Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Dismiss

fa.works

Contact owners and managers

1–30 of 260

0 selected

10/27/82

Info. wanted on desktop UNIX systems

I am compiling a set of descriptions of desktop, microprocessor-based UNIX systems. Pointers to

unread,

Info. wanted on desktop UNIX systems

I am compiling a set of descriptions of desktop, microprocessor-based UNIX systems. Pointers to

10/27/82

8/14/82

WORKS Digest V2 #73

>From PLEASANT@RUTGERS Thu Aug 12 22:07:08 1982 Works Digest Friday, 13 August 1982 Volume 2 :

unread,

WORKS Digest V2 #73

>From PLEASANT@RUTGERS Thu Aug 12 22:07:08 1982 Works Digest Friday, 13 August 1982 Volume 2 :

8/14/82

8/13/82

WORKS Digest V2 #72

>From PLEASANT@RUTGERS Wed Aug 11 00:19:53 1982 Works Digest Wednesday, 11 August 1982 Volume 2 :

unread,

WORKS Digest V2 #72

>From PLEASANT@RUTGERS Wed Aug 11 00:19:53 1982 Works Digest Wednesday, 11 August 1982 Volume 2 :

8/13/82

8/9/82

WORKS Digest V2 #71

>From PLEASANT@RUTGERS Sun Aug 8 23:51:34 1982 Works Digest Monday, 9 August 1982 Volume 2 : Issue

unread,

WORKS Digest V2 #71

>From PLEASANT@RUTGERS Sun Aug 8 23:51:34 1982 Works Digest Monday, 9 August 1982 Volume 2 : Issue

8/9/82

8/5/82

WORKS Digest V2 #69

>From PLEASANT@RUTGERS Wed Aug 4 19:23:12 1982 Works Digest Wednesday, 4 August 1982 Volume 2 :

unread,

WORKS Digest V2 #69

>From PLEASANT@RUTGERS Wed Aug 4 19:23:12 1982 Works Digest Wednesday, 4 August 1982 Volume 2 :

8/5/82

8/1/82

WORKS Digest V2 #68

>From PLEASANT@RUTGERS Sun Aug 1 16:50:43 1982 Works Digest Sunday, 1 August 1982 Volume 2 : Issue

unread,

WORKS Digest V2 #68

>From PLEASANT@RUTGERS Sun Aug 1 16:50:43 1982 Works Digest Sunday, 1 August 1982 Volume 2 : Issue

8/1/82

arpavax:hickman2

3/22/82

68000 unix (sun board)

Just some very un-official info....We have a sun board (10Mhz) and have a bit of timing info: "

unread,

68000 unix (sun board)

Just some very un-official info....We have a sun board (10Mhz) and have a bit of timing info: "

3/22/82

3/16/82

WORKS Digest V2 #24

>From PLEASANT@RUTGERS Tue Mar 16 23:41:26 1982 Works Digest Tuesday, 16 Mar 1982 Volume 2 : Issue

unread,

WORKS Digest V2 #24

>From PLEASANT@RUTGERS Tue Mar 16 23:41:26 1982 Works Digest Tuesday, 16 Mar 1982 Volume 2 : Issue

3/16/82

3/15/82

Ethernet Doomed?

>From BILLW@Sri-Kl Thu Mar 11 15:47:10 1982 You are also wrong. An ethernet tranceiver is a far

unread,

Ethernet Doomed?

>From BILLW@Sri-Kl Thu Mar 11 15:47:10 1982 You are also wrong. An ethernet tranceiver is a far

3/15/82

3/15/82

>From Joe.Newcomer@Cmu-10a Thu Mar 11 12:25:58 1982 The last I looked, DEC was nut fussy at all

unread,

>From Joe.Newcomer@Cmu-10a Thu Mar 11 12:25:58 1982 The last I looked, DEC was nut fussy at all

3/15/82

3/15/82

>From DPR@Mit-Xx Thu Mar 11 12:00:52 1982 Ethernet: People are comparing apples and oranges here.

unread,

>From DPR@Mit-Xx Thu Mar 11 12:00:52 1982 Ethernet: People are comparing apples and oranges here.

3/15/82

3/15/82

WORKS Digest V2 #19

>From baker.wbst@Parc-Maxc Wed Mar 10 11:01:48 1982 As someone in a Xerox distribution list

unread,

WORKS Digest V2 #19

>From baker.wbst@Parc-Maxc Wed Mar 10 11:01:48 1982 As someone in a Xerox distribution list

3/15/82

3/15/82

Is UNIX really the answer ?

>From JGOLDBERGER@Usc-Isib Wed Mar 10 14:58:06 1982 I was glad to see that someone else has the

unread,

Is UNIX really the answer ?

>From JGOLDBERGER@Usc-Isib Wed Mar 10 14:58:06 1982 I was glad to see that someone else has the

3/15/82

3/15/82

Unix really isn't the answer

>From Mishkin@Yale Wed Mar 10 20:51:16 1982 I think there are two basic reasons people feel

unread,

Unix really isn't the answer

>From Mishkin@Yale Wed Mar 10 20:51:16 1982 I think there are two basic reasons people feel

3/15/82

3/15/82

[decvax!watmath!watarts!plrowley at Berkeley: Window Manage...]

