Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Zimmerman family asks Holder why no Black Panther arrests
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Leroy N. Soetoro
May 1, 2012, 5:32:20 PM5/1/12
to
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/04/zimmerman_family_asks_holder_w
hy_no_black_panther_arrests.html
This is a question I've been wondering myself. Here we have a racist
organization literally putting a bounty of $10,000 on the head of George
Zimmerman - dead or alive - and Eric Holder has done nothing. The New
Black Panthers are inciting violence against a private US citizen while
stoking the fires of race hatred and the Attorney General - the highest
ranking law enforcement official in the country - stays mum and inactive.
Is it because of Holder's race that he refuses to arrest the Black
Panthers? Zimmerman's family thinks so.
The Daily Caller:
In a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder on Monday, obtained
exclusively by The Daily Caller, a family member of George Zimmerman asked
the nation's top law enforcement officer why he has chosen to not arrest
members of the New Black Panther Party for their rhetoric -- some of which
may fit the federal government's definition of a hate crime -- throughout
the Trayvon Martin case.
The family member believes the reason Holder hasn't made those arrests is
because he, like the members of the New Black Panther Party, is black.
"I am writing you to ask you why, when the law of the land is crystal
clear, is your office not arresting the New Black Panthers for hate
crimes?" the family member wrote to Holder.
"The Zimmerman family is in hiding because of the threats that have been
made against us, yet the DOJ has maintained an eerie silence on this
matter. These threats are very public. If you haven't been paying
attention just do a Google search and you will find plenty.
Since when can a group of people in the United States put a bounty on
someone's head, circulate Wanted posters publicly, and still be walking
the streets?"
The New Black Panthers have issued ultimatums to the Sanford authorities,
saying they want Zimmerman arrested "dead or alive." They have placed a
bounty on Zimmerman's head, and have called for the building of an army of
vigilantes to track him down and effect a citizen's arrest.
Most recently, the New Black Panther Party has called for violence.
What is it about the New Black Panther Party that keeps Eric Holder from
prosecuting them? He dropped charges against them for standing outside of
a polling place and threatening white voters with clubs.
And now, he stays silent as they whip up a frenzy of hate against George
Zimmerman - a man not arrested or convicted of any crime.
Accusing the attorney general of racism is a serious charge but Holder has
brought it on himself by being curiously inactive while the New Black
Panther Party stalks George Zimmerman.
--
Obama's black racist USAG appointee.
Eric Holder, racist black United States Attorney General drops voter
intimidation charges against the Black Panthers, "You are about to be
ruled by the black man, cracker!"
Eric Holder, prejudiced black United States Attorney General settles the
hate crime debate, "Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws."
Nancy Pelosi, Democrat criminal, accessory before and after the fact, to
former House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles B. Rangel of New
York's million dollar tax evasion.
Barack Obama and Eric Holder, committed treason by knowingly and
deliberately arming enemies of the United States of America through
Operation Fast and Furious. Complicit in the murder of Federal employees
during the execution of their duties.
--- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to ne...@netfront.net ---
hy_no_black_panther_arrests.html
This is a question I've been wondering myself. Here we have a racist
organization literally putting a bounty of $10,000 on the head of George
Zimmerman - dead or alive - and Eric Holder has done nothing. The New
Black Panthers are inciting violence against a private US citizen while
stoking the fires of race hatred and the Attorney General - the highest
ranking law enforcement official in the country - stays mum and inactive.
Is it because of Holder's race that he refuses to arrest the Black
Panthers? Zimmerman's family thinks so.
The Daily Caller:
In a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder on Monday, obtained
exclusively by The Daily Caller, a family member of George Zimmerman asked
the nation's top law enforcement officer why he has chosen to not arrest
members of the New Black Panther Party for their rhetoric -- some of which
may fit the federal government's definition of a hate crime -- throughout
the Trayvon Martin case.
The family member believes the reason Holder hasn't made those arrests is
because he, like the members of the New Black Panther Party, is black.
"I am writing you to ask you why, when the law of the land is crystal
clear, is your office not arresting the New Black Panthers for hate
crimes?" the family member wrote to Holder.
"The Zimmerman family is in hiding because of the threats that have been
made against us, yet the DOJ has maintained an eerie silence on this
matter. These threats are very public. If you haven't been paying
attention just do a Google search and you will find plenty.
Since when can a group of people in the United States put a bounty on
someone's head, circulate Wanted posters publicly, and still be walking
the streets?"
The New Black Panthers have issued ultimatums to the Sanford authorities,
saying they want Zimmerman arrested "dead or alive." They have placed a
bounty on Zimmerman's head, and have called for the building of an army of
vigilantes to track him down and effect a citizen's arrest.
Most recently, the New Black Panther Party has called for violence.
What is it about the New Black Panther Party that keeps Eric Holder from
prosecuting them? He dropped charges against them for standing outside of
a polling place and threatening white voters with clubs.
And now, he stays silent as they whip up a frenzy of hate against George
Zimmerman - a man not arrested or convicted of any crime.
Accusing the attorney general of racism is a serious charge but Holder has
brought it on himself by being curiously inactive while the New Black
Panther Party stalks George Zimmerman.
--
Obama's black racist USAG appointee.
Eric Holder, racist black United States Attorney General drops voter
intimidation charges against the Black Panthers, "You are about to be
ruled by the black man, cracker!"
Eric Holder, prejudiced black United States Attorney General settles the
hate crime debate, "Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws."
Nancy Pelosi, Democrat criminal, accessory before and after the fact, to
former House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles B. Rangel of New
York's million dollar tax evasion.
Barack Obama and Eric Holder, committed treason by knowingly and
deliberately arming enemies of the United States of America through
Operation Fast and Furious. Complicit in the murder of Federal employees
during the execution of their duties.
--- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to ne...@netfront.net ---
JohnJohnsn
May 1, 2012, 6:58:31 PM5/1/12
to
On May 1, 4:32 pm, "Leroy N. Soetoro" <leroysoet...@usurper.org>
wrote:
>
>
>http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/04/zimmerman_family_asks_holder_why_no_black_panther_arrests.html
From `The Blaze' comes:
Holder: Focus on Black Panther Case Demeans ‘My People’
Posted on March 1, 2011 at 5:27pm by Meredith Jessup
Continuing to face down questions as to why the U.S. Justice
Department went easy on prosecuting members of the New Black Panther
Party who stood armed with nightsticks outside a Philadelphia polling
location during the 2008 presidential election, Attorney General Eric
Holder expressed his personal frustration over the criticism that race
played a role.
[Embedded video]
During a hearing of a House Appropriations subcommittee Tuesday, Rep.
John Culberson, R-Texas, accused Holder’s DOJ of failing to cooperate
with a Civil Rights Commission investigation into the decision to
dismiss the case. Holder seemed to take personal offense when
Culberson read comments from former Democratic activist Bartle Bull
condemning the decision as the most serious act of voter intimidation
he had witnessed during his career.
“Think about that,” Holder fired back. “When you compare what people
endured in the South in the 60s to try to get the right to vote for
African Americans, to compare what people subjected to that with what
happened in Philadelphia, which was inappropriate….to describe it in
those terms I think does a great disservice to people who put their
lives on the line for my people,” said Holder, an African American.
“To compare that kind of courage, that kind of action, to say some
Black Panther incident is of greater concern to us, historically, I
think just flies in the face of history,” the attorney general said.
Earlier in the hearing, Culberson insisted that race had indeed
affected the DOJ’s decision-making process, accusing Holder’s agency
of having a “double standard” when it comes to the rights of whites
vs. blacks.
“This Department of Justice does not enforce the law on the basis of
race,” Holder insisted.
Democratic Rep. Chakah Fattah acknowledged that the New Black Panthers
“should not have been there,” but the Philadelphia congressman accused
the GOP of playing the race card by focusing too much attention on the
Black Panther case.
“The most unethical thing a person can do is make allegations based on
absolutely nothing,” Fattah said. “The only issue of race is singling
out this particular decision…That this rises to national significance
is bogus on its face.”
During his Tuesday radio broadcast, conservative host Rush Limbaugh
lashed out at Holder for his response to Culberson’s charges,
suggesting Holder should take offense to Rep. Charlie Rangel’s claim
that abolishing collective bargaining rights is akin to reinstate
slavery:
[Embedded video]
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/holder-focus-on-black-panther-case-demeans-my-people/
Even the WashTimes noticed Eric "The Red" Holder's racism:
EDITORIAL: Holder ill serves his ‘people’
Attorney general admits to race-based view of the world
By THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. played the race card in
congressional testimony on Tuesday, referring to blacks as his
“people” while neglecting the rest of Americans. That race-based lens
pervades his Justice Department, causing consistently skewed
enforcement of the law.
Mr. Holder was testifying before the House Appropriations subcommittee
that oversees his department’s budget. Chairman Frank R. Wolf,
Virginia Republican, and Rep. John Culberson, Texas Republican,
pressed Mr. Holder to stop giving evasive answers about scandals
growing from the New Black Panther voter-intimidation case. Agitated,
Mr. Holder objected to a statement by witness Bartle Bull that Panther
behavior was the worst the civil rights activist had ever seen at the
polls. “When you compare what people endured in the South in the ‘60s
to try to get the right to vote for African-Americans, to compare what
people subjected to that with what happened in Philadelphia … does a
great disservice to people who put their lives on the line, who risked
all for my people,” Mr. Holder said.
His people? America left behind this sort of expression in the 1960s.
“By sounding like Al Sharpton, Holder is demeaning his position as the
chief law enforcement officer of the United States,” said Deneen
Borelli of the black conservative organization Project 21.
Mr. Holder has a history of stoking racial resentments. In 2009, he
quipped that “in things racial” Americans form “a nation of cowards.”
In 1996, he told The Washington Post that for 25 years he carried in
his wallet a quote from a black preacher that, “No matter how
affluent, educated and mobile [a black person] becomes, his race
defines him more particularly than anything else.” To which Mr. Holder
added: “It really says that … I am not the tall U.S. attorney, I am
not the thin U.S. attorney. I am the black U.S. attorney. And [the
preacher] was saying that no matter how successful you are, there’s a
common cause that bonds the black U.S. attorney with the black
criminal or the black doctor with the black homeless person.”
In short, race comes first. It makes allies, not adversaries, of black
criminals and prosecutors. On Tuesday, Mr. Holder again dodged
questions asking him to deny that Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Julie Fernandes had told her division to prosecute only civil rights
cases involving black victims, not black perpetrators. He refused to
release relevant documents about the decision-making behind dropping
most of the Black Panther case. For two years, Justice has pressed for
explicitly race-conscious legal action.
Mr. Holder doesn’t understand that while he’s attorney general, his
“people” are all citizens of the United States, not just black
Americans. Unless he stops stonewalling on documents from the broader
investigation stemming from the Black Panther case, his every action
will be viewed through the racial prism he himself has chosen.
-30-
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/mar/2/holder-ill-serves-his-people/
wrote:
>
>
>http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/04/zimmerman_family_asks_holder_why_no_black_panther_arrests.html
Holder: Focus on Black Panther Case Demeans ‘My People’
Posted on March 1, 2011 at 5:27pm by Meredith Jessup
Continuing to face down questions as to why the U.S. Justice
Department went easy on prosecuting members of the New Black Panther
Party who stood armed with nightsticks outside a Philadelphia polling
location during the 2008 presidential election, Attorney General Eric
Holder expressed his personal frustration over the criticism that race
played a role.
[Embedded video]
During a hearing of a House Appropriations subcommittee Tuesday, Rep.
John Culberson, R-Texas, accused Holder’s DOJ of failing to cooperate
with a Civil Rights Commission investigation into the decision to
dismiss the case. Holder seemed to take personal offense when
Culberson read comments from former Democratic activist Bartle Bull
condemning the decision as the most serious act of voter intimidation
he had witnessed during his career.
“Think about that,” Holder fired back. “When you compare what people
endured in the South in the 60s to try to get the right to vote for
African Americans, to compare what people subjected to that with what
happened in Philadelphia, which was inappropriate….to describe it in
those terms I think does a great disservice to people who put their
lives on the line for my people,” said Holder, an African American.
“To compare that kind of courage, that kind of action, to say some
Black Panther incident is of greater concern to us, historically, I
think just flies in the face of history,” the attorney general said.
Earlier in the hearing, Culberson insisted that race had indeed
affected the DOJ’s decision-making process, accusing Holder’s agency
of having a “double standard” when it comes to the rights of whites
vs. blacks.
“This Department of Justice does not enforce the law on the basis of
race,” Holder insisted.
Democratic Rep. Chakah Fattah acknowledged that the New Black Panthers
“should not have been there,” but the Philadelphia congressman accused
the GOP of playing the race card by focusing too much attention on the
Black Panther case.
“The most unethical thing a person can do is make allegations based on
absolutely nothing,” Fattah said. “The only issue of race is singling
out this particular decision…That this rises to national significance
is bogus on its face.”
During his Tuesday radio broadcast, conservative host Rush Limbaugh
lashed out at Holder for his response to Culberson’s charges,
suggesting Holder should take offense to Rep. Charlie Rangel’s claim
that abolishing collective bargaining rights is akin to reinstate
slavery:
[Embedded video]
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/holder-focus-on-black-panther-case-demeans-my-people/
Even the WashTimes noticed Eric "The Red" Holder's racism:
EDITORIAL: Holder ill serves his ‘people’
Attorney general admits to race-based view of the world
By THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. played the race card in
congressional testimony on Tuesday, referring to blacks as his
“people” while neglecting the rest of Americans. That race-based lens
pervades his Justice Department, causing consistently skewed
enforcement of the law.
Mr. Holder was testifying before the House Appropriations subcommittee
that oversees his department’s budget. Chairman Frank R. Wolf,
Virginia Republican, and Rep. John Culberson, Texas Republican,
pressed Mr. Holder to stop giving evasive answers about scandals
growing from the New Black Panther voter-intimidation case. Agitated,
Mr. Holder objected to a statement by witness Bartle Bull that Panther
behavior was the worst the civil rights activist had ever seen at the
polls. “When you compare what people endured in the South in the ‘60s
to try to get the right to vote for African-Americans, to compare what
people subjected to that with what happened in Philadelphia … does a
great disservice to people who put their lives on the line, who risked
all for my people,” Mr. Holder said.
His people? America left behind this sort of expression in the 1960s.
“By sounding like Al Sharpton, Holder is demeaning his position as the
chief law enforcement officer of the United States,” said Deneen
Borelli of the black conservative organization Project 21.
Mr. Holder has a history of stoking racial resentments. In 2009, he
quipped that “in things racial” Americans form “a nation of cowards.”
In 1996, he told The Washington Post that for 25 years he carried in
his wallet a quote from a black preacher that, “No matter how
affluent, educated and mobile [a black person] becomes, his race
defines him more particularly than anything else.” To which Mr. Holder
added: “It really says that … I am not the tall U.S. attorney, I am
not the thin U.S. attorney. I am the black U.S. attorney. And [the
preacher] was saying that no matter how successful you are, there’s a
common cause that bonds the black U.S. attorney with the black
criminal or the black doctor with the black homeless person.”
In short, race comes first. It makes allies, not adversaries, of black
criminals and prosecutors. On Tuesday, Mr. Holder again dodged
questions asking him to deny that Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Julie Fernandes had told her division to prosecute only civil rights
cases involving black victims, not black perpetrators. He refused to
release relevant documents about the decision-making behind dropping
most of the Black Panther case. For two years, Justice has pressed for
explicitly race-conscious legal action.
Mr. Holder doesn’t understand that while he’s attorney general, his
“people” are all citizens of the United States, not just black
Americans. Unless he stops stonewalling on documents from the broader
investigation stemming from the Black Panther case, his every action
will be viewed through the racial prism he himself has chosen.
-30-
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/mar/2/holder-ill-serves-his-people/
Too_Many_Tools
May 1, 2012, 7:30:36 PM5/1/12
to
> http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/04/zimmerman_family_asks_hol...
> --- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to n...@netfront.net ---
Why...did they shoot an unarmed child wearing a hoodie and eating
Skittles?
TMT
Why...did they shoot an unarmed child wearing a hoodie and eating
Skittles?
TMT
ozark...@yahoo.com
May 1, 2012, 8:02:43 PM5/1/12
to
Juris Diction
May 1, 2012, 8:52:08 PM5/1/12
to
In article <XnsA04693E583...@202.177.16.121>,
LEt's see the Bush administration get the justice they deserve first.
--
Give it up. The future is progressive.
9/11 ---> Bush --->Republicans
Fuck The Alamo, Remember What Bush Did
--
Give it up. The future is progressive.
9/11 ---> Bush --->Republicans
Fuck The Alamo, Remember What Bush Did
Way Back Jack
May 1, 2012, 10:27:29 PM5/1/12
to
On Tue, 01 May 2012 17:52:08 -0700, Juris Diction wrote:
> In article <XnsA04693E583...@202.177.16.121>,
> "Leroy N. Soetoro" <leroys...@usurper.org> wrote:
>> Accusing the attorney general of racism is a serious charge
But totally appropriate nonetheless.
> In article <XnsA04693E583...@202.177.16.121>,
> "Leroy N. Soetoro" <leroys...@usurper.org> wrote:
>> Accusing the attorney general of racism is a serious charge
Oglethorpe
May 2, 2012, 1:00:56 AM5/2/12
to
"Juris Diction" <iw...@theditch.com> wrote in message
news:iwas-02DD1C.1...@news.shawcable.net...
reward for jobs well done.
Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names
May 1, 2012, 11:07:24 PM5/1/12
to
>On May 1, 4:32 pm, "Leroy N. Soetoro" <leroysoet...@usurper.org>
>wrote:
>> http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/04/zimmerman_family_asks_hol...
>> hy_no_black_panther_arrests.html
>>
>> This is a question I've been wondering myself. Here we have a racist
>> organization literally putting a bounty of $10,000 on the head of George
>> Zimmerman - dead or alive - and Eric Holder has done nothing. The New
>> Black Panthers are inciting violence against a private US citizen while
>> stoking the fires of race hatred and the Attorney General - the highest
>> ranking law enforcement official in the country - stays mum and inactive.
>>
>> Is it because of Holder's race that he refuses to arrest the Black
>> Panthers? Zimmerman's family thinks so.
Who gives a shit what the Zimmerman family thinks?
>wrote:
>> http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/04/zimmerman_family_asks_hol...
>> hy_no_black_panther_arrests.html
>>
>> This is a question I've been wondering myself. Here we have a racist
>> organization literally putting a bounty of $10,000 on the head of George
>> Zimmerman - dead or alive - and Eric Holder has done nothing. The New
>> Black Panthers are inciting violence against a private US citizen while
>> stoking the fires of race hatred and the Attorney General - the highest
>> ranking law enforcement official in the country - stays mum and inactive.
>>
>> Is it because of Holder's race that he refuses to arrest the Black
>> Panthers? Zimmerman's family thinks so.
After all, they think Zimmerman is innocent. Shows you what great
thinkers they are.
>>
>> The Daily Caller:
>>
>> In a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder on Monday, obtained
>> exclusively by The Daily Caller, a family member of George Zimmerman asked
>> the nation's top law enforcement officer why he has chosen to not arrest
>> members of the New Black Panther Party for their rhetoric -- some of which
>> may fit the federal government's definition of a hate crime -- throughout
>> the Trayvon Martin case.
>>
>> The family member believes the reason Holder hasn't made those arrests is
>> because he, like the members of the New Black Panther Party, is black.
>>
>> "I am writing you to ask you why, when the law of the land is crystal
>> clear, is your office not arresting the New Black Panthers for hate
>> crimes?" the family member wrote to Holder.
>>
>> "The Zimmerman family is in hiding
raising money, allegedly for his defense but really for several new
cars and lots of bling.
> because of the threats that have been
>> made against us, yet the DOJ has maintained an eerie silence on this
>> matter. These threats are very public. If you haven't been paying
>> attention just do a Google search and you will find plenty.
>>
>> Since when can a group of people in the United States put a bounty on
>> someone's head, circulate Wanted posters publicly, and still be walking
>> the streets?"
>>
>> The New Black Panthers have issued ultimatums to the Sanford authorities,
>> saying they want Zimmerman arrested "dead or alive." They have placed a
>> bounty on Zimmerman's head, and have called for the building of an army of
>> vigilantes to track him down and effect a citizen's arrest.
Right?
>>
>> Most recently, the New Black Panther Party has called for violence.
>>
>> What is it about the New Black Panther Party that keeps Eric Holder from
>> prosecuting them? He dropped charges against them for standing outside of
>> a polling place and threatening white voters with clubs.
>>
>> And now, he stays silent as they whip up a frenzy of hate against George
>> Zimmerman - a man not arrested or convicted of any crime.
and out on bail.
Sid9
May 1, 2012, 11:19:33 PM5/1/12
to
"Oglethorpe" <anti...@go.com> wrote in message
news:WoqdnZRiUdBAPj3S...@mchsi.com...
Isn’t he supposed to be helping Willard?
Too_Many_Tools
May 1, 2012, 11:28:44 PM5/1/12
to
>
> - Show quoted text -
You mean Zimmerman who out weighed Martin?
And had a gun?
And shot an unarmed child?
The man who stalked the child?
Sounds like Zimmerman might be a conservative pedophile.
Why does conservatives allow perverts to own guns and prey on
children?
TMT
Algonquin J. Calhoun, Esq.
May 2, 2012, 1:46:50 AM5/2/12
to
Algonquin J. Calhoun, Esq.
May 2, 2012, 1:47:37 AM5/2/12
to
Lookout
May 2, 2012, 3:05:38 AM5/2/12
to
On Tue, 1 May 2012 23:19:33 -0400, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>"Oglethorpe" <anti...@go.com> wrote in message
>news:WoqdnZRiUdBAPj3S...@mchsi.com...
>>
>> "Juris Diction" <iw...@theditch.com> wrote in message
>> news:iwas-02DD1C.1...@news.shawcable.net...
>>> In article <XnsA04693E583...@202.177.16.121>,
>>> "Leroy N. Soetoro" <leroys...@usurper.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/04/zimmerman_family_asks_holder_w
>>>> hy_no_black_panther_arrests.html
>>>>
>>>> This is a question I've been wondering myself. Here we have a racist
>>>> organization
5 people is an organization
>
>"Oglethorpe" <anti...@go.com> wrote in message
>news:WoqdnZRiUdBAPj3S...@mchsi.com...
>>
>> "Juris Diction" <iw...@theditch.com> wrote in message
>> news:iwas-02DD1C.1...@news.shawcable.net...
>>> In article <XnsA04693E583...@202.177.16.121>,
>>> "Leroy N. Soetoro" <leroys...@usurper.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/04/zimmerman_family_asks_holder_w
>>>> hy_no_black_panther_arrests.html
>>>>
>>>> This is a question I've been wondering myself. Here we have a racist
>>>> organization
Way Back Jack
May 2, 2012, 9:09:26 AM5/2/12
to
On Wed, 02 May 2012 08:54:51 -0400, abelincoln wrote:
> fuck, if the black panthers or any other local militia group took out
> (i.e. brought to justice) that fucking child murderer they would only be
> carrying out god's inerrant law....made very clear for you goddamned
> racist repugnants...in exodus 21.....zimmerman must die for his heinous
> murdering crime.....god says so, that's who......
Next time that a pack of savage blacks jumps on a white boy, or douses him
with gasoline, I hope it's you, punk, or better yet, a family member.
Know whut I be sayin'?
> fuck, if the black panthers or any other local militia group took out
> (i.e. brought to justice) that fucking child murderer they would only be
> carrying out god's inerrant law....made very clear for you goddamned
> racist repugnants...in exodus 21.....zimmerman must die for his heinous
> murdering crime.....god says so, that's who......
Next time that a pack of savage blacks jumps on a white boy, or douses him
with gasoline, I hope it's you, punk, or better yet, a family member.
Know whut I be sayin'?
RD Sandman
May 2, 2012, 11:57:45 AM5/2/12
to
Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names <PopUl...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:r191q7turgdceg412...@6ax.com:
> On Tue, 1 May 2012 16:30:36 -0700 (PDT), Too_Many_Tools
> <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>On May 1, 4:32 pm, "Leroy N. Soetoro" <leroysoet...@usurper.org>
>>wrote:
>>> http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/04/zimmerman_family_asks_hol
>>> ... hy_no_black_panther_arrests.html
>>>
>>> This is a question I've been wondering myself. Here we have a racist
>>> organization literally putting a bounty of $10,000 on the head of
>>> George Zimmerman - dead or alive - and Eric Holder has done nothing.
>>> The New Black Panthers are inciting violence against a private US
>>> citizen while stoking the fires of race hatred and the Attorney
>>> General - the highest ranking law enforcement official in the
>>> country - stays mum and inactive.
>>>
>>> Is it because of Holder's race that he refuses to arrest the Black
>>> Panthers? Zimmerman's family thinks so.
>
>
> Who gives a shit what the Zimmerman family thinks?
>
> After all, they think Zimmerman is innocent.
He may be.
Shows you what great
> thinkers they are.
No, making judgements like you are without evidence show what a lack of a
thinker you are.
--
It's too bad the people who really know how to run this
country are so busy cutting hair and driving taxis!!
George Burns
Sleep well, tonight.....
RD (The Sandman)
news:r191q7turgdceg412...@6ax.com:
> On Tue, 1 May 2012 16:30:36 -0700 (PDT), Too_Many_Tools
> <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>On May 1, 4:32 pm, "Leroy N. Soetoro" <leroysoet...@usurper.org>
>>wrote:
>>> http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/04/zimmerman_family_asks_hol
>>> ... hy_no_black_panther_arrests.html
>>>
>>> This is a question I've been wondering myself. Here we have a racist
>>> organization literally putting a bounty of $10,000 on the head of
>>> George Zimmerman - dead or alive - and Eric Holder has done nothing.
>>> The New Black Panthers are inciting violence against a private US
>>> citizen while stoking the fires of race hatred and the Attorney
>>> General - the highest ranking law enforcement official in the
>>> country - stays mum and inactive.
>>>
>>> Is it because of Holder's race that he refuses to arrest the Black
>>> Panthers? Zimmerman's family thinks so.
>
>
> Who gives a shit what the Zimmerman family thinks?
>
> After all, they think Zimmerman is innocent.
Shows you what great
> thinkers they are.
thinker you are.
--
It's too bad the people who really know how to run this
country are so busy cutting hair and driving taxis!!
George Burns
Sleep well, tonight.....
RD (The Sandman)
JohnJohnsn
May 2, 2012, 12:53:57 PM5/2/12
to
On May 2, 2:05 am, Andrew G "mrLookout" Hull <mrlooko...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>>"Oglethorpe" <antike...@go.com> wrote in message
>> news:WoqdnZRiUdBAPj3S...@mchsi.com...
>
>>>"Juris Diction" <i...@theditch.com> wrote in message
>>> news:iwas-02DD1C.1...@news.shawcable.net...
>
>>>> In article <XnsA04693E583F6D6F089P2...@202.177.16.121>,
Panther Party has?
Hint:
"As of 2009, the NBPP claimed a few thousand members organized in 45
chapters, while independent estimates by the Anti-Defamation League
suggest that the group is "much smaller" but is nevertheless able to
attract a large turnout of non-members (some of whom "may not even
realize what this group actually stands for") to its events by
focusing on specific issues of local interest."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Black_Panther_Party#Membership_size
>>> They already have. Bush and Cheney are drawing six figure pensions
Also; we note that Obama has the endorsement of avowed Vermont
Socialist Bernard "Bernie" Sanders.
And as we all know:
"Obama is a socialist, you fucking moron. As are all Americans.
Only about 25%, including you, are too stupid to know what that
means"
— Scheißekopf "Deep Dudu", Wed, Oct 12 2011
"Socialism IS our form of government, idiot."
— Scheißekopf "Deep Dudu", Wed, Oct 12 2011
"Socialist governments traditionally do make a financial mess.
They [socialists] always run out of other people's money.
It's quite a characteristic of them."
--Margaret Thatcher, UK Prime Minister;
Thames TV This Week, February 5, 1976
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the
gospel of envy; its
inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery..."
-- Sir Winston Churchill
"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings;
the inherent virtue of
socialism is the equal sharing of miseries."
-- Sir Winston Churchill
wrote:
>>"Oglethorpe" <antike...@go.com> wrote in message
>> news:WoqdnZRiUdBAPj3S...@mchsi.com...
>
>>>"Juris Diction" <i...@theditch.com> wrote in message
>>> news:iwas-02DD1C.1...@news.shawcable.net...
