Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Trayvon Martin is a dead drug dealer and thief. George Zimmerman put a slug in a thug.
5 views
Skip to first unread message
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 2:01:48 PM5/28/12
to
In article <40l6s7hhtd176ogl7...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:09:49 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >... forcing...
>
> I needn't be forced to continue replicating racist lies
> defaming Zimmerman in the subject lines.
That's what liberals do. Lie, defame, constantly get things
wrong.
--
Trayvon Martin's typical negro behavior got him killed. Let
that be a lesson to the rest of you liberals.
Donate: George Zimmerman Defense Fund
http://gzlegalcase.com/index.php/defense-fund
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:09:49 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >... forcing...
>
> I needn't be forced to continue replicating racist lies
> defaming Zimmerman in the subject lines.
That's what liberals do. Lie, defame, constantly get things
wrong.
--
Trayvon Martin's typical negro behavior got him killed. Let
that be a lesson to the rest of you liberals.
Donate: George Zimmerman Defense Fund
http://gzlegalcase.com/index.php/defense-fund
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 2:18:27 PM5/28/12
to
In article <mrk6s7togmcfvaha2...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 18:04:51 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 25 May 2012 16:48:10 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>... he claims he was returning to his vehicle. Looks like we will
> >>have to wait until either witnesses or forensics proves that wrong.
> >
> >We will never know via witnesses or forensics. What this will come
> >down to is Zimmerman's frame of mind. And from what I've seen that
> >doesn't look good for Zimmerman.
>
> As in "they always get away" ...
Traycon didn't. He got his ass shot off during an attempted
hate crime.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 18:04:51 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 25 May 2012 16:48:10 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>... he claims he was returning to his vehicle. Looks like we will
> >>have to wait until either witnesses or forensics proves that wrong.
> >
> >We will never know via witnesses or forensics. What this will come
> >down to is Zimmerman's frame of mind. And from what I've seen that
> >doesn't look good for Zimmerman.
>
> As in "they always get away" ...
Traycon didn't. He got his ass shot off during an attempted
hate crime.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 2:23:50 PM5/28/12
to
In article <6rl6s7h5f04b7ee2o...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:03:22 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >How could Martin be an "agressor", "confronter" and "assailant"---if
>
> Your subject line had inappropriately referred to the victim as a thug.
>
> >Zimmerloon was not in proximity to Martin---as required by both law
> >and police dispatcher?
>
> Zimmerman could have stayed in his vehicle, but instead he went
> after his victim so he could terrorize and shoot him.
If Traycon had not been casing Zimmerman's vehicle looking for
somthing to steal he might be alive today.
Sometimes black thieves just don't succeed.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:03:22 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >How could Martin be an "agressor", "confronter" and "assailant"---if
>
> Your subject line had inappropriately referred to the victim as a thug.
>
> >Zimmerloon was not in proximity to Martin---as required by both law
> >and police dispatcher?
>
> Zimmerman could have stayed in his vehicle, but instead he went
> after his victim so he could terrorize and shoot him.
If Traycon had not been casing Zimmerman's vehicle looking for
somthing to steal he might be alive today.
Sometimes black thieves just don't succeed.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 2:29:09 PM5/28/12
to
In article <9lk6s75j3uvesu04e...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 18:54:13 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 25 May 2012 11:14:23 -0700, Randal Scripter
> ><kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >
> >>They're not. Conservatives are not, as a matter of ideology, racist.
> >
> >Were the southern aristocracy conservative or liberal?
> >
> >Were the KKK conservatives or liberals ?
> >
> >Was Jesse helms, strom thurmond conservative or liberal?
> >
> >Is their favorite organization the C of CC liberal or conservative?
> >
> >Is "left" liberal?
> >
> >Is "Right" conservative?
> >
> >Or are you so fucking confused that you simply don't know?
>
> Indeed.
Traycon Martin knows the difference now.
He learned not to fuck with his betters.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 18:54:13 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 25 May 2012 11:14:23 -0700, Randal Scripter
> ><kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >
> >>They're not. Conservatives are not, as a matter of ideology, racist.
> >
> >Were the southern aristocracy conservative or liberal?
> >
> >Were the KKK conservatives or liberals ?
> >
> >Was Jesse helms, strom thurmond conservative or liberal?
> >
> >Is their favorite organization the C of CC liberal or conservative?
> >
> >Is "left" liberal?
> >
> >Is "Right" conservative?
> >
> >Or are you so fucking confused that you simply don't know?
>
> Indeed.
Traycon Martin knows the difference now.
He learned not to fuck with his betters.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 2:29:10 PM5/28/12
to
In article <rlk6s7512afgft2pn...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:34:22 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... racist ...
>
> Profiling a black kid certainly is.
Shooting a violent negro who is attacking you isn't.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:34:22 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... racist ...
>
> Profiling a black kid certainly is.
Shooting a violent negro who is attacking you isn't.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 2:34:52 PM5/28/12
to
In article <vok6s71e3sdm1f805...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 21:16:50 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... racist... all racist...race matters...
>
> Are you claiming George Zimmerman would have shot a white kid?
Only if he was a liberal white kid acting like a negro.
Which most of them do out of ignorance.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 21:16:50 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... racist... all racist...race matters...
>
> Are you claiming George Zimmerman would have shot a white kid?
Only if he was a liberal white kid acting like a negro.
Which most of them do out of ignorance.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 2:34:51 PM5/28/12
to
In article <ltk6s75m90t40qttg...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 17:27:23 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> The vigilante with the gun said
"help" because he being attacked by drugged up negro.
Then, he blew that negro's ass away.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 17:27:23 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >On 5/25/2012 5:04 PM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
> >> On Fri, 25 May 2012 16:48:10 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>> ... he claims he was returning to his vehicle. Looks like we will
> >>> have to wait until either witnesses or forensics proves that wrong.
> >>
> >> We will never know via witnesses or forensics. What this will come
> >> down to is Zimmerman's frame of mind.
> >
> >And you know that how, exactly?
> >On 5/25/2012 5:04 PM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
> >> On Fri, 25 May 2012 16:48:10 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>> ... he claims he was returning to his vehicle. Looks like we will
> >>> have to wait until either witnesses or forensics proves that wrong.
> >>
> >> We will never know via witnesses or forensics. What this will come
> >> down to is Zimmerman's frame of mind.
> >
>
> The vigilante with the gun said
"help" because he being attacked by drugged up negro.
Then, he blew that negro's ass away.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 2:34:52 PM5/28/12
to
In article <knk6s71hidrt9ftq2...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 22:08:14 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >Just who do you think opposed the passage of the DEMOCRATIC sponsored
> >Civil Rights Act?
Why do you think it's relevant to the bullet that passed through
Traycoon Martin's body?
> Indeed.
Lifting the Klan mask revealed a chaotic multitude of antiblack
vigilante groups, disgruntled poor white farmers, wartime
guerrilla bands, displaced Democratic politicians, illegal
whiskey distillers, coercive moral reformers, sadists, rapists,
white workmen fearful of black competition, employers trying to
enforce labor discipline, common thieves, neighbors with decades-
old grudges, and even a few freedmen and white Republicans who
allied with Democratic whites or had criminal agendas of their
own. Indeed, all they had in common, besides being
overwhelmingly white, southern, and Democratic, was that they
called themselves, or were called, Klansmen.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 22:08:14 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >Just who do you think opposed the passage of the DEMOCRATIC sponsored
> >Civil Rights Act?
Why do you think it's relevant to the bullet that passed through
Traycoon Martin's body?
> Indeed.
Lifting the Klan mask revealed a chaotic multitude of antiblack
vigilante groups, disgruntled poor white farmers, wartime
guerrilla bands, displaced Democratic politicians, illegal
whiskey distillers, coercive moral reformers, sadists, rapists,
white workmen fearful of black competition, employers trying to
enforce labor discipline, common thieves, neighbors with decades-
old grudges, and even a few freedmen and white Republicans who
allied with Democratic whites or had criminal agendas of their
own. Indeed, all they had in common, besides being
overwhelmingly white, southern, and Democratic, was that they
called themselves, or were called, Klansmen.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 2:34:52 PM5/28/12
to
In article <opl6s7p0b7klcfgir...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman was told
to watch out for violent negro animals.
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman was told
to watch out for violent negro animals.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 2:34:52 PM5/28/12
to
In article <3nl6s7dj8i39i21ge...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 21:24:24 -0700, Lack Skullcapacity <thick....@SouthTeats.con>
> wrote:
>
> >... fists.
>
> So you could have a vehicle and a gun and
> still end up beaten by a unarmed pedestrian?
>
> How colossally clueless of you.
Traycon Martin wasn't a pedestrian. He was a black negro
stalker skulking where he shouldn't have been.
Sometimes negro criminals do stupid things and get themselves
killed.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 21:24:24 -0700, Lack Skullcapacity <thick....@SouthTeats.con>
> wrote:
>
> >... fists.
>
> So you could have a vehicle and a gun and
> still end up beaten by a unarmed pedestrian?
>
> How colossally clueless of you.
Traycon Martin wasn't a pedestrian. He was a black negro
stalker skulking where he shouldn't have been.
Sometimes negro criminals do stupid things and get themselves
killed.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 2:40:22 PM5/28/12
to
In article <9ll6s7hjrodsv3fk5...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 21:19:22 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... stupid ...
>
> That's why you
shoot violent negro criminals like Traycon Martin.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 21:19:22 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... stupid ...
>
> That's why you
shoot violent negro criminals like Traycon Martin.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 2:40:22 PM5/28/12
to
In article <2ul6s7l5gb9hqhbdv...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:45:03 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >by going ...to confront, attack and aggress ...
>
> Zimmerman did that because he wanted to prevent
a black criminal from attacking him.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:45:03 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >by going ...to confront, attack and aggress ...
>
> Zimmerman did that because he wanted to prevent
a black criminal from attacking him.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 2:51:10 PM5/28/12
to
In article <87l6s7dmsehsoldr4...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:08:23 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 25 May 2012 11:28:20 -0700, "Wornout E. Harridan" <beat....@shitbags.con> idiotically wrote:
> >>1. Shows he regularly misbehaved
> >>2. Shows he was a pothead
> >
> >And that's relevant--how?
>
> It isn't relevant, of course, as you note.
>
> Summary execution
is not the same as defending yourself from an attack by a drug
crazed negro.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:08:23 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 25 May 2012 11:28:20 -0700, "Wornout E. Harridan" <beat....@shitbags.con> idiotically wrote:
> >>1. Shows he regularly misbehaved
> >>2. Shows he was a pothead
> >
> >And that's relevant--how?
>
> It isn't relevant, of course, as you note.
>
> Summary execution
is not the same as defending yourself from an attack by a drug
crazed negro.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 2:51:14 PM5/28/12
to
In article <2ul6s7l5gb9hqhbdv...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:45:03 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >by going ...to confront, attack and aggress ...
>
> Zimmerman did that because he wanted to prevent
a black criminal from attacking him.
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:45:03 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >by going ...to confront, attack and aggress ...
>
> Zimmerman did that because he wanted to prevent
a black criminal from attacking him.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 2:51:14 PM5/28/12
to
In article <l2l6s75tg5p3v1cou...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:47:09 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... a clown - a racist, race-obsessed clown...
>
> You're
correct.
Of course he was. Any crazed negro criminal should be put down
like the sick animals they are.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:47:09 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... a clown - a racist, race-obsessed clown...
>
> You're
correct.
Of course he was. Any crazed negro criminal should be put down
like the sick animals they are.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 3:21:58 PM5/28/12
to
In article <nfl6s7l6r2n5l6rm4...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 22:11:50 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:44:01 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>No - about 150 feet.
> >
> >Then how did Martin assault him?
> >
> >He either disobeyed orders to "stay put"---or he did not.
> >
> >Since he confronted his victim (after chasing martin down)---he must
> >have narrowed that "150 feet" very considerably.
>
> Indeed.
>
> Since the innocent victim was
Zimmerman.
He was justified when he shot Traycon, saving himself from
attack by a wild animal.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 22:11:50 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:44:01 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>No - about 150 feet.
> >
> >Then how did Martin assault him?
> >
> >He either disobeyed orders to "stay put"---or he did not.
> >
> >Since he confronted his victim (after chasing martin down)---he must
> >have narrowed that "150 feet" very considerably.
>
> Indeed.
>
> Since the innocent victim was
Zimmerman.
He was justified when he shot Traycon, saving himself from
attack by a wild animal.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 3:33:21 PM5/28/12
to
In article <gkm6s7pjddfq9ffg1...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:47:51 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >...a race-obsessed racist...
>
> Otherwise
Traycon would not have exhibited the behavior that got himself
killed.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:47:51 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >...a race-obsessed racist...
>
> Otherwise
Traycon would not have exhibited the behavior that got himself
killed.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 3:33:21 PM5/28/12
to
In article <7el6s79mo7s7lfmvf...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:44:01 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... a bag of dope ...
>
> You
pegged Traycon.
George Zimmerman pegged him too.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:44:01 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... a bag of dope ...
>
> You
pegged Traycon.
George Zimmerman pegged him too.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 3:33:19 PM5/28/12
to
In article <sbl6s71eh8mt6g2q1...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:02:13 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 25 May 2012 14:15:29 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>Even she didn't use the term "stalking".
> >
> >Actually, "she" doesn't have to
> >
> >The simple fact (evidence) that zimmerloon was FAR away from his
> >truck, carrying a weapon in an act of intimidation, is logically one
> >that presupposes "tracking", "stalking", "following", chasing" to the
> >extent that zimmerloon was the agressor and Martin was a victim
> >
> >Legal definition of all those words are not the same as general usage.
> >
> >Like "perjury"
> >
> >It's not simply "lying"
> >
> >3 congressionaly defined components are required for it to be
> >"perjury"
>
> Indeed.
Democrat, politician, and truthful liberal.
There's an oxymoron in any combination...
> Subject line corrected.
Indeed.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:02:13 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 25 May 2012 14:15:29 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>Even she didn't use the term "stalking".
> >
> >Actually, "she" doesn't have to
> >
> >The simple fact (evidence) that zimmerloon was FAR away from his
> >truck, carrying a weapon in an act of intimidation, is logically one
> >that presupposes "tracking", "stalking", "following", chasing" to the
> >extent that zimmerloon was the agressor and Martin was a victim
> >
> >Legal definition of all those words are not the same as general usage.
> >
> >Like "perjury"
> >
> >It's not simply "lying"
> >
> >3 congressionaly defined components are required for it to be
> >"perjury"
>
> Indeed.
Democrat, politician, and truthful liberal.
There's an oxymoron in any combination...
> Subject line corrected.
Indeed.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 3:38:46 PM5/28/12
to
In article <q3m6s79kvd4rv440v...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 18:51:46 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 25 May 2012 10:59:04 -0700, Randam Schitter.<thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>...as if you know that Zimmerman intended to try to
> >>apprehend and detain Martin. You know no such thing.
> >
> >The hell we don't
> >
> >If he wasn't interested in anything else---he could have "Stayed put"
> >
> >He'd already called 911 and the police were on their way
> >
> >He "determined" that Martin was guilty of "something", followed,
> >confronted, assaulted and killed him
> >
> >Zimmerloon
There went any credibility in this discussion.
It's a good thing George Zimmerman killed that negro so this
wouldn't get out of hand.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 18:51:46 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 25 May 2012 10:59:04 -0700, Randam Schitter.<thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>...as if you know that Zimmerman intended to try to
> >>apprehend and detain Martin. You know no such thing.
> >
> >The hell we don't
> >
> >If he wasn't interested in anything else---he could have "Stayed put"
> >
> >He'd already called 911 and the police were on their way
> >
> >He "determined" that Martin was guilty of "something", followed,
> >confronted, assaulted and killed him
> >
> >Zimmerloon
There went any credibility in this discussion.
It's a good thing George Zimmerman killed that negro so this
wouldn't get out of hand.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 3:38:46 PM5/28/12
to
In article <1em6s7tv9h38erib2...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:24:18 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >... it was initiated because of race. It happened because Zimmerman
> >is mentally ill.
>
> Of course Zimmerman
was within his right to defend himself again an attack from
Traycon.
> Subject line updated
Indeed.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:24:18 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >... it was initiated because of race. It happened because Zimmerman
> >is mentally ill.
>
> Of course Zimmerman
was within his right to defend himself again an attack from
Traycon.
> Subject line updated
Indeed.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 3:44:23 PM5/28/12
to
In article <t8m6s75gkj54820m3...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 18:14:18 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >Still intent to capture...
>
> Absolutely.
>
> Furthermore, the victim wasn't a thug, so it's
> appropriate to remove that libelous slur from
> the subject line in your followups.
That's correct. George Zimmerman is not a thug.
>
> >... pursue applies without
> >intent other than to follow, but in Zimmerman's case there clearly is
> >a distinct posibility he did intent to at least aid in capture, so
> >pursue certainly would be the proper choice of words.
> >
> >Bazinga!
>
> Indeed.
Sometimes negroes make incorrect decisions because of their
lower intelligence.
Traycon wasn't the biggest coconut on the ground.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 18:14:18 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >Still intent to capture...
>
> Absolutely.
>
> Furthermore, the victim wasn't a thug, so it's
> appropriate to remove that libelous slur from
> the subject line in your followups.
That's correct. George Zimmerman is not a thug.
>
> >... pursue applies without
> >intent other than to follow, but in Zimmerman's case there clearly is
> >a distinct posibility he did intent to at least aid in capture, so
> >pursue certainly would be the proper choice of words.
> >
> >Bazinga!
>
> Indeed.
Sometimes negroes make incorrect decisions because of their
lower intelligence.
Traycon wasn't the biggest coconut on the ground.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 3:44:23 PM5/28/12
to
In article <jjm6s7l1762p6nflt...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman has definitely been
vindicated by the media and every witness who saw Traycon
beating on him.
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman has definitely been
vindicated by the media and every witness who saw Traycon
beating on him.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 3:50:16 PM5/28/12
to
In article <12m6s79km0h7gnvfo...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 21:21:16 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >Because he was a stupid punk ...
>
> Zimmerman should never
have to worry about some dumb negro like Traycon bothering him
again.
They know he'll shoot them.
Legally.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 21:21:16 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >Because he was a stupid punk ...
>
> Zimmerman should never
have to worry about some dumb negro like Traycon bothering him
again.
They know he'll shoot them.
Legally.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 3:50:16 PM5/28/12
to
In article <acm6s71dsmadjlpf8...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 17:29:07 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >...skinny mewling cocksucker...
>
> I'm just like my illegal immigrant gay hero Obama.
Too bad you both weren't with Traycon. Zimmerman was a good
shot.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 17:29:07 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >...skinny mewling cocksucker...
>
> I'm just like my illegal immigrant gay hero Obama.
Too bad you both weren't with Traycon. Zimmerman was a good
shot.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 3:55:45 PM5/28/12
to
In article <5nm6s7t23kugks5d7...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:35:47 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... race-obsessed... insisting, shrilly but
> >incorrectly...
>
> Traycon supporters do have problems.
>
> Traycon didn't have a legal right to
assault George Zimmerman.
It's a good thing Zimmerman shot Traycon before he could harm
someone else. Like a pregnant white woman alone in her
apartment or an 80-year-old lady in a parking lot.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:35:47 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... race-obsessed... insisting, shrilly but
> >incorrectly...
>
> Traycon supporters do have problems.
>
> Traycon didn't have a legal right to
assault George Zimmerman.
It's a good thing Zimmerman shot Traycon before he could harm
someone else. Like a pregnant white woman alone in her
apartment or an 80-year-old lady in a parking lot.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 3:55:45 PM5/28/12
to
In article <bpm6s7dlin8t80ko3...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 22:09:55 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >Wrong.
>
> Trayvon Martin was an
ignorant, now dead, negro criminal.
> Subject line corrected to remove racist's libelous slur on the victim.
Indeed.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 22:09:55 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >Wrong.
>
> Trayvon Martin was an
ignorant, now dead, negro criminal.