>From WMARTIN@Office-3 Wed Mar 10 14:21:18 1982 As far as I can determine, these two messages were

unread,

[decvax!watmath!watarts!plrowley at Berkeley: Window Manage...]

>From WMARTIN@Office-3 Wed Mar 10 14:21:18 1982 As far as I can determine, these two messages were

3/15/82

3/15/82

>From JWALKER@Bbna Wed Mar 10 19:58:32 1982 Sure. It makes perfect sense not to @i[require] the To

unread,

>From JWALKER@Bbna Wed Mar 10 19:58:32 1982 Sure. It makes perfect sense not to @i[require] the To

3/15/82

3/15/82

is unix really the answer?

>From BILLW@Sri-Kl Wed Mar 10 18:09:49 1982 Im not sure I agree. One of the nice things about UNIX

unread,

is unix really the answer?

>From BILLW@Sri-Kl Wed Mar 10 18:09:49 1982 Im not sure I agree. One of the nice things about UNIX

3/15/82

3/14/82

Mike O'Dell and Ethernet

>From Odonnell@Yale Wed Mar 10 13:48:16 1982 Several points should be made: First, about broadband

unread,

Mike O'Dell and Ethernet

>From Odonnell@Yale Wed Mar 10 13:48:16 1982 Several points should be made: First, about broadband

3/14/82

3/14/82

Hardware Driven?

>From Jeffrey@Office-2 Wed Mar 10 09:54:31 1982 I've been reading WorkS mail for a couple of

unread,

Hardware Driven?

>From Jeffrey@Office-2 Wed Mar 10 09:54:31 1982 I've been reading WorkS mail for a couple of

3/14/82

3/14/82

>From BUSH@Usc-Isie Tue Mar 9 07:01:39 1982 Date: 6-Mar-82 1600-EST From: Nathaniel Mishkin <

unread,

>From BUSH@Usc-Isie Tue Mar 9 07:01:39 1982 Date: 6-Mar-82 1600-EST From: Nathaniel Mishkin <

3/14/82

3/12/82

UNIX as a working environment

>From COMSAT.SoftArts@Mit-Multics Thu Mar 11 20:18:37 1982 Local: works at mit-ai Via: Mit-Ai; 11

unread,

UNIX as a working environment

>From COMSAT.SoftArts@Mit-Multics Thu Mar 11 20:18:37 1982 Local: works at mit-ai Via: Mit-Ai; 11

3/12/82

3/12/82

Opinions & Biases

>From JGOLDBERGER@Usc-Isib Thu Mar 11 20:07:35 1982 In my original message that seems to have

unread,

Opinions & Biases

>From JGOLDBERGER@Usc-Isib Thu Mar 11 20:07:35 1982 In my original message that seems to have

3/12/82

3/12/82

Unix, IBM, humankind, Smalltalk, animation, parallelism

>From RYLAND@Sri-Kl Thu Mar 11 21:16:30 1982 Please, let's not crank up the old Unix religious

unread,

Unix, IBM, humankind, Smalltalk, animation, parallelism

>From RYLAND@Sri-Kl Thu Mar 11 21:16:30 1982 Please, let's not crank up the old Unix religious

3/12/82

3/12/82

software releases

>From WALKER@Cmu-20c Thu Mar 11 21:17:09 1982 Software releases will only be different in the

unread,

software releases

>From WALKER@Cmu-20c Thu Mar 11 21:17:09 1982 Software releases will only be different in the

3/12/82

3/12/82

UNIX & the Answer

>From mike@Rand-Unix Thu Mar 11 16:11:09 1982 Dear Joe, Your message about UNIX has the following

unread,

UNIX & the Answer

>From mike@Rand-Unix Thu Mar 11 16:11:09 1982 Dear Joe, Your message about UNIX has the following

3/12/82

3/12/82

Someone's Theory

>From mo@Lbl-Unix Thu Mar 11 16:15:50 1982 Just a passing comment... There is a psychological

unread,

Someone's Theory

>From mo@Lbl-Unix Thu Mar 11 16:15:50 1982 Just a passing comment... There is a psychological

3/12/82

3/12/82

A minor point...

>From BILLW@Sri-Kl Fri Mar 12 00:28:13 1982 I would like to ponit out that new micro-processors

unread,

A minor point...

>From BILLW@Sri-Kl Fri Mar 12 00:28:13 1982 I would like to ponit out that new micro-processors

3/12/82

3/10/82

>From DREIFU@Wharton-10 Wed Mar 10 12:21:14 1982 Pls send future problems to works-request. Thanks

unread,

>From DREIFU@Wharton-10 Wed Mar 10 12:21:14 1982 Pls send future problems to works-request. Thanks

3/10/82

3/9/82

>From DREIFU@Wharton-10 Mon Mar 8 16:09:24 1982 We also have the font editor, running on a

unread,

>From DREIFU@Wharton-10 Mon Mar 8 16:09:24 1982 We also have the font editor, running on a

3/9/82

3/9/82

>From Mishkin@Yale Mon Mar 8 16:06:34 1982 Mail-from: ARPANET site BRL rcvd on Mon Mar 8 17:21:04

unread,

>From Mishkin@Yale Mon Mar 8 16:06:34 1982 Mail-from: ARPANET site BRL rcvd on Mon Mar 8 17:21:04

3/9/82

Search

Clear search

Close search

Google apps

Main menu