On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 22:05:44 -0500, Will Fitzgerald
<will.fi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> According to the CDC (Centers for Disease Control) [1], it "becomes
> dangerous to the human ear" to listen (for example) to sound measured
> at 97 dB for more than 30 minutes. According to someone who brought a
> decibel meter to the Midwest Convention, this was about the average
> noise level from the second row.
>
> Are we putting our hearing in danger at large conventions? Has anyone
> looked into this carefully?
This has been discussed before and is worth discussing again. The decibel
meter is a good idea if we want to move beyond anecdotal evidence. Not
that there's any lack of anecdotal evidence. The last online discussion
started, I believe, with someone's report of tinnitus. My daughter, who
loves to sing, had peculiar sounds and sensations for a full month after
last year's Camp Fasola. I had to leave a certain very well-known Southern
sing a number of years ago because the sound level was painful, and I have
not returned to that particular sing. 150 people singing as loud as they
can, in a small room... what is wrong with this picture?
Singing with FULL VOICE is not the same as singing at FULL VOLUME. I've
never been able to get an "Amen" to that point, but maybe some day.
Ever,
Stephen Conte
It's not Led Zeppelin. :-)
According to ASHA (speech/hearing people), OSHA says protection is
required in the workplace when the time-weighted average over 8 hours
is greater than 85dB.
Bob, I wonder if your averages included readings between the songs?
Sheila
Alexandria, VA
p.s.
Conversation between two refridgerated rabbits the day after Easter:
"My butt hurts."
"What?"
I've experienced some hearing issues
from my little used,
uncalibrated meter
Best,
Ian