I stuffed all the my recent notes on camlp4 3.10 onto ocaml-tutorial.org.
http://ocaml-tutorial.org/camlp4_3.10
If you too are doing experiments with the new camlp4, please write down
the things that you find. Even if a new camlp4 experiment is
contributed only 80% correctly I feel that it's better than it having no
documentation. The errors will correct with time.
I am totally open to taking it out of the "tutorial" list on the home
page, since it's really not a tutorial. Someone with history editing on
the site should decide how it should be listed . . .
Regards,
Jeff Henrikson
_______________________________________________
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
Thanks for grouping these bits of information.
--
Nicolas Pouillard
> Hello caml-list,
>
> I stuffed all the my recent notes on camlp4 3.10 onto ocaml-tutorial.org.
>
> http://ocaml-tutorial.org/camlp4_3.10
>
> If you too are doing experiments with the new camlp4, please write down
> the things that you find. Even if a new camlp4 experiment is
> contributed only 80% correctly I feel that it's better than it having no
> documentation. The errors will correct with time.
Good initiative.
> I am totally open to taking it out of the "tutorial" list on the home
> page, since it's really not a tutorial. Someone with history editing on
> the site should decide how it should be listed . . .
I think the guidelines for editing the wiki are pretty loose.
We might split the "Tutorials" section of the main page into smaller
sections.
Martin
--
Martin Jambon
http://martin.jambon.free.fr