Fight! conversion guide
77 views
Skip to first unread message
Alejo Gabriel Marello
Jul 29, 2019, 12:16:15 PM7/29/19
to FIGHT! The Fighting Game RPG
A conversion guide from 1st edition to 2nd edition is now available as a free download!
Kim Foster
Jul 29, 2019, 6:48:58 PM7/29/19
to figh...@googlegroups.com
(according to rpg.net *heavy sarcasm*) were resolved. :)
Christopher Peter
Jul 29, 2019, 10:18:35 PM7/29/19
to figh...@googlegroups.com
This made me laugh.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FIGHT! The Fighting Game RPG" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fightrpg+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fightrpg/a1ce6974-8a5f-734a-75c1-f446057acce8%40gmail.com.
Kim Foster
Jul 30, 2019, 6:00:58 AM7/30/19
to figh...@googlegroups.com
On 7/29/2019 10:18 PM, 'Christopher Peter' via FIGHT! The Fighting Game
RPG wrote:
> This made me laugh.
That whole situation was laugh or cry. *eyeroll*
AstonWildsteel
Jul 30, 2019, 8:39:58 AM7/30/19
to FIGHT! The Fighting Game RPG
The link redirects me to the rpg.net homepage, huh...
Christopher Peter
Jul 30, 2019, 8:48:36 AM7/30/19
to figh...@googlegroups.com
Yeah, I think that was a Google thing; Kim wasn't trying to link it. In any case, I have no interest in calling attention to an event from a full 10 years ago regarding details of Fight that no longer apply. If you just have to know, PM me on Discord and I'll give you the basics.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FIGHT! The Fighting Game RPG" group.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FIGHT! The Fighting Game RPG" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fightrpg+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Kim Foster
Jul 30, 2019, 9:07:19 AM7/30/19
to figh...@googlegroups.com
On 7/30/2019 8:48 AM, 'Christopher Peter' via FIGHT! The Fighting Game
RPG wrote:
> Yeah, I think that was a Google thing; Kim wasn't trying to link it.
That was odd, but yes, I wasn't intending to link anything not that
> Yeah, I think that was a Google thing; Kim wasn't trying to link it.
particular clown show especially.
Kim Foster
Jul 30, 2019, 8:52:42 PM7/30/19
to figh...@googlegroups.com
Took a quick look and I like it but I am a little torn. In many ways 2ed
seems to be moving in a more generic (in a good sense) effects based
direction which, IMO, improves its flexibility and intuitive nature of
the rules, easier for folks like me to understand. I do regret the loss
of some color aspects of Qualities like Beautiful and Cute. *shrug* They
were genre appropriate, IMO and had good flavor, communicated something
about the characters that had them in one or a few words.
Also the almost bullying tactics employed by those complained and
assumption of some kind of moral high ground, bad faith and out right
finger wagging and inability to employ some degree of common sense was
annoying as is seeing it have impact (No matter how thought out and
possibly correct) as it will just encourage the smug jerks.
seems to be moving in a more generic (in a good sense) effects based
direction which, IMO, improves its flexibility and intuitive nature of
the rules, easier for folks like me to understand. I do regret the loss
of some color aspects of Qualities like Beautiful and Cute. *shrug* They
were genre appropriate, IMO and had good flavor, communicated something
about the characters that had them in one or a few words.
Also the almost bullying tactics employed by those complained and
assumption of some kind of moral high ground, bad faith and out right
finger wagging and inability to employ some degree of common sense was
annoying as is seeing it have impact (No matter how thought out and
possibly correct) as it will just encourage the smug jerks.
AstonWildsteel
Jul 31, 2019, 1:40:48 PM7/31/19
to FIGHT! The Fighting Game RPG
Beautiful and Cute still exist. You can pick Attractive multiple times and it's encouraged to give bonus attractiveness a descriptor. The text for Attractive then shows a few examples "drawn from the source material", which are... Beautiful, Cute, Dashing and Sexy.
Nothing is truly lost.
Christopher Peter
Jul 31, 2019, 3:22:24 PM7/31/19
to figh...@googlegroups.com
My point. Everything is still there. It's just packaged differently.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FIGHT! The Fighting Game RPG" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fightrpg+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FIGHT! The Fighting Game RPG" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fightrpg+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Kim Foster
Jul 31, 2019, 3:37:56 PM7/31/19
to figh...@googlegroups.com
On 7/31/2019 1:40 PM, AstonWildsteel wrote:
> Beautiful and Cute still exist. You can pick Attractive multiple times
> and it's encouraged to give bonus attractiveness a descriptor. The
> text for Attractive then shows a few examples "drawn from the source
> material", which are... Beautiful, Cute, Dashing and Sexy.
>
> Nothing is truly lost.
Attractive: He's cute as a button! or "She's got the Bad Girl appeal..."
) and cabut they are grouped under a more generic label and not set
apart and separately defined. That's more efficient space wise and more
flexible but some, myself some what included, feel that can cost
'flavor'. Its a subjective evaluation, so mileage will vary. It's not
game breaker for me, just a bit of nostalgia and some smirking from the
bruhaha the Outrage Brigade put up about 1st edition terminology.
On a related topic, could a character get a weakness for a certain
definition of Attractive, Distracting, etc? Like a character that's a
sucker for blondes or loves school girl uniforms, perhapa treating them
as the base Qualities even the subject doesn't have them or taking
effect if the do?
Kitchi Koo has Attractive x1 "Nekojin Kawaii!"
Peter Otaku has a Weakness for Catgirls so treats Kitchi has having
Attractive x2 and even if she didn't have it all, just being described
as a cat girl would make him relate to her mechanically as if she had
Attractive x1 (and possibly Distracting...)
Christopher Peter
Jul 31, 2019, 3:54:28 PM7/31/19
to figh...@googlegroups.com
That's not formally in the rules, but you could do that, I guess...IF such a Weakness actually has a negative effect. Personally, I think gaining a full Quality or a Combat Skill Point just because some rare characters get a +1 to interaction effects is not a balanced trade.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FIGHT! The Fighting Game RPG" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fightrpg+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fightrpg/3a965356-3b43-6388-f2ef-cc1f005125e3%40gmail.com.
Kim Foster
Jul 31, 2019, 4:39:28 PM7/31/19
to 'Christopher Peter' via FIGHT! The Fighting Game RPG
On 7/31/2019 3:54 PM, 'Christopher Peter' via FIGHT! The Fighting Game
RPG wrote:
> That's not formally in the rules, but you could do that, I guess...IF
> such a Weakness actually has a negative effect. Personally, I think
> gaining a full Quality or a Combat Skill Point just because some rare
> characters get a +1 to interaction effects is not a balanced trade.
Perhaps I used the wrong terminology?
> That's not formally in the rules, but you could do that, I guess...IF
> such a Weakness actually has a negative effect. Personally, I think
> gaining a full Quality or a Combat Skill Point just because some rare
> characters get a +1 to interaction effects is not a balanced trade.
It would give character a free bonus against your character for nothing
and could apply to combat effects like "Distracting" as well as effect
role playing. Otaku might be wrong to full Kichi's tricks. It would
depend on role playing and how much emphasis that game puts on it or
mechanics, in or out of combat. My group uses social mechanics and
effect fairly extensively in and out combat and "little issues" can bite
you in the butt as, some of then might rp and suggest the bonuses
without getting anything for it, But as you suggest it might not be
appropriate for all groups.
Or maybe I just don't full grasp the mindset this game as much as I like
it.
Kim Foster
Aug 17, 2021, 8:20:50 PM8/17/21
to figh...@googlegroups.com
I've wanted to see something like this for Fight!. I'll definitely be
picking it up when I get some spare cash!
picking it up when I get some spare cash!
Kim Foster
Aug 17, 2021, 8:22:32 PM8/17/21
to figh...@googlegroups.com
I've wanted to see something like this for Fight!. I'll definitely be
picking it up when I get some spare cash!
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product/367932/Fight-2nd-Edition-Movelist?src=sub
picking it up when I get some spare cash!
Christopher Peter
Aug 18, 2021, 1:27:09 PM8/18/21
to figh...@googlegroups.com
Thanks! We're hoping it allows more people to actually sit down and *play* the game.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FIGHT! The Fighting Game RPG" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fightrpg+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fightrpg/c55cb4fb-0e0c-ea31-fae0-81fa6832fd97%40gmail.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages