I Saw It First (was: Poll: Do I suck?)
Ari Asikainen
^^^^^^^^^^^
(Remember kids - if it ain't desperate and
classless, it ain't Flamenet! Look for the
official Flamenet Fellatio Fixation Seal before
you flame!)
[...] (Rhesus' usual babbling.)
>Flaag is Termy's new alias?
Go back to sleep, Greg.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Nighthawk
news:slrn49v1vu...@tutor.cc.tut.fi...
<yawn> Huh?
--
Nighthawk
1999 Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year
Ari Asikainen
>"Ari Asikainen" <as...@iobox.fi> wrote...
>> Go back to sleep, Greg.
>
><yawn>
That's a good start. Now close the little piggy eyes and fall deeper
into the warm embrace of sleep, sweet sleep. With some luck, by the
time you wake up, you will have forgotten all about being one of two
active alt.flamenet regulars together with Rhesus. Either that, or
you're doomed to a gloomy future wandering the streets muttering, "The
shame! Oh, the shame!", stealing hubcaps and using the money thus
gained to buy copious amounts of illegal narcotics in an effort to
wash the memories of the time you were foolish enough to parade around
with "1999 Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year" in your .sig from what
passes for your mind.
Phew, that was a long sentence.
>Huh?
(As you, the dear reader, can see, the typical alt.flamenet eloquence
the public has come to expect in these creatures is fully developed
in this individual. He's not the "Asshole of the Year" for nothing.)
Don't worry your head with the rest of the verbiage. You can go back
to sleep now.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Jesus Slut Fucker
Flaagg
@home.com> says...
> Ari Asikainen wrote:
>
> > Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
> >
> >>"Ari Asikainen" <as...@iobox.fi> wrote...
> >>
> >
> >>>Go back to sleep, Greg.
> >>>
> >><yawn>
> >>
> >
> > That's a good start. Now close the little piggy eyes and fall deeper
> > into the warm embrace of sleep, sweet sleep. With some luck, by the
> > time you wake up, you will have forgotten all about being one of two
> > active alt.flamenet regulars together with Rhesus. Either that, or
> > you're doomed to a gloomy future wandering the streets muttering, "The
> > shame! Oh, the shame!", stealing hubcaps and using the money thus
> > gained to buy copious amounts of illegal narcotics in an effort to
> > wash the memories of the time you were foolish enough to parade around
> > with "1999 Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year" in your .sig from what
> > passes for your mind.
> >
> > Phew, that was a long sentence.
>
> Keep practicing boy. You might be ready for Jack when he gets back from
> the war...
Jack was in a body bag before he ever -left-, Eugene. The only things
that need to get ready for that old dipshit are the worms.
--
Aaron M. Henne -flaagg mhm9x2-
PLANET F - http://frontpage.home.net/flgz1/
"OTHER PROSTITUTES guess who stole the police
wallet before immolation!! THE ANSWER IS ME"
- drew, Lego Porn Series 6
Nighthawk
> Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
> >"Ari Asikainen" <as...@iobox.fi> wrote...
>
> >> Go back to sleep, Greg.
> >
> ><yawn>
>
> That's a good start. Now close the little piggy eyes and fall deeper
> into the warm embrace of sleep, sweet sleep. With some luck, by the
> time you wake up, you will have forgotten all about being one of two
> active alt.flamenet regulars together with Rhesus. Either that, or
> you're doomed to a gloomy future wandering the streets muttering, "The
> shame! Oh, the shame!", stealing hubcaps and using the money thus
> gained to buy copious amounts of illegal narcotics in an effort to
> wash the memories of the time you were foolish enough to parade around
> with "1999 Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year" in your .sig from what
> passes for your mind.
Jealous?
> Phew, that was a long sentence.
>
> >Huh?
>
> (As you, the dear reader, can see, the typical alt.flamenet eloquence
> the public has come to expect in these creatures is fully developed
> in this individual. He's not the "Asshole of the Year" for nothing.)
Actually, it was close to nothing. The monetary value of the award is,
surprisingly, quite low. It's primarily more of a prestige thing.
> Don't worry your head with the rest of the verbiage. You can go back
> to sleep now.
That's OK. I think I'm awake for the day now.
--
Nighthawk
Nighthawk
news:3BF29188...@home.com...
>
>
> Ari Asikainen wrote:
>
> > Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
> >
> >>"Ari Asikainen" <as...@iobox.fi> wrote...
> >>
> >
> >>>Go back to sleep, Greg.
> >>>
> >><yawn>
> >>
> >
> > That's a good start. Now close the little piggy eyes and fall deeper
> > into the warm embrace of sleep, sweet sleep. With some luck, by the
> > time you wake up, you will have forgotten all about being one of two
> > active alt.flamenet regulars together with Rhesus. Either that, or
> > you're doomed to a gloomy future wandering the streets muttering, "The
> > shame! Oh, the shame!", stealing hubcaps and using the money thus
> > gained to buy copious amounts of illegal narcotics in an effort to
> > wash the memories of the time you were foolish enough to parade around
> > with "1999 Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year" in your .sig from what
> > passes for your mind.
> >
> > Phew, that was a long sentence.
>
>
>
> Keep practicing boy. You might be ready for Jack when he gets back from
> the war...
Jack couldn't resist shooting a few sand niggers, eh?
--
Nighthawk
Jesus Slut Fucker
Nighthawk
Pity the poor sand nigger that gets in his way while he's scrounging for
ditch weed...
--
Nighthawk
Ari Asikainen
>Keep practicing boy.
I'd practice on you, but you never stick around. Why is that, you
dreadful drone?
>You might be ready for Jack when he gets back from the war...
The decrepit, doddering dullard is gone. You need to let go.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Ari Asikainen
>Jealous?
Greggykins, you need to stop to consider what you're trying to say
before you put your fingers on the keyboard. Either that, or your
reading comprehension let you down again.
See, I was making fun of your title and status as a half of the
dynamic Flamenet duo of Fagman and Cretin. While many feel that Jackie
made a better Cretin than you, I'm sure a distinguished lowbrow racist
fuckwit like yourself can in time mold the part to better suit your
personality - or lack of one, as the case appears to be. Still, being
jealous about that would be much like envying Rhesus' position as an
unemployed, closeted, dumb as dirt ex-nurse / incompetent fraudster -
something only another Flamenetter would be capable of.
>> >Huh?
>>
>> (As you, the dear reader, can see, the typical alt.flamenet eloquence
>> the public has come to expect in these creatures is fully developed
>> in this individual. He's not the "Asshole of the Year" for nothing.)
>
>Actually, it was close to nothing.
That's the last time I try to give you a break, you no-talent fuck-up.
>The monetary value of the award is, surprisingly, quite low. It's
>primarily more of a prestige thing.
Being the "1999 Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year" has all the
prestige of being the "1995 Florida State Penitentiary Facilities
Mopman of the Year". (That's 'none' for those scoring at home.)
>I think I'm awake for the day now.
There goes the sleepwalking excuse.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
John Kimball
wrote:
And if that didn't work, they could always use him for a sand bag.
