On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> can you confirm one way or the other that the "gvp11" kernel
> parameter is thoroughly dead? thanks.
Unfortunately not. Apparently we just forgot to rewire gvp11_setup() during
the conversion from old to new parameter setup style.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > can you confirm one way or the other that the "gvp11" kernel
> > parameter is thoroughly dead? thanks.
>
> Unfortunately not. Apparently we just forgot to rewire gvp11_setup()
> during the conversion from old to new parameter setup style.
ah, ok, so i'll just leave that with you and strike it off my list.
thanks.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > can you confirm one way or the other that the "gvp11" kernel
> > parameter is thoroughly dead? thanks.
>
> Unfortunately not. Apparently we just forgot to rewire gvp11_setup()
> during the conversion from old to new parameter setup style.
ok. i'll leave that with you folks, then.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================