[PATCH] JFFS2: min/max confusion?

[Roel Kluin]

MAX_SUMMARY_SIZE was meant as a limit, not as a minimum

Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel....@gmail.com>
---
fs/jffs2/summary.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

unless I am mistaken?

diff --git a/fs/jffs2/summary.c b/fs/jffs2/summary.c
index 6caf1e1..800171d 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/summary.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/summary.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@

int jffs2_sum_init(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
{
- uint32_t sum_size = max_t(uint32_t, c->sector_size, MAX_SUMMARY_SIZE);
+ uint32_t sum_size = min_t(uint32_t, c->sector_size, MAX_SUMMARY_SIZE);

c->summary = kzalloc(sizeof(struct jffs2_summary), GFP_KERNEL);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 16:34 +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
> MAX_SUMMARY_SIZE was meant as a limit, not as a minimum
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel....@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/jffs2/summary.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> unless I am mistaken?
>
> diff --git a/fs/jffs2/summary.c b/fs/jffs2/summary.c
> index 6caf1e1..800171d 100644
> --- a/fs/jffs2/summary.c
> +++ b/fs/jffs2/summary.c
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
>
> int jffs2_sum_init(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
> {
> - uint32_t sum_size = max_t(uint32_t, c->sector_size, MAX_SUMMARY_SIZE);
> + uint32_t sum_size = min_t(uint32_t, c->sector_size, MAX_SUMMARY_SIZE);
>
> c->summary = kzalloc(sizeof(struct jffs2_summary), GFP_KERNEL);

This looks right, I've pushed your patch to my l2-mtd tree, thanks.

--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)