nwar...@gmail.com
unread,Jan 18, 2019, 2:38:53 PM1/18/19You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
On Friday, July 25, 1997 at 3:00:00 AM UTC-4, Gregory Aharonian wrote:
> !19970725 More on the examiner being harassed at the PTO
>
> A few days ago, I sent out a news item about a female examiner who not
> only was being sexually harassed by a fellow examiner, but also was then
> treated just as bad by PTO management when she registered complaints.
>
> When I sent out the news item, I did not mention the examiner's name, and
> did not disclose how I found out about her problems (the NOW Web page, while
> it exists, was not how I found out about her). I did so out of concern for
> the examiner, given that she has experienced enough crap already. I get
> information from examiners and lawyers from time to time, and distort the
> source of the information (but not the information itself) at their request.
> They fear retribution.
>
> Unfortunately, some chuckleheads on the Internet challenged my credibility
> for posting "gossip", for not verifying such gossip, etc., etc. They prefer
> to defend the mismanagement at the PTO at any cost. Would such people spend
> as much time critiquing the Patent Office.
>
> While I could care less about the attacks on my credibility from people
> with questionable levels of neurotransmitters, I do care that such attacks
> could affect the credibility of the examiner, who has real serious problems
> and needs all the support she can get.
>
> To that extent, I asked Valerie Darbe, the harassed examiner, if I could
> release her name and more details of her story (information on her PTO
> position is at the PTO's Web site in the employees directory). She has agreed,
> and here is more information in her own words, as conveyed to my critics:
>
>
> I saw your response to it and it seemed that you thought that maybe
> it was not true or that Greg Aharonian made it up. I have communicated
> with Mr. Aharonian and given him permission to release my name.
>
> The National Organization for Women suggested not putting names in --
> that is why there is no names.
>
> The name of the examiner is Valerie Darbe (i.e. me).
>
> The name of the IG agent is Mark Montevidino
>
> The name of the FPS Police Chief is David Mahmoud
>
> I made the original complaint to Director of Group 2300 (now retired)
> Bobby Gray, then Deputy Director Joseph Rolla (now director), my SPE
> Tod Swann and others were aware of it but they are the ones directly
> involved with me.
>
> The NOW posting is absolutely true and VERY well documented.
>
> It leaves out a lot of detail though---regarding who else has been
> involved in the situation or knows of it through various means
> INCLUDING Paul Donovan, Sec. of Commerce Daley's Chief of Staff.
>
> The people at the Dept. of Comm. OGC that I have communicated with
> about the FOIA appeal FOR MONTHS have been Michael Baroffsky, his
> boss Brian DiGiacomo and his boss Barbara Fredericks.
>
> The POPA union rep. handling the suspension is Larry Oresky.
>
> The situation has been and is continuing to be a nightmare.
>
> For your info., I went to NOW because I wasnt getting anywhere ---
> the stonewalling etc. from PTO, DOC is incredible.
>
> It seems that the PTO/DOC doesn't care about what is legal, what is
> moral, etc. so I expect the situation to get even bigger and more
> visible.
>
> I am NOT a member of NOW and since I am very Pro-Life, I expect that
> I never will be. It was very difficult for me to go to NOW but I
> couldn't see any other way to advance the situation......
>
>
> With regards to her charges of someone in PTO management filing a false
> police report against her, if true, means that someone in PTO management
> faces a fine or imprisonment, which could explain part of the inaction:
>
>
> Title 18 (Title of U.S. Code which deals with crimes and criminal
> procedure).
>
> 1001. Statements or entries generally
>
> Whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department
> or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies,
> conceals or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material
> fact, or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or
> representations, or makes or uses any false writing or document
> knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent
> statement or entry, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned
> not more than five years, or both.
>
>
> Early on, PTO management could have dealt with this problem in a timely
> and fair manner. It didn't. Valerie now needs your support to seek justice.
> And as bizarre as all of this it, the reality is even worse. For example,
> go visit Group 2300 tomorrow, and when you get off the elevator, you will
> notice something rarely if ever seen in PTO hallways.
>
> Greg Aharonian
> Internet Patent News Service
Did she not commit murder?