>
>>>> In article <XnsA04693E583F6D6F089P2...@202.177.16.121>,
>>>> "Leroy N. Soetoro" <leroysoet...@usurper.org> wrote:
>
>>>>>http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/04/zimmerman_family_asks_hol...hy_no_black_panther_arrests.html
>
>
>>>>>http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/04/zimmerman_family_asks_hol...hy_no_black_panther_arrests.html
>
>>>>> This is a question I've been wondering myself. Here we have a racist
>>>>> organization
>
> 5 people is an organization
>
Tell us, Andy: just how many members do you believe the New Black
>>>>> organization
>
> 5 people is an organization
>
Panther Party has?
Hint:
"As of 2009, the NBPP claimed a few thousand members organized in 45
chapters, while independent estimates by the Anti-Defamation League
suggest that the group is "much smaller" but is nevertheless able to
attract a large turnout of non-members (some of whom "may not even
realize what this group actually stands for") to its events by
focusing on specific issues of local interest."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Black_Panther_Party#Membership_size
>>> as a reward for jobs well done.
>
>> Where's bush,jr?
>
There is no "bush,jr," Sid.
>
>> Where's bush,jr?
>
>
>> Isn’t he supposed to be helping Willard?
>
You're early here, Sid; wait until the Republican Convention.
>> Isn’t he supposed to be helping Willard?
>
Also; we note that Obama has the endorsement of avowed Vermont
Socialist Bernard "Bernie" Sanders.
And as we all know:
"Obama is a socialist, you fucking moron. As are all Americans.
Only about 25%, including you, are too stupid to know what that
means"
— Scheißekopf "Deep Dudu", Wed, Oct 12 2011
"Socialism IS our form of government, idiot."
— Scheißekopf "Deep Dudu", Wed, Oct 12 2011
"Socialist governments traditionally do make a financial mess.
They [socialists] always run out of other people's money.
It's quite a characteristic of them."
--Margaret Thatcher, UK Prime Minister;
Thames TV This Week, February 5, 1976
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the
gospel of envy; its
inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery..."
-- Sir Winston Churchill
"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings;
the inherent virtue of
socialism is the equal sharing of miseries."
-- Sir Winston Churchill
ozark...@yahoo.com
May 2, 2012, 5:28:30 PM5/2/12
to
>
>And had a gun?
Not to smart to attack an unarmed man
>
>And shot an unarmed child?
>
>The man who stalked the child?
but perhaps you witnesed it?
>
>Sounds like Zimmerman might be a conservative pedophile.
>
>Why does conservatives allow perverts to own guns and prey on
>children?
>
>TMT
RD Sandman
May 2, 2012, 5:39:53 PM5/2/12
to
ozark...@yahoo.com wrote in
news:uj93q7dric8a6ddct...@4ax.com:
Zimmerman weighs 170 pounds, Martin weighed 140 - 150. So we are looking
at what? 25 pounds (favoring Zimmerman) and a difference in height of up
to 6 inches (favoring Martin). Martin was between 6' 1" and 6' 3" and
Zimmerman was 5' 9".
That is not a huge difference in either case.
>>And had a gun?
>
> Not to smart to attack an unarmed man
Bingo!! Of course, I doubt Martin knew that Zimmerman was armed until it
was ..... ooops, too late.
>>And shot an unarmed child?
>
> "Child"? LOL
Amazing when someone is at an age where they are referred to as
teenagers, young adults, young men, etc.. How many "child" are 6' 3"?
>>The man who stalked the child?
>
> Produce your evidence. From what i have read there was no stalking;
> but perhaps you witnesed it?
Following....most certainly.....stalking? Not by any definition either
legally or common usage.
news:uj93q7dric8a6ddct...@4ax.com:
at what? 25 pounds (favoring Zimmerman) and a difference in height of up
to 6 inches (favoring Martin). Martin was between 6' 1" and 6' 3" and
Zimmerman was 5' 9".
That is not a huge difference in either case.
>>And had a gun?
>
> Not to smart to attack an unarmed man
was ..... ooops, too late.
>>And shot an unarmed child?
>
> "Child"? LOL
teenagers, young adults, young men, etc.. How many "child" are 6' 3"?
>>The man who stalked the child?
>
> Produce your evidence. From what i have read there was no stalking;
> but perhaps you witnesed it?
legally or common usage.
pyotr filipivich
May 2, 2012, 6:29:27 PM5/2/12
to
Let the Record show that "Leroy N. Soetoro" <leroys...@usurper.org>
on or about Tue, 1 May 2012 21:32:20 +0000 (UTC) did write, type or
otherwise cause to appear in talk.politics.guns the following:
Holder called off the investigation into voter intimidation by
the New Black Panther Party for racial reasons. Since then he has
demonstrated a complete lack of qualifications for the job, unless you
consider his job is as a minion loyally protecting the ass of his
boss.
tschus
pyotr
--
pyotr filipivich
Next Month's Panel: Suicide - getting it right the first time.
on or about Tue, 1 May 2012 21:32:20 +0000 (UTC) did write, type or
otherwise cause to appear in talk.politics.guns the following:
the New Black Panther Party for racial reasons. Since then he has
demonstrated a complete lack of qualifications for the job, unless you
consider his job is as a minion loyally protecting the ass of his
boss.
tschus
pyotr
--
pyotr filipivich
Next Month's Panel: Suicide - getting it right the first time.
Harold Burton
May 2, 2012, 9:39:33 PM5/2/12
to
Harold Burton
May 2, 2012, 9:40:27 PM5/2/12
to
In article <37u0q7h70c7mc30pm...@4ax.com>,
Don't confuse the idiot too many drool with inconvenient facts.
snicker
snicker
Harold Burton
May 2, 2012, 9:41:25 PM5/2/12
to
In article
<ef09edf0-3cb5-4445...@i18g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>,
Nope. you must be "thinking" of someone else.
snicker
<ef09edf0-3cb5-4445...@i18g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>,
snicker
Harold Burton
May 2, 2012, 9:43:21 PM5/2/12
to
In article <uj93q7dric8a6ddct...@4ax.com>,
You nailed it. Too many drools is the poster boy for stupidity.
Lookout
May 3, 2012, 12:29:14 AM5/3/12
to
On Wed, 2 May 2012 09:09:26 -0400, Way Back Jack <inv...@invalid.net>
wrote:
Show us the black panther party.
wrote:
Way Back Jack
May 3, 2012, 6:57:12 AM5/3/12
to
Google's your friend.
Lookout
May 3, 2012, 3:09:24 PM5/3/12
to
On Thu, 3 May 2012 06:57:12 -0400, Way Back Jack <inv...@invalid.net>
The NEW Black Panther party has like 8 active members.
Way Back Jack
May 3, 2012, 3:19:52 PM5/3/12
to
There were more than 8 members in Philadelphia alone terrorizing white
voters.
And then maybe you didn't see the tribe of them who put out a bounty on
Zimmerman.
But continue watching MSNBC and stay ignorant, moonbat.
Greg Arama
May 3, 2012, 3:45:20 PM5/3/12
to
"Way Back Jack" wrote in message
news:cuhvi5pdkjww$.1p3ujcwrd5g8r$.dlg@40tude.net...
Proving that LOOKOUT is as RETARDED as DooDoo!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Black_Panther_Party
DEMOCRACTIC LOSERS!
Lookout
May 3, 2012, 5:00:42 PM5/3/12
to
On Thu, 3 May 2012 15:19:52 -0400, Way Back Jack <inv...@invalid.net>
Show us how many ACTIVE members they have. Until then..do some reading
>
http://www.blackpanther.org/newsalert.htm
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Black_Panther_Party
believe anything you see on Fox.
>
http://www.blackpanther.org/newsalert.htm
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Black_Panther_Party
As of 2009, the NBPP claimed a few thousand members organized in 45
chapters, while independent estimates by the Anti-Defamation League
suggest that the group is "much smaller" but is nevertheless able to
attract a large turnout of non-members (some of whom "may not even
realize what this group actually stands for") to its events by
focusing on specific issues of local interest
And only Fox covers them because you're a bunch of idiots and you'll
chapters, while independent estimates by the Anti-Defamation League
suggest that the group is "much smaller" but is nevertheless able to
attract a large turnout of non-members (some of whom "may not even
realize what this group actually stands for") to its events by
focusing on specific issues of local interest
believe anything you see on Fox.
Way Back Jack
May 3, 2012, 5:19:17 PM5/3/12
to
And any non-member who doesn't know what the group is all about must have
double-digit IQs. Or else be blatant racists like Eric Holder.
Fox News, no, they're allowing too many moonbats to spout their Obama
infomercials for me.
JohnJohnsn
May 3, 2012, 5:45:21 PM5/3/12
to
On May 3, 4:00 pm, Andy "mrLookout" Hull <mrlooko...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 3 May 2012 15:19:52 -0400, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net>
This isn't "FOXNews," Andy:
The New Black Panther Party Evidence on Voter Intimidation
By Hans von Spakovsky
July 21, 2010 at 1:00 pm
Andy McCarthy has an important story over at National Review Online
that does an outstanding job of demolishing many of the myths being
propagated about the New Black Panther voter intimidation case. It is
important, however, to highlight some specific testimony on one of
those myths. One of the constant refrains heard from liberals in their
attempt to diminish the importance of the New Black Panther scandal is
that there is no evidence that any voters were intimidated or
prevented from voting.That claim is patently false although it was
repeated last night again by Abigail Thernstrom on NBC News.
http://www.youtube.com/v/neGbKHyGuHU&hl
For anyone who bothers to actually look at the record, the U.S.
Commission on Civil Rights received direct evidence on that very
issue. Those critics also miss the point that it is a crime to attempt
to intimidate voters and anyone assisting voters, which would include
poll watchers, and no one watching the videotape could come to any
conclusion other than the New Black Panthers were trying to intimidate
people at that poll in Philadelphia.
On the issue of poll watchers, one of the witnesses at the first
hearing of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Chris Hill, testified
on that specific point and what happened when he got to the polling
place. He was responding to a desperate phone call for help from one
of the two black poll watchers who were stationed at the polling
place:
http://www.youtube.com/v/neGbKHyGuHU&hl
HILL: [Shabazz] immediately started with ‘What are you doing here,
Cracker?’ And he and Mr. Jackson attempted to close ranks. I went
straight between them through the door to find our poll watcher, who
was inside the building at the time…he was pretty shaken up…he was
visibly upset.
QUESTION: What did he tell you?
HILL: He was called a race traitor for being a poll watcher,
credentialed poll watcher for the Republican Party as a black man, and
that he was threatened if he stepped outside of the building, there
would be hell to pay.
So there is witness testimony that both Black Panthers, including the
one who was dismissed by the Justice Department, were physically
threatening a poll watcher. And the witnesses made it clear that the
two Black Panthers acted as a team, in concert, at the polling place.
On the issue of voters, Hill testified as follows:
QUESTION: How were third parties reacting to the presence and the
actions of the Panther members?
HILL: People were put off when – there were a couple of people that
walked up, a couple of people that drove up, and they would come to a
screeching halt because it’s not something you expect to see in front
of a polling place. As I was standing on the corner, I had two older
ladies and an older gentleman stop right next to me, ask what was
going on. I said, ‘Truthfully, we don’t really know. All we know is
there’s two Black Panthers here.’ And the lady said, ‘Well, we’ll just
come back.’ And so, they walked away.
Of course, no one knows if those voters ever came back – but we know
for sure that they left without voting when Hill was there rather than
try to get by the New Black Panthers. What is so odd about this is
that Hill was then questioned about that testimony by Commissioner
Abby Thernstrom, who has been one of the persons claiming there is no
evidence that voters were kept from voting:
THERNSTROM: But otherwise, did you see anybody at the polling place
who obviously intended to vote, and didn’t end up voting because of
the presence of the New Black Panther Party members?
HILL: It was two women and a gentleman….They stopped right at the
corner of the driveway, circular drive, where I was standing on the
phone, and they said, ‘What’s going on?’ Truthfully, I didn’t really
have a good answer for them…But at that exact moment in time, those
people were not going near that doorway, and ma’am, I’m not as well
versed as you are in these civil rights issues, but they were
intimidated.
Bartle Bull, one of the other poll watchers who came to the precinct
after the black poll watchers who were stationed there reported they
had been threatened, testified on this point also:
BULL: One of them was waving a baton like that, slapping against his
hand, pointing at people. And several people – I was more or less at
the end of the driveway, and several people began to walk up the
driveways, saw these guys, and then went back and didn’t go on to
vote.
QUESTION: Did the individuals that you saw turn around, those were
people that you believed were coming to vote?
BULL: Oh, yes, yes. That’s the only reason you walk along that long
block on the pavement, and then go in the long driveway. And several
walked in, saw this at the door, and walked back out the drive.
Keep in mind that Bull and Hill were only at the polling place for
about an hour, and in that short amount of time they saw several
people turn around and leave rather than run the thug gauntlet set up
at the front door to the polling place. And there is no question that
the poll watchers stationed inside the precinct were terrified because
of the threats that had been made against them by the New Black
Panthers.
So why haven’t any witnesses who were actual voters come forward? I
talked to Chris Hill after his testimony before the Civil Rights
Commission. As someone who knows Philadelphia and that neighborhood
where these New Black Panthers live, he said that if he lived there he
would be probably be too scared to come forward with testimony that
crossed the NBPP. In short, intimidated voters often stay intimidated
It is time, once and for all, for critics of this case to stop
claiming there is no evidence of intimidation – the evidence is there
in the record for anyone who bothers to actually look for it. And it
is not even necessary to win a case for attempted intimidation – and
no one can rationally claim there was not an attempt to intimidate.
Don’t forget a crucial point that keeps getting missed – the New Black
Panthers never contested any of these charges.
After she heard Hill’s testimony, Commissioner Thernstrom admitted
that those people “were intimidated…I mean I take seriously when
anybody is intimidated, and I’m not dismissing that experience of
theirs…but nevertheless, it seems to me the case of the New Black
Panther Party actually blocking people from voting would be stronger
if there were more than three people that we’re talking about here.”
Really? So how many people have to be intimidated and prevented from
voting before it becomes a “serious” case? How many poll watchers have
to be threatened before it becomes a “serious” case? I have great
respect for Commissioner Thernstrom but she is quite simply wrong
about this case, about the evidence presented, and about the law that
applies.
The only people who don’t think this was a serious case of voter
intimidation seem to be apologists for the administration who want to
sweep this case under the table and make excuses for the inexcusable
conduct of the political appointees who are running the Civil Rights
Division and the Justice Department.
-30-
http://blog.heritage.org/2010/07/21/the-new-black-panther-party-evidence-on-voter-intimidation/
>
>
> On Thu, 3 May 2012 15:19:52 -0400, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 03 May 2012 14:09:24 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
>>> On Thu, 3 May 2012 06:57:12 -0400, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net>
>
>> On Thu, 03 May 2012 14:09:24 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
>>> wrote:
>
>>>> On Wed, 02 May 2012 23:29:14 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
>>>>> On Wed, 2 May 2012 09:09:26 -0400, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net>
>
>>>> On Wed, 02 May 2012 23:29:14 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
The New Black Panther Party Evidence on Voter Intimidation
By Hans von Spakovsky
July 21, 2010 at 1:00 pm
Andy McCarthy has an important story over at National Review Online
that does an outstanding job of demolishing many of the myths being
propagated about the New Black Panther voter intimidation case. It is
important, however, to highlight some specific testimony on one of
those myths. One of the constant refrains heard from liberals in their
attempt to diminish the importance of the New Black Panther scandal is
that there is no evidence that any voters were intimidated or
prevented from voting.That claim is patently false although it was
repeated last night again by Abigail Thernstrom on NBC News.
http://www.youtube.com/v/neGbKHyGuHU&hl
For anyone who bothers to actually look at the record, the U.S.
Commission on Civil Rights received direct evidence on that very
issue. Those critics also miss the point that it is a crime to attempt
to intimidate voters and anyone assisting voters, which would include
poll watchers, and no one watching the videotape could come to any
conclusion other than the New Black Panthers were trying to intimidate
people at that poll in Philadelphia.
On the issue of poll watchers, one of the witnesses at the first
hearing of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Chris Hill, testified
on that specific point and what happened when he got to the polling
place. He was responding to a desperate phone call for help from one
of the two black poll watchers who were stationed at the polling
place:
http://www.youtube.com/v/neGbKHyGuHU&hl
HILL: [Shabazz] immediately started with ‘What are you doing here,
Cracker?’ And he and Mr. Jackson attempted to close ranks. I went
straight between them through the door to find our poll watcher, who
was inside the building at the time…he was pretty shaken up…he was
visibly upset.
QUESTION: What did he tell you?
HILL: He was called a race traitor for being a poll watcher,
credentialed poll watcher for the Republican Party as a black man, and
that he was threatened if he stepped outside of the building, there
would be hell to pay.
So there is witness testimony that both Black Panthers, including the
one who was dismissed by the Justice Department, were physically
threatening a poll watcher. And the witnesses made it clear that the
two Black Panthers acted as a team, in concert, at the polling place.
On the issue of voters, Hill testified as follows:
QUESTION: How were third parties reacting to the presence and the
actions of the Panther members?
HILL: People were put off when – there were a couple of people that
walked up, a couple of people that drove up, and they would come to a
screeching halt because it’s not something you expect to see in front
of a polling place. As I was standing on the corner, I had two older
ladies and an older gentleman stop right next to me, ask what was
going on. I said, ‘Truthfully, we don’t really know. All we know is
there’s two Black Panthers here.’ And the lady said, ‘Well, we’ll just
come back.’ And so, they walked away.
Of course, no one knows if those voters ever came back – but we know
for sure that they left without voting when Hill was there rather than
try to get by the New Black Panthers. What is so odd about this is
that Hill was then questioned about that testimony by Commissioner
Abby Thernstrom, who has been one of the persons claiming there is no
evidence that voters were kept from voting:
THERNSTROM: But otherwise, did you see anybody at the polling place
who obviously intended to vote, and didn’t end up voting because of
the presence of the New Black Panther Party members?
HILL: It was two women and a gentleman….They stopped right at the
corner of the driveway, circular drive, where I was standing on the
phone, and they said, ‘What’s going on?’ Truthfully, I didn’t really
have a good answer for them…But at that exact moment in time, those
people were not going near that doorway, and ma’am, I’m not as well
versed as you are in these civil rights issues, but they were
intimidated.
Bartle Bull, one of the other poll watchers who came to the precinct
after the black poll watchers who were stationed there reported they
had been threatened, testified on this point also:
BULL: One of them was waving a baton like that, slapping against his
hand, pointing at people. And several people – I was more or less at
the end of the driveway, and several people began to walk up the
driveways, saw these guys, and then went back and didn’t go on to
vote.
QUESTION: Did the individuals that you saw turn around, those were
people that you believed were coming to vote?
BULL: Oh, yes, yes. That’s the only reason you walk along that long
block on the pavement, and then go in the long driveway. And several
walked in, saw this at the door, and walked back out the drive.
Keep in mind that Bull and Hill were only at the polling place for
about an hour, and in that short amount of time they saw several
people turn around and leave rather than run the thug gauntlet set up
at the front door to the polling place. And there is no question that
the poll watchers stationed inside the precinct were terrified because
of the threats that had been made against them by the New Black
Panthers.
So why haven’t any witnesses who were actual voters come forward? I
talked to Chris Hill after his testimony before the Civil Rights
Commission. As someone who knows Philadelphia and that neighborhood
where these New Black Panthers live, he said that if he lived there he
would be probably be too scared to come forward with testimony that
crossed the NBPP. In short, intimidated voters often stay intimidated
It is time, once and for all, for critics of this case to stop
claiming there is no evidence of intimidation – the evidence is there
in the record for anyone who bothers to actually look for it. And it
is not even necessary to win a case for attempted intimidation – and
no one can rationally claim there was not an attempt to intimidate.
Don’t forget a crucial point that keeps getting missed – the New Black
Panthers never contested any of these charges.
After she heard Hill’s testimony, Commissioner Thernstrom admitted
that those people “were intimidated…I mean I take seriously when
anybody is intimidated, and I’m not dismissing that experience of
theirs…but nevertheless, it seems to me the case of the New Black
Panther Party actually blocking people from voting would be stronger
if there were more than three people that we’re talking about here.”
Really? So how many people have to be intimidated and prevented from
voting before it becomes a “serious” case? How many poll watchers have
to be threatened before it becomes a “serious” case? I have great
respect for Commissioner Thernstrom but she is quite simply wrong
about this case, about the evidence presented, and about the law that
applies.
The only people who don’t think this was a serious case of voter
intimidation seem to be apologists for the administration who want to
sweep this case under the table and make excuses for the inexcusable
conduct of the political appointees who are running the Civil Rights
Division and the Justice Department.
-30-
http://blog.heritage.org/2010/07/21/the-new-black-panther-party-evidence-on-voter-intimidation/
Lookout
May 4, 2012, 6:27:47 AM5/4/12
to
On Thu, 3 May 2012 17:19:17 -0400, Way Back Jack <inv...@invalid.net>
I said ACTIVE members, dumbass. Try to keep up.
Way Back Jack
May 4, 2012, 8:44:37 AM5/4/12
to
to Eric Holder, cunt.
Lookout
May 4, 2012, 3:52:26 PM5/4/12
to
On Fri, 4 May 2012 08:44:37 -0400, Way Back Jack <inv...@invalid.net>
There's like EIGHT of them..they can't terrorize ANYONE you fucking
idiot.
idiot.
Way Back Jack
May 4, 2012, 4:14:20 PM5/4/12
to
propaganda's rotting your brain.
Too_Many_Tools
May 4, 2012, 4:13:54 PM5/4/12
to
On May 2, 4:39 pm, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net>
wrote:
> ozarkhe...@yahoo.com wrote innews:uj93q7dric8a6ddct...@4ax.com:
> RD (The Sandman)- Hide quoted text -
As for the tagline...there is a reason why those people are cutting
hair, drive taxis and vote Republican.
TMT
wrote:
> ozarkhe...@yahoo.com wrote innews:uj93q7dric8a6ddct...@4ax.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Tue, 1 May 2012 20:28:44 -0700 (PDT), Too_Many_Tools
>
>
>
>
> > On Tue, 1 May 2012 20:28:44 -0700 (PDT), Too_Many_Tools
>
> - Show quoted text -
Wait for the trial...the word "stalking" will be used.
> - Show quoted text -
As for the tagline...there is a reason why those people are cutting
hair, drive taxis and vote Republican.
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
May 4, 2012, 4:15:16 PM5/4/12
to
On May 2, 8:40 pm, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> In article <37u0q7h70c7mc30pmgc4ccpnjv7toop...@4ax.com>,
> snicker- Hide quoted text -
it without cause.
Ask good old Tiggerman about that.
TMT
> In article <37u0q7h70c7mc30pmgc4ccpnjv7toop...@4ax.com>,
>
> - Show quoted text -
An inconvenient fact is having a dead body and being responsible for
> - Show quoted text -
it without cause.
Ask good old Tiggerman about that.
TMT
Lookout
May 4, 2012, 4:44:24 PM5/4/12
to
On Fri, 4 May 2012 16:14:20 -0400, Way Back Jack <inv...@invalid.net>
Show me how many ACTIVE members they have.
What are you waiting for?
What are you waiting for?
Harold Burton
May 4, 2012, 4:47:38 PM5/4/12
to
In article
<2be28d1a-6fb5-4f4d...@n5g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>,
> Wait for the . . .
. . . acquittal.
snicker
<2be28d1a-6fb5-4f4d...@n5g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>,
. . . acquittal.
snicker
Harold Burton
May 4, 2012, 4:49:20 PM5/4/12
to
In article
<ec8dc899-c115-4dfa...@z14g2000vbh.googlegroups.com>,
> An inconvenient fact is having a dead body . . .
. . . of someone stupid enough to attack an armed man.
Inconvenient to you and your fellow drools.
snicker
<ec8dc899-c115-4dfa...@z14g2000vbh.googlegroups.com>,
. . . of someone stupid enough to attack an armed man.
Inconvenient to you and your fellow drools.
snicker
Way Back Jack
May 4, 2012, 6:14:29 PM5/4/12
to
babies and that a tribe of NBPs didn't put out a bounty on the "white
Hispanic." Then show me where DOJ took a stance on the issue of the NBPs
threats.
Lookout
May 4, 2012, 6:19:59 PM5/4/12
to
On Fri, 4 May 2012 18:14:29 -0400, Way Back Jack <inv...@invalid.net>
Still waiting for your answer.
Way Back Jack
May 4, 2012, 6:29:14 PM5/4/12
to
Lookout
May 4, 2012, 6:48:43 PM5/4/12
to
On Fri, 4 May 2012 18:29:14 -0400, Way Back Jack <inv...@invalid.net>
I asked first.
And no there is no "tribe" of NBPs you fucking idiot. Talking like
that just makes you look dumber than you are.
The DOJ didn't take a stance because they aren't a threat. How hard
is that to understand?
And no there is no "tribe" of NBPs you fucking idiot. Talking like
that just makes you look dumber than you are.
The DOJ didn't take a stance because they aren't a threat. How hard
is that to understand?
Way Back Jack
May 4, 2012, 6:58:32 PM5/4/12
to
They aren't a threat? Run that horsehit past the voters in Philly who were
terrorized by them in 2008, and by Zimmerman just this year. And imagine
the reaction if some KKK type exhorted the brotherhood to eat black babies.
Lookout
May 4, 2012, 8:02:55 PM5/4/12
to
On Fri, 4 May 2012 18:58:32 -0400, Way Back Jack <inv...@invalid.net>
I said ACTIVE members, dumbass
Try again
> Run that horsehit past the voters in Philly who were
>terrorized by them in 2008,
This isn't Philly, is it? Try to keep on topic.
>and by Zimmerman just this year.
Again, a different topic.
> And imagine the reaction if some KKK type exhorted the brotherhood to eat black babies.
>
Again, different topic.
Please try to stay on topic..just prove they, or Shabazz is a threat.
Message-ID: <zjaudkhft797.1s...@40tude.net>
BTW...we all know who you are, nitwit. And I'm beating you silly once
again.
Try again
>
>They aren't a threat?
That's what I said to prove.
>They aren't a threat?
> Run that horsehit past the voters in Philly who were
>terrorized by them in 2008,
>and by Zimmerman just this year.
> And imagine the reaction if some KKK type exhorted the brotherhood to eat black babies.
>
Please try to stay on topic..just prove they, or Shabazz is a threat.
Message-ID: <zjaudkhft797.1s...@40tude.net>
BTW...we all know who you are, nitwit. And I'm beating you silly once
again.
Way Back Jack
May 4, 2012, 9:07:11 PM5/4/12
to
You made the assertion of 8.
It's your burden to prove your assertion
You won't.
Because you can't.
Cunt
>>They aren't a threat?
>
> That's what I said to prove.
>> Run that horsehit past the voters in Philly who were
>>terrorized by them in 2008,
>
> This isn't Philly, is it? Try to keep on topic.
>>and by Zimmerman just this year.
>
> Again, a different topic.
Same issue.
>> And imagine the reaction if some KKK type exhorted the brotherhood to eat black babies.
>>
> Again, different topic.
DOJ and the media would be on that like stink on shit.
> Please try to stay on topic..just prove they, or Shabazz is a threat.
> Message-ID: <zjaudkhft797.1s...@40tude.net>
>
> BTW...we all know who you are, nitwit. And I'm beating you silly once
> again.
JohnJohnsn
May 4, 2012, 10:29:39 PM5/4/12
to
On May 4, 7:02 pm, Lying Looney Liberal Lookout, a/k/a Andy
"mrLookout" Hull <mrlooko...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 4 May 2012 18:58:32 -0400, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net>
Your own source below states there are 45 NBPP chapters: kinda hard to
do with only "8 active members."
it's your responsibility to prove that claim.
Tactics With Guns and Machetes…to Kids
Posted on September 1, 2011 at 5:36pm by Madeleine Morgenstern
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=8h2n3vJo7Xo
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/training-holding.jpg
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/training-punch.jpg
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/training-gun-kids.jpg
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/training-kids.jpg
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/training-machete-demo-kids.jpg
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/training-machete-demo.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HwOBWX2d9I&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4CPqW98m70&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2HZvbPrJyE&feature=player_embedded
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/shock-video-new-black-panther-party-member-teaches-black-survival-tactics-with-guns-and-machetes-to-kids/
> Message-ID: <zjaudkhft797.1sywk9fb946aa....@40tude.net>
on your wife's face:
http://xa.yimg.com/kq/groups/14584976/sn/524437752/name/BJ452.jpg
By: mrLookout
File Name: BJ452.jpg
Posted: Feb 23, 2010
http://xa.yimg.com/kq/groups/14584976/sn/524437752/name/BJ452.jpg
By: mrLookout
File Name: BJ452.jpg
Posted: Feb 23, 2010
"Oh wait...I look like a complete asshole"
--Andy "mrLookout" Hull, Sat, June 11 2011
"Confronting Liberals with the facts of reality is very much akin
to clubbing baby seals. It gets boring after a while, but because
Liberals are so stupid it is easy work."
— Steven M. Barry
"mrLookout" Hull <mrlooko...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 4 May 2012 18:58:32 -0400, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net>
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 04 May 2012 17:48:43 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
>>> On Fri, 4 May 2012 18:29:14 -0400, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net>
>
>> On Fri, 04 May 2012 17:48:43 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
>>> wrote:
>
>>>>On Fri, 04 May 2012 17:19:59 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
>>>>> On Fri, 4 May 2012 18:14:29 -0400, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net>
>
>>>>On Fri, 04 May 2012 17:19:59 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
>>>>> wrote:
>
>>>>>>On Fri, 04 May 2012 15:44:24 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 4 May 2012 16:14:20 -0400, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net>
>
>>>>>>On Fri, 04 May 2012 15:44:24 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>On Fri, 04 May 2012 14:52:26 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 4 May 2012 08:44:37 -0400, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net>
>
>>>>>>>>On Fri, 04 May 2012 14:52:26 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 04 May 2012 05:27:47 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 May 2012 17:19:17 -0400, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net>
>
>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 04 May 2012 05:27:47 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 03 May 2012 16:00:42 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 May 2012 15:19:52 -0400, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 03 May 2012 16:00:42 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 03 May 2012 14:09:24 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 May 2012 06:57:12 -0400, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 03 May 2012 14:09:24 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 02 May 2012 23:29:14 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 May 2012 09:09:26 -0400, Way Back Jack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <inva...@invalid.net> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 02 May 2012 08:54:51 -0400, abelincoln wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuck, if the black panthers or any other local militia group took out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (i.e. brought to justice) that fucking child murderer they would only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be carrying out god's inerrant law....made very clear for you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goddamned racist repugnants...in exodus 21.....zimmerman must
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> die for his heinous murdering crime.....god says so, that's who......
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Next time that a pack of savage blacks jumps on a white boy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or douses him with gasoline, I hope it's you, punk, or better yet,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a family member.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Know whut I be sayin'?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Show us the black panther party.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They have a website, moonbat.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google's your friend.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The NEW Black Panther party has like 8 active members.
>
Prove this assertion, Andy.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 02 May 2012 23:29:14 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 May 2012 09:09:26 -0400, Way Back Jack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <inva...@invalid.net> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 02 May 2012 08:54:51 -0400, abelincoln wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuck, if the black panthers or any other local militia group took out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (i.e. brought to justice) that fucking child murderer they would only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be carrying out god's inerrant law....made very clear for you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goddamned racist repugnants...in exodus 21.....zimmerman must
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> die for his heinous murdering crime.....god says so, that's who......
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Next time that a pack of savage blacks jumps on a white boy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or douses him with gasoline, I hope it's you, punk, or better yet,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a family member.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Know whut I be sayin'?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Show us the black panther party.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They have a website, moonbat.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google's your friend.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The NEW Black Panther party has like 8 active members.
>
Your own source below states there are 45 NBPP chapters: kinda hard to
do with only "8 active members."
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh horseshit.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were more than 8 members in Philadelphia alone terrorizing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> white voters.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And then maybe you didn't see the tribe of them who put out a bounty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on Zimmerman.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But continue watching MSNBC and stay ignorant, moonbat.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Show us how many ACTIVE members they have. Until then..do some
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>http://www.blackpanther.org/newsalert.htm
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Black_Panther_Party
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> As of 2009, the NBPP claimed a few thousand members organized in 45
>>>>>>>>>>>>> chapters, while independent estimates by the Anti-Defamation League
>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggest that the group is "much smaller" but is nevertheless able to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> attract a large turnout of non-members (some of whom "may not even
>>>>>>>>>>>>> realize what this group actually stands for") to its events by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> focusing on specific issues of local interest
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And only Fox covers them because you're a bunch of idiots and you'll
>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe anything you see on Fox.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You were saying something about 8 members, moonbat.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> I said ACTIVE members, dumbass. Try to keep up.
>
If there are only "8 active members," name them!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh horseshit.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were more than 8 members in Philadelphia alone terrorizing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> white voters.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And then maybe you didn't see the tribe of them who put out a bounty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on Zimmerman.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But continue watching MSNBC and stay ignorant, moonbat.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Show us how many ACTIVE members they have. Until then..do some
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>http://www.blackpanther.org/newsalert.htm
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Black_Panther_Party
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> As of 2009, the NBPP claimed a few thousand members organized in 45
>>>>>>>>>>>>> chapters, while independent estimates by the Anti-Defamation League
>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggest that the group is "much smaller" but is nevertheless able to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> attract a large turnout of non-members (some of whom "may not even
>>>>>>>>>>>>> realize what this group actually stands for") to its events by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> focusing on specific issues of local interest
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And only Fox covers them because you're a bunch of idiots and you'll
>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe anything you see on Fox.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You were saying something about 8 members, moonbat.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> I said ACTIVE members, dumbass. Try to keep up.
>
>
>>>>>>>>>> I said New Black Panther racists who terrorize whites with impunity,
>>>>>>>>>> thanks to Eric Holder, cunt.
>
>>>>>>>>> There's like EIGHT of them..they can't terrorize ANYONE you fucking
>>>>>>>>> idiot.
>
>>>>>>>> Keep telling you to dump MSNBC, Salon, and Mother Jones, moonbat.
>>>>>>>> Their propaganda's rotting your brain.
>
>>>>>>> Show me how many ACTIVE members they have.
>>>>>>> What are you waiting for?
>
>>>>>> Convince me that Shabazz hasn't made terrorist threats to kill all white
>>>>>> babies and that a tribe of NBPs didn't put out a bounty on the "white
>>>>>> Hispanic." Then show me where DOJ took a stance on the issue of the
>>>>>> NBPs threats.
>
>>>>> Still waiting for your answer.
>
>>>> Back at ya.
>
>>> I asked first.
>
No, Andy: you made the claim that there are only "8 active members;"
>>>>>>>>>> I said New Black Panther racists who terrorize whites with impunity,
>>>>>>>>>> thanks to Eric Holder, cunt.
>
>>>>>>>>> There's like EIGHT of them..they can't terrorize ANYONE you fucking
>>>>>>>>> idiot.
>
>>>>>>>> Keep telling you to dump MSNBC, Salon, and Mother Jones, moonbat.
>>>>>>>> Their propaganda's rotting your brain.
>
>>>>>>> Show me how many ACTIVE members they have.
>>>>>>> What are you waiting for?
>
>>>>>> Convince me that Shabazz hasn't made terrorist threats to kill all white
>>>>>> babies and that a tribe of NBPs didn't put out a bounty on the "white
>>>>>> Hispanic." Then show me where DOJ took a stance on the issue of the
>>>>>> NBPs threats.
>
>>>>> Still waiting for your answer.
>
>>>> Back at ya.
>
>>> I asked first.
>
it's your responsibility to prove that claim.
>
>>> And no there is no "tribe" of NBPs you fucking idiot. Talking like
>>> that just makes you look dumber than you are.
>
>>> The DOJ didn't take a stance because they aren't a threat.
>>> How hard is that to understand?
>
>>Your own document showed more than 8, cunt.
>
> I said ACTIVE members, dumbass
> Try again
>
Still awaiting your proof of your claim, Andy.
>>> And no there is no "tribe" of NBPs you fucking idiot. Talking like
>>> that just makes you look dumber than you are.
>
>>> The DOJ didn't take a stance because they aren't a threat.
>>> How hard is that to understand?
>
>>Your own document showed more than 8, cunt.
>
> I said ACTIVE members, dumbass
> Try again
>
>
>> They aren't a threat?
>
> That's what I said to prove.
>
See below, Andy.
>> They aren't a threat?
>
> That's what I said to prove.
>
>
>> Run that horsehit past the voters in Philly who were
>> terrorized by them in 2008...
>> Run that horsehit past the voters in Philly who were
>
> This isn't Philly, is it? Try to keep on topic.
>
>> ...and by Zimmerman just this year.
> This isn't Philly, is it? Try to keep on topic.
>
>
> Again, a different topic.
>
>> And imagine the reaction if some KKK type exhorted the brotherhood
>> to eat black babies.
>
> Again, different topic.
>
> Please try to stay on topic..just prove they, or Shabazz is a threat.
>
Shock Videos: New Black Panther Party Member Teaches ‘Black Survival’
> Again, a different topic.
>
>> And imagine the reaction if some KKK type exhorted the brotherhood
>> to eat black babies.
>
> Again, different topic.
>
> Please try to stay on topic..just prove they, or Shabazz is a threat.
>
Tactics With Guns and Machetes…to Kids
Posted on September 1, 2011 at 5:36pm by Madeleine Morgenstern
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=8h2n3vJo7Xo
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/training-holding.jpg
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/training-punch.jpg
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/training-gun-kids.jpg
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/training-kids.jpg
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/training-machete-demo-kids.jpg
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/training-machete-demo.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HwOBWX2d9I&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4CPqW98m70&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2HZvbPrJyE&feature=player_embedded
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/shock-video-new-black-panther-party-member-teaches-black-survival-tactics-with-guns-and-machetes-to-kids/
> Message-ID: <zjaudkhft797.1sywk9fb946aa....@40tude.net>
>
> BTW...we all know who you are, nitwit. And I'm beating you silly once
> again.
>
The _only_ thing you "beat," Andy, is your "meat" so you can splooge
> BTW...we all know who you are, nitwit. And I'm beating you silly once
> again.
>
on your wife's face:
http://xa.yimg.com/kq/groups/14584976/sn/524437752/name/BJ452.jpg
By: mrLookout
File Name: BJ452.jpg
Posted: Feb 23, 2010
http://xa.yimg.com/kq/groups/14584976/sn/524437752/name/BJ452.jpg
By: mrLookout
File Name: BJ452.jpg
Posted: Feb 23, 2010
"Oh wait...I look like a complete asshole"
--Andy "mrLookout" Hull, Sat, June 11 2011
"Confronting Liberals with the facts of reality is very much akin
to clubbing baby seals. It gets boring after a while, but because
Liberals are so stupid it is easy work."
— Steven M. Barry
Lookout
May 4, 2012, 11:34:34 PM5/4/12
to
On Fri, 4 May 2012 21:07:11 -0400, Way Back Jack <inv...@invalid.net>
Nope. You're wrong
Last chance..then I put you away for a while to give you time to come
up with some answers.
up with some answers.
pyotr filipivich
May 5, 2012, 2:53:34 AM5/5/12
to
Let the Record show that Way Back Jack <inv...@invalid.net> on or
about Fri, 4 May 2012 16:14:20 -0400 did write, type or otherwise
cause to appear in talk.politics.guns the following:
It hasn't rotted his brain. He sticks with them because he can
understand them ... they agree with him.
--
pyotr filipivich
Next Month's Panel: Suicide - getting it right the first time.
about Fri, 4 May 2012 16:14:20 -0400 did write, type or otherwise
cause to appear in talk.politics.guns the following:
understand them ... they agree with him.
--
pyotr filipivich
Next Month's Panel: Suicide - getting it right the first time.
Way Back Jack
May 5, 2012, 6:59:32 AM5/5/12
to
Greg Arama
May 5, 2012, 7:24:37 AM5/5/12
to
"Lookout" wrote in message
news:gr79q79glgrn82cpd...@4ax.com...
Invite him to Hooters, you retard.
Lookout
May 5, 2012, 7:55:32 AM5/5/12
to
On Sat, 5 May 2012 06:59:32 -0400, Way Back Jack <inv...@invalid.net>
2 weeks. Then we'll see if you can respond to your own allegations.
Way Back Jack
May 5, 2012, 8:07:34 AM5/5/12
to
Way Back Jack
May 5, 2012, 9:26:13 AM5/5/12
to
On Sat, 05 May 2012 06:55:32 -0500, Lookout wrote:
And even if you can prove 8 "actives" - - whatever that is, there are
thousands if not millions of "inactives" waiting for the "actives" to beat
the drums and commence with the bongo party.
The one cool thing about this is that they will carry out their mindless
violence on liberals along with everyone else.
ozark...@yahoo.com
May 5, 2012, 4:32:19 PM5/5/12
to
herself - her election is coming up.
RD Sandman
May 5, 2012, 4:51:29 PM5/5/12
to
ozark...@yahoo.com wrote in
news:9e3bq71nkrokkojn0...@4ax.com:
With the SYG law she certainly isn't setting herself up with an easy
task. The pressure is on her to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that
Zimmerman's claim of self defense has no merit.
>>As for the tagline...there is a reason why those people are cutting
>>hair, drive taxis and vote Republican.
>>
>>TMT
>
news:9e3bq71nkrokkojn0...@4ax.com:
task. The pressure is on her to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that
Zimmerman's claim of self defense has no merit.
>>As for the tagline...there is a reason why those people are cutting
>>hair, drive taxis and vote Republican.
>>
>>TMT
>
Harold Burton
May 5, 2012, 6:02:19 PM5/5/12
to
In article <XnsA04A8CF9D...@216.196.121.131>,
<http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/04/25/dershowitz-trayvon-prosecutor-overr
eached-with-murder-charge/>
eached-with-murder-charge/>
Exterminate the christjew government
May 6, 2012, 9:07:23 AM5/6/12
to
> >And had a gun?
>
> Not to smart to attack an unarmed man
>
>
>
>
> Not to smart to attack an unarmed man
>
>
>
> >And shot an unarmed child?
>
> "Child"? LOL
>
>
>
>
> "Child"? LOL
>
>
>
> >The man who stalked the child?
>
> Produce your evidence. From what i have read there was no stalking;
> but perhaps you witnesed it?
>
>
>
> >Sounds like Zimmerman might be a conservative pedophile.
>
> Produce your evidence. From what i have read there was no stalking;
> but perhaps you witnesed it?
>
>
>
>
> Sounds lke you might be a liberal bigot
>
>
>
> >Why does conservatives allow perverts to own guns and prey on
> >children?
>
> Why do liberals hate freedom?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >TMT
Why do conservatives celebrate the rape of a little 12 year old girl
and worship a pedophile that had his only child executed after he grew
all big and hairy- God is a piece of shit
Exterminate the christjew government
May 6, 2012, 9:08:39 AM5/6/12
to
On May 5, 6:59 am, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 04 May 2012 22:34:34 -0500, Lookout wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 May 2012 21:07:11 -0400, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net>
> On Fri, 04 May 2012 22:34:34 -0500, Lookout wrote:
> > wrote:
>
> >>On Fri, 04 May 2012 19:02:55 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
> >>> On Fri, 4 May 2012 18:58:32 -0400, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net>
>
> >>On Fri, 04 May 2012 19:02:55 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>>>On Fri, 04 May 2012 17:48:43 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Fri, 4 May 2012 18:29:14 -0400, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net>
>
> >>>>On Fri, 04 May 2012 17:48:43 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
> >>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>On Fri, 04 May 2012 17:19:59 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, 4 May 2012 18:14:29 -0400, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net>
>
> >>>>>>On Fri, 04 May 2012 17:19:59 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>On Fri, 04 May 2012 15:44:24 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 4 May 2012 16:14:20 -0400, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net>
>
> >>>>>>>>On Fri, 04 May 2012 15:44:24 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 04 May 2012 14:52:26 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 4 May 2012 08:44:37 -0400, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net>
>
> >>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 04 May 2012 14:52:26 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 04 May 2012 05:27:47 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 May 2012 17:19:17 -0400, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net>
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 04 May 2012 05:27:47 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 03 May 2012 16:00:42 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 May 2012 15:19:52 -0400, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net>
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 03 May 2012 16:00:42 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 03 May 2012 14:09:24 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 May 2012 06:57:12 -0400, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net>
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 03 May 2012 14:09:24 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 02 May 2012 23:29:14 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 May 2012 09:09:26 -0400, Way Back Jack <inva...@invalid.net>
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 02 May 2012 23:29:14 -0500, Lookout wrote:
>
>
> >>> BTW...we all know who you are, nitwit. And I'm beating you silly once
> >>> again.
>
> >>Only in your orgasmic dreams, cunt.
>
> > Last chance..then I put you away for a while to give you time to come
> > up with some answers.
>
> Run away cunt, like all liberals do when they tangle with da man.
You are a pussy!
> >>> BTW...we all know who you are, nitwit. And I'm beating you silly once
> >>> again.
>
> >>Only in your orgasmic dreams, cunt.
>
> > Last chance..then I put you away for a while to give you time to come
> > up with some answers.
>
> Run away cunt, like all liberals do when they tangle with da man.
Gunner Asch
May 6, 2012, 12:14:00 PM5/6/12
to
On Sun, 6 May 2012 06:07:23 -0700 (PDT), Exterminate the christjew
government <hic...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >TMT
>
>Why do conservatives celebrate the rape of a little 12 year old girl
>and worship a pedophile that had his only child executed after he grew
>all big and hairy- God is a piece of shit
??? Seems you have Muslims and Christians confused.
government <hic...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >TMT
>
>Why do conservatives celebrate the rape of a little 12 year old girl
>and worship a pedophile that had his only child executed after he grew
>all big and hairy- God is a piece of shit
But then..I suspect your mental processes are equally..confused.
Gunner, Buddhist
--
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry
capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency.
It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an
Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense
and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have
such a man for their? president.. Blaming the prince of the
fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of
fools that made him their prince".
RD Sandman
May 6, 2012, 4:06:27 PM5/6/12
to
Dan Jeffers
May 12, 2012, 10:25:31 PM5/12/12
to
In article <ef09edf0-3cb5-4445-b089-
0c52cf...@i18g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>
Size doesn't mean a thing in a street fight.
> And had a gun?
Trayvon the dirtbag was taller and being aggressive.
> And shot an unarmed child?
Trayvon Martin is older than the average age of a nigger being
sentenced to 20 years in jail for a felony.
> The man who stalked the child?
Trayvon was walking around Zimmerman's car.
> Sounds like Zimmerman might be a conservative pedophile.
Like Obama the dicksucking homosexual marriage proponent?
> Why does conservatives allow perverts to own guns and prey on
> children?
They have to defend themselves against liberals.
> TMT
0c52cf...@i18g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>
> And had a gun?
Trayvon the dirtbag was taller and being aggressive.
> And shot an unarmed child?
sentenced to 20 years in jail for a felony.
> The man who stalked the child?
> Sounds like Zimmerman might be a conservative pedophile.
> Why does conservatives allow perverts to own guns and prey on
> children?
> TMT
0 new messages