Dear all,
My answer is slightly different. Coz my way of computing the terminal value is slightly different from Philip's. The equation I used is
FCF at 2014/(WACC-growth rate)
In other words, I do not multiply FCF at 2014 further with the growth rate, coz that's not required inthe lecture notes.
Attached results for your reference, pls.
It' quite fun doing this gimmick thing. But I wonder how people can - and on what basis - make all the assumptions in the case well into the next decade. I'm sceptical.
LK