cfg80211 conversion of all drivers
Luis R. Rodriguez
802.11 work, there are some 802.11 drivers which need conversion to
cfg80211. The list is here:
http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/todo-list/cfg80211-conversion
Takers are greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Gábor Stefanik
> Staging developers, if you would like to get your hands wet with some
> 802.11 work, there are some 802.11 drivers which need conversion to
> cfg80211. The list is here:
>
> http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/todo-list/cfg80211-conversion
>
> Takers are greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> �Luis
> --
> the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at �http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
May I ask you why hostap is "to be killed"? What is the alternative?
--
Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-)
John W. Linville
> May I ask you why hostap is "to be killed"? What is the alternative?
I think that is code for "replace it with something based on mac80211"...
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linv...@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
Gábor Stefanik
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 02:56:31AM +0100, G�bor Stefanik wrote:
>
>> May I ask you why hostap is "to be killed"? What is the alternative?
>
> I think that is code for "replace it with something based on mac80211"...
Isn't Prism2 a Fullmac chipset?
Anyway, as I hoped for, it is not "kill in favor of orinoco" (which
also has some support for Prism2, though not as good as hostap).
>
> --
> John W. Linville � � � � � � � �Someday the world will need a hero, and you
> linv...@tuxdriver.com � � � � � � � � �might be all we have. �Be ready.
>
--
Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-)
Holger Schurig
That's not going to happen, hostap + orinoco both work against fullmac chips,
which can't send arbitrary packets and therefore no 802.11 management frames.
--
http://www.holgerschurig.de
Jouni Malinen
> > I think that is code for "replace it with something based on mac80211"...
>
> That's not going to happen, hostap + orinoco both work against fullmac chips,
> which can't send arbitrary packets and therefore no 802.11 management frames.
The Host AP mode in Prism 2/2.5/3 provides for a somewhat special
situation.. It does actually allow sending of (almost) arbitrary packets
and management frames in AP mode. In other words, it should be possible
to create a mac80211-based AP mode driver for Prism 2/2.5/3 to replace
the AP side of the Host AP driver. Whether anyone has enough interest
and time to do that is another question, though.
As far as station functionality is concerned, I would agree that
mac80211 is not a good target for the Host AP driver. If AP side were to
be made available as a mac80211-based driver, it could make more sense
to merge station side from the Host AP driver into orinoco or some kind
of combination of the driver. However, having two different drivers for
same hardware issue would not go anywhere with this.
One of the problems here is that the hardware is question is quite old
and for many practical purposes obsolete, so finding people to work on
this can get difficult. I can certainly come up with much better uses
for my time.. ;-)
--
Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA
Holger Schurig
> situation.. It does actually allow sending of (almost) arbitrary packets
> and management frames in AP mode.
Oh, thanks, I stand corrected.
--
http://www.holgerschurig.de