[felix] #10: review commenting style

felix

unread,

May 12, 2007, 1:40:33 AM5/12/07

to felix-...@googlegroups.com

#10: review commenting style
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: erickt | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: syntax | Version:
Keywords: |
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
We have a couple literate programming keywords that are not really used at
the moment: `comment`, `todo`, and `publish`. Should we keep them, or
remove them to free up the words for identifiers?

from skaller:

> Originally i wanted to give Felix some builtin Literate Programming
> features -- I still do. But it is harder than I thought.

> We should treat the LP as a DSSL.
> At the moment `publish` is a user defined statement ..
> However user syntax isn't strong enough to support, for example,
> annotation of function parameters. Even doxygen can do that.

--
Ticket URL: <http://code.felix-lang.org/ticket/10>
felix <http://code.felix-lang.org>
The advanced scripting language

felix

unread,

May 12, 2007, 1:50:15 AM5/12/07

to felix-...@googlegroups.com

#10: review commenting style
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: erickt | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: closed

Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: syntax | Version:

Resolution: duplicate | Keywords:
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Changes (by erickt):

* status: new => closed
* resolution: => duplicate

Comment:

duplicate of #7.

--
Ticket URL: <http://code.felix-lang.org/ticket/10#comment:1>