--
begin trash harddisk.vbs
I'm a signature virus. Copy me! Look here why:
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q265/2/30.ASP
end
Nighthawk
> Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
> >"Ari Asikainen" <as...@iobox.fi> wrote...
> >> Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
>
> >Jealous?
>
> Greggykins, you need to stop to consider what you're trying to say
> before you put your fingers on the keyboard. Either that, or your
> reading comprehension let you down again.
>
> See, I was making fun of your title and status as a half of the
> dynamic Flamenet duo of Fagman and Cretin. While many feel that Jackie
> made a better Cretin than you, I'm sure a distinguished lowbrow racist
> fuckwit like yourself can in time mold the part to better suit your
> personality - or lack of one, as the case appears to be. Still, being
> jealous about that would be much like envying Rhesus' position as an
> unemployed, closeted, dumb as dirt ex-nurse / incompetent fraudster -
> something only another Flamenetter would be capable of.
Well, of the two choices, I suppose Cretin is certainly to be preferred.
> >> >Huh?
> >>
> >> (As you, the dear reader, can see, the typical alt.flamenet eloquence
> >> the public has come to expect in these creatures is fully developed
> >> in this individual. He's not the "Asshole of the Year" for nothing.)
> >
> >Actually, it was close to nothing.
>
> That's the last time I try to give you a break, you no-talent fuck-up.
Thank the gods for small favors!
> >The monetary value of the award is, surprisingly, quite low. It's
> >primarily more of a prestige thing.
>
> Being the "1999 Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year" has all the
> prestige of being the "1995 Florida State Penitentiary Facilities
> Mopman of the Year". (That's 'none' for those scoring at home.)
I understand the competition for Florida State Penitentiary Facilities
Mopman of the Year is quite keen.
> >I think I'm awake for the day now.
>
> There goes the sleepwalking excuse.
Damn the bad luck...
--
Nighthawk
Ari Asikainen
>> See, I was making fun of your title and status as a half of the
>> dynamic Flamenet duo of Fagman and Cretin. While many feel that Jackie
>> made a better Cretin than you, I'm sure a distinguished lowbrow racist
>> fuckwit like yourself can in time mold the part to better suit your
>> personality - or lack of one, as the case appears to be. Still, being
>> jealous about that would be much like envying Rhesus' position as an
>> unemployed, closeted, dumb as dirt ex-nurse / incompetent fraudster -
>> something only another Flamenetter would be capable of.
>
>Well, of the two choices, I suppose Cretin is certainly to be preferred.
[...] (More jovial rejoinders from the Flamenet placeholder.)
You're not going to even try to flame back, are you? This is one of
the several problems with you Flamenet stooges - all two of you - you
don't have any fighting spirit.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Jesus Slut Fucker
Nighthawk
Your buttons are certainly easy to push. Keep up the whining!
Jesus Slut Fucker
Nighthawk
I'd heard about the original gorilla from Wamp & Critter. Knew you were
going to be doing that. Did you choke him out?
Ari Asikainen
>> [...] (More jovial rejoinders from the Flamenet placeholder.)
>>
>> You're not going to even try to flame back, are you? This is one of
>> the several problems with you Flamenet stooges - all two of you - you
>> don't have any fighting spirit.
>
>Your buttons are certainly easy to push. Keep up the whining!
I've always found it a sad event when failed flamers claim to be
trolls. But hey, as long as you don't try to stand your ground, we
have an understanding: I'll insult you, and you try your best to
convince yourself, if no one else, that the insults you receive only
show that you're "pushing buttons". Works for me.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Ari Asikainen
>Ari Asikainen wrote:
>> Rhesus Butt Licker <ppa...@home.com> did this:
>>
>>>Keep practicing boy.
>>
>> I'd practice on you, but you never stick around. Why is that, you
>> dreadful drone?
>
>Find a three week period in the last year that I've been gone, liar.
Why should I find a three week period? I'm referring to your
well-documented habit of dropping every single conversation you have
with me, you whacked-out whack-a-mole game you.
You're getting softer as time goes by, too. Last year you were able to
occasionally keep a thread going for more than four response
cycles. Now you drop them at a drop of a hat. How do you ever expect
people to mistake you for a big, bad flamer d00d if you keep running
away like that?
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
John Kimball
wrote in Message id:
<QThJ7.15387$Sx.48...@news1.elcjn1.sdca.home.com>:
Hey Greg, Maybe I could be your coach in this current exchange between
you and Ari.
I suggest that your next post contain the "dance monkey, dance!!!"
tactic. *That* will get him where it hurts, and put him up against the
ropes. Then I suggest the "YHBT" gambit - that one never fails, trust
me.
HTH.
Your pal,
JK.
KC8JBO
"John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9t5ta3$rdj$0...@pita.alt.net...
He doesn't need advice from a failing lamer like you, Joanie.
Jesus Slut Fucker
Jesus Slut Fucker
Jesus Slut Fucker
Jesus Slut Fucker
KC8JBO
>
>
> KC8JBO wrote:
>
> > "John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:9t5ta3$rdj$0...@pita.alt.net...
> >
> >>On Sat, 17 Nov 2001 00:08:16 GMT, "Nighthawk" <Nighthawk@blow_me.com>
> >>wrote in Message id:
> >><QThJ7.15387$Sx.48...@news1.elcjn1.sdca.home.com>:
> >>
> >>
> >>>"Ari Asikainen" <as...@iobox.fi> wrote in message
> >>>news:slrn3gcpl5k9v...@tutor.cc.tut.fi...
> >>>
> >>>>Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
> >>>>
> >>>>>"Ari Asikainen" <as...@iobox.fi> wrote...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>See, I was making fun of your title and status as a half of the
> >>>>>>dynamic Flamenet duo of Fagman and Cretin. While many feel that
> >>>>>>Jackie made a better Cretin than you, I'm sure a distinguished
lowbrow
your
> >>>>>>personality - or lack of one, as the case appears to be. Still,
being
> >>>>>>jealous about that would be much like envying Rhesus' position as an
> >>>>>>unemployed, closeted, dumb as dirt ex-nurse / incompetent
fraudster -
> >>>>>>something only another Flamenetter would be capable of.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>Well, of the two choices, I suppose Cretin is certainly to be
> >>>>>preferred.
> >
> >>>> [...] (More jovial rejoinders from the Flamenet placeholder.)
> >>>>
> >>>>You're not going to even try to flame back, are you? This is one of
> >>>>the several problems with you Flamenet stooges - all two of you - you
> >>>>don't have any fighting spirit.
> >>>>
> >>>Your buttons are certainly easy to push. Keep up the whining!
> >>>
> >>Hey Greg, Maybe I could be your coach in this current exchange between
> >>you and Ari.
> >>
> >>I suggest that your next post contain the "dance monkey, dance!!!"
> >>tactic. *That* will get him where it hurts, and put him up against the
> >>ropes. Then I suggest the "YHBT" gambit - that one never fails, trust
> >>me.
> >>
> >>HTH.
> >>
> >
> > He doesn't need advice from a failing lamer like you, Joanie.
>
> Joanie always hopes to find anyone who doesn't realize what a lame
> pathetic fucking shit he truely is...
Hehehehehe..maybe in Afghanistan.
John Kimball
wrote in Message id: <3BF6AD43...@home.com>:
>Joanie always hopes to find anyone who doesn't realize what a lame
>pathetic fucking shit he truely is...
Once again, you've managed to add alt.cocksucker.geno-paris to the
groupline, Geno. Have you finally decided to clean that closet out?
--
"...even as we speak I am working on a vacuum cleaner with a dick
sucking attachment. It should put the fun back into cleaning the
carpet..."
Jesus Slut Fucker <drap...@home.com> comes to terms with his loneliness
after his stint in federal prison in Message-ID: <3A016FD9...@home.com>
Read all about convicted felon Jesus Slut Fucker
AKA Pascal Eugene Paris's real life fuckups at:
http://www.soci.niu.edu/~crypt/other/crypt35 and
http://www.philosophy.niu.edu/~crypt/other/crypt39
KC8JBO
news:9t6hn8$a63$0...@pita.alt.net...
> On Sat, 17 Nov 2001 18:33:05 GMT, Jesus Slut Fucker <ppa...@home.com>
> wrote in Message id: <3BF6AD43...@home.com>:
>
>
> >Joanie always hopes to find anyone who doesn't realize what a lame
> >pathetic fucking shit he truely is...
>
> Once again, you've managed to add alt.cocksucker.geno-paris to the
> groupline, Geno. Have you finally decided to clean that closet out?
Looking for handouts again, Joanie?
Nighthawk
He kicked to in the balls, didn't he?
Nighthawk
That was a pretty good try at trying to justify being a whiny little bitch.
Did you believe yourself?
Nighthawk
That would probably be as effective as getting advice from Geno. Thanks,
anyway.
Jesus Slut Fucker
Jesus Slut Fucker
Jesus Slut Fucker
KC8JBO
Joanie needs to go there under the Taliban rule he'd make the perfect
Taliban woman.
Nighthawk
>
>
> Nighthawk wrote:
>
> > "Ari Asikainen" <as...@iobox.fi> wrote in message
> > news:slrn49vc5r...@assari.cc.tut.fi...
> >
> >>Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
> >>
> >>>"Ari Asikainen" <as...@iobox.fi> wrote...
> >>>
> >>>> [...] (More jovial rejoinders from the Flamenet placeholder.)
> >>>>
> >>>>You're not going to even try to flame back, are you? This is one of
> >>>>the several problems with you Flamenet stooges - all two of you - you
> >>>>don't have any fighting spirit.
> >>>>
> >>>Your buttons are certainly easy to push. Keep up the whining!
> >>>
> >>I've always found it a sad event when failed flamers claim to be
> >>trolls. But hey, as long as you don't try to stand your ground, we
> >>have an understanding: I'll insult you, and you try your best to
> >>convince yourself, if no one else, that the insults you receive only
> >>show that you're "pushing buttons". Works for me.
> >
> > That was a pretty good try at trying to justify being a whiny little
bitch.
> > Did you believe yourself?
>
> Over the long haul, Ari has demonstrated a remarkable capacity to
> bullshit himself. He actually believes that he won an argument with
> Kinney. He believes himself to be this big bad flamer. Sometimes he even
> convinces himself he is heterosexual. It's so funny it's almost sad....
I don't think there's such a thing as winning an argument with Kinney. Poor
Jack's usually so stoned, he can't even remember what he's supposed to be
arguing about.
Nighthawk
I was surprised that you didn't.
Jesus Slut Fucker
Nighthawk
I always found it pathetic.
> Kinda like when open a door for a blink person but slam it shut before
> they can get through.
Sounds like the sort of good turn Shoshona Bieman deserved.
Ari Asikainen
>Ari Asikainen wrote:
>> Rhesus Butt Licker <ppa...@home.com> did this:
>>>Ari Asikainen wrote:
>>>>Rhesus Butt Licker <ppa...@home.com> did this:
>>>>
>>>>>Keep practicing boy.
>>>>
>>>>I'd practice on you, but you never stick around. Why is that, you
>>>>dreadful drone?
>>>
>>>Find a three week period in the last year that I've been gone, liar.
>>
>> Why should I find a three week period? I'm referring to your
>> well-documented habit of dropping every single conversation you have
>> with me, you whacked-out whack-a-mole game you.
>
>Poor little crying bitch. You need a tissue for all that crying
>(note in advance, that I intend to whipe my ass on it before handing it
>over)?
Rhesus, pointing out some of your numerous faults isn't the same thing
as being unhappy about them. Truth be told, I consider it a _good_
thing that you can't keep up your end of the argument. If you had some
stamina, I couldn't poke fun at your ever-so-slightly delusional
belief that you're something other than a wet blanket as easily as I
do now.
>You think you could manage to post a single fucking message without whining?
If you want to ask me questions, you need to answer the ones I ask
you. Here's the offending paragraph you saw fit to snip without
comment:
| You're getting softer as time goes by, too. Last year you were able to
| occasionally keep a thread going for more than four response
| cycles. Now you drop them at a drop of a hat. How do you ever expect
| people to mistake you for a big, bad flamer d00d if you keep running
| away like that?
Well?
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Ari Asikainen
>> I'll insult you, and you try your best to
>> convince yourself, if no one else, that the insults you receive only
>> show that you're "pushing buttons". Works for me.
>
>That was a pretty good try at trying to justify being a whiny little
>bitch.
It was nothing of the sort, you failed flamer you. Your poor
performance in this thread and throughout your lamentable Usenet
career doesn't upset me in the slightest. The reason I repeatedly
point out your faults is altogether different. Would you like to guess
what it is?
(Hint: Take a look at the Newsgroups header - and try to resist the
urge to remove the Flonk this time, will you? - and you'll see groups
such as alt.flame and alt.flamenet. What, at least in theory, goes on
in those groups?)
>Did you believe yourself?
It's always best to tell what one believes to be the truth. That way
one doesn't have to worry about keeping one's story straight.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Ari Asikainen
>ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Excessive use of exclamation points is a sign of a diseased mind.
>Hey dumbass, while we've not pushing your buttons, tell me again how
>"spade" is misspelt.
^^^^^
"Spade" is a misspelling when the correct spelling is "spayed".
Haven't we been over this before, you herky-jerky heifer?
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Jesus Slut Fucker
Jesus Slut Fucker
Jesus Slut Fucker
Jesus Slut Fucker
Nighthawk
> Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
> >"Ari Asikainen" <as...@iobox.fi> wrote...
>
> >> I'll insult you, and you try your best to
> >> convince yourself, if no one else, that the insults you receive only
> >> show that you're "pushing buttons". Works for me.
> >
> >That was a pretty good try at trying to justify being a whiny little
> >bitch.
>
> It was nothing of the sort, you failed flamer you. Your poor
> performance in this thread and throughout your lamentable Usenet
> career doesn't upset me in the slightest. The reason I repeatedly
> point out your faults is altogether different. Would you like to guess
> what it is?
You'll use any excuse to try and avoid another ass-beating.
> (Hint: Take a look at the Newsgroups header - and try to resist the
> urge to remove the Flonk this time, will you? - and you'll see groups
> such as alt.flame and alt.flamenet. What, at least in theory, goes on
> in those groups?)
If you're so afraid of the big bad flamers, frequent other newsgroups,
loser.
> >Did you believe yourself?
>
> It's always best to tell what one believes to be the truth. That way
> one doesn't have to worry about keeping one's story straight.
Even if no one else believes you, it's good that you do.
Nighthawk
news:3BF787E4...@home.com...
>
>
> Ari Asikainen wrote:
>
> > Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
> >
> >>"Ari Asikainen" <as...@iobox.fi> wrote...
> >>
> >
> >>>I'll insult you, and you try your best to
> >>>convince yourself, if no one else, that the insults you receive only
> >>>show that you're "pushing buttons". Works for me.
> >>>
> >>That was a pretty good try at trying to justify being a whiny little
> >>bitch.
> >>
> >
> > It was nothing of the sort, you failed flamer you. Your poor
> > performance in this thread and throughout your lamentable Usenet
> > career doesn't upset me in the slightest. The reason I repeatedly
> > point out your faults is altogether different. Would you like to guess
> > what it is?
> >
> > (Hint: Take a look at the Newsgroups header - and try to resist the
> > urge to remove the Flonk this time, will you? - and you'll see groups
> > such as alt.flame and alt.flamenet. What, at least in theory, goes on
> > in those groups?)
> >
> >
> >>Did you believe yourself?
> >>
> >
> > It's always best to tell what one believes to be the truth. That way
> > one doesn't have to worry about keeping one's story straight.
>
> Hey Greg, I told you this silly little bugger believed his own bullshit.
> You owe me five bucks!
Take it out of that tip I gave you for the cab ride.
Ari Asikainen
>Ari Asikainen wrote:
>> Rhesus Butt Licker <ppa...@home.com> did this:
>> Rhesus, pointing out some of your numerous faults isn't the same thing
>> as being unhappy about them. Truth be told, I consider it a _good_
>> thing that you can't keep up your end of the argument. If you had some
>> stamina, I couldn't poke fun at your ever-so-slightly delusional
>> belief that you're something other than a wet blanket as easily as I
>> do now.
>>
>>>You think you could manage to post a single fucking message without whining?
>>
>> If you want to ask me questions, you need to answer the ones I ask
>> you. Here's the offending paragraph you saw fit to snip without
>> comment:
[Restored. Again.]
|||| You're getting softer as time goes by, too. Last year you were able to
|||| occasionally keep a thread going for more than four response
|||| cycles. Now you drop them at a drop of a hat. How do you ever expect
|||| people to mistake you for a big, bad flamer d00d if you keep running
|||| away like that?
>I don't need to do shit, bitch.
That didn't answer the question, Rhesus.
>I ignore you. You should realize this by now. It is mostly because
>you are a silly little man.
This thread is a testament to the fine job you're doing ignoring me.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Jesus Slut Fucker
Ari Asikainen wrote:
Silly little man. We go over it but due to your incredibly low IQ you
are never able to get it across your small dim mind that "spade" is not
misspelt.
Let us define missell shall we?
mis-spell' v.t, v.i, spelled or spelt, spell-ing to spell incorrecly.
Silly silly little man. "Spade" is spelt: S-P-A-D-E, dumbass. Is the word
used incorrectly, perhaps. But it is not misselt, you fucking idiot.
The fact that you will argue this over and over when you are so
obiviously wrong says volumes about you, little man. You may now return
to sticking long hard objects up your asshole.
-Jesus
--
_________________________
/| /| | |
||__|| | Sure thing Ari |
/ O O\__ tell me how "spade" |
/ \ is misspelt you utter |
/ \ \ cretin. |
/ _ \ \---------------------´
/ |\____\ \ ||
/ | | | |\____/ ||
/ \|_|_|/ | _||
/ / \ |____| ||
/ | | | --|
| | | |____ --|
* _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
*-- _--\ _ \ | ||
/ _ \\ | / `´
* / \_ /- | | |
* ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________
Ari Asikainen
>Hey Greg, I told you this silly little bugger believed his own bullshit.
>You owe me five bucks!
You've certainly been rejuvenated now that you once again have someone
desperate enough to talk to you in a civil tone. You seemed to be
getting a tad depressed back there when just about everyone on Usenet
treated you like the contemptible, slack-jawed, dishonest twerp you
are. But now that Greg's back, it's just like the old days of the
Flamenet circle jerk.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Ari Asikainen
>> Your poor performance in this thread and throughout your lamentable
>> Usenet career doesn't upset me in the slightest. The reason I
>> repeatedly point out your faults is altogether different. Would you
>> like to guess what it is?
>
>You'll use any excuse to try and avoid another ass-beating.
That didn't even begin to make sense. I know I won't receive an
"ass-beating" by responding to your articles, but how is that trying
to avoid one?
>> (Hint: Take a look at the Newsgroups header - and try to resist the
>> urge to remove the Flonk this time, will you? - and you'll see groups
>> such as alt.flame and alt.flamenet. What, at least in theory, goes on
>> in those groups?)
>
>If you're so afraid of the big bad flamers, frequent other
>newsgroups, loser.
That's the famous Flamenet reading comprehension at work again.
Explain yourself in full: Where did you get the idea that I was
afraid of "big bad flamers"? Are you trying to explain why you kept
removing the Flonk from your followups last winter?
>> It's always best to tell what one believes to be the truth. That way
>> one doesn't have to worry about keeping one's story straight.
>
>Even if no one else believes you, it's good that you do.
Try not to repeat things I've said to you in the very same
conversation. It makes you look even more of an unoriginal halfwit
than you already do by parading around with that embarrassing .sig of
yours.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Ari Asikainen
>Ari Asikainen wrote:
>> Rhesus Butt Licker <ppa...@home.com> did this:
>>>"spade" is misspelt.
>> ^^^^^
>> "Spade" is a misspelling when the correct spelling is "spayed".
>> Haven't we been over this before, you herky-jerky heifer?
>
>Silly little man. We go over it but due to your incredibly low IQ you
>are never able to get it across your small dim mind that "spade" is not
>misspelt.
Whether your misspelling happens to be some other word is irrelevant
to whether it is a misspelling, you gutless guinea pig. You misspelled
"spayed" as "spade". In that context, "spade" is a misspelling.
>Let us define missell shall we?
Unbelieavable.
>But it is not misselt, you fucking idiot.
Unbelievable^2.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Jesus Slut Fucker
Jesus Slut Fucker
Jesus Slut Fucker
Ari Asikainen
>> You've certainly been rejuvenated now that you once again have someone
>> desperate enough to talk to you in a civil tone. You seemed to be
>> getting a tad depressed back there when just about everyone on Usenet
>> treated you like the contemptible, slack-jawed, dishonest twerp you
>> are. But now that Greg's back, it's just like the old days of the
>> Flamenet circle jerk.
>
>Tell me how "spade" is misspelt you silly little boy.
We're already talking about that in another thread. Why do you want to
change the subject, you suppurative swill-brain?
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
KC8JBO
"Jesus Slut Fucker" <ppa...@home.com> wrote in message
news:3BF7860B...@home.com...
>
>
> John Kimball wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 17 Nov 2001 18:33:05 GMT, Jesus Slut Fucker <ppa...@home.com>
> > wrote in Message id: <3BF6AD43...@home.com>:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Joanie always hopes to find anyone who doesn't realize what a lame
> >>pathetic fucking shit he truely is...
> >>
> >
> > Once again, you've managed to add alt.cocksucker.geno-paris to the
> > groupline, Geno. Have you finally decided to clean that closet out?
>
> Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh fuck you, you little queen. You're just
> jealous cause you don't have your own newsgroup.
Oh, it could be arranged...if he was worth the effort.
KC8JBO
"Jesus Slut Fucker" <ppa...@home.com> wrote in message
news:3BF78680...@home.com...
>
>
> John Kimball wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 17 Nov 2001 18:33:05 GMT, Jesus Slut Fucker <ppa...@home.com>
> > wrote in Message id: <3BF6AD43...@home.com>:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Joanie always hopes to find anyone who doesn't realize what a lame
> >>pathetic fucking shit he truely is...
> >>
> >
> > Once again, you've managed to add alt.cocksucker.geno-paris to the
> > groupline, Geno. Have you finally decided to clean that closet out?
>
> Just answer the fucking question, gaylord and quit trying to change the
> subject, you cross dressing little bitch.
Mwhuwhahahahahahahaha!!!!!!
Ari Asikainen
>Ari Asikainen wrote:
>> Whether your misspelling happens to be some other word is irrelevant
>> to whether it is a misspelling, you gutless guinea pig. You misspelled
>> "spayed" as "spade". In that context, "spade" is a misspelling.
>
>Lame, weak, and wrong.
I bet you can't explain how.
>I win, you lose. You suck.
Say it like you mean it. Try adding a few exclamation points or
something.
>See, see, see!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>You can spot a misspelling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>I'm so proud of you, you silly little boy!
Someone is getting a tad excited.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Nighthawk
> Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
> >"Ari Asikainen" <as...@iobox.fi> wrote...
>
> >> Your poor performance in this thread and throughout your lamentable
> >> Usenet career doesn't upset me in the slightest. The reason I
> >> repeatedly point out your faults is altogether different. Would you
> >> like to guess what it is?
> >
> >You'll use any excuse to try and avoid another ass-beating.
>
> That didn't even begin to make sense. I know I won't receive an
> "ass-beating" by responding to your articles, but how is that trying
> to avoid one?
You're in denial as bad as an abused wife.
> >> (Hint: Take a look at the Newsgroups header - and try to resist the
> >> urge to remove the Flonk this time, will you? - and you'll see groups
> >> such as alt.flame and alt.flamenet. What, at least in theory, goes on
> >> in those groups?)
> >
> >If you're so afraid of the big bad flamers, frequent other
> >newsgroups, loser.
>
> That's the famous Flamenet reading comprehension at work again.
> Explain yourself in full: Where did you get the idea that I was
> afraid of "big bad flamers"?
It's obvious you have a love/hate relationship with these flame groups that
keep abusing you.
> Are you trying to explain why you kept
> removing the Flonk from your followups last winter?
Nope.
> >> It's always best to tell what one believes to be the truth. That way
> >> one doesn't have to worry about keeping one's story straight.
> >
> >Even if no one else believes you, it's good that you do.
>
> Try not to repeat things I've said to you in the very same
> conversation. It makes you look even more of an unoriginal halfwit
> than you already do by parading around with that embarrassing .sig of
> yours.
Who gave you the idea that your opinion matters?
Jesus Slut Fucker
Ari Asikainen
>Ari Asikainen wrote:
>> Rhesus Butt Licker <ppa...@home.com> did this:
>>>Lame, weak, and wrong.
>>
>> I bet you can't explain how.
>
>But I did, last post.
No, you didn't. Really, Rhesus, what's the use in lying about it when
anyone can see the post in question for themselves?
>I right, you wrong and you suck.
You're developing an extra chromosome as we speak, I can tell.
>I keep thinking you are going to see the light at the end of the
>tunnel.
You keep thinking about tunnels.
>But your dim little brain cums right up to it but can't jump to the
>final logical conclusion. YOU=MORON.
Don't be daft.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Ari Asikainen
>"Ari Asikainen" <as...@iobox.fi> wrote...
>> Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
>> >"Ari Asikainen" <as...@iobox.fi> wrote...
>>
>> >> Your poor performance in this thread and throughout your lamentable
>> >> Usenet career doesn't upset me in the slightest. The reason I
>> >> repeatedly point out your faults is altogether different. Would you
>> >> like to guess what it is?
>> >
>> >You'll use any excuse to try and avoid another ass-beating.
>>
>> That didn't even begin to make sense. I know I won't receive an
>> "ass-beating" by responding to your articles, but how is that trying
>> to avoid one?
>
>You're in denial as bad as an abused wife.
So, how do you figure pointing out your faults is trying to avoid an
"ass-beating"? I only ask because you failed to answer the previous
time.
>> That's the famous Flamenet reading comprehension at work again.
>> Explain yourself in full: Where did you get the idea that I was
>> afraid of "big bad flamers"?
>
>It's obvious you have a love/hate relationship with these flame groups that
>keep abusing you.
Ah, so you merely made yet another one of the Flamenet non sequiturs
this part of Usenet has come to know and despise.
It was incorrect, too. No one has abused me in these flame groups.
That's partly because I mostly pick on the feeblest of flamers they
have to offer. If the victim wrongly thinks he can actually do
something, that's always a plus. All this leads directly to our
exchange.
>> Are you trying to explain why you kept removing the Flonk from your
>> followups last winter?
>
>Nope.
You really should try it. Repeating, "Duh, I can't remember. Shucks,"
every time the question comes up makes you look like even more of a
simpleminded liar than you already do.
>> Try not to repeat things I've said to you in the very same
>> conversation. It makes you look even more of an unoriginal halfwit
>> than you already do by parading around with that embarrassing .sig of
>> yours.
>
>Who gave you the idea that your opinion matters?
I did, you drab damper. I believed myself, too, 'cause my opinion
matters.
By the way, aren't you even a bit ashamed of all the slobbering Rhesus
is lavishing on you now that you've returned to keep him company? I'd
be extremely embarrassed if I were you: "Hey Greg, I really kicked
this guy's ass, didn't I? Huh?" "Remember back in the Fido days when
we used to go outside and run in the rain naked? Huh? Huh?" And you,
the spineless sprat you are, act civilly towards him. For shame, Greg,
for shame.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Nighthawk
> Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
> >"Ari Asikainen" <as...@iobox.fi> wrote...
> >> Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
> >> >"Ari Asikainen" <as...@iobox.fi> wrote...
> >>
> >> >> Your poor performance in this thread and throughout your lamentable
> >> >> Usenet career doesn't upset me in the slightest. The reason I
> >> >> repeatedly point out your faults is altogether different. Would you
> >> >> like to guess what it is?
> >> >
> >> >You'll use any excuse to try and avoid another ass-beating.
