LIABILITY BY LOCALITY: PRACTICAL STANDARD OR OUTDATED NOTION?
Some say an old rule for deciding negligence by local, versus national, care standards protects rural medicine. Others say it invites risks.
By Amy Lynn Sorrel, amednews staff .
As efforts to reform the medical liability system plow forward, some jurisdictions still adhere to a long-standing rule for judging the standard of care in malpractice cases. Whether in case law or in legislation, about 20 states maintain some version of the so-called locality rule, under which physician liability may be measured based on local practice customs instead of a national standard of care, according to a 2007 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association. The locality could be the physician's community, one similar to it, or the entire state. [...]
Read the entire article in American Medical News:
www.amednews.com/2010/prsa0118
SENDER'S COMMENT: Locality Rule developments and considerations FYI
Sent by: Louise Andrew
Neil
Gary Helmbrecht, M.D.
Neil
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Fellowship for Accurate Courtroom Testimony (FACT)" group.
To post to this group, send email to
fellowship-for-accura...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
fellowship-for-accurate-cou...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fellowship-for-accurate-courtroom-testimony?h
l=en.