Timo I think is still on holidays as he hasn't responded as yet, so are there any others out there that know how to troubleshoot EVAC input code . In the combined model Fire and Evac, the fire part is working like clockwork, but unfortunately the evacuating agents were not doing as I had expected. So I isolated out the EVAC input code to see what was causing the strange evacuation behaviour. I have attached my latest version of that portion of the input code. I did tweak the evac model further and at one stage, I did have it running on its own but again still not doing what I expected it to do. With further tweaks I have now broken it completely. The trouble is I do not know what this error is referring to, as there are no vents in the model, unless vents = doors but all doors have the correct IOR from what I can see.
Could you please help me – I think I am so close to resolving this issue, but have spent too many hours trying to troubleshoot this problem. The strange thing is that I have never had much problem with setting up fire models but the fds evac module, although a powerful addition to fds are in my opinion so finicky to get right. I think I probably too close to the problem to spot why this logjam is occurring.
What I am trying to model is an evacuation
scenario that has a common escape corridor that goes to
stairs at one end of that corridor then exits out to an escape corridor on
ground level, were the occupants walk to escape outside the building. These agents should exit
their rooms and then move to the stair at the end of the corridor and then down
the stair and then out through the escape corridor at ground level. At one stage I was also getting agent oscillations in the corridor. This phenomena seems to have settled down so I think it is something to do with the way I set up the stair portion of the model but from what I see all stair doors do have IOR in the correct orientation. So unfortunately the problem may be somewhere else?
Kind regards, Mark
Hi Timo;
Thank you so much you are my life saver. I suspected something was amiss as I did hear some rumour that EVAC may be coming to an end which if true is very sad for the Fire Safety Engineering community. As soon as I have some cash I don’t mind paying something for your time because you have been so go to me. Just let me know how I can do this and if it is appropriate. I don’t want to jeopardise your employment in any way.
Kind regards, Mark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "FDS and Smokeview Discussions" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/fds-smv/xFTpm8E8jL8/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to fds-smv+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to fds...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fds-smv/69e6cbbb-a672-4309-a682-f10a8b1e14fc%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Hi Timo;
Thank you for your response to my questions but I did clear up these obstructions by adding holes. I also then simplified the problem as recommended. Now, however, I am only going from the 3 rd floor to the second floor doors and out the new exit on that level which you recently added. As you see FDS still generates the error I described previously. So in fact I have narrowed down the problem. My hunch is that it relates to traversing from one mesh to the other. In my case 'EMesh_3' to 'EMesh_2'. When I remove stair doors on 'EMesh_2' all works so the room doors on level 3 are all OK in my view. The stair door definitions are these:
&DOOR ID='Door_out_2', IOR=+1,
EXIT_SIGN=.TRUE.,
TO_NODE= 'EMesh_2'
XYZ= -0.2, 3.60, 4.6,
XB=0.0, 0.0, 2.5,4.8, 4.5, 7.5, /
&DOOR ID='Door_in_2', IOR=-1,
EXIT_SIGN=.FALSE.,
TO_NODE= 'Door_out_3'
XYZ= 0.2, 3.60, 4.6,
XB=0.1, 0.1, 2.5,4.8, 4.5, 7.5, /
So as you can see the IOR is Ok and they are not imbedded in obstructions and the TO_NODE definitions appear OK. See my latest version which is attached. So why is it not working?
Kind regards, Mark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "FDS and Smokeview Discussions" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/fds-smv/xFTpm8E8jL8/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to fds-smv+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to fds...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fds-smv/c0aa55e6-1445-4942-a19a-711413e3fe85%40googlegroups.com.