12 Years A Slave Hulu

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Johnette Esteb

unread,
Aug 5, 2024, 1:41:07 AM8/5/24
to facpsohafor
Inthe past three years, the Times has grappled with the fallout from Hannah-Jones' assertion, including the revelation that it ignored its own fact-checker's warnings against printing the charge. The Times tempered its language to apply to "some of" the colonists, only to see it reasserted by Hannah-Jones in her public commentaries. Later, a related line about the Project's goal of replacing 1776 with a "true founding" of 1619 disappeared without notice from the Times' website. The newspaper found itself in a balancing act between its writer's uncompromising positions and the need to preserve credibility as it made a Pulitzer Prize bid with the series. But Hannah-Jones was not ready to abandon the claim at the center of her lead essay, and the first episode of the Hulu series makes that abundantly clear.

Dunmore's decree made him the author of an "Emancipation Proclamation" of sorts, both Hannah-Jones and Holton contend. Their language intentionally evokes parallels to President Abraham Lincoln's famous order freeing the slaves of the rebellious Confederacy in 1863. Prompted by Hannah-Jones' questioning, Holton then recounts his version of the lesser-known events of some four score and eight years prior. "Dunmore issued that Emancipation Proclamation November 1775," he explains, "and that Emancipation Proclamation infuriated white southerners."


At the time of his decree, the real Dunmore had not set foot in Williamsburg in almost five months. His order, decreeing martial law in the colony and calling on slaves to enlist in a Royalist militia, came not from the governor's residence but from a position of exile aboard the HMS William, a naval ship anchored off the coast of Norfolk, Virginia.


Dunmore abandoned the Governor's Palace on June 8, 1775, amid signs that patriot militiamen were converging on Williamsburg to defend the House of Burgesses from a threatened power grab by the crown. The trouble began a few weeks earlier with a botched attempt by Dunmore to seize the colony's gunpowder stores as a preemptive strike against revolutionary grumblings.


The inescapable progression of the timeline has always worked against Hannah-Jones' narrative. Leaning heavily on Holton's academic work, she asserts that Dunmore galvanized the southern colonies against Britain by imperiling their slave plantations and moving them into the revolutionary column. Holton's commentaries in the docuseries signal his concurrence with this view insofar as it relates to Virginia, even as he stops short of Hannah-Jones' blurry ascription of this motive to "the colonists" of the future U.S. at large. Yet as a matter of history, it collides with easily documented facts.


In 1774, the House of Burgesses adopted a resolution of fasting to show their support for the people of Boston, then under a punitive edict from London in retaliation for its tax protests. A short time later, a group of leading Virginians including George Washington and George Mason signed the Fairfax Resolves, stating a long list of grievances against the crown (its promotion of the slave trade among them) and rejecting parliamentary control over the colonies. Patrick Henry, another Virginian, delivered his famous "Give me liberty, or give me death" speech in March 1775 before Dunmore even uttered a word about enlisting slaves. Washington himself would take command of the Continental Army on June 19, 1775, organizing his troops in New England after the Battle of Bunker Hill.


As his shipbound circumstances illustrated, the remnants of Lord Dunmore's governorship amounted to little more than paper when he issued his decree that autumn. It is undoubtedly true that Dunmore's order further inflamed an already-raging revolution, including nudging some slave-owning planters off the fence. But its sweeping martial law provision was likely the greater source of outrage. As Dunmore's own financial interests illustrate, he had every intention of honoring the decree's explicit exemptions for the human property of Royalist enslavers. None of these complicating details receive even the slightest amount of attention in the Hulu presentation from Williamsburg.


Hannah-Jones' latest chronological mishap adds to a long list of errors that have plagued the 1619 Project. In this instance, it also speaks to a deeper underlying negligence around matters of basic fact. As a flashpoint of controversy since the 1619 Project's inception, the claims about slavery in the American Revolution warranted careful attention. The docuseries offered Hannah-Jones yet another opportunity to clarify her case, ostensibly with the guidance of trained historians such as Holton. Instead, she pushed ahead, unaware of a timeline that any tour guide at the Governor's Palace could have resolved for her.


Holton's case is a bit more complicated, as his academic works, including his 2021 book Liberty Is Sweet, evince awareness of Dunmore's shipbound circumstances after his June 1775 flight. In fact, Holton's scholarly publications have attempted to walk a fine line around the 1619 Project that chafes with his ringing public endorsements of the same in popular media. A revealing footnote tucked inside Liberty Is Sweet states that Hannah-Jones "vastly exaggerates the size and strength of the British abolition movement" in the years before the revolution, dampening her attempts to use the 1772 anti-slavery Somerset case as an instigating cause of American independence. Yet as the docuseries shows, it is Holton who assigns particular significance to the filming location in Williamsburg, and it is Holton who points to the governor's residence as the source of his own vastly exaggerated "Emancipation Proclamation."


This peculiar convergence of factual error and cinematic misdirection comes with an ironic twist. If there are historical parallels to be drawn between Dunmore's order and later events, it is not Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation but rather the desperate actions of his Confederate adversaries. In the waning days of the Civil War, Jefferson Davis authorized what became known as General Orders No. 14. The measure called for the "enlistment of colored persons" into the Confederate army, with provisions to accept any male slave "with his own consent and with the approbation of his master by a written instrument conferring, as he may, the rights of a freedman" in exchange for service. The Confederates paraded a handful of black companies on the streets of Richmond in late March 1865. Some of these troops were likely involved in a rearguard skirmish as Robert E. Lee's army abandoned the city and made its fateful retreat toward Appomattox Courthouse.


The Confederates' measure was no act of magnanimity by the slavers, but rather an exercise in desperation by a government on the precipice of collapse. Like Dunmore some 90 years before him, Davis lost his seat of power and found his forces in disarray. Most historians interpret his actions in this panicked context, not as some sudden change of heart on the central issue that sparked the Civil War.


Phillip W. Magness is a senior research fellow at the American Institute for Economic Research and co-author (with Jason Brennan) of Cracks in the Ivory Tower: The Moral Mess of Higher Education (Oxford University Press).


It's a new month and that means tons of new movies are arriving on Hulu. While the streaming service is better known for its TV shows than its movies, it has a surprisingly deep library of critically acclaimed movies.


Don't believe me when I say these movies are a cut above the rest? All seven movies have a rating of over 90% fresh on Rotten Tomatoes, so you know that most critics have given them their stamp of approval. So turn on the TV and get ready to start watching. Here are the seven best movies new to Hulu this month.


"Judas and the Black Messiah" was nominated for several Academy Awards in 2021, including Best Picture and two Best Supporting Actor nominations. Nomadland (which is also new to Hulu this month) would ultimately beat out this movie for Best Picture but Daniel Kaluuya did take home an Oscar for his portrayal of civil rights leader Fred Hampton.


Starring Kaluuya as Hampton and LaKeith Stanfield as Bill O'Neal (also nominated), this movie is based on the true story of how the FBI infiltrated the Black Panther Party of Illinois and ultimately assassinated Hampton during a raid that led to the death of an additional BPP member and several injuries after the FBI fired 100 rounds inside Hampton's apartment. You know how the story ends but the betrayal still stings all the same.


From one powerful dramatization of true events to another, "12 Years a Slave" is the story of Solomon Northup (Chiwetel Ejiofor), a free man from upstate New York who was abducted and sold into slavery in Louisiana. He then spends 12 years in captivity until a meeting with abolitionist Samuel Bass (Brad Pitt) finally gives Northup a chance at returning to freedom.


The third Best Picture nominee on this list, "Call Me by Your Name" stars Timothe Chalamet as Elio Perlman, a Jewish French-Italian 17-year-old boy who begins a secretive relationship with Oliver (Armie Hammer), one of Elio's father's graduate students at the nearby university.


While this love story doesn't have a happy ending, to quote Nicole Kidman, "Heartbreak feels good in a place like this." The performance from Chalamet in particular is a star-making one, making him the third-youngest Best Actor nominee ever. Once you're done watching, you won't be surprised that this movie not only got a standing ovation when it debuted at Sundance but received the longest standing ovation in New York Film Festival history when it was shown at the NYC festival following its Sundance debut.


The fourth Best Picture nominee on this list and second winner, "Nomadland" suffers in the annals of history for coming out in the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite winning Best Picture, Best Director (Chlo Zhao) and Best Actress (Frances McDormand), it feels like this acclaimed movie has fallen through the cracks. That's all the more surprising given it made $39.5 million at the U.S. box office even though it came out on Hulu a mere month after its release and movie theaters were struggling in general.

3a8082e126
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages