Hi Pradeep,
Whilst not an expert in this field I have a couple of suggestions.
The wind velocity outside it affected by boundary conditions and so
need to be specified appropriately to ensure you get a reasonable
profile. The atmospbheric profile can be utilised here. This is
similar to internal forced flows, the boundary effects of obstructions
need to develop otherwise the flow regime is incorrect.
There is more information in the thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/fds-smv/browse_thread/thread/b5819297fdf6040a#
In addition when specifying the external flow you will need to delay
the start of the fire. If you use a boundary condition in the model
the true flow regime through your tankfarm will not have time to
develop. The fire may act as a 'choke' and affect the ability of the
wind regime to develop. Running the wind regime to develop first,
either in the simulation or through an 'INIT' file will give better
results. I have seen particularly urban canyon simulations alter
massively with and without initial wind flow regimes.
In terms of making the fire spread from one tank to the other you must
first determine the mode of fire spread in reality and then determine
if FDS can simulate those. If the diesel is in fully enclosed tanks
what is your mechanism for fire spread? Some sort of tank failure?
Remember the model has limitations and so you must fundamentally
understand whether what you are trying to simulate is feasible.
> DIESEL_TANK_FIRE.fds
> 2468KViewDownload