[PATCH] dax: use devm_add_action_or_reset

[Sudip Mukherjee]

If devm_add_action() fails we are explicitly calling the cleanup to free
the resources allocated. Lets use the helper devm_add_action_or_reset()
and return directly in case of error, as we know that the cleanup
function has been already called by the helper if there was any error.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.m...@codethink.co.uk>
---

There is no maintainer mentioned for this driver, so not sure who should
this patch go through.

drivers/dax/dax.c | 8 ++------
drivers/dax/pmem.c | 14 ++++++--------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dax/dax.c b/drivers/dax/dax.c
index b891a12..9eacd4d 100644
--- a/drivers/dax/dax.c
+++ b/drivers/dax/dax.c
@@ -211,13 +211,9 @@ int devm_create_dax_dev(struct dax_region *dax_region, struct resource *res,
}
dax_dev->dev = dev;

- rc = devm_add_action(dax_region->dev, unregister_dax_dev, dev);
- if (rc) {
- unregister_dax_dev(dev);
- return rc;
- }
+ rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(dax_region->dev, unregister_dax_dev, dev);

- return 0;
+ return rc;

err_create:
ida_simple_remove(&dax_minor_ida, minor);
diff --git a/drivers/dax/pmem.c b/drivers/dax/pmem.c
index 55d510e..f5bbbca 100644
--- a/drivers/dax/pmem.c
+++ b/drivers/dax/pmem.c
@@ -102,21 +102,19 @@ static int dax_pmem_probe(struct device *dev)
if (rc)
return rc;

- rc = devm_add_action(dev, dax_pmem_percpu_exit, &dax_pmem->ref);
- if (rc) {
- dax_pmem_percpu_exit(&dax_pmem->ref);
+ rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, dax_pmem_percpu_exit,
+ &dax_pmem->ref);
+ if (rc)
return rc;
- }

addr = devm_memremap_pages(dev, &res, &dax_pmem->ref, altmap);
if (IS_ERR(addr))
return PTR_ERR(addr);

- rc = devm_add_action(dev, dax_pmem_percpu_kill, &dax_pmem->ref);
- if (rc) {
- dax_pmem_percpu_kill(&dax_pmem->ref);
+ rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, dax_pmem_percpu_kill,
+ &dax_pmem->ref);
+ if (rc)
return rc;
- }

nd_region = to_nd_region(dev->parent);
dax_region = alloc_dax_region(dev, nd_region->id, &res,
--
1.9.1

[Dan Williams]

On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Sudip Mukherjee
<sudipm.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If devm_add_action() fails we are explicitly calling the cleanup to free
> the resources allocated. Lets use the helper devm_add_action_or_reset()
> and return directly in case of error, as we know that the cleanup
> function has been already called by the helper if there was any error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.m...@codethink.co.uk>

Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.w...@intel.com>

> ---
>
> There is no maintainer mentioned for this driver, so not sure who should
> this patch go through.

*raises hand*, I'll make sure MAINTAINERS gets updated, for this one
it seems Andrew has already taken it. I notice that drivers/nvdimm/
could use the same cleanup. I'll take a look unless you beat me to
it.

[Sudip Mukherjee]

I will give you an advantage in the race, i will not see that before
saturday. :)

Regards
Sudip