The changes to the 1-to-n, as well as to the 1-to-1, appear as changes
in the corresponding slots in each of the classes in the relation.
But the same is true for the n-to-m relations and yet I've created the
TxIntrospector.getRelationsChangelog() method because it is easier to
look into this than into each of the supporting collections.
So, I guess that it makes sense to have also the 1-to-n relations in the
result of the getRelationsChangelog() method. But also the 1-to-1, right?
--
João Cachopo
> Yes, it would make sense to have all the changes to the role slots
> available on the RelationsChangeLog.
The latest version (just committed) already does this.
--
João Cachopo