box constraints have been added
137 views
Skip to first unread message
Marcin Wojdyr
May 16, 2013, 5:09:09 PM5/16/13
to fityk...@googlegroups.com
A small announcement.
I've added a support for box constraints, which was probably the most
popular feature request.
Either one or two bounds can be specified, for example:
$a = ~0.5 [0:]
$a = ~0.5 [0:1]
Some function parameters will be constrained by default, for example
the shape of pseudo-Voigt will be in the <0,1> range
(but it will be possible to switch off these constraints).
I'm not sure yet when the next version will be released.
Marcin
I've added a support for box constraints, which was probably the most
popular feature request.
Either one or two bounds can be specified, for example:
$a = ~0.5 [0:]
$a = ~0.5 [0:1]
Some function parameters will be constrained by default, for example
the shape of pseudo-Voigt will be in the <0,1> range
(but it will be possible to switch off these constraints).
I'm not sure yet when the next version will be released.
Marcin
C L
Mar 14, 2014, 9:16:23 AM3/14/14
to fityk...@googlegroups.com
Hello Marcin,
... can you say ny now when a new version with the constraint feature will be released?
Best Regards,
CL
... can you say ny now when a new version with the constraint feature will be released?
Best Regards,
CL
Marcin Wojdyr
Apr 10, 2014, 9:05:20 PM4/10/14
to fityk...@googlegroups.com
I'm going to release ver. 1.2.9 this weekend.
1.2.9 because major new features that I wanted to include in ver.
1.3.0 are not completely finished yet.
Marcin
> --
> --
> http://groups.google.com/group/fityk-users
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "fityk-users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to fityk-users...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
1.2.9 because major new features that I wanted to include in ver.
1.3.0 are not completely finished yet.
Marcin
> --
> http://groups.google.com/group/fityk-users
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "fityk-users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to fityk-users...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
C L
Apr 16, 2014, 3:39:34 AM4/16/14
to fityk...@googlegroups.com
Great news, thank you!
C L
May 4, 2014, 6:13:11 PM5/4/14
to fityk...@googlegroups.com
Hej again.
The new feature works so far nicely. But I would like to know, if it is possible to copy the box contraints to the next dataset. If I try to, only functions with their parameters are copied, instead of contraints only [auto] is written in the parameter.
Furthermore, for the usabilty it would be nice to integrate the box constraints feature in the GUI. Maybe two input boxes to fill in min. and max. values (absolute/relative) next to the parameter boxes?
The new feature works so far nicely. But I would like to know, if it is possible to copy the box contraints to the next dataset. If I try to, only functions with their parameters are copied, instead of contraints only [auto] is written in the parameter.
Furthermore, for the usabilty it would be nice to integrate the box constraints feature in the GUI. Maybe two input boxes to fill in min. and max. values (absolute/relative) next to the parameter boxes?
Marcin Wojdyr
May 5, 2014, 5:24:18 PM5/5/14
to fityk...@googlegroups.com
On 4 May 2014 23:13, C L <clumin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hej again.
>
> The new feature works so far nicely. But I would like to know, if it is
> possible to copy the box contraints to the next dataset. If I try to, only
> functions with their parameters are copied, instead of contraints only
> [auto] is written in the parameter.
I've overlooked it. Now I've fixed it, but I suppose there are other
> Hej again.
>
> The new feature works so far nicely. But I would like to know, if it is
> possible to copy the box contraints to the next dataset. If I try to, only
> functions with their parameters are copied, instead of contraints only
> [auto] is written in the parameter.
places where domains are not handled properly.
> Furthermore, for the usabilty it would be nice to integrate the box
> constraints feature in the GUI.
Cheers
Marcin
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages