We have extensively used WFDS in our recent studies. It is computationally much less expensive than FDS and we have well-established validation cases with proper convergence studies.
However, FDS has many more features such as &GEOM, VLES & SVLES turbulence model, MOST etc. Moreover, for grassfires, it does not rely on a “maximum MLR”. Therefore, we are currently trialing FDS. If we find that, the computational cost is prohibitive, we will keep using WFDS.
From: fds...@googlegroups.com <fds...@googlegroups.com>
On Behalf Of Ankit Patil
Sent: Tuesday, 11 April 2023 11:18 PM
To: FDS and Smokeview Discussions <fds...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [fds-smv] FDS over WFDS
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please be cautious before clicking on any links or downloading attachments.
What are the main advantages of FDS over WFDS in case of fire spread over vegetation? Which one is better nowadays? Can anyone tell me with reference?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FDS and Smokeview Discussions" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
fds-smv+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fds-smv/8c69e8f3-2582-4f2a-851e-9f11a473de8dn%40googlegroups.com.
Sure sir,Is it possible to get values of HRR of flank fire and head fire in FDS? Like I have attached fds file about C064 expt of grassland fire
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fds-smv/0d6146c2-bbc9-4389-9277-49382549b83cn%40googlegroups.com.