Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

No delay shutter

6 views
Skip to first unread message

itten

unread,
May 29, 2003, 5:05:27 AM5/29/03
to
I'm looking for a digital camera that has a fairly quick response to
the shutter. Due to the nature of my work, I need to get a few shots
off fairly quickly and dont have time to wait for the camera to cycle
to be ready to take the next shot. Does any one have any ideas? Also
I'm tired of these super small cameras that I need a magnifing glass to
read the find the controls. I wan't something fairly hefty but I don't
want to pay an arm and a leg for it.

Tesselator

unread,
May 29, 2003, 4:57:20 PM5/29/03
to

"itten" <it...@comcast.net> wrote in message news:290520030505274056%it...@comcast.net...

> I'm looking for a digital camera that has a fairly quick response to
> the shutter. Due to the nature of my work, I need to get a few shots
> off fairly quickly and dont have time to wait for the camera to cycle
> to be ready to take the next shot. Does any one have any ideas?

Hi Itten,

Others may know more but of the cameras I've handeled /recently/ that
being 8 or 10 of the "most popular" under $400, I've /felt/ that the
quickest (in full auto) was the Minolta F-x00 series. They are for
sure faster than most of the others.

> Also
> I'm tired of these super small cameras that I need a magnifing glass to
> read the find the controls. I wan't something fairly hefty but I don't
> want to pay an arm and a leg for it.

But the F-x00 series of which I speak are pretty small.

Peter

unread,
Jun 7, 2003, 6:12:11 PM6/7/03
to
I just bought a Minolta dimage f300 (on the net, 2 3rds of the high
street price) & it has a UHS mode, shoots 11 frames a second!
Don't know if this is the sort of work you're doing, but it does work
OK.

itten

unread,
Jun 8, 2003, 5:39:20 AM6/8/03
to
I'm kinda leaning toward that model. Where did you find it at that price:
ie a link to the site?
0 new messages