Saikat Ghosh
--
Join FCI Officers on Google+
For various reasons, there was no recruitment in FCI for nearly two decades. Then, faced with the prospect of large scale retirement the management suddenly woke up and started recruitment in the last decade. As a result, we are now facing a situation where there is bunching of people of nearly similar age group at various levels. This naturally would lead to a situation where people would stagnate for years at their entry level posts or after getting one promotion. While the ACP scheme, once approved, is expected to provide some benefit to such persons, it would not satisfy the aspirations of those who believe that their qualities can be more effectively utilised. At the same time they would get further frustrated as external candidates are recruited under DR quota.
Keeping this mind, during the last General Meeting of the Association at Hqrs I had proposed the house to consider the need for recruitment through departmental exams in FCI. The house also agreed to the proposal. However, unfortunately we have so far not been able to crystallise our proposal to the management.
I am trying to get the details of the process and schemes of departmental exams followed by other organisations so that we can built up a strong case. However I admit that the progress in this regard has been quite slow far.
I am therefore requesting for help from all officers to find whatever material possible in respect of other PSUs and banks and forward the same so that we can speed up the process and make a clear and powerful demand to the management as quickly as possible.
Saikat Ghosh
--
Join FCI Officers on Google+
Follow Rediff Deal ho jaye! to get exciting offers in your city everyday. |
i agree with the views of Mishra sir, If DR quota is abolished at AGM,DGM & GM levels, the promotional avenues can be enhanced substantially. this would help cat. III as well as cat. II employees.
----- Original Message -----
From: prince verma <prince...@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 8:52 pm
Subject: Re: need for departmental exam in FCI
To: fciofficers...@googlegroups.com
I.. INDIAN RAILWAY ESTABLISHMENT CODE
VOL. I (FIFTH EDITION - 1985, SECOND REPRINT EDITION - 2003)
Chapter 2, General conditions of Service.
Recruitment, Training and Promotion to Group 'A' & Group 'B' Posts.
it provides for demartmental examination in various services. Presently the quata has been increased from 25% to 30.
II. . The Orissa department of Agriculture and Cooperation provides as follows: II. RECRUITMENT TO THE SERVICE
5. Methods of recruitment –
1. Recruitment to the Service shall be made by the following methods namely :
a) direct recruitment in accordance with rules 6 to 11; and
b) promotion from the cadre of the Agriculture Overseers, Horticulture Overseersand Soil Conservation Assistants in accordance with rules 15 to 17.
c) Appointment of departmental candidates completing successfully B. Sc. (Ag.)course on being sponsored by the Government in accordance with rules 15 to17.
III. The Government has changed the mode of recruitment of Section Oficers?s (SO) Grade of Central Secretariat Service (CSS) from Direct recruitment to the Departmental recruitment.
Refer to the order .No.21/39/03-CS.I
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, P.G. and Pensions
( Department of Personnel & Training )
Please help for the common cause.
DineshTripathi
AGM(Procurement)
Sir,
Last few days we have a very active discussion on 'NEED FOR DEPARTMENTAL EXAM' in FCI. However, I must say that the we are discussing on a dead cause since the damage has already been done in an irreparable manner after the induction of current batch of Cat-I officers blocking all the posts which could have been made available for the 'PROPOSED DEPARTMENTAL EXAM'. In fact the same could have been averted well within time if the Officers Association would have shown a little pragmatism in its approach in dealing such an important and far reaching issue.
The matter was brought to the notice of the Officers Association as early as May 2009 (at least two and half years back) in this very forum (see appended email). However the issue was nipped in the bud and we were told that “The direct recruitment in FCI may actually be a blessing for many” and “it gave the opportunity of a fast track promotion to many” at that time. Co-incidentally the same logic has been put forth by the FCI Management in retaining DR quota.
The points raised by Swarup are definitely relevant. However, there are always two sides to any story.
1. Absence of singular entry level post: It has become a standard policy of all major PSU to fill up most of the direct recruitment in the officer cadre only in Management trainee level. In FCI As per staff regulation, direct recruitment is made in the AGM and DGM post @33.33% of the total post. Keeping view of the meager amount of posts, in ED, GM or DGM level, there is heavy blockage in all along the managerial ladder due to the higher career span of direct recruits in these posts.
The direct recruitment in FCI may actually be a blessing for many. In the present Direct Recruitment process, 100% of DGM(G) & DGM(L) selected were from existing AGMs. Similarly, about 50% of the AGM(G) & AGM(A/cs) are from existing Managers. So effectively it gave the opportunity of a fast track promotion to many. The FCI employees are second to none. Given the right opportunity, they can compete with any external candidates and come out on top.The FCI OA has demanded upgradation of the Manager post to E2 level, with similar adjustment at higer levels. In case that is accepted (presently with the Ministry) then there would be only two gaps at E6 (between DGM & GM) and E3 (between Mgr & AGM). There is already a non-standard scale intermediate post between Mgr & AGM which is operated for Medical Officers & Selection Grade Managers which can be fitted to the standard scale of E3. That would leave only a gap at E6 level which can be taken up with the management. The proposed updradation also fits into the above concept of Lower Management (Mgr & Medical Officer/Sl. Gr. Mgr), Middle Management (AGM & DGM plus may be another post at E6) and Higher Management (GM, CGM & ED).
2. Absence of all scales recommended for A category PSUs i.e. E0 to E9: More scales means more promotional avenues. It is seen that most of the Leading PSUs are having 10 executive level scales from E0 to E9, some of them was having even more by creating sub-scales, such as E2/A and so on. Compare this with FCI and you will get the root cause of Stagnation.
3. Absence of well defined lower, middle and higher management posts/scales: In PSUs, Generally the three tier of management is well defined and each tier is having at least 3 posts/scales. Ideally, scales should be distributed as
i. Lower Management:-E0 to E3
ii Middle Management:-E4 to E6
iii Higher Management:-E7 to E9
4. Screwed and disproportionate ratio of posts within the managerial ladder: In FCI Category II post is having a ratio of approximately 10:1. against entire band of Category I. The top of the pyramid is too sharp to allow any time bound promotion.The FCI management has already sent a proposal of increasing the higher level posts for approval of the Ministry. However, the final decision, as usual rests with the Ministry.
5. Abolition of higher management post through VRS.The deputation below ED level is only in General Cadre posts and always against Direct Recruit vacancies. That is because while Direct Recruitment in other Cadres take place at all levels, DR in higher posts of General Cadre are never proposed. Possibly because the persons proposing the DR also belong to the General Cadre and are of the belief that in case a DR vacancy is filled up by regular appointment, they would loose that many seniority permanently and if DR posts remain vacant they may get Ad-hoc promotion. What is overlooked in the process is that in case DR for GM(G) is undertaken, some of the existing FCI employees would have a chance for selection also. The persons coming on Deputation utilise this loophole and come in through "Recruitment on Deputation" basis. It is time that a demand is raised to at least regulate such "Recruitment" as per the standard transparent process followed by other organisations i.e. through advertisement, interview etc.
6. Widespread deputation in higher management posts.FCI does not have any system of "temporary" appointment. Ad-hoc promotions are made against Vacant DR posts. Deployment are made against vacant DR posts or when PR posts remain vacant due to absence of requisite number of eligible candidates in the lower posts.
7. Culture of appointment in ad-hoc, deployment and temporary basis at higher posts keeping post without regular appointment/promotion for years.
8. I think there should be a drastic change in the HR policy in FCI. I appeal to FCIOA to persue for this change. The need of the hour is to introduce newer scales which is presently absent in FCI. There should also be a policy for awarding of scales in time bound manner, even if the post is not vacant. Thus, even if a person is not getting promotional post, he should be entitled to the scale in a time bound manner.
The present situation has arisen due to the fact that for almost three decades, FCI did not follow any policy of regular recruitment in small batches. As a result, when recruitment at major scale were started some 10 years back people of almost similar age group got selected at different levels and naturally there is bound to be stagnation. A pragmatic approach perhaps would be to follow the system of banks who have a system of filling up direct recruitment vacancies at higher levels through departmental examinations. So deserving candidates get fast track promotion while the others also get promotion as per seniority and vacancy position.
Saikat Ghosh
Saikat Ghosh
Sir,
�
�
Last few days we have a very active discussion on 'NEED FOR DEPARTMENTAL EXAM' in FCI. However, I must say that the we are discussing on a dead cause since the damage has already been done in an irreparable manner after the induction of current batch of Cat-I officers blocking all the posts which could have been made available for the 'PROPOSED DEPARTMENTAL EXAM'. In fact the same could have been averted well within time if the Officers Association�would have�shown a little pragmatism in its approach in dealing such an important and far reaching issue.
��������� The matter was brought to the notice of the Officers Association as early as May 2009 (at least two and half years back) in this very forum (see appended email). However the issue was nipped in the bud and we were told that �The direct recruitment in FCI may actually be a blessing for many� and �it gave the opportunity of a fast track promotion to many� at that time. Co-incidentally the same logic has been put forth by the FCI Management in retaining DR quota.
�
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:17 PM, saikat ghosh <saikatg...@gmail.com> wrote:
The points raised by Swarup are definitely relevant. However, there are always two sides to any story.
1. Absence of singular entry level post: It has become a standard policy of all major PSU to fill up most of the direct recruitment in the officer cadre only in Management trainee level. �In FCI As per staff regulation, direct recruitment is made in the AGM and DGM post @33.33% of the total post. Keeping view of the meager amount of posts, in ED, GM or DGM level, there is heavy blockage in all along the managerial ladder due to the higher career span of direct recruits in these posts.
The direct recruitment in FCI may actually be a blessing for many. In the present Direct Recruitment process, 100% of DGM(G) & DGM(L) selected were from existing AGMs. Similarly, about 50% of the AGM(G) & AGM(A/cs) are from existing Managers. So effectively it gave the opportunity of a fast track promotion to many. The FCI employees are second to none. Given the right opportunity, they can compete with any external candidates and come out on top.
2. Absence of all scales recommended for A category PSUs i.e. E0 to E9: More scales means more promotional avenues. It is seen that most of the Leading PSUs are having 10 executive level scales from E0 to E9, some of �them was having even more by creating sub-scales, such as E2/A and so on. Compare this with FCI and you will get the root cause of Stagnation.
3. Absence of well defined lower, middle and higher management posts/scales: In PSUs, Generally the three tier of management is well defined and each tier is having at least 3 posts/scales. Ideally, scales should be distributed as
i. Lower Management:-E0 to E3
ii Middle Management:-E4 to E6
iii Higher Management:-E7 to E9
The FCI OA has demanded upgradation of the Manager post to E2 level, with similar adjustment at higer levels. In case that is accepted (presently with the Ministry) then there would be only two gaps at E6 (between DGM & GM) and E3 (between Mgr & AGM). There is already a non-standard scale intermediate post between Mgr & AGM which is operated for Medical Officers & Selection Grade Managers which can be fitted to the standard scale of E3. That would leave only a gap at E6 level which can be taken up with the management. The proposed updradation also fits into the above concept of Lower Management (Mgr & Medical Officer/Sl. Gr. Mgr), Middle Management (AGM & DGM plus may be another post at E6) and Higher Management (GM, CGM & ED).
4. Screwed and disproportionate ratio of posts within the managerial ladder: In FCI Category II post is having a ratio of approximately 10:1. against entire band of Category I. The top of the pyramid is too sharp to allow any time bound promotion.The FCI management has already sent a proposal of increasing the higher level posts for approval of the Ministry. However, the final decision, as usual rests with the Ministry.
5. Abolition of higher management post through VRS.
The deputation below ED level is only in General Cadre posts and always against Direct Recruit vacancies. That is because while Direct Recruitment in other Cadres take place at all levels, DR in higher posts of General Cadre are never proposed. Possibly because the persons proposing the DR also belong to the General Cadre and are of the belief that in case a DR vacancy is filled up by regular appointment, they would loose that many seniority permanently and if DR posts remain vacant they may get Ad-hoc promotion. What is overlooked in the process is that in case DR for GM(G) is undertaken, some of the existing FCI employees would have a chance for selection also. The persons coming on Deputation utilise this loophole and come in through "Recruitment on Deputation" basis. It is time that a demand is raised to at least regulate such "Recruitment" as per the standard transparent process followed by other organisations i.e. through advertisement, interview etc.
6. Widespread deputation in higher management posts.
7. Culture of appointment in ad-hoc, deployment and temporary basis at higher posts keeping post without regular appointment/promotion for years.
FCI does not have any system of "temporary" appointment. Ad-hoc promotions are made against Vacant DR posts. Deployment are made against vacant DR posts or when PR posts remain vacant due to absence of requisite number of eligible candidates in the lower posts.
8. I think there should be a drastic change in the HR policy �in FCI. I appeal to FCIOA to persue for this change. The need of the hour is to introduce newer scales which is presently absent in FCI. There should also be a policy for awarding of scales in time bound manner, even if the post is not vacant. Thus, even if a person is not getting promotional post, he should be entitled to �the scale in a time bound manner.
The present situation has arisen due to the fact that for almost three decades, FCI did not follow any policy of regular recruitment in small batches. As a result, when recruitment at major scale were started some 10 years back people of almost similar age group got selected at different levels and naturally there is bound to be stagnation. A pragmatic approach perhaps would be to follow the system of banks who have a system of filling up direct recruitment vacancies at higher levels through departmental examinations. So deserving candidates get fast track promotion while the others also get promotion as per seniority and vacancy position.
Saikat Ghosh
Saikat Ghosh