Unix Iso Image Download

[Brinda]

Ifthe filename extensions are .XMP or .AAE, the files are not images at all, but sidecar files describing adjustments or metadata. Photos can export original image files with the metadata stored separately.

If the filename extension of the images is .heic or heir, you need to install at least macOS 10.13 High Sierra or a new system to open the files on your Mac. Or use the online image converter on this web page:

With the prior posts in SO.com I have tried building my script to send email to my Outlook account with the Image inline in the email body. But the html contents are getting displayed in the html rather displaying the image. Please help.

Also, your boundary is wrong. If you define boundary=--XYZ, then each message part needs to start with ----XYZ (you need to add two dashes), otherwise your boundary should be only XYZ. And the headers of the mime parts must be separated from the bodies by an empty line.

I am on a Mac [Mojave OS] and took shots with the R10, transferred them to my iPad [while out of town] which uploaded to Photos then when I got back to my Mac I downloaded the image files - JPGs came in as well as "Unix Executable File" and I figured that was just a RAW file [it had the same # as the preceding JPG] but when I added the extension RAW to the file it could not be opened. Any suggestions on what is going on and how to 'fix' it == the Unix files are mostly 30mb and the JPG ones with the same number are about 15.

Was Finder hiding those extensions? Highlight a single file you think is a RAW image, then bring up its info (Command+I). Under the "Name & Extension" section, check to see if the "Hide Extension" checkbox is enabled.

Only a newer version of macOS would correctly recognize the file type for the CR3 file. The file type is newer than the OS. If a new version of Canon DPP runs on that version of macOS, I expect that it would be able to process it with no difficulty. With macOS Ventura, the CR3 files are recognized by the mac photos app and can be processed by the photos app.

Thanks -- Hide is not checked but bet my OS is too old to handle the new R10-- I'm upgrading anyway so will not worry about dealing with them until that's done and I can double check -- appreciate the patience and guidance.

Thanks to all == I am now in Monterey OS and downloaded files from iCloud [they come in as zips] and expanded the zips and have them come in as a plain icon, and if I get Info there's no CR2 or 3 attached == but the jpg of the image shows and the images without the extension still show up in column view.. I decided to test adding CR2 to the image and that solved the problem ===I"m hoping I can use Automator to do them all, or I'll do them one by one == thanks much for the help and discussion [I'm not moving to Ventura just yet]

Any idea why subscription schedule update call gives error 400 says bad request when i send date time to unix timestamp in miliseconds? or seconds. or how can i convert bubble datetime to epoch timestamp?

Since Ubuntu ships with Python, you can also use a Python script to achieve this with a little more control over what happens - see this stackoverflow question for example scripts. Those examples use just the standard library.

You must be in the same directory as the picture files for both of these scripts. The first one shrinks the image to 128x128 pixels. The second script makes it 300 pixels wide and calculates the proportional height. This is more of a Python answer, but it is done all through the terminal technically.

One should probably appreciate that PC had such a cool Unix version before Linux was even born. Unfortunately this stuff was all prohibitively expensive and mortals could not afford it to run on their 386s.

You can download 86Box version here. Make sure to look at readme for some last minute updates. Especially around configuring TCP/IP and Looking Glass licensing. There also is a VirtualBox OVA, however it only works in 800600 and no networking/tcpip. Additional software can be downloaded from funet ftp. Install disks are here.

now i'm not expecting you solving my problems, just tell me if you've tried it and it's not impossible. it'd be really cool to load this ancient SysV version from grub. oh, and don't ask why, i'm just a sucker for these things. :))

oh, by the way, i've compiled bochs on linux with cirrus support, but there's a strange and rather annoying bug which is exclusive to the linux version: anytime i press shift, it messes up the terminal and from then on everything is upper case. even mouseclicks don't work in X. it's like if the shift key is 'stuck'. did you have this problem?

Thanks for sharing this. I used Interactive UNIX in the early 1990s when dozens of us in my area set up a UUCP calling tree to exchange mail and Netnews with the rest of the world. We had a mix of Amigas, AT&T UNIX PCs (7300/3B1), and Intel boxes (mostly i386s, though I think the rich guys had i486s) running Interactive, all calling each other hourly.

