Harry & Aslan

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Mike Gray

unread,
Jul 26, 2007, 10:57:12 AM7/26/07
to Fantasy Fiction & Religion
This is an extension of the first post, but it get into the kind of
comparison I find particularly interesting:

If you compare Harry in Deathly Hallows and Aslan in The Lion the
Witch and the Wardrobe, how are they similar and how are they
different?

Mike Gray

Rachael V.

unread,
Jul 26, 2007, 11:53:30 AM7/26/07
to Fantasy Fiction & Religion

Different:

Aslan knew he would be resurrected; Harry didn't.
Aslan went to face death alone; Harry didn't.
Aslan (we assume, since the narrative viewpoint does not follow him)
really died; Harry kind of didsn't.
Aslan substituted himself for a liar/betrayer; Harry substituted
himself for his innocent friends.

Similar:

Both were jeered by crowds.
Both sacrificed themselves.
Neither told his friends what he was about to do.
Both were threats to the one who killed them.

Mike & Susan Gray

unread,
Jul 26, 2007, 12:49:02 PM7/26/07
to fantasy-an...@googlegroups.com
Rachael noted:

> Different:
>
> Aslan knew he would be resurrected; Harry didn't.

Check.

> Aslan went to face death alone; Harry didn't.

Hm. Aslan wasn't quite alone - Lucy and Susan went with him. In fact, in
some ways I would say that Aslan was less alone. OTOH, it's two very
different kinds of company. Harry had people - like his parent - he looked
up to - people he wanted for support. (Interesting that Dumbledore was *not*
there.) Aslan had two little girls who came uninvited (though not unwanted)
and didn't even know what was happening.

Harry is certainly very different!

> Aslan (we assume, since the narrative viewpoint does not
> follow him) really died; Harry kind of didsn't.

Check. Sort of. I'd drop that one, though.

> Aslan substituted himself for a liar/betrayer; Harry
> substituted himself for his innocent friends.

Yes! The theological word is "substitutiary atonement" - which Lewis employs
very much on purpose. For more of a parallel, Harry would have had to face
Voldemort *for,* say, Snape or Pettigrew or Draco. Which most certainly
didn't happen. Come to think of it ... hmm. That - just as much as an
attempt to console Voldemort's damaged soul - would have been a very
interesting twist indeed.

It ties into Tim's/Dumbledad's observation: Rowling's pacifism & generosity
has its limits!

Mike Gray
_______________________

"Of course, I'm not entirely sure he can read, so that may not have been
bravery...." JK Rowling, The Goblet of Fire.

http://www.research-projects.unizh.ch/p8199.htm

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages