Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
WHY to buy a CHEAP 2-MegaPixel digital camera...
2 views
Skip to first unread message
USA
May 9, 2003, 10:54:43 PM5/9/03
to
http://www.eccentrix.com/members/lx200/index.html
READ and then REread PAGE-1 at the site above.
No ads, no spam. Just facts... of what the camera
seller's DON'T tell you about digital cameras.
It all has to do with electronic-GUTS within the
camera.
READ IT, LEARN ! Then... only buy CHEAP cameras.
Unless you have money to burn and throw away....
in the near future.
READ and then REread PAGE-1 at the site above.
No ads, no spam. Just facts... of what the camera
seller's DON'T tell you about digital cameras.
It all has to do with electronic-GUTS within the
camera.
READ IT, LEARN ! Then... only buy CHEAP cameras.
Unless you have money to burn and throw away....
in the near future.
~webmaster~
Dave Watson
May 9, 2003, 11:29:31 PM5/9/03
to
wow - that wasnt worth the time.
"USA" <i...@americathefree.net> wrote in message
news:76d28789.0305...@posting.google.com...
Gary Schueren
May 13, 2003, 10:33:19 PM5/13/03
to
the pictures are very poor quality, why work with poor quality, just to be
cheap!!
cheap!!
"USA" <i...@americathefree.net> wrote in message
news:76d28789.0305...@posting.google.com...
Tesselator
May 14, 2003, 1:07:04 PM5/14/03
to
"Gary Schueren" <sur...@wcnet.org> wrote in message news:vc3am53...@corp.supernews.com...
> the pictures are very poor quality, why work with poor quality, just to be
> cheap!!
>
Cuz the guy that posted it has too much stock and
wants to minimalize his losses. Can't say I blame
him. I'm not falling for it though!
O :-P
Bill Harrison
May 27, 2003, 1:42:54 PM5/27/03
to
Well I get far better pictures than those from a 1.5Mp camera. They must
have seen him coming!
have seen him coming!
"USA" <i...@americathefree.net> wrote in message
news:76d28789.0305...@posting.google.com...
Lee Harrison
May 31, 2003, 10:07:02 AM5/31/03
to
It seems apparent that you have never blown-up your pictures, to
print in a 8x10 or larger format, else you would have soon realized
the limitations of a lower Mpxl camera. I Have had both a 1.6Mpxl and
a 4.0 Mpxl camera, and can testify to the fact that the 4Mpxl camera
makes much better prints, in addition to the fact that if there is an
area in the picture which I wish to crop & enlarge, I then have a better
chance of doing so without the subject becoming grainy. If however I
were to want to keep my prints at 4x6 or smaller, I would agree.
Regards, Lee.
print in a 8x10 or larger format, else you would have soon realized
the limitations of a lower Mpxl camera. I Have had both a 1.6Mpxl and
a 4.0 Mpxl camera, and can testify to the fact that the 4Mpxl camera
makes much better prints, in addition to the fact that if there is an
area in the picture which I wish to crop & enlarge, I then have a better
chance of doing so without the subject becoming grainy. If however I
were to want to keep my prints at 4x6 or smaller, I would agree.
Regards, Lee.
"USA" <i...@americathefree.net> wrote in message
news:76d28789.0305...@posting.google.com...
0 new messages