> Subject line corrected to remove racist's libelous slur on the victim.
Indeed.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 4:06:48 PM5/28/12
to
In article <s6m6s71cd75rkgvc5...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:33:50 -0700, Randam Schitter <thiick....@SouthTeats.conn>
> wrote:
>
> >... perfectly within his
> >rights ...
>
> No, moron, a stalking negro is illegal.
>
> Martin was perfectly within his
> rights
to be stupid and commit suicide.
Too bad George Zimmerman didn't shoot him more than once. He
could have gotten a mint for those bullets on eBay.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:33:50 -0700, Randam Schitter <thiick....@SouthTeats.conn>
> wrote:
>
> >... perfectly within his
> >rights ...
>
> No, moron, a stalking negro is illegal.
>
> Martin was perfectly within his
> rights
to be stupid and commit suicide.
Too bad George Zimmerman didn't shoot him more than once. He
could have gotten a mint for those bullets on eBay.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 4:06:48 PM5/28/12
to
In article <mhm6s7l016imt9ml5...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> No one has yet indicated that Zimmerman would have profiled,
> stalked, or shot a white kid.
White kids don't act like negroes. Well, liberal white kids do,
but that's because their parents failed to teach them about the
stigma of failure.
> Now, a Mexican
is on the Supreme Court.
The negro who is on the Supreme Court wouldn't like Traycon
either.
Looks like Traycon's brain damaged supporters are screwed.
* US * wrote:
>
> No one has yet indicated that Zimmerman would have profiled,
> stalked, or shot a white kid.
White kids don't act like negroes. Well, liberal white kids do,
but that's because their parents failed to teach them about the
stigma of failure.
> Now, a Mexican
is on the Supreme Court.
The negro who is on the Supreme Court wouldn't like Traycon
either.
Looks like Traycon's brain damaged supporters are screwed.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 4:06:48 PM5/28/12
to
In article <0rm6s7dg36s1j825f...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 21:18:43 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >...wrong merely by getting out of his car...
>
> No, wrong to get out of his car
I think he should have stayed in the car and run over Traycon a
couple of times to save that bullet.
> >...wrong and stupid ...
>
> You are right.
Sucks to be you.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 21:18:43 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >...wrong merely by getting out of his car...
>
> No, wrong to get out of his car
I think he should have stayed in the car and run over Traycon a
couple of times to save that bullet.
> >...wrong and stupid ...
>
> You are right.
Sucks to be you.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 4:06:48 PM5/28/12
to
In article <rvl6s71aiu0aj1rdt...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 22:13:15 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >Why would he "go back" and confront someone who was scaring the shit
> >out of him---just feet away from where he was going?
> >
> >Hmmm?
>
> Good question.
Asking questions for only those answers you want to hear is very
liberal.
It no doubt makes Traycon feel much better while he takes his
dirt nap.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 22:13:15 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >Why would he "go back" and confront someone who was scaring the shit
> >out of him---just feet away from where he was going?
> >
> >Hmmm?
>
> Good question.
Asking questions for only those answers you want to hear is very
liberal.
It no doubt makes Traycon feel much better while he takes his
dirt nap.
Obama Be Down Low
May 28, 2012, 4:12:21 PM5/28/12
to
In article <7mm6s791ev5tcvccl...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 18:56:56 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >"Getting out of the car"---is related to an act that must be done to
> >Chase down, confront, assault and kill a law-abiding, legal-acting
> >citizen.
Except Traycon was a black bum who just got kicked out of school
for failure to attend, drugs, and being an all around dirtbag.
> ... Who wasn't a thug: subject line corrected.
Zimmerman wasn't a negro thug.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 18:56:56 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >"Getting out of the car"---is related to an act that must be done to
> >Chase down, confront, assault and kill a law-abiding, legal-acting
> >citizen.
Except Traycon was a black bum who just got kicked out of school
for failure to attend, drugs, and being an all around dirtbag.
> ... Who wasn't a thug: subject line corrected.
Zimmerman wasn't a negro thug.
*us*
May 28, 2012, 5:00:15 PM5/28/12
to
On 28 May 2012 18:40:22 -0000, "idiot" <lo...@inattentive.com> wrote:
>... violent ... criminals like ...
You like the way your Messiah Zimmerman murdered
that innocent kid.
On Fri, 25 May 2012 21:19:22 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>... stupid ...
That's why you can't understand that Zimmerman
needed to stay in his vehicle and away from his
innocent victim.
>... violent ... criminals like ...
You like the way your Messiah Zimmerman murdered
that innocent kid.
On Fri, 25 May 2012 21:19:22 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>... stupid ...
needed to stay in his vehicle and away from his
innocent victim.
Obama means GAY In Kenyan
May 28, 2012, 8:57:08 PM5/28/12
to
In article <g8upr757pt86svc54...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 00:15:54 -0700, "lax headdump" <maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote:
>
> >... full of shit...
>
> You sure are. So is your hate-filled <flush>
Like the OP said, you're full of it.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 00:15:54 -0700, "lax headdump" <maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote:
>
> >... full of shit...
>
> You sure are. So is your hate-filled <flush>
Like the OP said, you're full of it.
Obama means GAY In Kenyan
May 28, 2012, 9:08:23 PM5/28/12
to
In article <95upr75brmhtqci6n...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:11:55 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 22 May 2012 16:32:58 -0700, Pimples the dumb asshole <geo...@si.not> wrote:
> >>If you don't in some way make physical contact with the supposed victim,
> >>then it isn't violent, you fucking douche.
> >
> >It's still a criminal act
> >
> >Placing anyone in fear of their life by threatening, a threating
> >manner, is an overt act of agression, you dumb asshole
>
> Exactly.
That's exactly why Traycon got his dumb ass shot.
You don't like that? Teach your black pets that they don't mess
with a man with a gun.
Anybody with a brain would know that.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:11:55 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 22 May 2012 16:32:58 -0700, Pimples the dumb asshole <geo...@si.not> wrote:
> >>If you don't in some way make physical contact with the supposed victim,
> >>then it isn't violent, you fucking douche.
> >
> >It's still a criminal act
> >
> >Placing anyone in fear of their life by threatening, a threating
> >manner, is an overt act of agression, you dumb asshole
>
> Exactly.
That's exactly why Traycon got his dumb ass shot.
You don't like that? Teach your black pets that they don't mess
with a man with a gun.
Anybody with a brain would know that.
Obama means GAY In Kenyan
May 28, 2012, 9:19:05 PM5/28/12
to
In article <g8upr757pt86svc54...@4ax.com>
The only mud you can throw in this fight is hollering "racist"
and hoping it sticks?
You must be some Southern California or bay area weirdo.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 00:15:54 -0700, "lax headdump" <maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote:
>
> >... full of shit...
>
> You sure are. So is your hate-filled violent racist <flush>
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 00:15:54 -0700, "lax headdump" <maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote:
>
> >... full of shit...
>
The only mud you can throw in this fight is hollering "racist"
and hoping it sticks?
You must be some Southern California or bay area weirdo.
Obama means GAY In Kenyan
May 28, 2012, 9:24:48 PM5/28/12
to
In article <07upr7hcligbjta46...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:45:51 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... following someone to keep an eye on him is not, of course...
>
> It doesn't involve shooting the innocent victim, you idiot.
Traycon shouldn't have jumped on Zimmerman and tried to smash
his skull.
It got his ass shot.
Dead.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:45:51 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... following someone to keep an eye on him is not, of course...
>
> It doesn't involve shooting the innocent victim, you idiot.
Traycon shouldn't have jumped on Zimmerman and tried to smash
his skull.
It got his ass shot.
Dead.
Leon Manfredi
May 28, 2012, 10:01:49 PM5/28/12
to
35% OF MONEY DONATED GOES TO THE CAUSE.... THE REST INTO MY POCKETS.
Obama means GAY In Kenyan
May 28, 2012, 10:31:06 PM5/28/12
to
In article <taupr71m564k49tm0...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Martin had every right to stand his ground and defend himself.
So did Zimmerman. Traycon shouldn't have pushed his luck.
> It's not easy for an unarmed pedestrian teenager to protect himself
> from an older violent racist with a vehicle and a gun, though.
Odd. I don't recall any recordings of Zimmerman calling Traycon
a nigger at any point of the conflict.
Or vice versa in Traycon's case.
How far up your ass did you have to reach to pull out that lie?
* US * wrote:
>
> Martin had every right to stand his ground and defend himself.
So did Zimmerman. Traycon shouldn't have pushed his luck.
> It's not easy for an unarmed pedestrian teenager to protect himself
> from an older violent racist with a vehicle and a gun, though.
Odd. I don't recall any recordings of Zimmerman calling Traycon
a nigger at any point of the conflict.
Or vice versa in Traycon's case.
How far up your ass did you have to reach to pull out that lie?
.USA!..not..USSR.
May 28, 2012, 10:42:09 PM5/28/12
to
In article <idupr717236fgg0j9...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:15:41 -0700, "Oglethorpe" <anti...@go.com> wrote:
>
> >... LIED
> >in describing what happpened [sic]
>
> Zimmerman certainly did.
Not.
Maybe Traycon should have had more father son talks with his
"daddy."
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:15:41 -0700, "Oglethorpe" <anti...@go.com> wrote:
>
> >... LIED
> >in describing what happpened [sic]
>
> Zimmerman certainly did.
Not.
Maybe Traycon should have had more father son talks with his
"daddy."
.USA!..not..USSR.
May 28, 2012, 10:47:38 PM5/28/12
to
In article <qhupr7hqv1a1q5o9i...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 09:54:11 -0400, HVAC <mr....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >... have decided he's guilty.
>
> Your idol Zimmerman shot an innocent kid.
Was Traycon innocent before or after he committed burglary and
stole that jewelry?
> On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:28:58 -0400, Garnett <1x...@none.com> wrote:
>
> >... He did not
> >have the right to attack ...
>
> Yet Zimmerman profiled, stalked, terrorized,
> and shot his innocent victim.
Why was Zimmerman looking for black burglars in his neighborhood?
> Zimmerman was on the offensive as soon
> as he spotted his victim.
Sure he was, and the Miami Dolphins won the Superbowl twice in
the same year by beating the Calgary Stampeders and guest team
Iowa State.
> There's no doubt that Zimmerman caused
> the incident.
Would that be before or after Traycon Martin jumped him and
tried to smash his skull?
> It's what he wanted.
No, it what you want.
You don't give a damn about Traycon. It's all about beating up
on a man who dared defend himself against a black assailant.
That just can't be permitted in the brave new world of
liberalism.
Negroes are sacred animals. It's unlawful to correct them,
discipline them, or otherwise object to them.
Obama might be offended and we couldn't have that.
> On Sun, 20 May 2012 11:54:56 -0400, Garnett <1x...@none.com> wrote:
>
> >The "unarmed pedestrian" was ...
>
> Martin was attempting to stand his ground
> and defend himself.
It's pretty hard to stand one's ground while kneeling on the
other guy's chest and pounding his head into the ground.
> Zimmerman shot an unarmed pedestrian
> who had every right to be where he was
> doing what he was.
Zimmerman shot a black thug who had him on the ground and was
beating his ass.
> That remains undisputed.
Your lack of brainpower is undisputed.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 09:54:11 -0400, HVAC <mr....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >... have decided he's guilty.
>
> Your idol Zimmerman shot an innocent kid.
Was Traycon innocent before or after he committed burglary and
stole that jewelry?
> On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:28:58 -0400, Garnett <1x...@none.com> wrote:
>
> >... He did not
> >have the right to attack ...
>
> Yet Zimmerman profiled, stalked, terrorized,
> and shot his innocent victim.
Why was Zimmerman looking for black burglars in his neighborhood?
> Zimmerman was on the offensive as soon
> as he spotted his victim.
Sure he was, and the Miami Dolphins won the Superbowl twice in
the same year by beating the Calgary Stampeders and guest team
Iowa State.
> There's no doubt that Zimmerman caused
> the incident.
Would that be before or after Traycon Martin jumped him and
tried to smash his skull?
> It's what he wanted.
No, it what you want.
You don't give a damn about Traycon. It's all about beating up
on a man who dared defend himself against a black assailant.
That just can't be permitted in the brave new world of
liberalism.
Negroes are sacred animals. It's unlawful to correct them,
discipline them, or otherwise object to them.
Obama might be offended and we couldn't have that.
> On Sun, 20 May 2012 11:54:56 -0400, Garnett <1x...@none.com> wrote:
>
> >The "unarmed pedestrian" was ...
>
> Martin was attempting to stand his ground
> and defend himself.
It's pretty hard to stand one's ground while kneeling on the
other guy's chest and pounding his head into the ground.
> Zimmerman shot an unarmed pedestrian
> who had every right to be where he was
> doing what he was.
Zimmerman shot a black thug who had him on the ground and was
beating his ass.
> That remains undisputed.
Your lack of brainpower is undisputed.
.USA!..not..USSR.
May 28, 2012, 10:58:35 PM5/28/12
to
In article <1gupr7p78d4jd26ek...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 19:02:52 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >...The kid very likely is the one who ...
>
> He had the right to stand his ground and defend himself, you idiot.
Except he was too busy jumping on Zimmerman and trying to beat
his skull in.
Maybe he could have worked on standing his ground after killing
Zimmerman before the police arrived.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 19:02:52 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >...The kid very likely is the one who ...
>
> He had the right to stand his ground and defend himself, you idiot.
Except he was too busy jumping on Zimmerman and trying to beat
his skull in.
Maybe he could have worked on standing his ground after killing
Zimmerman before the police arrived.
Scott Sanford
May 29, 2012, 1:59:56 AM5/29/12
to
On 28 May 2012, Leon Manfredi <man...@fastmail.fm> posted some
news:FYqdnaYoaPOds1nS...@posted.toastnet:
That's the American way! Capitalism rocks!
news:FYqdnaYoaPOds1nS...@posted.toastnet:
124 Grains
May 29, 2012, 3:21:04 AM5/29/12
to
In article <d87sr752jvpdrndmo...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 10:46:43 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:22:11 -0700, "max headroom"
> ><maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote:
> >
> >>* US * <* US *> wrote in news:g8upr757pt86svc54...@4ax.com:
> >>
> >>>> ... full of shit...
> >>
> >>> You sure are. So is your hate-filled violent racist idol Zimmerman.
> >>
> >>Your debate skills are awesome!
> >>
> >
> >Good for you
> >
> >At least you didn't refute the truth of what he said.
What? That * US * was full of shit?
> He couldn't.
Who would want to?
> Zimmerman's been lying about the crime.
There's that liberal libel again. You silly little children
just can't admit that Traycon Martin may have had a greater hand
in all this.
When a drug addicted, drug dealing burglar, gets caught with
stolen property, then gets booted from school, his angel wings
and halo get taken away.
His credibility in life and death get tossed in the toilet.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 10:46:43 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:22:11 -0700, "max headroom"
> ><maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote:
> >
> >>* US * <* US *> wrote in news:g8upr757pt86svc54...@4ax.com:
> >>
> >>>> ... full of shit...
> >>
> >>> You sure are. So is your hate-filled violent racist idol Zimmerman.
> >>
> >>Your debate skills are awesome!
> >>
> >
> >Good for you
> >
> >At least you didn't refute the truth of what he said.
What? That * US * was full of shit?
> He couldn't.
Who would want to?
> Zimmerman's been lying about the crime.
There's that liberal libel again. You silly little children
just can't admit that Traycon Martin may have had a greater hand
in all this.
When a drug addicted, drug dealing burglar, gets caught with
stolen property, then gets booted from school, his angel wings
and halo get taken away.
His credibility in life and death get tossed in the toilet.
124 Grains
May 29, 2012, 3:21:04 AM5/29/12
to
In article <ta7sr752kkqgd4gb1...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 07:38:45 -0700, Pimples <geo...@si.not> wrote:
>
> >Following and observing someone ...
>
> That doesn't include provoking and shooting someone, you moron.
Who did that? The provoking part.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 07:38:45 -0700, Pimples <geo...@si.not> wrote:
>
> >Following and observing someone ...
>
> That doesn't include provoking and shooting someone, you moron.
Who did that? The provoking part.
124 Grains
May 29, 2012, 3:26:48 AM5/29/12
to
In article <877sr7prnbiqu78ki...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> The hate-filled violent racist
Traycon Martin supporters will stop at no end to libel George
Zimmerman who was only protecting himself from a violent black
criminal.
* US * wrote:
>
> The hate-filled violent racist
Traycon Martin supporters will stop at no end to libel George
Zimmerman who was only protecting himself from a violent black
criminal.
124 Grains
May 29, 2012, 3:48:59 AM5/29/12
to
In article <737sr71hvc7q9isqe...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:38:26 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:45:51 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>No, following someone to keep an eye on him is not, of course, a
> >>criminal act... full of shit, as usual.
> >
> >Anytime a behavior or act creates a fear in a victim---that is a
> >chargable crime.
> >
> >You think you have a right to follow someone, stand outside their
> >home, detain them to ask them questions, chase down, confront, then
> >claim you have a right to kill them simply because your own actions
> >created the event?
> >
> >Hmm?
Yoorghis is full of crap too. Traycon wasn't even near his
home. He was casing his neighbors homes looking to see who
wasn't around so he could go rob them later.
> Good question.
Dumb response on your part.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:38:26 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:45:51 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>No, following someone to keep an eye on him is not, of course, a
> >>criminal act... full of shit, as usual.
> >
> >Anytime a behavior or act creates a fear in a victim---that is a
> >chargable crime.
> >
> >You think you have a right to follow someone, stand outside their
> >home, detain them to ask them questions, chase down, confront, then
> >claim you have a right to kill them simply because your own actions
> >created the event?
> >
> >Hmm?
Yoorghis is full of crap too. Traycon wasn't even near his
home. He was casing his neighbors homes looking to see who
wasn't around so he could go rob them later.
> Good question.
Dumb response on your part.
rst11
May 29, 2012, 7:33:57 AM5/29/12
to
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/03/27/article-2120504-125AFDAD000005DC-895_634x474.jpg
Ah could 'a been a big murderer ... now I just be dead thug ...
Ah could 'a been a big murderer ... now I just be dead thug ...
Eddie Haskell
May 29, 2012, 11:35:45 AM5/29/12
to
"Obama Be Down Low" <fag-pr...@attackwatch.com> wrote in message
news:WIKOXOUN4105...@reece.net.au...
> In article <87l6s7dmsehsoldr4...@4ax.com>
> * US * wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:08:23 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>
>> >On Fri, 25 May 2012 11:28:20 -0700, "Wornout E. Harridan"
>> ><beat....@shitbags.con> idiotically wrote:
>> >>1. Shows he regularly misbehaved
>> >>2. Shows he was a pothead
>> >
>> >And that's relevant--how?
It proves that he was not the innocent cute little boy the Goebbels MSM /
DNC cabal was portraying him as while Zimmerman was forced to go underground
in a country where the concept of "innocent until proven guilty" has all but
been destroyed by the Negro / MSM / DNC third-world trifecta alliance.
-Eddie Haskell
>> It isn't relevant, of course, as you note.
>>
>> Summary execution
>
> is not the same as defending yourself from an attack by a drug
> crazed negro.
Eddie Haskell
May 29, 2012, 11:38:04 AM5/29/12
to
news:G7VADTX54105...@reece.net.au...
> In article <t8m6s75gkj54820m3...@4ax.com>
> * US * wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 25 May 2012 18:14:18 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>>
>> >Still intent to capture...
>>
>> Absolutely.
>>
>> Furthermore, the victim wasn't a thug, so it's
>> appropriate to remove that libelous slur from
>> the subject line in your followups.
>
> That's correct. George Zimmerman is not a thug.
Yes, correct.
>> >... pursue applies without
>> >intent other than to follow, but in Zimmerman's case there clearly is
>> >a distinct posibility he did intent to at least aid in capture, so
>> >pursue certainly would be the proper choice of words.
>> >
>> >Bazinga!
>>
>> Indeed.
>
> Sometimes negroes make incorrect decisions because of their
> lower intelligence.
Correct again. Easily susceptible to the gangsta image than the Negro youth
aspire to.
> Traycon wasn't the biggest coconut on the ground.
Hahahahahaha!!
-Eddie Haskell
> In article <t8m6s75gkj54820m3...@4ax.com>
> * US * wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 25 May 2012 18:14:18 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>>
>> >Still intent to capture...
>>
>> Absolutely.
>>
>> Furthermore, the victim wasn't a thug, so it's
>> appropriate to remove that libelous slur from
>> the subject line in your followups.
>
> That's correct. George Zimmerman is not a thug.
Yes, correct.
>> >... pursue applies without
>> >intent other than to follow, but in Zimmerman's case there clearly is
>> >a distinct posibility he did intent to at least aid in capture, so
>> >pursue certainly would be the proper choice of words.
>> >
>> >Bazinga!
>>
>> Indeed.
>
> Sometimes negroes make incorrect decisions because of their
> lower intelligence.
Correct again. Easily susceptible to the gangsta image than the Negro youth
aspire to.
> Traycon wasn't the biggest coconut on the ground.
Hahahahahaha!!
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
May 29, 2012, 11:39:26 AM5/29/12
to
"Obama means GAY In Kenyan" <gay-keny...@attackwatch.com> wrote in
message news:7ZERYHJL4105...@reece.net.au...
> In article <07upr7hcligbjta46...@4ax.com>
> * US * wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:45:51 -0700, Randam Slurper
>> <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>>
>> >... following someone to keep an eye on him is not, of course...
>>
>> It doesn't involve shooting the innocent victim, you idiot.
>
> Traycon shouldn't have jumped on Zimmerman and tried to smash
> his skull.
>
> It got his ass shot.
>
> Dead.
He though it would be neat to beat up a white man like they talk about in
> * US * wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:45:51 -0700, Randam Slurper
>> <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>>
>> >... following someone to keep an eye on him is not, of course...
>>
>> It doesn't involve shooting the innocent victim, you idiot.
>
> Traycon shouldn't have jumped on Zimmerman and tried to smash
> his skull.
>
> It got his ass shot.
>
> Dead.
his gangsta rap songs.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
May 29, 2012, 11:40:34 AM5/29/12
to
"Leon Manfredi" <man...@fastmail.fm> wrote in message
news:FYqdnaYoaPOds1nS...@posted.toastnet...
take that up your ass and squeal like a pig for us.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
May 29, 2012, 12:01:14 PM5/29/12
to
"Scott Sanford" <inv...@not-for-mail.invalid> wrote in message
news:8b16fecba969dbc5...@not-for-mail.invalid...
-Eddie Haskell
klattu
May 29, 2012, 12:55:05 PM5/29/12
to
so burdened!.......(liberal and demoncrat logic)
klattu
Eddie Haskell
May 29, 2012, 1:56:43 PM5/29/12
to
"klattu" <m...@somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:1iv9s7ppeb5t4lg5d...@4ax.com...
-Eddie Haskell
124 Grains
May 29, 2012, 2:31:18 PM5/29/12
to
In article <mj7sr71p9aanjdgrn...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman is still
alive.
Traycon should have used better judgement.
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman is still
alive.
Traycon should have used better judgement.
124 Grains
May 29, 2012, 2:31:17 PM5/29/12
to
In article <gf7sr75eub1dkgt7i...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Martin had the legal right to stand his ground and defend himself,
Defense isn't one sided. Zimmerman had the same simultaneous
right.
* US * wrote:
>
> Martin had the legal right to stand his ground and defend himself,
Defense isn't one sided. Zimmerman had the same simultaneous
right.
124 Grains
May 29, 2012, 2:31:18 PM5/29/12
to
In article <pe7sr7dhreb3srokb...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 07:59:47 -0700, "Oglethorpe" <anti...@go.com> wrote:
>
> >What Martin did ...
>
> He attempted to
beat George Zimmerman's skull in.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 07:59:47 -0700, "Oglethorpe" <anti...@go.com> wrote:
>
> >What Martin did ...
>
> He attempted to
beat George Zimmerman's skull in.
124 Grains
May 29, 2012, 2:54:04 PM5/29/12
to
In article <7i7sr71jmebmoo6ib...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman never had any right to defend himself against the savage negro animal who attacked him.
Exactly.
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman never had any right to defend himself against the savage negro animal who attacked him.
Exactly.
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 3:16:37 PM5/29/12
to
In article <6r7sr7tj0afkgnnm7...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 07:33:26 -0700, Pimples <geo...@si.not> wrote:
>
> >... following and
> >observation ...
>
> That doesn't include confront and shoot, you idiot.
It doesn't include lying about it and making a fool of yourself
either.
But that's you.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 07:33:26 -0700, Pimples <geo...@si.not> wrote:
>
> >... following and
> >observation ...
>
> That doesn't include confront and shoot, you idiot.
It doesn't include lying about it and making a fool of yourself
either.
But that's you.
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 3:16:37 PM5/29/12
to
In article <lm7sr7l8uepfekj9l...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Martin was justified in
shutting his yappy gold grilled gangsta mouth and leaving George
Zimmerman alone.
Let's dig him up and ask him why he failed to do that.
* US * wrote:
>
> Martin was justified in
shutting his yappy gold grilled gangsta mouth and leaving George
Zimmerman alone.
Let's dig him up and ask him why he failed to do that.
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 3:22:11 PM5/29/12
to
In article <9d7sr75e0jglh7bcp...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:56:21 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >It certainly was challenged by Mr. Zimmerman ...
>
> Deluded racist belief isn't a valid challenge, you moron.
It seems to be for you and other Traycon supporters.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:56:21 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >It certainly was challenged by Mr. Zimmerman ...
>
> Deluded racist belief isn't a valid challenge, you moron.
It seems to be for you and other Traycon supporters.
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 3:22:12 PM5/29/12
to
In article <4u7sr7htd7rujmkko...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman didn't just stalk his victim.
It's kind of hard to "stalk" when the "victim" is kneeling on
your chest slamming your skull into the ground.
> He terrorized and then shot him.
Oh yeah...that works. Totally... A 6' 3" football player was
terrorized by a 5' 9" man.
That's not quite as good as the lynching yarn. Keep working at
it though.
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman didn't just stalk his victim.
It's kind of hard to "stalk" when the "victim" is kneeling on
your chest slamming your skull into the ground.
> He terrorized and then shot him.
Oh yeah...that works. Totally... A 6' 3" football player was
terrorized by a 5' 9" man.
That's not quite as good as the lynching yarn. Keep working at
it though.
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 3:22:11 PM5/29/12
to
In article <dp7sr79n6o66ajo92...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:23:48 -0700, Pimples <geo...@si.not> wrote:
>
> >... blabbering ... and
> >also crying... nothing but cry.
>
> Aw, poor Pimples.
>
> hate-filled violent racist <flush>
liberals have taken up another losing cause.
They are now defending a violent negro thug who attacked a man
with a gun and got killed for his trouble.
Not very smart.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:23:48 -0700, Pimples <geo...@si.not> wrote:
>
> >... blabbering ... and
> >also crying... nothing but cry.
>
> Aw, poor Pimples.
>
> hate-filled violent racist <flush>
liberals have taken up another losing cause.
They are now defending a violent negro thug who attacked a man
with a gun and got killed for his trouble.
Not very smart.
George Plimpton
May 29, 2012, 3:28:52 PM5/29/12
to
On 5/29/2012 12:22 PM, Bang! Thump. wrote:
> In article<9d7sr75e0jglh7bcp...@4ax.com>
> * US * wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:56:21 -0700, Randam Slurper<lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>>
>>> It certainly was challenged by Mr. Zimmerman ...
>>
>> Deluded racist belief isn't a valid challenge, you moron.
>
> It seems to be for you and other Traycon supporters.
It isn't valid, of course, but they do find it satisfying, sort of the
> In article<9d7sr75e0jglh7bcp...@4ax.com>
> * US * wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:56:21 -0700, Randam Slurper<lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>>
>>> It certainly was challenged by Mr. Zimmerman ...
>>
>> Deluded racist belief isn't a valid challenge, you moron.
>
> It seems to be for you and other Traycon supporters.
way a baby finds taking a dump in its diaper satisfying.
George Plimpton
May 29, 2012, 3:30:32 PM5/29/12
to
On 5/29/2012 12:22 PM, Bang! Thump. wrote:
> In article<dp7sr79n6o66ajo92...@4ax.com>
> Blowjob, aka *I Hate the US*, lied:
>>
>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:23:48 -0700, Pimples<geo...@si.not> wrote:
>>
>>> ... blabbering ... and
>>> also crying... nothing but cry.
>>
>> Aw, poor Pimples.
>>
>> hate-filled violent racist<flush>
>
> liberals have taken up another losing cause.
Have you noticed that they've all but abandoned it? I mean, the
>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:23:48 -0700, Pimples<geo...@si.not> wrote:
>>
>>> ... blabbering ... and
>>> also crying... nothing but cry.
>>
>> Aw, poor Pimples.
>>
>> hate-filled violent racist<flush>
>
> liberals have taken up another losing cause.
national pundits have, anyway - it's only deluded time-wasters like
Blowjob (aka *I Hate the US*) whose time isn't worth anything in a
market economy who keep blabbering this race-obsession bullshit.
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 3:44:04 PM5/29/12
to
In article <l99sr7hdnfi5ju9b2...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:24:01 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... He followed a thug ...
>
> No, he took life preserving defensive action and shot a thug.
Accuracy restored.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:24:01 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... He followed a thug ...
>
> No, he took life preserving defensive action and shot a thug.
Accuracy restored.
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 3:44:04 PM5/29/12
to
In article <ne9sr71h1q89071c1...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 18:41:05 -0700 (PDT), Jim Jensen <jjci...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On May 22, 6:16 am, * US * wrote:
> >> Zimmerman attacked the kid for no valid reason.
> >
> >Very objective viewpoint (not)
>
> If you believe you'd have a valid reason for Zimmerman
> to have stalked <flush>
Watching a known criminal case your vehicle while you sit in it
is valid enough for most people.
Of course, liberal drones are not really people.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 18:41:05 -0700 (PDT), Jim Jensen <jjci...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On May 22, 6:16 am, * US * wrote:
> >> Zimmerman attacked the kid for no valid reason.
> >
> >Very objective viewpoint (not)
>
> If you believe you'd have a valid reason for Zimmerman
> to have stalked <flush>
Watching a known criminal case your vehicle while you sit in it
is valid enough for most people.
Of course, liberal drones are not really people.
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 3:49:39 PM5/29/12
to
In article <728sr7t9rbf6t84eq...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman had to chase down his innocent victim in order to shoot him.
He didn't have to run far at all since Traycon was kneeling on
his chest slamming his head into the ground.
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman had to chase down his innocent victim in order to shoot him.
He didn't have to run far at all since Traycon was kneeling on
his chest slamming his head into the ground.
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 3:55:26 PM5/29/12
to
In article <hb9sr7h3vilojgecs...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:24:40 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >...to follow and observer [sic]...
>
> You said "to stalk and assault", which is what
> Traycon Martin did to his intended victim.
Fixed that little mistake for you. No charge.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:24:40 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >...to follow and observer [sic]...
>
> You said "to stalk and assault", which is what
> Traycon Martin did to his intended victim.
Fixed that little mistake for you. No charge.
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 4:00:57 PM5/29/12
to
In article <g08sr7p146f5mdf85...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman wasn't supposed to stalk his innocent victim,
> but he couldn't have shot him if he didn't.
6' 3" Traycon was an extremely willing victim. He was kneeling
on 5' 9" George Zimmerman's chest while bashing his skull
against the ground.
George was probably thinking, "I can't miss." "...or this guy
might kill me..."
BOOM!
One shot, one kill.
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman wasn't supposed to stalk his innocent victim,
> but he couldn't have shot him if he didn't.
6' 3" Traycon was an extremely willing victim. He was kneeling
on 5' 9" George Zimmerman's chest while bashing his skull
against the ground.
George was probably thinking, "I can't miss." "...or this guy
might kill me..."
BOOM!
One shot, one kill.
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 4:11:52 PM5/29/12
to
In article <uh9sr7hp35387s9u4...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:19:45 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >...the one who started the fight...
>
> Martin wasn't the one who decided that Zimmerman shouldn't "get away".
Indeed.
6' 3" Traycon felt he had the upper hand when he was on 5' 9"
Zimmerman's chest slamming his skull against the ground.
Zimmerman showed him how wrong he was.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:19:45 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >...the one who started the fight...
>
> Martin wasn't the one who decided that Zimmerman shouldn't "get away".
Indeed.
6' 3" Traycon felt he had the upper hand when he was on 5' 9"
Zimmerman's chest slamming his skull against the ground.
Zimmerman showed him how wrong he was.
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 6:57:21 PM5/29/12
to
In article <ig9sr756uep0rfie0...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 01:48:32 -0700, China Blue Max <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >In article
> ><6aca0d19-f481-4b22...@kw17g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
>
> Indeed - Zimmerman
was victimized by Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and the liberal MSM.
After he blew a hole in Traycon for trying to bash his skull in.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 01:48:32 -0700, China Blue Max <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >In article
> ><6aca0d19-f481-4b22...@kw17g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
> > Jim Jensen <jjci...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On May 22, 6:16 am, * US * wrote:
> >> > Zimmerman attacked the kid for no valid reason.
> >>
> >> Very objective viewpoint (not)
> >
> >It was night. Martin was black. And walking. He was so obviously doing something illegal.
> >
> >> On May 22, 6:16 am, * US * wrote:
> >> > Zimmerman attacked the kid for no valid reason.
> >>
> >> Very objective viewpoint (not)
> >
>
> Indeed - Zimmerman
was victimized by Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and the liberal MSM.
After he blew a hole in Traycon for trying to bash his skull in.
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 7:03:09 PM5/29/12
to
In article <62asr7l8f1ub74v10...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 04:45:57 -0400, Flint <agen...@section31.org> wrote:
>
> >election/voting results ...
>
> From blackboxes?
>
> You're an idiot.
It's so gratifying that you're qualified to make that
assessment...
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 04:45:57 -0400, Flint <agen...@section31.org> wrote:
>
> >election/voting results ...
>
> From blackboxes?
>
> You're an idiot.
It's so gratifying that you're qualified to make that
assessment...
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 7:03:09 PM5/29/12
to
In article <cebsr7d0u20k0k1l2...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman's cow<flush>
How's that lynching story coming along? Be sure and pay
particular attention to the roaring bonfires and thousands of
nooses hanging from a giant oak tree. I want to read about
Traycon being hung in every single one of them.
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman's cow<flush>
How's that lynching story coming along? Be sure and pay
particular attention to the roaring bonfires and thousands of
nooses hanging from a giant oak tree. I want to read about
Traycon being hung in every single one of them.
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 7:03:08 PM5/29/12
to
In article <dhbsr79gcpnfr2djj...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 10:14:52 -0400, Vandar <vand...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >... in [sic] idiot ...
>
> Otherwise you'd object to a lynching, no doubt.
You tell that Traycon lynching story so well. The huge roaring
bonfires, the thousands of nooses with Traycon hanging from each
and every one of them...
> Zimmerman was too busy hoping <flush>
Failed attempt at mind reading noted.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 10:14:52 -0400, Vandar <vand...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >... in [sic] idiot ...
>
> Otherwise you'd object to a lynching, no doubt.
You tell that Traycon lynching story so well. The huge roaring
bonfires, the thousands of nooses with Traycon hanging from each
and every one of them...
> Zimmerman was too busy hoping <flush>
Failed attempt at mind reading noted.
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 7:09:03 PM5/29/12
to
In article <h9bsr7p07o5pjs55e...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 06:23:25 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 23 May 2012 23:00:44 -0700, "max headroom" <maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote:
> >>de...@dudu.org <de...@dudu.org> wrote in news:va6qr7tsr248ln12a...@4ax.com:
> >>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:50:58 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>> On 5/23/2012 9:38 AM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:43:39 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 5/23/2012 8:38 AM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:45:51 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> No, following someone to keep an eye on him is not, of course, a
> >>>>>>>> criminal act. ... full of shit, as usual.
> >>>>>>> Anytime a behavior or act creates a fear in a victim---that is a chargable crime.
> >>>>>> No, that's a ridiculous lie.
> >>>>>> From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
> >>>>>> Intimidation (also called cowing) is intentional behavior "which would cause a
> >>>>>> person of ordinary sensibilities" fear of injury or harm.
> >>>> Following someone creates no inherent fear of injury or harm.
> >>> You don't know that. Martin described Zimmerman as "Weird crazy
> >>> person". That's more than enough to make a teenager feel in danger.
> >>Apparently not a strong enough feeling to cause Martin to enter his father's
> >>girlfriend's house and eschew reversing his course to confront Zimmerman.
> >>
> >Um, he was a teenager being followed by an unknown "weird crazy
> >person". Maybe he didn't want the crazy person to know where he
> >lived? Ever think of that one dumbass? No of course not. You
> >moronic right wingers never think of the logical sensible stuff.
When a liberal is able to identify "logical and sensible" be
sure and let us know. It hasn't happened yet and probably never
will.
> Indeed.
>
> Moronic <flush>
"Moronic." It was "moronic" of 6' 3" Traycon Martin to attack
5' 9" George Zimmerman and bash his skull against the ground
again and again. Zimmerman was forced to draw a weapon and save
his life by shooting an out of control violent negro.
He did so with one shot.
One shot, one kill.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 06:23:25 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 23 May 2012 23:00:44 -0700, "max headroom" <maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote:
> >>de...@dudu.org <de...@dudu.org> wrote in news:va6qr7tsr248ln12a...@4ax.com:
> >>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:50:58 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>> On 5/23/2012 9:38 AM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:43:39 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 5/23/2012 8:38 AM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:45:51 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> No, following someone to keep an eye on him is not, of course, a
> >>>>>>>> criminal act. ... full of shit, as usual.
> >>>>>>> Anytime a behavior or act creates a fear in a victim---that is a chargable crime.
> >>>>>> No, that's a ridiculous lie.
> >>>>>> From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
> >>>>>> Intimidation (also called cowing) is intentional behavior "which would cause a
> >>>>>> person of ordinary sensibilities" fear of injury or harm.
> >>>> Following someone creates no inherent fear of injury or harm.
> >>> You don't know that. Martin described Zimmerman as "Weird crazy
> >>> person". That's more than enough to make a teenager feel in danger.
> >>Apparently not a strong enough feeling to cause Martin to enter his father's
> >>girlfriend's house and eschew reversing his course to confront Zimmerman.
> >>
> >Um, he was a teenager being followed by an unknown "weird crazy
> >person". Maybe he didn't want the crazy person to know where he
> >lived? Ever think of that one dumbass? No of course not. You
> >moronic right wingers never think of the logical sensible stuff.
When a liberal is able to identify "logical and sensible" be
sure and let us know. It hasn't happened yet and probably never
will.
> Indeed.
>
> Moronic <flush>
"Moronic." It was "moronic" of 6' 3" Traycon Martin to attack
5' 9" George Zimmerman and bash his skull against the ground
again and again. Zimmerman was forced to draw a weapon and save
his life by shooting an out of control violent negro.
He did so with one shot.
One shot, one kill.
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 7:14:41 PM5/29/12
to
In article <72csr71si8pmkg4vi...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 06:32:25 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >THC doesn't NOT cause violent reactions. The crap Zimmerman was taking can.
How do you explain Traycon Martin's violent tendencies, drug
addiction, drug use, burglaries, possession of stolen property,
truancy and suspension from school?
> Exactly.
Nice setup.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 06:32:25 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >THC doesn't NOT cause violent reactions. The crap Zimmerman was taking can.
How do you explain Traycon Martin's violent tendencies, drug
addiction, drug use, burglaries, possession of stolen property,
truancy and suspension from school?
> Exactly.
Nice setup.
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 7:14:41 PM5/29/12
to
In article <55bsr7deda61h4j3v...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 06:21:38 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 23 May 2012 21:53:25 -0400, "Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
> >><de...@dudu.org> wrote in message news:va6qr7tsr248ln12a...@4ax.com...
> >>
> >What? I'm lying again, of course?
>
> Of course.
>
> Removed racist lie from subject line.
Yes we did.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 06:21:38 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 23 May 2012 21:53:25 -0400, "Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
> >><de...@dudu.org> wrote in message news:va6qr7tsr248ln12a...@4ax.com...
> >>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:50:58 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>>On 5/23/2012 9:38 AM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:43:39 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 5/23/2012 8:38 AM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:45:51 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> No, following someone to keep an eye on him is not, of course, a
> >>>>>>>> criminal act. ...full of shit, as usual.
> >>>>On 5/23/2012 9:38 AM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:43:39 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 5/23/2012 8:38 AM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:45:51 -0700, Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> No, following someone to keep an eye on him is not, of course, a
> >>>>>>> Anytime a behavior or act creates a fear in a victim---that is a
> >>>>>>> chargable crime.
> >>>>>> No, that's a ridiculous lie.
> >>>>>> From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
> >>>>>> Intimidation (also called cowing) is intentional behavior "which would cause a
> >>>>>> person of ordinary sensibilities" fear of injury or harm.
> >>>>Following someone creates no inherent fear of injury or harm.
> >>> You don't know that. Martin described Zimmerman as "Weird crazy
> >>> person". That's more than enough to make a teenager feel in danger.
> >>So according to you Martin wasn't reasonable then?
> >>>>>>> chargable crime.
> >>>>>> No, that's a ridiculous lie.
> >>>>>> From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
> >>>>>> Intimidation (also called cowing) is intentional behavior "which would cause a
> >>>>>> person of ordinary sensibilities" fear of injury or harm.
> >>>>Following someone creates no inherent fear of injury or harm.
> >>> You don't know that. Martin described Zimmerman as "Weird crazy
> >>> person". That's more than enough to make a teenager feel in danger.
> >>
> >What? I'm lying again, of course?
>
> Of course.
>
> Removed racist lie from subject line.
Yes we did.
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 7:14:41 PM5/29/12
to
In article <43csr7hr1a6177bql...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 06:31:23 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 23 May 2012 21:00:54 -0400, "Scout"
> ><me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
> >>or how about if Martin had simply gone home...
> >>
> >Try to use your defective brain for at least a second and tell me why
> >you might think that Martin didn't want a "weird crazy person"
> >following him home and finding out where he lived. Go ahead. It's an
> >intelligence test. Why might Martin not want a "weird crazy person"
known burglar and thief. He didn't want anyone seeing him
scoping out apartments where people were not home so he could go
back and rob them later.
> Indeed.
Another fine setup. Good job. Idiot...
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 06:31:23 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 23 May 2012 21:00:54 -0400, "Scout"
> ><me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
> >>or how about if Martin had simply gone home...
> >>
> >Try to use your defective brain for at least a second and tell me why
> >you might think that Martin didn't want a "weird crazy person"
> >following him home and finding out where he lived. Go ahead. It's an
> >intelligence test. Why might Martin not want a "weird crazy person"
> >to know where he lived?
Traycon Martin was casing vehicles "on the way home." He was a
known burglar and thief. He didn't want anyone seeing him
scoping out apartments where people were not home so he could go
back and rob them later.
> Indeed.
Another fine setup. Good job. Idiot...
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 7:19:38 PM5/29/12
to
In article <hbcsr75r5tm17dlrj...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 06:39:15 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 23 May 2012 22:38:43 -0700, "max headroom" <maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote:
> >>de...@dudu.org <de...@dudu.org> wrote in news:e25qr7pnm9h2jifi4...@4ax.com:
> >>> Pursue doesn't necessarily imply the desire to catch or capture.
> >>> Besides, it makes no difference to the motivations and outcome.
> >>Then why do you insist upon using it instead of follow?
> >
> >Just to piss you off. Working better than my wildest dreams, too.
> >
> >snicker..
> >
> >you might actually be funny if you weren't so pathetic.
>
> It'll piss off the poor rac <flush>
If Traycon Martin and his family didn't live in that complex,
there might not have been a need for a security guard.
Traycon was a known drug addict, dealer and burglar.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 06:39:15 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 23 May 2012 22:38:43 -0700, "max headroom" <maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote:
> >>de...@dudu.org <de...@dudu.org> wrote in news:e25qr7pnm9h2jifi4...@4ax.com:
> >>> Pursue doesn't necessarily imply the desire to catch or capture.
> >>> Besides, it makes no difference to the motivations and outcome.
> >>Then why do you insist upon using it instead of follow?
> >
> >Just to piss you off. Working better than my wildest dreams, too.
> >
> >snicker..
> >
> >you might actually be funny if you weren't so pathetic.
>
> It'll piss off the poor rac <flush>
If Traycon Martin and his family didn't live in that complex,
there might not have been a need for a security guard.
Traycon was a known drug addict, dealer and burglar.
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 7:19:38 PM5/29/12
to
In article <hfbsr7d60sqfojq97...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman had to
shoot a violent and homicidal negro to save his own life.
One shot, one kill.
Don't fuck with a man who can shoot.
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman had to
shoot a violent and homicidal negro to save his own life.
One shot, one kill.
Don't fuck with a man who can shoot.
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 7:19:38 PM5/29/12
to
In article <ngcsr7ld5n0p4cdmo...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 05:53:31 -0700, Kluts Schattenpantze <klausscha...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >... just a troll...
>
> You do have problems.
Just you, and you're insignificant.
> So does your hate- <flush>
Oopsey. There's that 5-year-old pouty-pout again.
Grow up, you pathetic loser.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 05:53:31 -0700, Kluts Schattenpantze <klausscha...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >... just a troll...
>
> You do have problems.
Just you, and you're insignificant.
> So does your hate- <flush>
Oopsey. There's that 5-year-old pouty-pout again.
Grow up, you pathetic loser.
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 7:41:51 PM5/29/12
to
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 8:14:07 PM5/29/12
to
In article <4aisr7hf7j7tpkic1...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman should never <flush>
have had to defend himself against a savage out of control negro
thug named Traycon Martin.
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman should never <flush>
have had to defend himself against a savage out of control negro
thug named Traycon Martin.
Neighborhood Thug Watch
May 29, 2012, 8:14:03 PM5/29/12
to
In article <p55tr7dgclo80bmnd...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman couldn't remain in his vehicle
because Traycon was walking around outside casing it, looking
for a way to break in.
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman couldn't remain in his vehicle
because Traycon was walking around outside casing it, looking
for a way to break in.
Bang! Thump.
May 29, 2012, 8:14:04 PM5/29/12
to
In article <79isr79fc8pq5chr6...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 07:58:28 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >Martin looped around a house because he knew Zimmerman was following
> >him and was hoping to lose him. Clearly he was heading home when
> >Zimmerman confronted him.
> >
> >http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/trayvon-martin-george-zimmerman-path.jpg
Traycon was casing homes for burglary.
> Exactly.
>
> Subject line corrected.
You're too easy.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 07:58:28 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>
> >Martin looped around a house because he knew Zimmerman was following
> >him and was hoping to lose him. Clearly he was heading home when
> >Zimmerman confronted him.
> >
> >http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/trayvon-martin-george-zimmerman-path.jpg
Traycon was casing homes for burglary.
> Exactly.
>
> Subject line corrected.
You're too easy.
Neighborhood Thug Watch
May 29, 2012, 9:43:05 PM5/29/12
to
In article <pm6tr75i39rehg19o...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman wasn't interested
getting beat up by Traycon.
So he blew Traycon's ass away and lived to tell about it.
You liberals don't like that but there isn't a damn thing you
can do about it except beat your gums and run your mouths.
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman wasn't interested
getting beat up by Traycon.
So he blew Traycon's ass away and lived to tell about it.
You liberals don't like that but there isn't a damn thing you
can do about it except beat your gums and run your mouths.
Leon Manfredi
May 29, 2012, 9:51:27 PM5/29/12
to
On 5/29/2012 12:55 PM, klattu wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2012 11:01:14 -0500, "Eddie Haskell"
> <rgh...@sasas.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Scott Sanford"<inv...@not-for-mail.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:8b16fecba969dbc5...@not-for-mail.invalid...
>>> On 28 May 2012, Leon Manfredi<man...@fastmail.fm> posted some
>>> news:FYqdnaYoaPOds1nS...@posted.toastnet:
>>>
>>>> On 5/28/2012 9:24 PM, Obama means GAY In Kenyan wrote:
>>>>> In article<07upr7hcligbjta46...@4ax.com>
>>>>> * US * wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:45:51 -0700, Randam
>>>>>> Slurper<lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ... following someone to keep an eye on him is not, of course...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It doesn't involve shooting the innocent victim, you idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>> Traycon shouldn't have jumped on Zimmerman and tried to smash
>>>>> his skull.
>>>>>
>>>>> It got his ass shot.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dead.
>>>> 35% OF MONEY DONATED GOES TO THE CAUSE.... THE REST INTO MY POCKETS.
>>>
>>> That's the American way! Capitalism rocks!
>>
>> Charities and capitalism aren't the same thing, you drooling dunce.
>>
>> -Eddie Haskell
>>
>
>
> Well, if you didn't post the truth and facts so much, you wouldn't be
> so burdened!.......(liberal and demoncrat logic)
>
>
>
>
> klattu
BY THE WAY..... BIG TODAY NEWS FLASH....
ZIMMERMAN NOW OFFICIALLY CHARGED WITH SECOND DEGREE MURDER...!
> On Tue, 29 May 2012 11:01:14 -0500, "Eddie Haskell"
> <rgh...@sasas.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Scott Sanford"<inv...@not-for-mail.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:8b16fecba969dbc5...@not-for-mail.invalid...
>>> On 28 May 2012, Leon Manfredi<man...@fastmail.fm> posted some
>>> news:FYqdnaYoaPOds1nS...@posted.toastnet:
>>>
>>>> On 5/28/2012 9:24 PM, Obama means GAY In Kenyan wrote:
>>>>> In article<07upr7hcligbjta46...@4ax.com>
>>>>> * US * wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:45:51 -0700, Randam
>>>>>> Slurper<lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ... following someone to keep an eye on him is not, of course...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It doesn't involve shooting the innocent victim, you idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>> Traycon shouldn't have jumped on Zimmerman and tried to smash
>>>>> his skull.
>>>>>
>>>>> It got his ass shot.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dead.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Trayvon Martin's typical negro behavior got him killed. Let
>>>>> that be a lesson to the rest of you liberals.
>>>>>
>>>>> Donate: George Zimmerman Defense Fund
>>>>>
>>>>> http://gzlegalcase.com/index.php/defense-fund
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> WHAT YOU MEAN IS.... C'MON SUCKERS DONATE.... BECAUSE ONLY ABOUT
>>>>> --
>>>>> Trayvon Martin's typical negro behavior got him killed. Let
>>>>> that be a lesson to the rest of you liberals.
>>>>>
>>>>> Donate: George Zimmerman Defense Fund
>>>>>
>>>>> http://gzlegalcase.com/index.php/defense-fund
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> 35% OF MONEY DONATED GOES TO THE CAUSE.... THE REST INTO MY POCKETS.
>>>
>>> That's the American way! Capitalism rocks!
>>
>> Charities and capitalism aren't the same thing, you drooling dunce.
>>
>> -Eddie Haskell
>>
>
>
> Well, if you didn't post the truth and facts so much, you wouldn't be
> so burdened!.......(liberal and demoncrat logic)
>
>
>
>
> klattu
BY THE WAY..... BIG TODAY NEWS FLASH....
ZIMMERMAN NOW OFFICIALLY CHARGED WITH SECOND DEGREE MURDER...!
Neighborhood Thug Watch
May 29, 2012, 9:53:34 PM5/29/12
to
In article <9e6tr7d4f361ed97n...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 08:56:07 -0700, "Warren E. Harrison" <beat....@shitbags.con> wrote:
>
> >Martin was ...
>
> Martin was being chased
Chortle...Yeah he was being chased alright. He was being chased
by a speeding bullet as he rolled off George Zimmerman's chest.
The bullet caught up and took his life faster than Jesse Jackson
could steal money from a church collection plate.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 08:56:07 -0700, "Warren E. Harrison" <beat....@shitbags.con> wrote:
>
> >Martin was ...
>
> Martin was being chased
Chortle...Yeah he was being chased alright. He was being chased
by a speeding bullet as he rolled off George Zimmerman's chest.
The bullet caught up and took his life faster than Jesse Jackson
could steal money from a church collection plate.
Neighborhood Thug Watch
May 29, 2012, 9:59:10 PM5/29/12
to
In article <cg6tr75a2p95vgrmo...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Martin had the right <flush>
Who is "Martin?"
We're talking about that dead black criminal Traycon in this
thread. Please stay on topic.
* US * wrote:
>
> Martin had the right <flush>
Who is "Martin?"
We're talking about that dead black criminal Traycon in this
thread. Please stay on topic.
Paging Al Sharpton
May 29, 2012, 9:59:11 PM5/29/12
to
In article <qn6tr7hdf8hihrje3...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman had no
choice but to shoot the rampaging negro slamming his skull
against the ground.
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman had no
choice but to shoot the rampaging negro slamming his skull
against the ground.
Leon Manfredi
May 29, 2012, 10:10:36 PM5/29/12
to
On 5/29/2012 12:01 PM, Eddie Haskell wrote:
> "Scott Sanford"<inv...@not-for-mail.invalid> wrote in message
> news:8b16fecba969dbc5...@not-for-mail.invalid...
>> On 28 May 2012, Leon Manfredi<man...@fastmail.fm> posted some
>> news:FYqdnaYoaPOds1nS...@posted.toastnet:
>>
>>> On 5/28/2012 9:24 PM, Obama means GAY In Kenyan wrote:
>>>> In article<07upr7hcligbjta46...@4ax.com>
> "Scott Sanford"<inv...@not-for-mail.invalid> wrote in message
> news:8b16fecba969dbc5...@not-for-mail.invalid...
>> On 28 May 2012, Leon Manfredi<man...@fastmail.fm> posted some
>> news:FYqdnaYoaPOds1nS...@posted.toastnet:
>>
>>> On 5/28/2012 9:24 PM, Obama means GAY In Kenyan wrote:
>>>> In article<07upr7hcligbjta46...@4ax.com>
>>>> * US * wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:45:51 -0700, Randam
>>>>> Slurper<lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ... following someone to keep an eye on him is not, of course...
>>>>>
>>>>> It doesn't involve shooting the innocent victim, you idiot.
>>>>
>>>> Traycon shouldn't have jumped on Zimmerman and tried to smash
>>>> his skull.
>>>>
>>>> It got his ass shot.
>>>>
>>>> Dead.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:45:51 -0700, Randam
>>>>> Slurper<lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ... following someone to keep an eye on him is not, of course...
>>>>>
>>>>> It doesn't involve shooting the innocent victim, you idiot.
>>>>
>>>> Traycon shouldn't have jumped on Zimmerman and tried to smash
>>>> his skull.
>>>>
>>>> It got his ass shot.
>>>>
>>>> Dead.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Trayvon Martin's typical negro behavior got him killed. Let
>>>> that be a lesson to the rest of you liberals.
>>>>
>>>> Donate: George Zimmerman Defense Fund
>>>>
>>>> http://gzlegalcase.com/index.php/defense-fund
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Trayvon Martin's typical negro behavior got him killed. Let
>>>> that be a lesson to the rest of you liberals.
>>>>
>>>> Donate: George Zimmerman Defense Fund
>>>>
>>>> http://gzlegalcase.com/index.php/defense-fund
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> WHAT YOU MEAN IS.... C'MON SUCKERS DONATE.... BECAUSE ONLY ABOUT
>>> 35% OF MONEY DONATED GOES TO THE CAUSE.... THE REST INTO MY POCKETS.
>>
>> That's the American way! Capitalism rocks!
>
> Charities and capitalism aren't the same thing, you drooling dunce.
>
> -Eddie Haskell
>
>
I MAY BE A DUNCE, BUT MY A..HOLE ISN'T SLANTED.....
>>> 35% OF MONEY DONATED GOES TO THE CAUSE.... THE REST INTO MY POCKETS.
>>
>> That's the American way! Capitalism rocks!
>
> Charities and capitalism aren't the same thing, you drooling dunce.
>
> -Eddie Haskell
>
>
MONEY DONATED TO CHARITIES IS JUST ANOTHER WAY, OF A SELF
SERVING TAX EVASION SCHEME.... AND BROTHER WHAT MAKE YOU
THINK THAT THERE IS NO CONNECTION BETWEEN THE DONOR AND
THE DONEE AND BY THE WAY, IN CASE YOU MISSED THE PREVIOUS REPLY....
ZIMMERMAN WAS CHARGED WITH SECOND DEGREE MURDER.
Paging Al Sharpton
May 29, 2012, 10:09:29 PM5/29/12
to
In article <2q6tr717uekcsejj1...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Martin was just trying to
find some place to break into and steal things.
* US * wrote:
>
> Martin was just trying to
find some place to break into and steal things.
Paging Al Sharpton
May 29, 2012, 10:09:29 PM5/29/12
to
In article <3p6tr79vd518i5cs9...@4ax.com>
Martin.
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman
was attacked by a violent black criminal thug named Traycon
>
> Zimmerman
Martin.
Paging Al Sharpton
May 29, 2012, 10:15:12 PM5/29/12
to
In article <i27tr75vt8j77vsmj...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman's judgement
required that he shoot the violent crazed negro who was trying
to kill him.
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman's judgement
required that he shoot the violent crazed negro who was trying
to kill him.
Paging Al Sharpton
May 29, 2012, 10:15:12 PM5/29/12
to
In article <9v6tr7p7bv4966e9f...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Martin was entirely
in control of the situation that cost him his life.
* US * wrote:
>
> Martin was entirely
in control of the situation that cost him his life.
Paging Al Sharpton
May 29, 2012, 10:25:42 PM5/29/12
to
In article <007tr7psth242ontj...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Zimmerman had
to shoot a violent negro thug trying to kill him.
>
> Zimmerman had
Paging Al Sharpton
May 29, 2012, 10:25:41 PM5/29/12
to
In article <5r6tr79krg9a2crke...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 09:30:48 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >>> lived?...
> >>
> >>He had eluded Zimmerman;
> >
> >THat's nonsense
> >
> >All you'd had to do was Google the picture of that complex to know
> >"hiding" was not an option.
> >
> >He disobeyed an order
which would have gotten him killed.
> Indeed.
How does Yoorghis' dick taste? You seem to like it a lot.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 09:30:48 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 24 May 2012 06:37:07 -0700, "max headroom"
> ><maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote:
> >
> >>> Um, he was a teenager being followed by an unknown "weird crazy
> >>> person". Maybe he didn't want the crazy person to know where he
> >On Thu, 24 May 2012 06:37:07 -0700, "max headroom"
> ><maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote:
> >
> >>> Um, he was a teenager being followed by an unknown "weird crazy
> >>> lived?...
> >>
> >>He had eluded Zimmerman;
> >
> >THat's nonsense
> >
> >All you'd had to do was Google the picture of that complex to know
> >"hiding" was not an option.
> >
> >He disobeyed an order
which would have gotten him killed.
> Indeed.
How does Yoorghis' dick taste? You seem to like it a lot.
Paging Al Sharpton
May 29, 2012, 10:25:41 PM5/29/12
to
In article <0s6tr7pr041qat9mm...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 08:52:40 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... * US * is a faggot ...
>
> Zimmerman
shot a violent negro thugs trying to kill him.
* US * wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 08:52:40 -0700, Randam Slurper <lick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
> >... * US * is a faggot ...
>
> Zimmerman
shot a violent negro thugs trying to kill him.
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages