Re: Point Layout 2018 Keygen
Magali Swinderman
Autodesk Point Layout is used to bring precision and accuracy to construction field survey and layout workflows leveraging BIM and CAD data. By using Point Layout, contractors can better pinpoint project coordinates and layout measurements, capture as-built conditions, and move data between the field and office to save time, reduce errors, and improve communication.
Contractors and sub-contractors surveying and reviewing existing conditions, as-built conditions, and project layout for buildings and infrastructure use Point Layout to improve accuracy on the jobsite.
Autodesk Point Layout is used to bring precision and accuracy to construction field survey and layout workflows leveraging BIM and CAD data. By using Point Layout, contractors can better pinpoint project coordinates and layout measurements, capture as-built conditions, and move data between the field and office to save time, reduce errors, and improve communication.\r\n"}]},"@type":"Question","name":"Who uses Point Layout?","acceptedAnswer":["@type":"Answer","text":"Contractors and sub-contractors surveying and reviewing existing conditions, as-built conditions, and project layout for buildings and infrastructure use Point Layout to improve accuracy on the jobsite.\r\n"],"@type":"Question","name":"Which versions of Point Layout can I use if I subscribe to the current version? ","acceptedAnswer":["@type":"Answer","text":"Your Point Layout subscription gives you access to install and use the 3 previous versions. Available downloads are listed in your Autodesk Account after subscribing. See also previous releases available for subscribers.\r\n"],"@type":"Question","name":"Can I install Point Layout on multiple computers?","acceptedAnswer":["@type":"Answer","text":"With a subscription to Point Layout software, you can install it on up to 3 computers or other devices. However, only the named user can sign in and use that software on a single computer at any given time. Please refer to the Software License Agreement. \r\n"],"@type":"Question","name":"How do I convert my Point Layout free trial to a paid subscription?","acceptedAnswer":["@type":"Answer","text":"Launch your trial software and click Subscribe Now on the trial screen or buy Point Layout here. When buying your subscription, enter the same email address and password combination you used to sign in to your trial. Learn more about converting a trial to a paid subscription.\r\n"]],"@type":"FAQPage","@context":" "} Autodesk Company overview Careers Investor relations Autodesk Trust Center Newsroom Diversity and belonging
Neither is "better", they serve different purposes. Continuous running is better for display or if you are modeling the middle of a route and need to "recycle" trains to simulate traffic. You operate it like it is point to pont but its actually continuous running. On virtually every layout I've ever built I have created a connection someplace that allowed a portion of of the layout to be run continuous while the "normal" operation is point to point.
A point to point layout isn't for everybody.You see you would have to follow signal indications and may have to wait on 2 or more trains in a passing siding and many don't want to be bothered with such details and would rather relax by watching a train run endless loops which of course is all well and good.
I was a member of a club that was point to point and every inbound train had to be reclassified into different trains..Passenger trains had to be switch and observations turned.A intermodal train had to be switched from inbound to outbound or placed on a storage track if the outbound track was already occupied.
My first layout built in a garage (16x19') was a hollow L with 30-inch curves, yard, single track mainline, 18' passing siding and tear drop reverse loops at each end with two extra staging tracks in the tear drops. I could continuous run or stage.
My second layout was a 14x25' dogbone with 32-inch minimum radius and continuous loop. The single track mainline had a decent sized yard, 18' passing track and then ran underneath the yard for a hidden 10 track staging yard with tracks ranging from 18-24' in length. I could continuous run if I wanted, or stage trains to be run across the layout.
My layouts have always had a continuous run, and all have all had a yard, various sidings, a loco terminal, and recent ones have had staging tracks. I enjoy watching the trains go "in circles", and often have them plodding around while I'm switching industrial sidings and making/breaking up trains. As I enjoy mainline (ATSF / IC) railroading, my 11x15 room just won't allow a realistic point to point layout in HO scale.
For me to have a point to point layout, I feel that I would need a lot of space to make it "real". If I had I had a 20x20 room and modeled N scale, I could weave a RR up and down the room a few times and really feel like I was going somewhere, and transporting goods.
It's the smaller layouts where you really are making either or decisions. And then it really comes down to what you are trying to do. For example, mainline operations in a bedroom probably need a continuous run. An industrial park layout probably works well with point to point. And so forth.
All my layouts so far have been continuous run, because they were all too small for point to point, at least for me. My next one will be a basement size layout and I'm planning point to point, but I can easily add a continuous run connection later if I want one.
I have a pretty good size layout and it is a continuous loop with a freight yard, passenger car yard, a large city passenger station, a country train station, an engine servicing facility with a turntable and several industrial sidings. So, although some trains may be "running in circles" while I am working the yards and stations, sidings,etc., eventually, even the trains on the continuous loop arrive at their destination, be it a station, a yard, a siding, or the engine servicing facility. I like the responses from dhusman and riogrande who see no reason not to have both.
Having the option of continuous-run along with point-to-point operation is often easily acheived. This is also a huge benefit when a major part of your traffic is open-top loads (as yours will be, based on the other thread). A continuous-running connection (often in staging) can allow through traffic such as loaded and empty coal trains to circulate in the proper directions, for example.
My current 15 X 25 layout is point to point as was its prototype, it diverged from the SP and wondered off into the foothills for 29 miles. Now I have 80 X 40 to work with, no earth shattering revisions to the current theme with the exception of a continous loop with stagging to represent a section of the Coast Route and the inclusion of the modest yard that once existed in Oxnard Ca.
Operations will remain point-to point with the loop used to cycle traffic between the two end points. Technically, I could operate such a loop under the guise of a second carrier, there were serveral independent shortline operators in the area that would fit the bill and all interchange among themselfs and the SP. During the height of packing season 50 plus reefers a day were common outbound traffic on this branch, feeder lines in the immediate area with a similar purpose contributed hundreds more.
CR&T's N Scale layout planning is a multi-level layout with a connecting 3-track helix => and includes two railroads => 'an ancient' time-honored tradition surrounding a shorter-radius traction layout with a Class I railroad.
So, we can have a PRR continuous run, in fact two of them, one freight & one passenger, while CR&T is freight point-to-pointing, and/or PCC-running, which is a snapshot of the prototype where the PRR represents the busy-feeling of that larger world beyond your local world.
It seems to me a short line or industrial railroad would do well on a point-to-point layout. I think that has been well understood by most of us, if not found particularly appealing for one reason or another. Obviously, for a very constrained space, a switching layout is almost sure to be 'it'. And that applies to any scale if the availabel space is sufficiently small.
As has been mentioned, sometimes you just want to walk around your layout lining all the key turnouts for continuous run in my case, at least, they are all manually switched, and then let the Limited or Local accelerate out from the station and out onto the main for a few minutes of gee-whiz with all the flying valve gear and sounds.
But, it seems to me that pure modelling, with all the key elements between points A and B depicted, would not be done in a loop unless that was the only way to get the length. You would need a looooooon bench around several walls, or else lots of whorls and helices, or peninsulas, to get the distance to some semblance of acceptable compression.
What it boils down to for me is that if I could only have 20-30 square feet, it would be a simple short line and a point-to-point. Certainly in HO, anyway. Once you find you can have use of 100 square feet of total layout footprint, including standing room, you begin to think in terms of loops if you don't want to turn passenger trains. Or, so I look at it.
In a word - Both. I like to have a continuous run connection for showing off (non railroad people don;t care one whit that real railroads only move cars for a reason, and they don't care how slow you can make your switcher creep) and for atmosphere while I'm working on something else. Any continuous loop layout can be operated as point to point - use the extra part of the loop as staging, or don't run past a certain town/station at each end. The opposite is not true. On my new layout the continuous run connection is back in an alcove in the room which doesn't really accommodate an operator, and the only scenicing will probably be just painting the pink foam an earth brown color.
aa06259810