Comparison with LZO

243 views
Skip to first unread message

Nitin Gupta

unread,
Dec 18, 2007, 1:18:34 AM12/18/07
to fastlz
Hi,

I have been using LZO compression for Compressed Caching project
(http://linuxcompressed.sourceforge.net/) for quite some time now. LZO
compression is very fast and decompression is lightening!

I could not find any data on your site comparing fastLZ with LZO. If
you have collected this data, can you please share the same?

Thanks,
Nitin

Ariya Hidayat

unread,
Dec 18, 2007, 1:32:22 AM12/18/07
to fas...@googlegroups.com
Hi,

I haven't done extensive measurement yet, but typically LZO compresses
slightly better. However, FastLZ could be twice as fast in most cases.
So, it's a trade off you need to make.

Regards,

Ariya

Andrew Griffiths

unread,
Feb 4, 2008, 1:16:39 AM2/4/08
to fastlz
Hi Nitin,

I found a comparison on speed and compression rate on the QuickLZ
website: http://www.quicklz.com/

I'd definitely like to see some more stats and comparisons with
different datasets :)

Andrew

Ariya Hidayat

unread,
Feb 7, 2008, 5:00:52 AM2/7/08
to fas...@googlegroups.com
> I found a comparison on speed and compression rate on the QuickLZ
> website: http://www.quicklz.com/
>
> I'd definitely like to see some more stats and comparisons with
> different datasets :)

Please keep in mind that with a relatively simplistic algorithm used
by FastlZ (and LZF), it is difficult to get a much higher compression
ratio.

Regards,

Ariya

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages