"Next major version" refers to that of Firebug, which will probably be out in a couple of months. It will have minVersion >= 29,
but seriously, don't worry, Australis is quite okay,
and there are addons that give you the old appearance back.
Keeping with an up-to-date browser is important.
For the second error, can you post a link to some page online where that message can be reproduced, and somewhat more detailed instructions? It sounds like it's something like Firebug trying to copy styles from the page and failing because of CSS oddities, which isn't anything to worry about at all but clearly still ought to be fixed if possible.
No, it's not okay. It's part of the general trend of over-simplifying everything to cater to the mass audience, and screw the geeks and the content creators.
The arrogance of Mozilla is stunning. They seem to think there's something special about Firefox itself -- but actually the only thing that's special about it is the amazing extensions ecosystem, which Moz itself does not create, and which Moz's behavior often breaks. Many of those extensions (including most of the ones I rely on) need a status bar and custom toolbars and menus... you know, visible furniture. And also there's no way I'm going to use a browser that crams the address bar, bookmarks, icons, whatever into a single cramped bar at the top in the name of some misplaced "minimalism."
I don't want to rely on extensions for something as basic as toolbars.
I know, but very addon I add -- and I use many -- complicates keeping the whole show running. New incompatibilities crop up. Moz breaks stuff. I have to spend a lot of time testing every new update because of all the interactions.
For the second error, can you post a link to some page online where that message can be reproduced, and somewhat more detailed instructions? It sounds like it's something like Firebug trying to copy styles from the page and failing because of CSS oddities, which isn't anything to worry about at all but clearly still ought to be fixed if possible.Unfortunately I can't, because it's running on a development server (not on the Internet) and the project hasn't been made public yet. I can tell you that those weird errors don't appear from the identical pages when viewed in the Windows 7 versions of Firefox and Firebug. They only appear on the Mac -- same pages, coming off the same development server, same behavior on my part (clicking page components with Firebug's Inspect Element tool). Of course, since Mac FF is my main development environment, I have far more extensions installed there, so it's possible this is some kind of extension interaction, in which case I'll probably never track it down. This all seems to be going downhill fast.
For the second error, can you post a link to some page online where that message can be reproduced, and somewhat more detailed instructions? It sounds like it's something like Firebug trying to copy styles from the page and failing because of CSS oddities, which isn't anything to worry about at all but clearly still ought to be fixed if possible.
|
|
> AFAIK toolbars have not been removed, only the addon bar has.I hope you're right. I'd read various complaints (a couple of months ago, I guess) on a few different online forums about Australis killing all toolbars, including custom toolbars needed by extension developers... but perhaps they were mistaken, or maybe Mozilla has added more flexibility. I haven't experimented with Australis myself; I just assumed the complaints were accurate.
For the second error, can you post a link to some page online where that message can be reproduced, and somewhat more detailed instructions? It sounds like it's something like Firebug trying to copy styles from the page and failing because of CSS oddities, which isn't anything to worry about at all but clearly still ought to be fixed if possible.I've just done a lot more experimenting, disabling various extensions and themes, relaunching Mac Firefox repeatedly, etc. I finally discovered that the problem happens even with *all* extensions and themes disabled except Firebug itself. So it isn't an extensions conflict.
I also discovered that the problem happens if the "Warnings" button is enabled in the Console, but if I only have "Errors" enabled, the problem goes away. So I guess I just can't use Warnings any more.
By the way, can somebody explain the relationship between the choices you can check in the popdown menu -- like "Show JavaScript Errors", "Show JavaScript Warnings", etc. -- and the simple "All"/"Errors"/"Warnings" buttons along the top of the Firebug panel? (I should explain that I run Firebug in a standalone window on a separate monitor.) At present, the popdown-menu options seem to have no effect at all, although the buttons work.
I also tried to find online pages that exhibited the problem I was describing, that is clicking with the "Inspect Element" tool generating these weird warnings. But I discovered that on common pages such as https:///www.google.com or http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/ I can't even get that far -- if the Warnings button is enabled, the Console panel fills up with many, many warnings before I even get a chance to click anything. (Not always at first load, but always on reloading those pages.)
I also discovered that the same version of Firefox + Firebug on Win7 generates different messages in general than on the Mac, looking at the same pages. As I said before, the Windows version generates far fewer of the weird Warnings (generally none for my own pages). But it flags some things as Errors that the Mac doesn't -- for example, in a JavaScript "for loop", I had started it (as I usually do) like this: for(i=0; and Mac FF/Firebug had no problem with that, but the Windows version flagged it as an undeclared variable error and stopped the page from even loading further. (I easily fixed this by changing it to for(var i=0;... which seems kind of picky to me, but okay.) I was told here previously that the errors may come from Firefox, and are simply displayed by Firebug, but still I don't understand why Mac vs. PC would differ that way. Anyway, that's fairly trivial.