GTA IV PERFECT FullRip Direct Play 4 45 GB Only Direct Download | Added By Users

1 view

Skip to first unread message

Message has been deleted

Edel Dieringer

unread,

Jul 17, 2024, 7:44:12 AM7/17/24

to fitimocno

Targeting S+ (version 10000 and above) requires that one ofFLAG_IMMUTABLE or FLAG_MUTABLE be specified when creating aPendingIntent.Strongly consider using FLAG_IMMUTABLE, only use FLAG_MUTABLE if some functionality depends on the PendingIntent being mutable, e.g. ifit needs to be used with inline replies or bubbles.

GTA IV PERFECT FullRip Direct Play 4 45 GB Only Direct Download added by users

Download File --->>> https://urluso.com/2yM09a

Reading Google's documentation this should be all I need to for this security update within Android S. I did find a couple month old post on here that asked something similar and someone said to add WorkManager into project even if you do not use it. So I added

This didnt help at all as I still receive the error. Does anyone know if this is common issue with Android S upgrades or does it check libraries also? Stuck as the app just keeps crashing and not sure what to do.

I have created a application with none of my libraries and used the same PendingIntent and was able to run a basic hello world application with the pending intent. The full error I receive from the project I am trying to get to compile is:

According to documentation, "It is strongly recommended to use FLAG_IMMUTABLE when creating a PendingIntent. FLAG_MUTABLE should only be used when some functionality relies on modifying the underlying intent, e.g. any PendingIntent that needs to be used with inline reply or bubbles."

If the error still remains and your targetSdkVersion = 31 then the error must caused because one of your dependencies is internally using WorkManager or your are directly using old version of WorkManager.

Updating the WorkManager library isn't probably gonna be enough. There might also be other libraries that are using PendingIntent without the mutability flag, especially when you are working on a huge project. To find out this, use android studio's code inspection tool that will list down all the places where the Pending intent is used without a mutability flag.

Something that work in my specific case was to change the version of thecom.google.android.gms:play-services-analytics dependency, I had setted 15.0.1, and this was causing the issue. After I update to

Semantics, but full 40GB rips are still compressed, actually fairly heavily. The question is whether or not to re-encode them with a different compression scheme, and what data to keep and what to throw out. You can save a fair amount of space by removing streams you never use, and keep the main stream intact, or you can change to a different compression algorithm, or a combination of techniques, depending on your end use. Keeping the full rip ensures the best possible quality for later use if your needs change.

As already noted, however, the question is a bit incorrect => ALL movies are significantly compressed already on the DVD or BluRay media you get them on. The question isn't whether or not your movies are compressed -- it's whether or not you re-render them with a different compressor to use less space. Personally, I re-render everything so it will fit on a single 4.7GB DVD ... even though it's been years since I actually stored the result on a DVD [At one time I backed everything up by burning them to DVDs ... but for several years now I've stored my backups on hard drives and, for the last 2 years, on a dedicated backup UnRAID server]. But I still compress everything down to 4.7GB (if the source is a DVD that's already that size, then I don't do any further compression).

Agree => I should have noted that I was referring to DVDs. I have very few BluRays ... and I don't recompress those at all. I figure for those few cases where I want the higher resolution of a BluRay I don't want to compromise it ... so I just ripe them as is. As I noted above, space is CHEAP these days ... there's no real reason to recompress anything [i just do it with DVDs out of habit

Personally with a Samsung lcd 55 inch tv seen 3 m away i cannot see the difference between a full bluray backup and a 10-12 gb mkv compressed one. So, if you have like 50 bluray that is not a problem and i can suggest you keep the bluray as it is with makemkv. But if you are like me with 500 movies and hundreds of tv-series, i say compress everything to x264 with crf 19-20 slow/slowest quality and you are set.

I'm now experimenting with HEVC encoding and for example a 2 gb tv-series episode in 720p quality is compressed to like 750 mb. Not a big saving with a few series but a couple of big hard drive if you have a lot. The same with movies : you can compress a 12-15 gb h264 movie with near same quality in 5-6 gb.

Problem with HEVC is the playback...after a few tests i can tell you that plex server on my gaming rig (i5 3570k) is able to transcode a 1080p hevc movie to my ipad with cpu between 25%-95%, so you need a capable server.

Personally, I haven't bothered to switch my collection of 4000+ movies from DVD to BluRay, as I just don't see much difference in the visual quality on my 70" screen. Ageing eyes may contribute to that, but the simple fact is DVDs are plenty "good enough". If I wanted to pause frames and study them in detail -- count the leaves on a tree, etc. -- I'm sure BluRay would be better. But it's not a transition I'll be making anytime soon.

One very simple immutable rule: With ANY lossy compressor, you LOSE some quality. If the reason you're buying BluRays is to have the "best possible" quality; then re-compressing them is working against that goal. Granted, you may not be able to see the difference ... or what you can see isn't enough different to matter ... in which case compress-away. That's exactly why I don't bother to get BluRays -- I simply think DVDs are plenty "good enough." And that's on a 70" screen => if you're watching this stuff on small portable devices (phones, tablets, laptops) there's no way it matters !!

I think a lot depends on how you are going to watch them, if you're using PLEX then you lose a lot of quality so it doesn't matter so much. I set up plex but was disappointed with the quality of the resulting movie and replaced it with a Windows box in each room to drive the screens. My main system has a 65" UHD screen and a Windows i7 4K HTPC albeit set at HD1080p most of the time with an Onkyo receiver upscaling 1080p to 2160p as I only have a handful of movies/TV series at 2160p.

I have 2 unRAID servers, one dedicated to BluRay movies with only 1 user share, currently over 12,500 with an average size of 6.1GB but that average size is going up, it's probably 8-9GB per 1080p and 4-5GB per 720p. I am slowly replacing 720p rips with 1080p rips at typically 8-9GB or more if they are blockbusters.

I can see the difference between 720p and 1080p, as for DVD quality, I still have over 4,500 of those on another unRAID server along with a much larger collection of TV series and documentaries. I can't watch DVD rips, the definition is just too bad and the difference between 1080p and 2160p is astounding.

I really appreciate everyones feedback. I have been playing around with MakeMkv trying to rip specials and extra content. I like the approach of keeping blockbusters uncompressed. Now that I have moved on to Plex, I have been obsessed with trying to collect director commentary and so on....

I am having trouble obtaining Blurays of some of my old Favs. My Cousin Vinny comes to mind. The reviews on amazon make it seem like the picture quality is just ok, and the Extras are less than disirable.

One of my favorite examples of what remastering can do to a movie is Jaws. They decided to remaster the entire movie frame by frame because on higher bitrate formats, you could actually see the wires pulling Bruce (yeah, that was his name) through the water.

You only lose quality with Plex if you are playing back the content on a client that is not capable of direct play, and therefore Plex is transcoding the stream down to a quality the client can display. If the client is capable of direct play, Plex simply streams the source file to the client with no intervention.

I just completed my Lethal Weapon Collection. I used MakeMKV to capture all of the behind the scenes stuff too. I am pretty excited about that. I will go forward with using full Blurays from now on. the 1 dollar per movie example sold me. Plus, when it comes time to put up the projector, I am sure I will be happy I did it.

Agree. It's those 120" (or larger) screens where you can really start to notice the difference in resolution. Remember that a 120" screen has 4 times the display area of a 60" screen ... so you're FAR more likely to notice little flaws in the video. So if you're planning to move to that size in the future, preserving all the quality you can makes sense.

My view (as I noted earlier), is that for those movies I choose to buy in BluRay format (which is admittedly very few), the only reason I'm doing so is to get higher quality => so I do NOT want to compromise that quality at all by further compressing them.

I'll read your whole thread thoroughly again, but I understand where you where you are mentally with feeling like you're losing your mind. My problem is even simpler: Everything was working like a dream in Lightroom Classic on the previous macOS. Not until Ventura did I ever experience these issues. Period.

Additionally, I only use three different papers, each with a manufacturer provided ICC profile, and all have produced very, very good results. And, all still produce fine results if I just use Photoshop or Canon's Professional Print & Layout app. The problem is with Lightroom Classic on macOS Ventura. I don't care who's fault it is, it's simply just broken. Period.

While it would require more time, paper and ink, I might make one suggestion: Only change one parameter at a time, and make notes of each result. For instance, pick one image you have printed sucessfully in the past, and now print it twice from LrC on Ventura. Print one with the ICC profile (which we agree breaks things) and then print one without. That is, "Color Management: Managed by Printer". Luckily for me, when I do this, I get results that are easily 95-99% of what I was getting before with ICC profiles. The resulting prints are still not spot-on for color critical work, but for more artistic stuff, they suffice for now.