Problem retrieving Images. Possible format inaccuracy??

[jmschnei]

Hello everybody,

I am using fire to retrieve images using de color histogram and the tamura features histogram, but the system retrieves always the same images with relevance 1, although they have clearly different colors. After looking for the posible problem, I find out that the format of the images could be the problem. I am using images with 180x144 pixels, in jpeg format that are keyframes from videos. That could be the problem?

Greetings,

Julian.

[Thomas Deselaers]

Hi, 

unlikely. 

Take a look into the files that contain the extracted features and check whether you have the weights and distance functions setup properly.

t.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FIRE - Flexible Image Retrieval Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fire-cbir+...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fire-cbir?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
http://thomas.deselaers.de

[Julian Moreno Schneider]

Hi everybody,

it is not a problem of the images. I have used another collection of bigger images and still the same problem. The content of a .color.histo file is:

FIRE_histogram

# Histogram file saved for Fire V2

dim 3

counter 442368

steps 8 8 8

min 0 0 0

max 1 1 1

data 5273 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 2278 1516 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 1058 498 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 276 1751 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1282 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1973 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10841 6023 84 0 0 0 0 0 3 487 1706 118 0 0 0 0 0 5 1090 12014 23 0 0 0 0 0 27 281272 31458 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 226 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 496 634 1 0 0 0 0 0 321 1370 1426 54 1 0 0 0 1 41 297 882 104 2 0 0 0 4 113 12004 24629 35 0 0 0 0 1 4 4187 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 9 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 313 14 169 28 0 0 0 0 107 49 463 1026 26 1 0 0 0 90 394 116 683 99 9 0 0 1 90 10 1759 1874 32 0 0 0 0 6 5 375 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 18 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 2 11 69 0 0 0 0 266 75 123 145 3 0 0 0 94 137 70 388 1107 24 0 0 0 333 34 19 56 986 71 13 0 0 3 5 2 1766 733 24 0 0 0 0 1 2 4 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 41 80 0 0 0 0 14 67 68 0 0 0 0 0 252 145 20 0 140 5 0 0 36 333 36 1 361 893 25 1 0 205 45 2 1 59 859 54 0 0 0 1 3 3 130 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 0 0 0 0 0 17 121 20 0 0 0 0 0 90 15 12 1 0 0 0 21 7 0 2 3 1 0 0 219 280 11 0 0 120 8 0 13 880 30 3 1 239 1106 33 0 0 6 5 14 12 64 194 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 10 0 0 0 0 1 193 60 10 0 0 0 0 52 108 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 3 0 0 31 55 0 0 3 23 0 0 3712 420 7 3 1 9 191 16 152 1 0 4 3 9 379 6503

I think there is nothing wrong. Any idea?

Greetings,

Julian.

2013/2/22 Thomas Deselaers <dese...@gmail.com>

--


<<=========================>>
  \ \       Julian Moreno Schneider      / /
   \ \   Departamento de Informática  / /
   / /       jmsc...@inf.uc3m.es       \ \
  / /       http://labda.inf.uc3m.es        \ \
<<=========================>>

[Thomas Deselaers]

the feature looks ok. 

You probably have the server setup wrongly.

[Julian Moreno Schneider]

Hello,

I have copied directly the instructions and nothing seems to be wrong but the results, even using the offered webinterface (before I was using mine and that could be the problem but neither).

The valid instructions are still in the dierction:

http://code.google.com/p/fire-cbir/wiki/FIREUbuntu104

It seems that calculating the relevance of each image is not working, because every image has relevance as 1. 

Somebody has had the same problem? 

Thanks. Greetings,

[Julian Moreno Schneider]

Hello,

I am using FIRE on a Debian 5 distribution. I have tried it also on a Ubutnu 12.04 LTS. Could be that the problem? Is it mandatory to use the Ubutnu 10.04 distribution?

Thanks. Greetings, 

Julián.

2013/2/22 Julian Moreno Schneider <jmsc...@inf.uc3m.es>

[Thomas Deselaers]

no. 

Fire was developed before Ubuntu even existed on debian. 

It will run on anything when you can compile it. 

t.

[YOUSSEF BOURASS]

Hi all,

I have the same problem as you. Are you have found a solution for this?

Youssef.

[Anshul Gupta]

Hey,

Did you find the solution to the problem of static results? 

I am also getting the same results every time, even after giving relevance feedback for around 100 images.

Any idea what might be wrong?

Regards

Anshul