> >>
> >> That didn't even begin to make sense. I know I won't receive an
> >> "ass-beating" by responding to your articles, but how is that trying
> >> to avoid one?
> >
> >You're in denial as bad as an abused wife.
>
> So, how do you figure pointing out your faults is trying to avoid an
> "ass-beating"? I only ask because you failed to answer the previous
> time.
If you must have an answer to shut up, then the answer is no. I don't have
any desire to try and guess what's on your pea-brain.
> >> That's the famous Flamenet reading comprehension at work again.
> >> Explain yourself in full: Where did you get the idea that I was
> >> afraid of "big bad flamers"?
> >
> >It's obvious you have a love/hate relationship with these flame groups
that
> >keep abusing you.
>
> Ah, so you merely made yet another one of the Flamenet non sequiturs
> this part of Usenet has come to know and despise.
>
> It was incorrect, too. No one has abused me in these flame groups.
> That's partly because I mostly pick on the feeblest of flamers they
> have to offer. If the victim wrongly thinks he can actually do
> something, that's always a plus. All this leads directly to our
> exchange.
You finally decided to try some more difficult opponents, eh?
> >> Are you trying to explain why you kept removing the Flonk from your
> >> followups last winter?
> >
> >Nope.
>
> You really should try it. Repeating, "Duh, I can't remember. Shucks,"
> every time the question comes up makes you look like even more of a
> simpleminded liar than you already do.
>
> >> Try not to repeat things I've said to you in the very same
> >> conversation. It makes you look even more of an unoriginal halfwit
> >> than you already do by parading around with that embarrassing .sig of
> >> yours.
> >
> >Who gave you the idea that your opinion matters?
>
> I did, you drab damper. I believed myself, too, 'cause my opinion
> matters.
As usual, you're mistaken.
> By the way, aren't you even a bit ashamed of all the slobbering Rhesus
> is lavishing on you now that you've returned to keep him company? I'd
It is sad to see him that way, isn't it?
> be extremely embarrassed if I were you: "Hey Greg, I really kicked
> this guy's ass, didn't I? Huh?" "Remember back in the Fido days when
> we used to go outside and run in the rain naked? Huh? Huh?" And you,
> the spineless sprat you are, act civilly towards him. For shame, Greg,
> for shame.
I suppose I could be harder on him, but I've hardly been entirely civil with
him, either.
Ari Asikainen
> "Ari Asikainen" <as...@iobox.fi> wrote...
>> Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
>> >> Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
>> >> >"Ari Asikainen" <as...@iobox.fi> wrote...
>> >>
>> >> >> different. Would you like to guess what it is?
>> >> >
>> >> >You'll use any excuse to try and avoid another ass-beating.
>> So, how do you figure pointing out your faults is trying to avoid an
>> "ass-beating"? I only ask because you failed to answer the previous
>> time.
>
> If you must have an answer to shut up, then the answer is no.
ARI: "How do you figure pointing out your faults is trying to
avoid an 'ass-beating'?"
GREGSTER: "No."
Are you legally retarded? I'll stop taunting you if you are.
> I don't have any desire to try and guess what's on your pea-brain.
It's a good thing no one has asked you to do such a thing, isn't it?
Now, how do you figure pointing out your faults is trying to avoid an
"ass-beating"?
>> No one has abused me in these flame groups.
>> That's partly because I mostly pick on the feeblest of flamers they
>> have to offer. If the victim wrongly thinks he can actually do
>> something, that's always a plus. All this leads directly to our
>> exchange.
>
> You finally decided to try some more difficult opponents, eh?
No. I'm talking to you, the guy who couldn't construct an effective
insult even if your life depended on it.
>> >Who gave you the idea that your opinion matters?
>>
>> I did, you drab damper. I believed myself, too, 'cause my opinion
>> matters.
>
> As usual, you're mistaken.
I'm mistaken approximately once every five years. That's why my
opinion matters.
>> By the way, aren't you even a bit ashamed of all the slobbering Rhesus
>> is lavishing on you now that you've returned to keep him company?
>
> It is sad to see him that way, isn't it?
He's been that way ever since Dennis left. He hasn't quite plumbed the
lows of sickening mutual ego-stroking with you that the delved
together with Jackie before the old boy acquired a mhm number and
died.
>> I'd be extremely embarrassed if I were you: "Hey Greg, I really kicked
>> this guy's ass, didn't I? Huh?" "Remember back in the Fido days when
>> we used to go outside and run in the rain naked? Huh? Huh?" And you,
>> the spineless sprat you are, act civilly towards him. For shame, Greg,
>> for shame.
>
> I suppose I could be harder on him,
But then you'd have no one with whom you could indulge in the famous
alt.flamenet Circle Jerk:
---
FLAMENETTER_1: Hey FLAMENETTER_2, I bet this guy's gay.
FLAMENETTER_2: Yes, FLAMENETTER_1, and he also lives with his mommy.
FLAMENETTER_3: Hey FLAMENETTER_4, I bet this guy fucks animals.
FLAMENETTER_4: Yes, FLAMENETTER_3, and he's also
unemployed. Reminds me of the folks from Chatter.
FLAMENETTER_5: He's a moron.
FLAMENETTER_1: Hey FLAMENETTER_2, I bet this guy wants to suck my dick.
FLAMENETTER_2: Yes, FLAMENETTER_1, and he also used to turn tricks
for money.
[Repeat until all but one Flamenetter have been spanked from Usenet.]
FLAMENETTER_1: Hey guys, I bet this guy used to be a woman.
....
FLAMENETTER_1: Hey guys?
---
> but I've hardly been entirely civil with him, either.
Jackie told all about how you Flamenetters got together and decided
that Rhesus was "in", and some lucky bugger was out. Spineless twits,
the lot of you.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Jesus Slut Fucker
Ari Asikainen wrote:
You're getting confused again, Ass Bandit. Haven't I told you to leave
Jack's bong alone? You matter how much you suck on it (though I suppose
it's better than the things you normally suck on) you'll never be as
intelligent as Jack.
-Jesus
--
Ari Asikainen
Oh, there you are. You dropped all our threads. Again. How do you
suppose anyone will mistake you for a big bad flaymer d00d if you keep
running away like that?
> You're getting confused again, Ass Bandit.
Was there some particular part of my previous article with which you'd
like to take issue?
> Haven't I told you to leave Jack's bong alone? You matter how much
> you suck on it (though I suppose it's better than the things you
> normally suck on) you'll never be as intelligent as Jack.
Jackie isn't here to return the favour. Stop sucking up to the dead
dimbulb already.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Nighthawk
news:slrn9vn1n...@lehtori.cc.tut.fi...
> Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
> > "Ari Asikainen" <as...@iobox.fi> wrote...
> >> Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
> >> >> Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
> >> >> >"Ari Asikainen" <as...@iobox.fi> wrote...
> >> >>
> >> >> >> The reason I repeatedly point out your faults is altogether
> >> >> >> different. Would you like to guess what it is?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >You'll use any excuse to try and avoid another ass-beating.
>
> >> So, how do you figure pointing out your faults is trying to avoid an
> >> "ass-beating"? I only ask because you failed to answer the previous
> >> time.
> >
> > If you must have an answer to shut up, then the answer is no.
>
> ARI: "How do you figure pointing out your faults is trying to
> avoid an 'ass-beating'?"
>
> GREGSTER: "No."
>
> Are you legally retarded? I'll stop taunting you if you are.
Not at all. I just can't be bothered to read most of the drivel you pound
out on your keyboard.
> > I don't have any desire to try and guess what's on your pea-brain.
>
> It's a good thing no one has asked you to do such a thing, isn't it?
Are you senile or just stupid?
Ari: The reason I repeatedly point out your faults is altogether different.
Would you like to guess what it is?
> Now, how do you figure pointing out your faults is trying to avoid an
> "ass-beating"?
Just another attempt on your part to change the subject again.
> >> No one has abused me in these flame groups.
> >> That's partly because I mostly pick on the feeblest of flamers they
> >> have to offer. If the victim wrongly thinks he can actually do
> >> something, that's always a plus. All this leads directly to our
> >> exchange.
> >
> > You finally decided to try some more difficult opponents, eh?
>
> No. I'm talking to you, the guy who couldn't construct an effective
> insult even if your life depended on it.
I'm merely here to kill some time. I certainly don't expect much
entertainment out of idiots like you.
> >> >Who gave you the idea that your opinion matters?
> >>
> >> I did, you drab damper. I believed myself, too, 'cause my opinion
> >> matters.
> >
> > As usual, you're mistaken.
>
> I'm mistaken approximately once every five years. That's why my
> opinion matters.
Five years have gone by again so quickly?
We did? When did this supposedly happen? Who was it you're babbling about?
Ari Asikainen
> "Ari Asikainen" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote...
>> Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
>> >> >> Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
>> >> >> >"Ari Asikainen" <as...@iobox.fi> wrote...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >> The reason I repeatedly point out your faults is altogether
>> >> >> >> different. Would you like to guess what it is?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >You'll use any excuse to try and avoid another ass-beating.
>> > If you must have an answer to shut up, then the answer is no.
>>
>> ARI: "How do you figure pointing out your faults is trying to
>> avoid an 'ass-beating'?"
>>
>> GREGSTER: "No."
>>
>> Are you legally retarded? I'll stop taunting you if you are.
>
> Not at all. I just can't be bothered to read most of the drivel you pound
> out on your keyboard.
You're pretty brazen in your mindboggling stupidity. Why the fuck do
you respond to posts you can't bother to read? Do you enjoy making a
complete tit out of yourself in public, or have just found out that
reading doesn't really help since you can't fully understand it
anyway?
>> > I don't have any desire to try and guess what's on your pea-brain.
>>
>> It's a good thing no one has asked you to do such a thing, isn't it?
>
> Are you senile or just stupid?
>
> Ari: The reason I repeatedly point out your faults is altogether different.
> Would you like to guess what it is?
You really shouldn't play pedant with me. It's yet another thing at
which I'm much better than you. For example, if you insist on dragging
in out-of-context quotes, the very least you should do is to make sure
they really support the point you're trying to make.
Did I ask you to guess what my reason is, or did I just ask you
whether you'd like to do it?
>> Now, how do you figure pointing out your faults is trying to avoid an
>> "ass-beating"?
>
> Just another attempt on your part to change the subject again.
The same subject has been under discussion for four response cycles,
you blinkered basil you. Now, how do you figure pointing out your
faults is trying to avoid an "ass-beating"?
>> > You finally decided to try some more difficult opponents, eh?
>>
>> No. I'm talking to you, the guy who couldn't construct an effective
>> insult even if your life depended on it.
>
> I'm merely here to kill some time. I certainly don't expect much
> entertainment out of idiots like you.
Being insulted and having no way to return fire mustn't be much fun, I
should imagine.
>> I'm mistaken approximately once every five years. That's why my
>> opinion matters.
>
> Five years have gone by again so quickly?
As usual, I wasn't mistaken.
>> > but I've hardly been entirely civil with him, either.
>>
>> Jackie told all about how you Flamenetters got together and decided
>> that Rhesus was "in", and some lucky bugger was out. Spineless twits,
>> the lot of you.
>
> We did? When did this supposedly happen? Who was it you're babbling about?
Here's me quoting Jackie talking about it:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=qscolt0stg1g7p24tqnpp4mlt5lhsko42e%40nntp.newsnet
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Nighthawk
> Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
> > "Ari Asikainen" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote...
> >> Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
> >> >> >> Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
> >> >> >> >"Ari Asikainen" <as...@iobox.fi> wrote...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> The reason I repeatedly point out your faults is altogether
> >> >> >> >> different. Would you like to guess what it is?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >You'll use any excuse to try and avoid another ass-beating.
>
> >> > If you must have an answer to shut up, then the answer is no.
> >>
> >> ARI: "How do you figure pointing out your faults is trying to
> >> avoid an 'ass-beating'?"
> >>
> >> GREGSTER: "No."
> >>
> >> Are you legally retarded? I'll stop taunting you if you are.
> >
> > Not at all. I just can't be bothered to read most of the drivel you
pound
> > out on your keyboard.
>
> You're pretty brazen in your mindboggling stupidity. Why the fuck do
> you respond to posts you can't bother to read? Do you enjoy making a
> complete tit out of yourself in public, or have just found out that
> reading doesn't really help since you can't fully understand it
> anyway?
Try rereading what I wrote, dumbass, for comprehension this time. What you
produce from your keyboard is drivel, not worth any more than a cursory
glance.
> >> > I don't have any desire to try and guess what's on your pea-brain.
> >>
> >> It's a good thing no one has asked you to do such a thing, isn't it?
> >
> > Are you senile or just stupid?
> >
> > Ari: The reason I repeatedly point out your faults is altogether
different.
> > Would you like to guess what it is?
>
> You really shouldn't play pedant with me. It's yet another thing at
> which I'm much better than you. For example, if you insist on dragging
> in out-of-context quotes, the very least you should do is to make sure
> they really support the point you're trying to make.
>
> Did I ask you to guess what my reason is, or did I just ask you
> whether you'd like to do it?
If you're going to whine about unanswered questions, make sure there's only
one such question outstanding or just STFU and accept whatever answer you
get.
Jesus Slut Fucker: Usenet Adminstrator
Nighthawk
news:3BFE8E06...@home.com...
Was that the award OI was shooting for?
Jesus Slut Fucker: Usenet Adminstrator
Ari Asikainen
> "Ari Asikainen" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote...
>> Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
>> > "Ari Asikainen" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote...
>> >> >> >> Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> The reason I repeatedly point out your faults is altogether
>> >> >> >> >> different. Would you like to guess what it is?
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >You'll use any excuse to try and avoid another ass-beating.
>> >> Are you legally retarded? I'll stop taunting you if you are.
>> >
>> > Not at all. I just can't be bothered to read most of the drivel you pound
>> > out on your keyboard.
>>
>> You're pretty brazen in your mindboggling stupidity. Why the fuck do
>> you respond to posts you can't bother to read? Do you enjoy making a
>> complete tit out of yourself in public, or have just found out that
>> reading doesn't really help since you can't fully understand it
>> anyway?
>
> Try rereading what I wrote, dumbass, for comprehension this time. What you
> produce from your keyboard is drivel, not worth any more than a cursory
> glance.
You again neglected to read what you were responding to, I can
tell.
You see, I wasn't asking why you can't bother to read most of what I
write. I know better than to take seriously the opinions of someone
who voluntarily advertises the fact that he was elected the "1999
Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year". Instead, I was wondering why the
fuck do you _respond_ to posts you can't bother to read. You must
realize that it makes you look like an utter and complete tit when you
respond to questions that can't be answered with a "yes" or a "no"
with a "no", or repeat yourself as though I hadn't understood what you
were trying to say in your own insipid, inarticulate style.
So, why the fuck do you do it?
>> You really shouldn't play pedant with me. It's yet another thing at
>> which I'm much better than you. For example, if you insist on dragging
>> in out-of-context quotes, the very least you should do is to make sure
>> they really support the point you're trying to make.
>>
>> Did I ask you to guess what my reason is, or did I just ask you
>> whether you'd like to do it?
>
> If you're going to whine about unanswered questions, make sure there's only
> one such question outstanding
When I ask you a question and you feel like answering a question, you
really should answer that particular question instead of one you
"forgot" to answer several response cycles ago. If you answer some
other question than the one just above your answer, you'd do well to
indicate that in some way - even I can't read minds.
> or just STFU and accept whatever answer you get.
Speaking of getting answers: I noticed that a rather large part of my
previous article was curiously missing from your followup. I'm sure
this was just an oversight on your part, so here's that question
again:
||>> Now, how do you figure pointing out your faults is trying to avoid an
||>> "ass-beating"?
||>
||> Just another attempt on your part to change the subject again.
||
|| The same subject has been under discussion for four response cycles,
|| you blinkered basil you. Now, how do you figure pointing out your
|| faults is trying to avoid an "ass-beating"?
Well?
Oh, and Greg... Could you stop squirming? It's unseemly. Thanks a
bunch.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Tubby Chubbs
wrote:
> ...
> ...
>When I ask you a question and you feel like answering a question, you
>really should answer that particular question instead of one you
>"forgot" to answer several response cycles ago. If you answer some
>other question than the one just above your answer, you'd do well to
>indicate that in some way - even I can't read minds.
> ...
> ...
He probably thinks you have some sort of telepathic powers like
Aquaman.
Jesus Slut Fucker: Usenet Adminstrator
Nighthawk
LOL! That's not squirming. It's laughing... at you.
--
Nighthawk
Ari Asikainen
(First the part Greg couldn't handle...)
> "Ari Asikainen" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote...
>> Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
>> > "Ari Asikainen" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote...
>> >> >> >> >> Nighthawk <Nighthawk@blow_me.com> did this:
>> >> >> >> >> >"Ari Asikainen" <as...@iobox.fi> wrote...
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> The reason I repeatedly point out your faults is altogether
>> >> >> >> >> >> different. Would you like to guess what it is?
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >You'll use any excuse to try and avoid another ass-beating.
>> >> You're pretty brazen in your mindboggling stupidity. Why the fuck do
>> >> you respond to posts you can't bother to read? Do you enjoy making a
>> >> complete tit out of yourself in public, or have just found out that
>> >> reading doesn't really help since you can't fully understand it
>> >> anyway?
>> >
>> > Try rereading what I wrote, dumbass, for comprehension this time. What you
>> > produce from your keyboard is drivel, not worth any more than a cursory
>> > glance.
>>
>> You again neglected to read what you were responding to, I can
>> tell.
>>
>> You see, I wasn't asking why you can't bother to read most of what I
>> write. I know better than to take seriously the opinions of someone
>> who voluntarily advertises the fact that he was elected the "1999
>> Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year". Instead, I was wondering why the
>> fuck do you _respond_ to posts you can't bother to read. You must
>> realize that it makes you look like an utter and complete tit when you
>> respond to questions that can't be answered with a "yes" or a "no"
>> with a "no", or repeat yourself as though I hadn't understood what you
>> were trying to say in your own insipid, inarticulate style.
>>
>> So, why the fuck do you do it?
(The boy didn't put up much of a fight when he tried to respond, to be
honest, but I'm still a bit disappointed at just how infirm he turned
out to be.)
>> >> Did I ask you to guess what my reason is, or did I just ask you
>> >> whether you'd like to do it?
>> >
>> > If you're going to whine about unanswered questions, make sure there's only
>> > one such question outstanding
>>
>> When I ask you a question and you feel like answering a question, you
>> really should answer that particular question instead of one you
>> "forgot" to answer several response cycles ago. If you answer some
>> other question than the one just above your answer, you'd do well to
>> indicate that in some way - even I can't read minds.
(He's not a flamer, and no one will ever mistake him for one. The
mystery is how - and why - do these people keep posting through
fiascos like the above. Do they actually notice what kind of bullshit
they're spewing? Doesn't it bother them in the least that they're dumb
as dirt? Answers on a postcard.)
>> > or just STFU and accept whatever answer you get.
>>
>> Speaking of getting answers: I noticed that a rather large part of my
>> previous article was curiously missing from your followup. I'm sure
>> this was just an oversight on your part, so here's that question
>> again:
>>
>> ||>> Now, how do you figure pointing out your faults is trying to avoid an
>> ||>> "ass-beating"?
>> ||>
>> ||> Just another attempt on your part to change the subject again.
>> ||
>> || The same subject has been under discussion for four response cycles,
>> || you blinkered basil you. Now, how do you figure pointing out your
>> || faults is trying to avoid an "ass-beating"?
>>
>> Well?
(Let this be a warning to you, boys and girls. If you write as poorly
as your common garden-variety Flamenetter, think as poorly as your
common garden-variety Flamenetter, and your only defense mechanism is
posting "Ouch^H^H^H^HThat didn't hurt a bit!" over and over again, you
really shouldn't wander outside. The world is a big and sometimes
dangerous place, and someone might decide embarrass you just to see
you squirm.)
>> Oh, and Greg... Could you stop squirming? It's unseemly. Thanks a
>> bunch.
(Here, finally, Greg pipes up. Apparently he has a thing about
dropping threads. Your humble narrator can't think up any other reason
for him to post the insipid one-liner below after ignoring about 90
lines of flames directed at him.)
(You have to be really quiet, or your noise will drown out his weak
squeaks.)
> LOL! That's not squirming. It's laughing... at you.
You better be someone else trolling as "Greg". No one is this feeble,
not even the nondescript Flamenetter who posted as Nighthawk last
winter before he got spanked.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Nighthawk
So, you're only not disappointed when you get a *firm* response, ball
jiggler?
Still trying to claim a spank, loser?
--
Nighthawk
Ari Asikainen
>> (The boy didn't put up much of a fight when he tried to respond, to be
>> honest, but I'm still a bit disappointed at just how infirm he turned
>> out to be.)
>
> So, you're only not disappointed when you get a *firm* response, ball
> jiggler?
Don't ever take up a profession where you must use logic, Gregster.
> Still trying to claim a spank, loser?
It's only a matter of time.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>