross", eh shitwipe?
>>
>> That'd be you, Eric, you pathological liar.
>
> Wrong again, shitwipe.
Or so you say. Bet Kent and/or Moe can prove all of their claims about
you before you can prove even one about either of them.
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069; Usenet Ruiner #5
The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pigfucker In The Universe
Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.
Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2; AUK Hate Machine Cog #19
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
Remove all the confusion and k00ks from my posting addy to send me your
sekrit messages.
"The most useful tool for dealing with management types is, of course,
an automatic weapon."
"these trolls are frustrated youngsters with serious psychic problems."
-- a web version of Alexa Cameron, named Adrian.
http://preview.tinyurl.com/6z5zym
"The fact that you are trying to defend the proselytisation of
homosexuality shows that RTG is making you turn gay step by step,
whereas I have been able to resist his sexual brainwashing. If you watch
series 2 of Torchwood you might even become a fully fledged mincer
yourself, complete with mashed potatoes and gravy." -- Yes, Aggie means
Russell T. "Gayvies". Message-ID:
<tO6dnYP81-E-cATY...@pipex.net>
Official Chung Demon
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008
"You are the GOD-DAMNED, IGNORANT LIAR here.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:48:44 -0600, Reality_CheckŠ attempted to
> confuse the issue further by squeaking:
>>>> I have a tolerance for alcohol and I need increasing amounts to
>>>> achieve the same effect. I get withdrawal symptoms.
>>
>> Wassa matta, eh Kent?
>
> That wasn't Kent...
Prove it.
Kent Wills
Confusion
<popesnarky...@verwirren.confused.k00ks.caballista.org> wrote:
[...]
>>>> Who's "Eric Ross", eh shitwipe?
>>>
>>> That'd be you, Eric, you pathological liar.
>>
>> Wrong again, shitwipe.
>
>Or so you say. Bet Kent and/or Moe can prove all of their claims about
>you before you can prove even one about either of them.
He's already acknowledged the police report exists. Weeks ago Moe
mentioned she didn't have a copy. Eric called her a liar.
Unless his pathological lying took over, which is possible, he
believed Moe was in possession of a copy. In order for her to be in
possession of one, there must be an original.
Kent Wills
>Reality_CheckŠ wrote:
>>> I have a tolerance for alcohol and I need increasing amounts to
>>> achieve the same effect. I get withdrawal symptoms.
>
>Wassa matta, eh Kent? Stay up all night again tweakin' on meth ?
>
>Does your parole officer know you're using illegal drugs again?
Outside of the lying your racial hate for my family compels of
you, I don't have a parole officer. I've never had a parole officer.
Since I don't commit acts that are likely to get me a parole officer,
it's unlikely I shall ever have a parole officer.
If you think I have a parole officer, and I'm doing something that
would violate parole, turn me in. Like you claimed you were going to
do in regards to my owning fire arms.
Jonezie:
>> Or you could discuss the holocaust of Native Americans by
>> the invading White Man ...
>
Deadrat:
> Sure. I for Indian or N for Native?
Jonezie:
S for Savage.
Prof. Jonez expressing his racial HATE for Native Americans.
Message-ID: <6b3i56F...@mid.individual.net>
>
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:24:42 GMT, Demon Lord Benedict Snodgrass Jr of
> Confusion
> <popesnarky...@verwirren.confused.k00ks.caballista.org> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>>> Who's "Eric Ross", eh shitwipe?
>>>>
>>>> That'd be you, Eric, you pathological liar.
>>>
>>> Wrong again, shitwipe.
>>
>> Or so you say. Bet Kent and/or Moe can prove all of their claims
>> about you before you can prove even one about either of them.
>
> He's already acknowledged the police report exists.
You're lying again, Kunt.
"You are in the Kill File. Have been for a while.
Note that I can only reply if I read someone else's
reply to you."
-- Kent B Wills
"Welcome to the kill file. You should feel honored.
Only three others are there."
-- Kent Wills responding to Prof. Jonez
"Frankly I've had enough of both of them. I have better things to do
with my time than their crap over and over again."
-- Moe (forevernitefan), obsessive-compulsive psycho , 8-13-08
"What heterosexual male would feel insulted at being compared
to that most fascinating of the female anatomy, the vagina? None."
-- Kent Wills explains his heterosexual manhood
Kent Wills
<the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:24:42 GMT, Demon Lord Benedict Snodgrass Jr of
>> Confusion
>> <popesnarky...@verwirren.confused.k00ks.caballista.org> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>>> Who's "Eric Ross", eh shitwipe?
>>>>>
>>>>> That'd be you, Eric, you pathological liar.
>>>>
>>>> Wrong again, shitwipe.
>>>
>>> Or so you say. Bet Kent and/or Moe can prove all of their claims
>>> about you before you can prove even one about either of them.
>>
>> He's already acknowledged the police report exists. Weeks ago Moe
>> mentioned she didn't have a copy. Eric called her a liar.
>> Unless his pathological lying took over, which is possible, he
>> believed Moe was in possession of a copy. In order for her to be in
>>possession of one, there must be an original.
>
>You're lying again, Kunt.
>
Prove there can be a copy without an original.
Jonezie:
>> Or you could discuss the holocaust of Native Americans by
>> the invading White Man ...
>
Deadrat:
> Sure. I for Indian or N for Native?
Jonezie:
S for Savage.
Prof. Jonez expressing his racial HATE for Native Americans.
Message-ID: <6b3i56F...@mid.individual.net>
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:55:50 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
> <the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:24:42 GMT, Demon Lord Benedict Snodgrass Jr
>>> of Confusion
>>> <popesnarky...@verwirren.confused.k00ks.caballista.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>>> Who's "Eric Ross", eh shitwipe?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That'd be you, Eric, you pathological liar.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wrong again, shitwipe.
>>>>
>>>> Or so you say. Bet Kent and/or Moe can prove all of their claims
>>>> about you before you can prove even one about either of them.
>>>
>>
>> You're lying again, Kunt.
>>
>
> Prove there can be a copy without an original.
There is neither, you lying cunt.
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:48:44 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ"
> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>
>> Reality_CheckŠ wrote:
>>>> I have a tolerance for alcohol and I need increasing amounts to
>>>> achieve the same effect. I get withdrawal symptoms.
>>
>> Wassa matta, eh Kent? Stay up all night again tweakin' on meth ?
>>
>> Does your parole officer know you're using illegal drugs again?
>
> Outside of the lying
So you lie to your parole officer too, eh cunt?
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
The Demon of Mockery & Silliness, Chas. E. Pemberton
<the...@jonez.net> sang, "If I were a Deep One...blub, blub, blub, blub,
blub, blub, blub, blub, bloody, bloody, blub...", and then randomly typed
out:
> Demon Lord Benedict Snodgrass Jr of Confusion wrote:
>> the issue further by squeaking:
>>>>> I have a tolerance for alcohol and I need increasing amounts to
>>>>> achieve the same effect. I get withdrawal symptoms.
>>>
>>> Wassa matta, eh Kent?
>>
>> That wasn't Kent...
>
> Prove it.
Okay.
Bytes: 1401
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:35:42 GMT
From: "Reality_Check©" <Rea...@Check.tits>
^^^^
Lines: 5
Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@dizum.com
Message-ID: <evxl1f$8rq$p...@zit-faced-profligate.org.east-timor>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Newsgroups:
alt.fan.bob-larson,alt.true-crime,alt.usenet.kooks,fl.general,la.general
Organization: rascally hosebag
^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^
Path: edtnps83!newsfeed2.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!feeder.erje.net!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.wiretrip.org!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news-x5!mail2news-x4!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
References: <72eoe45of8pt2fall...@4ax.com> <5940e8d9-18b6-4276...@i20g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <hhbqe4thdj366gbdj...@4ax.com> <6l4qekF...@mid.individual.net> <hfqqe4hjti248ii3n...@4ax.com> <6l5aphF...@mid.individual.net> <pan.2008.10.09....@jm.ck.poee.kothask.dsocpl.eothidiautp.hcnb.ggghd.bcb.cem.fi> <662te45akoqnkd738...@4ax.com> <6l7vo1F...@mid.individual.net> <kpjte4dbbq1kqbde5...@4ax.com> <6l86u2F...@mid.individual.net>
Subject: facial numbness due to stress
Xref: newsfeed2.telusplanet.net alt.fan.bob-larson:109726 alt.true-crime:1386667 alt.usenet.kooks:1900733 fl.general:67367 la.general:109843
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----------------------------------
The items I've underlined are very typical of a certain poster with whom
you are presumably unfamiliar, and not at all typical of "Kent". Those
items and the subject line are red flags that the poster is not KW, in
fact. Suffice to say, one of the great usenet legends has trolled you
into a fetal ball.
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
TEH USENETS BULLIE
http://www.runescape.com/
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pretzel_Cabal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008
"But the other thing about her, she does know about international
Eric "Reality Check©"/"Vox"/"_ Prof. Jonez _" Ross is a racist and
homophobic liar, k00k, and paedophile, as well as a coprophage.
Kent Wills
<Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:55:50 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
>> <the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:24:42 GMT, Demon Lord Benedict Snodgrass Jr
>>>> of Confusion
>>>> <popesnarky...@verwirren.confused.k00ks.caballista.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who's "Eric Ross", eh shitwipe?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That'd be you, Eric, you pathological liar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wrong again, shitwipe.
>>>>>
>>>>> Or so you say. Bet Kent and/or Moe can prove all of their claims
>>>>> about you before you can prove even one about either of them.
>>>>
>>>> He's already acknowledged the police report exists. \
>>>
>>> You're lying again, Kunt.
>>>
>>
>> Prove there can be a copy without an original.
>
>There is neither, you lying cunt.
Then why did you say Moe was lying when she stated she didn't have
a copy? If there is neither you would have stated something like, "Of
course you don't have a copy. There is no original, so you can't have
a copy."
You made it very clear you believed she was in possession of a
copy or you lied.
Which is it? Do you believe she was (and is) in possession of a
copy or did you lie? I'll accept either answer.
Kent Wills
<Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:48:44 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ"
>> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>
>>> Reality_CheckŠ wrote:
>>>>> I have a tolerance for alcohol and I need increasing amounts to
>>>>> achieve the same effect. I get withdrawal symptoms.
>>>
>>> Wassa matta, eh Kent? Stay up all night again tweakin' on meth ?
>>>
>>> Does your parole officer know you're using illegal drugs again?
>>
>> Outside of the lying your racial hate for my family compels of
>> you, I don't have a parole officer. I've never had a parole officer.
>> Since I don't commit acts that are likely to get me a parole officer,
>> it's unlikely I shall ever have a parole officer.
>> If you think I have a parole officer, and I'm doing something that
>> would violate parole, turn me in. Like you claimed you were going to
>> do in regards to my owning fire arms.
>
>So you lie to your parole officer too, eh cunt?
>
I don't have a parole officer. Prove your claim that I do,
unless your racial hate for my family has forced you to lie about this
as well.
Jonezie:
>> Or you could discuss the holocaust of Native Americans by
>> the invading White Man ...
>
Deadrat:
> Sure. I for Indian or N for Native?
Jonezie:
S for Savage.
Prof. Jonez expressing his racial HATE for Native Americans.
Message-ID: <6b3i56F...@mid.individual.net>
>http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
>
>
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:04:37 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ"
> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:55:50 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
>>> <the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:24:42 GMT, Demon Lord Benedict Snodgrass Jr
>>>>> of Confusion
>>>>> <popesnarky...@verwirren.confused.k00ks.caballista.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Who's "Eric Ross", eh shitwipe?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That'd be you, Eric, you pathological liar.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wrong again, shitwipe.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or so you say. Bet Kent and/or Moe can prove all of their claims
>>>>>> about you before you can prove even one about either of them.
>>>>>
>>>>> He's already acknowledged the police report exists. \
>>>>
>>>> You're lying again, Kunt.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Prove there can be a copy without an original.
>>
>> There is neither, you lying cunt.
>
> Then why
See Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies !
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
Name Kent Bradley Wills
Offender Number 1155768
Sex M
Birth Date 01/08/1969
Age 38
Location Interstate Compact
Offense BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE
County Of Commitment Polk
Commitment Date 01/16/2004
Duration
TDD/SDD *01/16/2009
Kent Wills
<the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:04:37 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ"
>> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:55:50 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
>>>> <the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:24:42 GMT, Demon Lord Benedict Snodgrass Jr
>>>>>> of Confusion
>>>>>> <popesnarky...@verwirren.confused.k00ks.caballista.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Who's "Eric Ross", eh shitwipe?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That'd be you, Eric, you pathological liar.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Wrong again, shitwipe.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or so you say. Bet Kent and/or Moe can prove all of their claims
>>>>>>> about you before you can prove even one about either of them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He's already acknowledged the police report exists. \
>>>>>
>>>>> You're lying again, Kunt.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Prove there can be a copy without an original.
>>>
>>> There is neither, you lying cunt.
>>
>> Then why did you say Moe was lying when she stated she didn't have
>> a copy? If there is neither you would have stated something like, "Of
>> course you don't have a copy. There is no original, so you can't have
>> a copy."
>> You made it very clear you believed she was in possession of a
>> copy or you lied.
>> Which is it? Do you believe she was (and is) in possession of a
>> copy or did you lie? I'll accept either answer.
>
>See Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies !
>
Answer the question, please.
If your racism won't permit you to answer, then by all means
continue playing the avoidance game.
Jonezie:
>> Or you could discuss the holocaust of Native Americans by
>> the invading White Man ...
>
Deadrat:
> Sure. I for Indian or N for Native?
Jonezie:
S for Savage.
Prof. Jonez expressing his racial HATE for Native Americans.
Message-ID: <6b3i56F...@mid.individual.net>
Reality_CheckŠ
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:06:06 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ"
> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:48:44 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ"
>>> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Reality_CheckŠ wrote:
>>>>>> I have a tolerance for alcohol and I need increasing amounts to
>>>>>> achieve the same effect. I get withdrawal symptoms.
>>>>
>>>> Wassa matta, eh Kent? Stay up all night again tweakin' on meth ?
>>>>
>>>> Does your parole officer know you're using illegal drugs again?
>>>
>>> Outside of the lying your racial hate for my family compels of
>>> you, I don't have a parole officer. I've never had a parole
>>> officer. Since I don't commit acts that are likely to get me a
>>> parole officer, it's unlikely I shall ever have a parole officer.
>>> If you think I have a parole officer, and I'm doing something
>>> that would violate parole, turn me in. Like you claimed you were
>>> going to do in regards to my owning fire arms.
>>
>> So you lie to your parole officer too, eh cunt?
>>
>
> I don't have a parole officer.
Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
Kent Wills
<Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
Answer the question, please.
Reality_CheckŠ
>>>>
>>>
>>> Answer the question, please.
>>
>> http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
>>
>>
>
> Answer the question, please.
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
Kent Wills
<Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
If true, then I must have been lying when I claimed my name in
real life is Kent Wills. You've stated I've made the claim.
BTW, the site claims Kent Bradley Wills is on probation, not
parole. Why would you lie about something so easy to check?
From the proven racist and admitted pedophile, Prof. Jonez:
Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies !
You've claimed numerous times that it *is* you, you
lying piece of shit. [made in regards to why he claims my name in
real life is Kent Wills]
The proven racist and self-admitted pedophile proves he never
believed my name in real life is Kent Wills. Or he's been lying about
believing what he calls Rule #1.
>
>http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
>
>
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 16:39:09 -0600, "Reality_Check©"
> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Reality_Check© wrote:
>>>>>>>> I have a tolerance for alcohol and I need increasing amounts to
>>>>>>>> achieve the same effect. I get withdrawal symptoms.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wassa matta, eh Kent? Stay up all night again tweakin' on meth ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does your parole officer know you're using illegal drugs again?
>>>>>
>>>>> Outside of the lying your racial hate for my family compels of
>>>>> you, I don't have a parole officer. I've never had a parole
>>>>> officer. Since I don't commit acts that are likely to get me a
>>>>> parole officer, it's unlikely I shall ever have a parole officer.
>>>>> If you think I have a parole officer, and I'm doing something
>>>>> that would violate parole, turn me in. Like you claimed you were
>>>>> going to do in regards to my owning fire arms.
>>>>
>>>> So you lie to your parole officer too, eh cunt?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't have a parole officer.
>>
>> Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
>
> If true, then I must have been lying when I claimed my name in
> real life is Kent Wills. You've stated I've made the claim.
> BTW, the site claims Kent Bradley Wills is on probation, not
> parole. Why would you lie about something so easy to check?
105 Southfield, Webster City, Iowa
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005
STATE OF IOWA,
Appellee,
vs.
KENT BRADLEY WILLS,
Appellant.
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Michael D.
Huppert, Judge.
Defendant appeals claiming ineffective assistance of counsel.
AFFIRMED.
KENT B WILLS 39
ANKENY, IA ( 3 addresses )
ROGERS, AR
MARSHALLTOWN, IA ( you mentioned living there)
HANOVER PARK, IL ( 2 addresses )
VILLA PARK, IL
BARTLETT, IL
TIFFANY J WILLS
JANET RAE WILLS
FREDERICK ALFRED WILLS
FRED WILLS (I laughed about the different Freds)
FREDRIC A WILLS
KELLY M WILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005
STATE OF IOWA,
Appellee,
vs.
KENT BRADLEY WILLS,
Appellant.
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Michael D.
Huppert, Judge.
Defendant appeals claiming ineffective assistance of
counsel. AFFIRMED.
Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender, and Tricia Johnston,
Assistant State Appellate Defender, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kevin Cmelik, Assistant Attorney
General, John P. Sarcone, County Attorney, and John Judisch, Assistant
County Attorney, for appellee.
WIGGINS, Justice.
Kent Wills appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary
contending that an attached garage is a separate occupied structure
from that of the living quarters of the residence. In this appeal, we
must determine whether trial counsel was ineffective for (1) failing
to move for judgment of acquittal on the basis there was insufficient
evidence to convict Wills of second-degree burglary when he entered an
attached garage of a residence when no persons were present in the
garage, but when persons were present in the living quarters; and (2)
failing to object to a jury instruction based on this same argument.
Because we find there was no legal basis for the motion for judgment
of acquittal or the objection to the jury instruction, Wills' trial
counsel was not ineffective. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of
the district court.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings.
Around 1 a.m., an Ankeny resident called the local police to report
that a car alarm sounded in the resident's neighborhood. The city
dispatched a police officer to the location. Observing nothing
unusual, the officer left the area, only to be stopped a couple of
blocks later by a person who informed the officer he had witnessed
someone running from the area of the car alarm. As the officer
started driving back to the area of the car alarm, he noticed a person
walking on the sidewalk. The officer asked the person, a minor, if he
had noticed anybody running from the area. The minor answered that he
had not. While the officer and another officer were speaking to the
minor, another resident of the neighborhood arrived in her car and
informed the officers that she had observed two people, one of whom
was heavy set with a blinking light on his back pocket, walking in the
area of her neighbor's residence. She observed the heavier-set
individual, later identified as Wills, enter her neighbor's attached
garage through an unlocked service door. She further observed a
smaller individual standing by a van parked in the neighbor's
driveway.
The officers eventually let the minor leave even though they found a
large amount of coins, a flashlight, and an electronic pocket
organizer in his pockets. After releasing the minor, the police
officers drove to the residence where the neighbor observed the two
suspicious people and woke the owner. The owner, his wife, and two
daughters were in the residence sleeping at the time. After a search
of his vehicles, the owner discovered change and an electronic pocket
organizer were missing from the vehicles. The owner's daughter
reported a diamond ring and some change were missing from her
vehicle. The officers then contacted the minor's parents, who
informed the officers the minor was with Wills. After the officers
questioned the minor again, he admitted his involvement in the theft
and implicated Wills in the burglary. Although Wills denied
involvement in the burglary, the officers arrested him.
The State filed a trial information charging Wills with second-degree
burglary. The State later amended the information to include two
additional charges of burglary in the third degree and using a
juvenile to commit an indictable offense.
The jury returned a verdict finding Wills guilty of the crimes of
burglary in the second degree, burglary in the third degree, and using
a juvenile to commit an indictable offense. Wills appeals his
conviction for second-degree burglary claiming ineffective assistance
of counsel.
II. Scope of Review.
Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are derived from the Sixth
Amendment of the United States Constitution. Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 684-86, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2063-64, 80 L. Ed.
2d 674, 691-93 (1984). Our review for a claim involving violations of
the Constitution is de novo. State v. Fintel, 689 N.W.2d 95, 100
(Iowa 2004). We normally preserve ineffective-assistance-of-counsel
claims for postconviction relief actions. State v. Carter, 602 N.W.2d
818, 820 (Iowa 1999). However, we will address such claims on direct
appeal when the record is sufficient to permit a ruling. State v.
Artzer, 609 N.W.2d 526, 531 (Iowa 2000). The appellate record in the
present case is sufficient to allow us to address Wills' ineffective-
assistance-of-counsel claims on direct appeal.
In order for a defendant to succeed on a claim of ineffective
assistance of counsel, the defendant must prove: (1) counsel failed
to perform an essential duty and (2) prejudice resulted. Id.
Prejudice results when "there is a reasonable probability that, but
for the counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding
would have been different." State v. Hopkins, 576 N.W.2d 374, 378
(Iowa 1998) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S. Ct. at 2068,
80 L. Ed. 2d at 698). Wills' arguments also raise issues of statutory
interpretation, which we review for correction of errors at law.
State v. Wolford Corp., 689 N.W.2d 471, 473 (Iowa 2004).
III. Analysis.
To find Wills guilty of burglary in the second degree, the State had
to prove Wills perpetrated a burglary "in or upon an occupied
structure in which one or more persons are present . . . ." Iowa Code
§ 713.5(2) (2003) (emphasis added).
In this appeal, Wills first contends his trial counsel was ineffective
for failing to move for a judgment of acquittal on the basis there was
insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage, there were persons present in or upon the occupied
structure. Wills concedes the garage was an occupied structure, but
argues the living quarters and the attached garage are separate and
independent occupied structures; therefore, the jury could not have
found there were people present in the attached garage at the time of
the burglary.
The Code defines an "occupied structure" as:
[A]ny building, structure, appurtenances to buildings and structures,
land, water or air vehicle, or similar place adapted for overnight
accommodation of persons, or occupied by persons for the purpose of
carrying on business or other activity therein, or for the storage or
safekeeping of anything of value. Such a structure is an "occupied
structure" whether or not a person is actually present.
Id. § 702.12.
Wills relies on State v. Smothers, 590 N.W.2d 721 (Iowa 1999), to
argue the garage and the living quarters are separate and independent
occupied structures. In Smothers, two separate and distinct
businesses connected by interior fire doors were operated in the same
structure. 590 N.W.2d at 723. We held the defendant committed two
burglaries by entering each business because "[t]he facility's
construction history and physical make-up demonstrate that the
portions are independent working units which constitute '[a]
combination of materials to form a construction for occupancy [or]
use.'" Id. Smothers is not at odds with the present case because the
living quarters and the garage are not separate or independent units
of the residence.
Our review of the record reveals the garage in question was a three-
car attached garage separated from the living quarters by a door. The
same roof covered the garage as the rest of the residence. The living
quarters surrounded the garage on two sides. It was structurally no
different from any other room in the residence.
The garage was a functional part of the residence. On the night of
the incident, the door was unlocked. The owner of the residence used
two stalls in the garage to park the family vehicles. The owner used
the third stall for his motorcycle. As such, the garage and the
living quarters are a single "structure" or "building" functioning as
an integral part of the family residence. Thus, the residence
including the garage is a single "occupied structure" under section
702.12. See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 256 (Ct. App.
1995) (holding defendant's entry into an attached garage constituted
first-degree burglary because the garage was attached to the house;
therefore, burglary of the garage was burglary of an inhabited
dwelling house); People v. Cunningham, 637 N.E.2d 1247, 1252 (Ill.
App. Ct. 1994) (holding "ordinarily an attached garage is a 'dwelling'
because it is part of the structure in which the owner or occupant
lives"); State v. Lara, 587 P.2d 52, 53 (N.M. Ct. App. 1978) (holding
"burglary of the [attached] garage was burglary of the dwelling house
because the garage was a part of the structure used as living
quarters"); People v. Green, 141 A.D.2d 760, 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
(holding "[s]ince the garage in the present case was structurally part
of a building which was used for overnight lodging of various persons,
it must be considered as part of a dwelling"); White v. State, 630 S.W.