When I then attempt to install again the interactive unix installer will the the previously installed disk in the virtual machine and offer to do an update. So I think the installation worked successfully and it is just a matter of getting it to boot.

I ran across this post because I loved dfs because it reported df in human readable text instead of blocks. The largest disk we every used was probably a Seagate 4.2GB Ultra SCSI 320 on DPT and Adaptec controllers. Unfortunately I still have these as well ?

Did you ever get a working system up and running with Looking Glass? I have an old program I need to run under Interactive Unix and am hoping to find either a virtual machine that I can download or perhaps a disk image that I could use?

Thanks. I downloaded the bochs image and it runs fine on a Windows XP machine. I need access to a physical parallel port because my old program uses a parallel port dongle. Is this possible with the bochs image? If not, I guess my only alternative is to track down install disks or images and install to an old 486 machine I still have. Unfortunately I seem to have discarded my original install disks for Interactive Unix.

Glad this is of use. I think the key to partitioning a drive is to keep it below LBA size, so essentially just below 500 MB. The 3.0 has no networking but it has working GUI. 4.1a has working network but no GUI.

Now also X11 install media in version greater than 2.0.0 has been made available to a wider range of hobbyists to play with this vintage windows environment on virtualized hardware, or like myself, with real hardware. The bugfix release v2.0.2 should come i.a. with SVPMI files to support even better screen resolutions for some older graphics boards, like e.g. Matrox MWIN1280, if documentation is correct.

VirtualBox: only one problem, I cannot connect it via virsh, if you try to compile gcc the system give a lot of errores and became really unstable, for the other is perfect, to install it use BusLogic

I have also tried with coreboot bios (both i440 and q35) and I get same errors

I have also tried to using a disk image working with 86box (scsi controller enabled on kernel, ide support enable) but crash when try to mount root.

hello all,

I have been trying to boot an image (.IMG) using qemu, for quite some time now and i can't seem to get it to work. I've been able to boot from the Windows XP CD, the Debian iso image, etc, so I know qemu is configured properly and is working. But when it come to booting an image that I created, it just doesn't work. I have tried creating an image with only the grub files, and qemu does not seem to even recognize the image as a bootable image. The result I get when trying to boot from the latter, is the same result I get if I just type the command "qemu" without any options. The image in question is attached below.

But when it come to booting an image that I created, it just doesn't work. I have tried creating an image with only the grub files, and qemu does not seem to even recognize the image as a bootable image.

You might also be putting the files one dir in too deep, boot/grub/ instead of just grub/. I often see people make a symlink boot -> . so they can put them directly in grub, letting either option work.

For that matter, I can't remember ever seeing grub used in a situation without partitions, and I'm not sure where to proceed on that. You might do better to get an image for a working grub floppy, or perhaps a USB booting thing, then modify it to your needs.

Sort of. You didn't need to create image.img in the current directory, and probably shouldn't, and didn't need to run any of that as root. It also only creates a 105KB file, not a 1440KB file, so I'd modify it a little:

How about you tell us what your ultimate goal is, not just what your problem of the millisecond is, so we can guide you in the right direction now instead of when we finally find out where you're trying to go. You spent a long time making an ext2 disk image when that turned out not to be what you needed...

ok, basically I am compiling a kernel and some modules, then I intend to boot it. The instructions here are what I'm trying to follow but they don't work. I've only gotten as far as compiling the kernel.

What I usually do, instead of building bootable things from scratch, is adapt existing ones. I usually use boot ISO's, not floppies, since they can actually hold an entire kernel. Give me a bit and I'll craft an example for you.

There's so many fiddly things in any boot process that it's best to start from a working example than build your own from scratch, I think. When your own goes wrong, it can't tell you why. When modifying an existing one, you can keep making changes until you do something that breaks it, then undo what you did and learn.

Here is a basic script which builds a small image with just GRUB Legacy on it and uses QEMU to test if the image boots. It is for Fedora 14 X64. All you need to do is change GRUBFILEDIR to point to the directory containing your GRUB stage1,2 files.

3a8082e126