Hi everyone,
Let me introduce myself:
My name is Marcel and I work for the biggest contractor in the
Netherlands in installing Fiber to the Home networks.
In the Netherlands point to point is the most common way to deploy
FttH networks. I believe Google has the same strategy instead of PON
networks with optical splitters?
A little more than 1 year ago a Canadian company introduced micro
trenching here in the Netherlands.
For the Dutch situation this is not an option: our pavements exists of
tiles laying loose on soil. It is very easy (and thus cheaper) to lift
these tiles (mostly 30x30cm) and just dig a trench of about 60cm deep
and lay the cables. Asphalt road ways are of course crossed with
horizontal directional drillings, same as canals and railways.
The problem I believe with micro trensching in asphalt is making the
branches to the homes? Approx. every 10 meters a cable (the drop
cable) has to branch of the main route (feeder route) towards the
homes (if the homes are about 10 meters apart). How could this be done
if the main route is under the asphalt? Break the asphalt surface
every ten meters is not an option I would say.
FttH deployment in the Netherlands started about 5 years ago. At the
moment about 600.000 homes are duct passed as we call it and about
450.000 homes are fiber connect (ie. a FTU is installed in the home).
Our company installed about 25% of the fiber connect houses in the
Netherlands.
For an overview of the Dutch situation on FttH see also [url]http://
www.stratix.com/ftth/ftth_2010.php[/url]
I am very curious about Google's strategy and vision on deploying the
FttH networks in the US.
Is Google already partnering with hardware companies?
Please let me know if anyone is interested in the Dutch network
architecture of FttH networks and I will try to post some photo's/
pictures and try to see if I have a video somewhere.
Marcel Nienhuis
VolkerWessels Telecom | FttH
> > > > Google Fiber- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -