FDS and Smokeview Discussions

This thread is now here

This discussion is continued here

We have released a new version of FDS, 6.9.0, and with that we are sun-setting this discussion forum.

Please just use the GitHub thread. Thanks On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 8:11 AM Muneeb Khalid <khalid.

Well, I lied. Google gets a stay. We ended up with a couple more issues to sort out today. So,

There is only one set of validation experiments in the FDS Validation Guide that invoke E_COEFFICIENT

There appears to be a problem where the merging of pressure zones is not working right. This might

Only those feature specifically noted as beta features are in beta testing (GEOM, 3D heat transfer,

Setting a small drag coefficent will decouple particles from the gas flow, but in that case not sure

I think your easy options are: 1) Use the worst case time for all heads. The fire code limits

Probably because the device is near a corner of the obstruction and FDS cannot determine where to

To Ed's point, if it were me, I would do a very simple test case with PENTANE (C5) as my fuel to

Thank you! Yes the SOOT_YIELD was defined as 0.008 Dne pondělí 18. března 2024 v 21:40:52 UTC+1

See Dr Floyd's early comment. FED thermal at the point of maximum received radiation flux (in the

There is a parameter called MINIMUM_LAYER_THICKNESS on the SURF line that defines the thickness of

Create a very simple test case where the only difference is the size of the compartment. Remove all

Also you probably want to build the non-debug version and run that. Debug is useful for finding bugs

Hi Jason Floyd and Kevin McGrattan, Thank you for your responses. Yes to Jason Floyd, and I saw the

This might have to do with your specific operating system. FDS outputs computed information into a

Thank you ! I modified the values and I took the enthalpy of formation of Dodecane. Le jeudi 14 mars

Hello, has anyone worked on computer simulation of fire in solar panels? Or involving these materials

Your input file has only one MESH, but you are trying to run the job using two MPI processes. I am

yes, i understood my mistake now. Although, to be clear, only 6 fans activate, remaining 6 do not

thank you. On Tuesday, March 12, 2024 at 8:31:25 PM UTC Kevin McGrattan wrote: SPECIFIC_HEAT_RAMP

Thank you ! Its clearer to me now. Le mardi 12 mars 2024 à 16:12:18 UTC+1, Kevin McGrattan a écrit :

This is from the Intel guide. Try the second suggested Troubleshooting method, for example mpiexec ..

The shape of the heat release curve also does not seem correct for a sofa. I would expect a curve

Have you looked at the User's Guide section on Tunnels? If you are already following the advice

Latest source? I think we have fixed issues with transport across mesh boundaries recently.

Thank you sir. I really appreciate your advice! fde <yilmaz....@gmail.com> 于2024年3月8日周五 20: