.ml files are copied for easier debugging and .mli for documentation, am
I right?
--
: Michal Moskal :::::::: malekith/at/pld.org.pl : GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv
: PLD Linux ::::::: Wroclaw University, CS Dept : {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-lis...@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Is there any reason, that `make install' copies .cmx files, that are
> present in .cmxa archives anyway?
.cmx'es contain small functions to be inlined, plus some internal
information that makes direct calls from module to module, otherwise
auxiliary(and uneeded) closures will be created resulting in indirect
calls - read SLOW.
>
> .ml files are copied for easier debugging and .mli for documentation, am
> I right?
>
>
--
mailto:ma...@pulsesoft.com
Fair enough, then why the cmxa library file in the first place, it seems
that one of them is redundant?
- Jakob Lichtenberg