Romano Amodeo's Nomination for a Nobel Prize in Physics

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Romano Amodeo

unread,
Aug 30, 2009, 4:02:02 PM8/30/09
to فانتازيا قراءة فيما وراء العلم

Motivation:
"Romano Amodeo has unified the Physics, through correcting all its
units. Well defined their unitary sizes, all the Units of the Physics
today suffer from the huge conceptual mistake of adding the Nth part
of N^-1 (which represents the antimatter's mass). This antimatter is
wrongly summed to the integer (the N integer elevated to +1, which
represents - it alone - the mass of the matter)"

One unit of Physics should have the value 1.
Well it has the value 1 in observance of the principle of Action and
Reaction, of the dynamics, ie, through a submultiple N^-1 of the same
unit that allows the representation of the same unit through the
opposite N.

Essentially, in every unitary size of every unity of physics, the
decimal part N^-1 represents always the antimatter of the matter's
mass N.
It owns the negative potency, and it is only what is working for
structuring the matter's mass N, which has the positive index 1 of
the mathematical potency.

We know that W (the potency) is Et (the Energy multiplied by the
time). So W/t is E.
Well, in the mathematics, the potencies are those of the base N
elevated to -1 and of the same base N elevated to 1. By consequence,
the indices (-1 and 1) are able to acquire the dimension E (of the
Energy) dividing by "t" (time) these potencies.

Since the 10 cycle is the "time base" of every number N (being N = Log
10^N), when we consider only the exponents (-1 and 1) we have only
the energy of the potency, having avoided the 10 unitary time of the
base, by acting the inverse of the potency in base 10, which is its
decimal Logarithm.

-1 and +1 are the energies of two opposite ways, negative and positive
(of antimatter and of matter, magnetic context and electric), and they
both are represented in positive way: differentiated in multiples and
submultiples, N/1 and 1/N of that unitary size.

Therefore, once defined the exact unitary size of a Unit of the
Physics, it is a big mistake to consider "unit of mass" not only the
integer part (multiple of 1), but also the decimal part (submultiple
of 1). Because the multiple of this unit quantifies matter and the
submultiple of this same unit quantifies antimatter!

The alternance between matter and antimatter can be represented like
the up and down of a same wave, and the barycentre is the unit 1,
between N and the opposite N elevated to -1.
Now, if we perceive both (the up and down of a wave), we perceive also
the up and down of the mass, but we can consider "presence of mass"
the upper part (in which we have presence of real mass) and we cannot
add to it the lower part (in which we have the lacking of the
mass!)... thinking that, adding the tenth part, we define "better" the
"presence" of the matter's mass... adding its "absence" !!!
If we make this mistake in a real wave, we have the zero, since
multiple of 1 and submultiple of 1 (its "up and down"), added, get 1
-1 = 0

The Physics cannot be Unified untill this (big, big) MISTAKE isn't
avoided!

In Physics, by the Principle of Action and Reaction, the negative N
elevated to -1 can be perceived as 1/N in positive way, but is only
the Action useful to quantify "N alone" an Unit of the Physics.
This argument is of a such big importance that the correction of this
big mistake in the valuations of the Phisical Units merits a Nobel
Prize in Physics.

Romano Amodeo expects a Nobel Prize in Physics and makes his
“nomination”!
Message has been deleted

Hamed al-Suhli

unread,
Aug 31, 2009, 9:41:11 AM8/31/09
to fant...@googlegroups.com
http://www.ordinespiritosanto.com/

I can't respond before reading most the theory, and this shall take long time

2009/8/31 Khaldoon Sinjab <sin...@gmail.com>
من هذا؟
who r u?

2009/8/30 Romano Amodeo <ra.a...@libero.it>



--
hamed suhli
http://sourceforge.net/projects/tarmeez
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages