Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

[Caml-list] New camlp4

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Nathaniel Gray

unread,
Jun 23, 2006, 12:05:04 AM6/23/06
to Caml Mailing List
I'm about to start a new project using camlp4 and I'm wondering
whether to use the "beta" updated version of camlp4 [1] or the version
that comes with 3.09. If the beta version is truly going to become
the official version of camlp4 in the future then I'll go that way,
but I don't recall seeing any official word to that effect.

Can anybody clear this up or make a recommendation?

Thanks,
-Nathan

[1] http://gallium.inria.fr/~pouillar/camlp4-changes.html

--
>>>-- Nathaniel Gray -- Caltech Computer Science ------>
>>>-- Mojave Project -- http://mojave.cs.caltech.edu -->

_______________________________________________
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs

Nicolas Pouillard

unread,
Jun 23, 2006, 4:52:31 AM6/23/06
to Nathaniel Gray, Caml Mailing List
On 6/23/06, Nathaniel Gray <n8g...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm about to start a new project using camlp4 and I'm wondering
> whether to use the "beta" updated version of camlp4 [1] or the version
> that comes with 3.09. If the beta version is truly going to become
> the official version of camlp4 in the future then I'll go that way,
> but I don't recall seeing any official word to that effect.
>
> Can anybody clear this up or make a recommendation?
>

The integration in the official CVS repository is imminent, just a few
days to wait :)

--
Nicolas Pouillard

Nathaniel Gray

unread,
Jun 26, 2006, 6:24:44 PM6/26/06
to Nicolas Pouillard, Caml Mailing List
On 6/23/06, Nicolas Pouillard <nicolas....@inria.fr> wrote:
> On 6/23/06, Nathaniel Gray <n8g...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm about to start a new project using camlp4 and I'm wondering
> > whether to use the "beta" updated version of camlp4 [1] or the version
> > that comes with 3.09. If the beta version is truly going to become
> > the official version of camlp4 in the future then I'll go that way,
> > but I don't recall seeing any official word to that effect.
> >
> > Can anybody clear this up or make a recommendation?
> >
>
> The integration in the official CVS repository is imminent, just a few
> days to wait :)

Great! Thanks!

--
>>>-- Nathaniel Gray -- Caltech Computer Science ------>
>>>-- Mojave Project -- http://mojave.cs.caltech.edu -->

_______________________________________________

0 new messages