Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

call to arms

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Victor Metelitsa

unread,
Mar 10, 2006, 7:10:15 AM3/10/06
to

Marten Feldtmann:

Andre Schnoor schrieb:

>
> Anyway, Smalltalk still has to get some homework done (e.g. better
deployment tools).


Yes, indeed ! Windows is the most important market for all
vendors (even for VW, VA ) - then do whatever you can do to
support this market very well:

- native widgets
- access to active X controls
- interop with .NET
- build community
- reporting framework
- relational mapping framework
- threading support
- offer suppor for famous tools like Word, Excel,
OpenOffice, Mozilla, IE etc ....
- very fast building GUI interface
- support for all that silly, unserious stuff - which the
end user likes so much: wheel mouse, schema support ...

then perhaps improve the other stuff:

- integrated development for NLS oriented applications
- installation support
- integrated SUnit, Refactoring Browser and statistic
and documentation tools.
- offer the users a special way for often used programming
tasks (sql query, view sql results in tables)

and new ideas:

- interface support

and noone will have any success without:

- create a community

Because no Smalltalk vendor is able to offer solutions for
all of these points above - the rest is done by the
community. But the community is a most critical one - no
member of a free community will pay EUR 1500 each year
just to give the own tools away.

And select other platforms and offer the same stuff there
and when I look at the market, there are only two other
potential client platforms: Apple and Linux.

Smalltalkers are said to have a high productivity - but they
get lost of this productivity because every Smalltalker has to
invent the most simpliest tools again and again.

For the VA friends of us: I used VA for 4 years without ever
doing a serious look into the ABT-Builder stuff and the ideas
they have. I always used WindowBuilder.

Now I'm doing a slightly switch back to the Abt Builder stuff
and I learned, that it is by far the most effective way of
building a GUI interface. It's a suitable place for
third party market (which existed a decade ago). (I know of
the new graphical way of builing unreadable graphical code
this way - but it's a good way to get GUI in a VERY fast
way).

The ABT-Builder forces one to build reusable tools, because
it supports GUI, logic and interface specification.


Marten


--
Marten Feldtmann - Germany - Software Development
Information regarding VA Smalltalk and DMS-system
"MSK - Mien Schrievkrom" at: www.schrievkrom.de

Отправлено через сервер Форумы@mail.ru - http://talk.mail.ru

0 new messages