2d 340, 342 (Tex. Ct. App. 1982) (holding an attached garage under the
same roof as the home would be considered a habitation within the
purview of the penal code because the garage is a structure
appurtenant to and connected to the house); State v. Murbach, 843 P.2d
551, 553 (Wash. Ct. App 1993) (holding the definition of a dwelling
under Washington's burglary statute included an attached garage).
Had Wills' trial counsel moved for a judgment of acquittal on the
basis there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the
time Wills entered the garage there were no persons present in or upon
the occupied structure, it would have been overruled by the court
because the owner and his family were present in the residence at the
time of the burglary.
Wills also claims his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to
the jury instruction used by the district court on the same ground;
that the living quarters were a separate and independent occupied
structure from the attached garage. The instruction as given stated:
The State must prove all of the following elements of Burglary in the
Second Degree as to Count I:
1. On or about the 12th day of August, 2003, the defendant or someone
he aided and abetted broke into or entered the residence at . . . .
2. The residence at . . . was an occupied structure as defined in
Instruction No. 29.
3. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did not have
permission or authority to break into the residence at . . . .
4. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did so with the
specific intent to commit a theft therein.
5. During the incident persons were present in or upon the occupied
structure.
If the State has proved all of the elements, the defendant is guilty
of Burglary in the Second Degree. If the State has failed to prove
any of the elements, the defendant is not guilty of Burglary in the
Second Degree and you will then consider the charge of Attempted
Burglary in the Second Degree explained in Instruction No. 21.
(Emphasis added.)
Wills' claim is without merit. As we have discussed, the residence is
the one and only "occupied structure" under the facts of this case.
Had Wills' trial counsel made this objection to the instruction, it
would have been overruled.
Therefore, Wills' trial counsel is not ineffective for failing to move
for a judgment of acquittal or objecting to the instruction because
there was no legal basis for the motion or objection. See State v.
Hochmuth, 585 N.W.2d 234, 238 (Iowa 1998) (holding trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise an issue that has no merit).
IV. Disposition.
We affirm the judgment of the district court because Wills' trial
counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise meritless issues.
AFFIRMED.
Kent Wills
<Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> So you lie to your parole officer too, eh cunt?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't have a parole officer.
>>>
>>> Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
>>
>> If true, then I must have been lying when I claimed my name in
>> real life is Kent Wills. You've stated I've made the claim.
>> BTW, the site claims Kent Bradley Wills is on probation, not
>> parole. Why would you lie about something so easy to check?
>
>105 Southfield, Webster City, Iowa
>
Why are you stalking Kent T. Wills, actor and ESL teacher from
Webster City Iowa, and doing such a poor job? He doesn't live on
Southfield. Never has, according to him.
>IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
>No. 31 / 04-0202
>Filed May 6, 2005
>
>
>STATE OF IOWA,
> Appellee,
>vs.
>KENT BRADLEY WILLS,
> Appellant.
You've made it clear you don't believe I am him.
>
>
>Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Michael D.
>Huppert, Judge.
>Defendant appeals claiming ineffective assistance of counsel.
>AFFIRMED.
>
>
>KENT B WILLS 39
More proof that he and I aren't the same person in real life: I'm
in my 40s.
Care to try again?
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 20:22:34 -0600, "Reality_Check©"
> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you lie to your parole officer too, eh cunt?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't have a parole officer.
>>>>
>>>> Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
>>>
>>> If true, then I must have been lying when I claimed my name in
>>> real life is Kent Wills. You've stated I've made the claim.
>>> BTW, the site claims Kent Bradley Wills is on probation, not
>>> parole. Why would you lie about something so easy to check?
>>
>> 105 Southfield, Webster City, Iowa
>>
>
> Why are you stalking Kent T. Wills, actor and ESL teacher from
> Webster City Iowa, and doing such a poor job?
Why are you lying again, eh Kunt?
> He doesn't live on Southfield. Never has, according to him.
According to you, you own a boat registered to that address.
Were you lying then, or are you lying now?
Or did you just prove Rule #1 ?
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005
STATE OF IOWA,
Appellee,
vs.
KENT BRADLEY WILLS,
Appellant.
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Michael D.
Huppert, Judge.
Defendant appeals claiming ineffective assistance of counsel.
AFFIRMED.
KENT B WILLS 39
ANKENY, IA ( 3 addresses )
ROGERS, AR
MARSHALLTOWN, IA ( you mentioned living there)
HANOVER PARK, IL ( 2 addresses )
VILLA PARK, IL
BARTLETT, IL
TIFFANY J WILLS
JANET RAE WILLS
FREDERICK ALFRED WILLS
FRED WILLS (I laughed about the different Freds)
FREDRIC A WILLS
KELLY M WILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005
STATE OF IOWA,
Appellee,
vs.
KENT BRADLEY WILLS,
Appellant.
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Michael D.
Huppert, Judge.
Defendant appeals claiming ineffective assistance of
counsel. AFFIRMED.
WIGGINS, Justice.
conviction for second-degree burglary claiming ineffective assistance
of counsel.
Kent Wills
<Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
[...]
>>>> If true, then I must have been lying when I claimed my name in
>>>> real life is Kent Wills. You've stated I've made the claim.
>>>> BTW, the site claims Kent Bradley Wills is on probation, not
>>>> parole. Why would you lie about something so easy to check?
>>>
Are you ever going to answer the question, or shall everyone
reading just accept that your racist hate for my family forced you to
lie again?
>>> 105 Southfield, Webster City, Iowa
>>>
>>
>> Why are you stalking Kent T. Wills, actor and ESL teacher from
>> Webster City Iowa, and doing such a poor job?
>
>Why are you lying again, eh Kunt?
Where is the lie?
Only one Kent Wills is associated with Webster City, Iowa. He's
an actor and ELS teacher. His middle initial isn't B, but T.
Why are you stalking him? Has your racism so warped your mind
that you think everyone with the same first and last name, even if
only a Usenet nym, are all the same person?
>
>> He doesn't live on Southfield. Never has, according to him.
>
>According to you, you own a boat registered to that address.
Liar.
You've claim I own a boat registered to that address. Funny how
outside of your racially motivated lie, there's nothing to support the
claim.
>
>Were you lying then, or are you lying now?
Only in your racist mind have I ever claimed to own a boat
registered to that address.
>
>Or did you just prove Rule #1 ?
You manage to prove Prof. Jonez is a bigot who will lie at every
opportunity with no assistance from me.
Why should I need to prove you're a bigot who will lie at every
opportunity when you do it so well?
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:18:30 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ"
> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>>> If true, then I must have been lying when I claimed my name in
>>>>> real life is Kent Wills. You've stated I've made the claim.
>>>>> BTW, the site claims Kent Bradley Wills is on probation, not
>>>>> parole. Why would you lie about something so easy to check?
>>>>
>
> Are you ever going to answer the question, or shall everyone
> reading just accept that your racist hate for my family forced you to
> lie again?
Rule #1.
>
>>>> 105 Southfield, Webster City, Iowa
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why are you stalking Kent T. Wills, actor and ESL teacher from
>>> Webster City Iowa, and doing such a poor job?
>>
>> Why are you lying again, eh Kunt?
>
> Where is the lie?
> Only one Kent Wills is associated with Webster City, Iowa. He's
> an actor and ELS teacher. His middle initial isn't B, but T.
Yet the boat you claimed to own is registered to that address.
> Why are you stalking him? Has your racism so warped your mind
> that you think everyone with the same first and last name, even if
> only a Usenet nym, are all the same person?
Rule #1.
>
>>
>>> He doesn't live on Southfield. Never has, according to him.
>>
>> According to you, you own a boat registered to that address.
>
> Liar.
Rule #1.
> You've claim I own a boat registered to that address. Funny how
> outside of your racially motivated lie, there's nothing to support the
> claim.
Rule #1.
>
>>
>> Were you lying then, or are you lying now?
>
> Only in your racist mind have I ever claimed to own a boat
> registered to that address.
Rule #1.
>
>>
>> Or did you just prove Rule #1 ?
>
> You manage to prove Prof. Jonez is a bigot who will lie at every
> opportunity with no assistance from me.
And again, Rule #1.
Kent Wills
<the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:18:30 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ"
>> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>>> If true, then I must have been lying when I claimed my name in
>>>>>> real life is Kent Wills. You've stated I've made the claim.
>>>>>> BTW, the site claims Kent Bradley Wills is on probation, not
>>>>>> parole. Why would you lie about something so easy to check?
>>>>>
>>
>> Are you ever going to answer the question, or shall everyone
>> reading just accept that your racist hate for my family forced you to
>> lie again?
>
>Rule #1.
>
You're a bigot who will lie at every opportunity. No one is
disputing this.
Now, are you ever going to answer the question?
>>
>>>>> 105 Southfield, Webster City, Iowa
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why are you stalking Kent T. Wills, actor and ESL teacher from
>>>> Webster City Iowa, and doing such a poor job?
>>>
>>> Why are you lying again, eh Kunt?
>>
>> Where is the lie?
>> Only one Kent Wills is associated with Webster City, Iowa. He's
>> an actor and ELS teacher. His middle initial isn't B, but T.
>
>Yet the boat you claimed to own is registered to that address.
Why do you lie?
>
>
>> Why are you stalking him? Has your racism so warped your mind
>> that you think everyone with the same first and last name, even if
>> only a Usenet nym, are all the same person?
>
>Rule #1.
Prof. Jonez is a bigot who will lie at every opportunity. Old
news, actually.
>
>>
>>>
>>>> He doesn't live on Southfield. Never has, according to him.
>>>
>>> According to you, you own a boat registered to that address.
>>
>> Liar.
>
>Rule #1.
Prove it.
>
>> You've claim I own a boat registered to that address. Funny how
>> outside of your racially motivated lie, there's nothing to support the
>> claim.
>
>Rule #1.
>
Inability to counter my point noted.
>
>>
>>>
>>> Were you lying then, or are you lying now?
>>
>> Only in your racist mind have I ever claimed to own a boat
>> registered to that address.
>
>Rule #1.
>
Inability to counter my point, noted.
>>
>>>
>>> Or did you just prove Rule #1 ?
>>
>> You manage to prove Prof. Jonez is a bigot who will lie at every
>> opportunity with no assistance from me.
>
>And again, Rule #1.
Prof. Jonez is a bigot who will lie at every opportunity. Not
even tjab is disputing this.
Some truths are so powerful, like you being a bigot who will lie
at every opportunity, that no one can deny them.
>
>
> "Welcome to the kill file. You should feel honored.
> Only three others are there."
> -- Kent Wills responding to Prof. Jonez
Where is the lie?
>
> "You are in the Kill File. Have been for a while.
>Note that I can only reply if I read someone else's
> reply to you."
> -- Kent B Wills
Where is the lie?
>
> "Frankly I've had enough of both of them. I have better things to do
> with my time than their crap over and over again."
> -- Moe (forevernitefan), obsessive-compulsive psycho , 8-13-08
>
Outside of the racist mental illness you've once again proved you
have, I'm not Moe.
>
> "What heterosexual male would feel insulted at being compared
> to that most fascinating of the female anatomy, the vagina? None."
> -- Kent Wills explains his heterosexual manhood
>
I accepted tjab's challenge and proved my statement correct. At
least with stereo-typical "Hell's Angels" type bikers. Not a one was
offended.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:49:18 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
> <the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:18:30 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ"
>>> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>>> If true, then I must have been lying when I claimed my name
>>>>>>> in real life is Kent Wills. You've stated I've made the claim.
>>>>>>> BTW, the site claims Kent Bradley Wills is on probation, not
>>>>>>> parole. Why would you lie about something so easy to check?
>>>>>>
>>>
>>> Are you ever going to answer the question, or shall everyone
>>> reading just accept that your racist hate for my family forced you
>>> to lie again?
>>
>> Rule #1.
>>
>
> You're a bigot who will lie at every opportunity.
Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
> No one is disputing this.
Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
> Now, are you ever going to answer the question?
What question?
>
>>>
>>>>>> 105 Southfield, Webster City, Iowa
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Why are you stalking Kent T. Wills, actor and ESL teacher from
>>>>> Webster City Iowa, and doing such a poor job?
>>>>
>>>> Why are you lying again, eh Kunt?
>>>
>>> Where is the lie?
>>> Only one Kent Wills is associated with Webster City, Iowa. He's
>>> an actor and ELS teacher. His middle initial isn't B, but T.
>>
>> Yet the boat you claimed to own is registered to that address.
>
> Why do you lie?
You're lying again, Kunt.
>
>>
>>
>>> Why are you stalking him? Has your racism so warped your mind
>>> that you think everyone with the same first and last name, even if
>>> only a Usenet nym, are all the same person?
>>
>> Rule #1.
>
> Prof. Jonez is a bigot who will lie at every opportunity.
Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> He doesn't live on Southfield. Never has, according to him.
>>>>
>>>> According to you, you own a boat registered to that address.
>>>
>>> Liar.
>>
>> Rule #1.
>
> Prove it.
"Welcome to the kill file. You should feel honored.
Only three others are there."
-- Kent Wills responding to Prof. Jonez
"You are in the Kill File. Have been for a while.
Note that I can only reply if I read someone else's
reply to you."
-- Kent B Wills
"Frankly I've had enough of both of them. I have better things to do
with my time than their crap over and over again."
-- Moe (forevernitefan), obsessive-compulsive psycho , 8-13-08
Kent Wills
<the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:49:18 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
>> <the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:18:30 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ"
>>>> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>>>>> If true, then I must have been lying when I claimed my name
>>>>>>>> in real life is Kent Wills. You've stated I've made the claim.
>>>>>>>> BTW, the site claims Kent Bradley Wills is on probation, not
>>>>>>>> parole. Why would you lie about something so easy to check?
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Are you ever going to answer the question, or shall everyone
>>>> reading just accept that your racist hate for my family forced you
>>>> to lie again?
>>>
>>> Rule #1.
>>>
>>
>> You're a bigot who will lie at every opportunity.
>
>Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
>
>> No one is disputing this.
>
>Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
>
>> Now, are you ever going to answer the question?
>
>What question?
>
The one I asked, dullard.
"BTW, the site claims Kent Bradley Wills is on probation, not
parole. Why would you lie about something so easy to check?"
You claimed Kent B. Wills is on parole. You lied.
>
>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> 105 Southfield, Webster City, Iowa
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why are you stalking Kent T. Wills, actor and ESL teacher from
>>>>>> Webster City Iowa, and doing such a poor job?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why are you lying again, eh Kunt?
>>>>
>>>> Where is the lie?
>>>> Only one Kent Wills is associated with Webster City, Iowa. He's
>>>> an actor and ELS teacher. His middle initial isn't B, but T.
>>>
>>> Yet the boat you claimed to own is registered to that address.
>>
>> Why do you lie?
>
>You're lying again, Kunt.
>
Prove it.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Why are you stalking him? Has your racism so warped your mind
>>>> that you think everyone with the same first and last name, even if
>>>> only a Usenet nym, are all the same person?
>>>
>>> Rule #1.
>>
>> Prof. Jonez is a bigot who will lie at every opportunity.
>
>Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
>
Yet you can't prove even one from me.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> He doesn't live on Southfield. Never has, according to him.
>>>>>
>>>>> According to you, you own a boat registered to that address.
>>>>
>>>> Liar.
>>>
>>> Rule #1.
>>
>> Prove it.
>
>
> "Welcome to the kill file. You should feel honored.
> Only three others are there."
> -- Kent Wills responding to Prof. Jonez
>
> "You are in the Kill File. Have been for a while.
>Note that I can only reply if I read someone else's
> reply to you."
> -- Kent B Wills
>
> "Frankly I've had enough of both of them. I have better things to do
> with my time than their crap over and over again."
> -- Moe (forevernitefan), obsessive-compulsive psycho , 8-13-08
>
>
> "What heterosexual male would feel insulted at being compared
> to that most fascinating of the female anatomy, the vagina? None."
> -- Kent Wills explains his heterosexual manhood
>
Besting you isn't even a challenge. You go out of your way to
ensure I'll win.
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:30:16 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
> <the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:49:18 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
>>> <the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If true, then I must have been lying when I claimed my name
>>>>>>>>> in real life is Kent Wills. You've stated I've made the
>>>>>>>>> claim. BTW, the site claims Kent Bradley Wills is on
>>>>>>>>> probation, not parole. Why would you lie about something so
>>>>>>>>> easy to check?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you ever going to answer the question, or shall everyone
>>>>> reading just accept that your racist hate for my family forced you
>>>>> to lie again?
>>>>
>>>> Rule #1.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You're a bigot who will lie at every opportunity.
>>
>> Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
>>
>>> No one is disputing this.
>>
>> Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
>>
>>> Now, are you ever going to answer the question?
>>
>> What question?
>>
>
> The one I asked, dullard.
Rule #1.
> "BTW, the site claims Kent Bradley Wills is on probation, not
> parole. Why would you lie about something so easy to check?"
So whine to your probation officer, convict.
>
> You claimed Kent B. Wills is on parole. You lied.
So you admit you are on felony probation, eh Kent?
>
>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 105 Southfield, Webster City, Iowa
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why are you stalking Kent T. Wills, actor and ESL teacher
>>>>>>> from Webster City Iowa, and doing such a poor job?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why are you lying again, eh Kunt?
>>>>>
>>>>> Where is the lie?
>>>>> Only one Kent Wills is associated with Webster City, Iowa.
>>>>> He's an actor and ELS teacher. His middle initial isn't B, but T.
>>>>
>>>> Yet the boat you claimed to own is registered to that address.
>>>
>>> Why do you lie?
>>
>> You're lying again, Kunt.
>>
>
> Prove it.
Rule #1.
>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Why are you stalking him? Has your racism so warped your mind
>>>>> that you think everyone with the same first and last name, even if
>>>>> only a Usenet nym, are all the same person?
>>>>
>>>> Rule #1.
>>>
>>> Prof. Jonez is a bigot who will lie at every opportunity.
>>
>> Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
>>
>
> Yet you can't prove even one from me.
"You are in the Kill File. Have been for a while.
Note that I can only reply if I read someone
else's reply to you." -- Kent B Wills
>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He doesn't live on Southfield. Never has, according to him.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> According to you, you own a boat registered to that address.
>>>>>
>>>>> Liar.
>>>>
>>>> Rule #1.
>>>
>>> Prove it.
>>
>>
>> "Welcome to the kill file. You should feel honored.
>> Only three others are there."
>> -- Kent Wills responding to Prof. Jonez
>>
>> "You are in the Kill File. Have been for a while.
>> Note that I can only reply if I read someone else's
>> reply to you."
>> -- Kent B Wills
>>
>> "Frankly I've had enough of both of them. I have better things to do
>> with my time than their crap over and over again."
>> -- Moe (forevernitefan), obsessive-compulsive psycho ,
>> 8-13-08
>>
>>
>> "What heterosexual male would feel insulted at being compared
>> to that most fascinating of the female anatomy, the vagina? None."
>> -- Kent Wills explains his heterosexual manhood
>>
>
> Besting you isn't even a challenge. You go out of your way to
> ensure I'll win.
Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
>
>
> From the proven racist and admitted pedophile, Kent Wills:
Kent Wills
<Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
[...]
>>> Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
>>>
>>>> Now, are you ever going to answer the question?
>>>
>>> What question?
>>>
>>
>> The one I asked, dullard.
>
>Rule #1.
That you're a bigot who will lie at every opportunity isn't in
dispute.
>
>> "BTW, the site claims Kent Bradley Wills is on probation, not
>> parole. Why would you lie about something so easy to check?"
>
>So whine to your probation officer, convict.
>
I don't have one. No amount of your continued lying will alter
this simple truth.
You found this out when you turned me in for possession various
fire arms. You did turn me in, right? Or was that another in your
long list of pathological lies?
No amount of your continued lying will alter this simple truth.
>>
>> You claimed Kent B. Wills is on parole. You lied.
>
>So you admit you are on felony probation, eh Kent?
No. Only your racist hate for my family would cause you to think
your lies equate to an admission.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:25:48 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ"
> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>> Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
>>>>
>>>>> Now, are you ever going to answer the question?
>>>>
>>>> What question?
>>>>
>>>
>>> The one I asked, dullard.
>>
>> Rule #1.
>
> That you're a bigot who will lie at every opportunity isn't in
> dispute.
Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
>
>>
>>> "BTW, the site claims Kent Bradley Wills is on probation, not
>>> parole. Why would you lie about something so easy to check?"
>>
>> So whine to your probation officer, convict.
>>
>
> I don't have one. No amount of your continued lying will alter
> this simple truth.
Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
> You found this out when you turned me in for possession various
> fire arms.
What "fire arms", eh Kent?
> You did turn me in, right? Or was that another in your
> long list of pathological lies?
>
> No amount of your continued lying will alter this simple truth.
Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
>
>>>
>>> You claimed Kent B. Wills is on parole. You lied.
>>
>> So you admit you are on felony probation, eh Kent?
>
> No. Only your racist hate for my family would cause you to think
> your lies equate to an admission.
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
Name Kent Bradley Wills
Offender Number 1155768
Sex M
Birth Date 01/08/1969
Age 38
Location Interstate Compact
Offense BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE
County Of Commitment Polk
Commitment Date 01/16/2004
Duration
TDD/SDD *01/16/2009
>
Kent Wills
<the...@jonez.net> wrote:
[...]
>>> So whine to your probation officer, convict.
>>>
>>
>> I don't have one. No amount of your continued lying will alter
>> this simple truth.
>
>Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
Prove one lie from me.
Oh yeah, you can't.
>
>
>> You found this out when you turned me in for possession various
>> fire arms.
>
>What "fire arms", eh Kent?
The ones I own and have access to.
If, as I suspect you're going to claim, I don't have any, why did
you state you would turn me in for having them?
If my suspicion is in error, I apologize.
>
>> You did turn me in, right? Or was that another in your
>> long list of pathological lies?
>>
>> No amount of your continued lying will alter this simple truth.
>
>Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
You claimed you were going to turn me in. Unless that was another
of your MANY pathological lies, you learned that I have no criminal
record (beyond traffic violations from years ago). As such, I can own
and posses as many guns as I desire and can afford.
>
>>
>>>>
>>>> You claimed Kent B. Wills is on parole. You lied.
>>>
>>> So you admit you are on felony probation, eh Kent?
>>
>> No. Only your racist hate for my family would cause you to think
>> your lies equate to an admission.
I see you have no retort for this. Some truths are just too
powerful for you to deny.
From the proven racist and admitted pedophile, Prof. Jonez:
Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies !
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:31:09 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
> <the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>> So whine to your probation officer, convict.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't have one. No amount of your continued lying will alter
>>> this simple truth.
>>
>> Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies!
>
> Prove one lie from me.
> Oh yeah, you can't.
"Welcome to the kill file. You should feel honored.
Only three others are there."
-- Kent Wills responding to Prof. Jonez
"You are in the Kill File. Have been for a while.
Note that I can only reply if I read someone else's
reply to you."
-- Kent B Wills
"What heterosexual male would feel insulted at being compared
to that most fascinating of the female anatomy, the vagina? None."
-- Kent Wills explains his heterosexual manhood
"Let's pretend breathing is outlawed and everyone the world
over ceases inhaling and exhaling.
There will be NO change in CO2 levels since we exhale carbon
monoxide, not carbon dioxide, stupid."
- Kent Wills idiot from Iowa
"At this point Madeleine is equally alive and dead. "
-- Kent ignoramus Wills giving the Iowa version of Kwantum Mahkaniks
" Currently, we, citizens of the U.S., aren't allowed to go to
Venezuela or Cuba. My hope is that Venezuela's restriction will
be lifted after the next election."
- Kent Wills 2007, lying jackass
Kent Wills
Deadly Ernest
> We all know that OJ killed Goldman and Nicole.
>
> Will justice be blind in sentencing OJ in Las
> Vegas, or will the judge pile on?
>
> Justice should be blind to his first crime.
>
> Ken Pangborn
>
> Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
> non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
> reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
> di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
> Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
> https://www.mixmaster.it
G'day,
No one likely to post anything here actually KNOWS anything about the
OJ case, but we all have opinions, and mine is:
In the murder trial so many people were sure he did it that they bent
everything out of shape to prove it. Sadly, if they'd done things
right they may have got the murderer with the evidence available, but
because it's tainted it's now no good.
I suspect the son did the killing and OJ suspected that himself so he
covered for his son. But no one involved even thought that at the
time, so they didn't even look at the boy.
Deadly Ernest
Reality_CheckŠ
Rule #1 .