Imagine I have a file named a.ml containing
> module C = struct
> include B
> end
and a file named b.ml containing the code
> let f x = x + 1
When I compile everything to .cmo files, I cannot load a.cmo from the
toplevel without loading b.cmo beforehand.
Is there a way to make the 'include B' statement to include the code of
the B module in the C submodule directly so that it is not required to
load the b.cmo file before loading the a.cmo file?
That would be extremely useful to me...
All the best,
--
Guillaume Yziquel
http://yziquel.homelinux.org/
_______________________________________________
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
maybe you can have a look at findlib and its #require statement. For
instance, pxp (xml related library) depends on many cma, but everything
loads automagically when invoking #require :
Objective Caml version 3.11.1
# #use "topfind";;
- : unit = ()
Findlib has been successfully loaded. Additional directives:
#require "package";; to load a package
#list;; to list the available packages
#camlp4o;; to load camlp4 (standard syntax)
#camlp4r;; to load camlp4 (revised syntax)
#predicates "p,q,...";; to set these predicates
Topfind.reset();; to force that packages will be reloaded
#thread;; to enable threads
- : unit = ()
# #require "pxp";;
/home/pveber/usr/lib/godi/lib/ocaml/pkg-lib/pcre: added to search path
/home/pveber/usr/lib/godi/lib/ocaml/pkg-lib/pcre/pcre.cma: loaded
/home/pveber/usr/lib/godi/lib/ocaml/std-lib/unix.cma: loaded
/home/pveber/usr/lib/godi/lib/ocaml/pkg-lib/netsys: added to search path
/home/pveber/usr/lib/godi/lib/ocaml/pkg-lib/netsys/netsys.cma: loaded
/home/pveber/usr/lib/godi/lib/ocaml/pkg-lib/netstring: added to search path
[...]
/home/pveber/usr/lib/godi/lib/ocaml/pkg-lib/pxp-ulex-utf8/pxp_ulex_link_utf8.cmo:
loaded
/home/pveber/usr/lib/godi/lib/ocaml/pkg-lib/pxp: added to search path
# Pxp_document.liquefy;;
- : ?omit_end:bool ->
?omit_positions:bool ->
(< clone : 'a; node : 'a Pxp_document.node;
set_node : 'a Pxp_document.node -> unit; .. >
as 'a)
Pxp_document.solid_xml -> 'b -> Pxp_types.event option
= <fun>
hth,
ph.
2009/11/12 Guillaume Yziquel <guillaum...@citycable.ch>
2009/11/12 Guillaume Yziquel <guillaum...@citycable.ch>
> Philippe Veber a �crit :
>
> Hi
>>
>> maybe you can have a look at findlib and its #require statement. For
>> instance, pxp (xml related library) depends on many cma, but everything
>> loads automagically when invoking #require :
>>
>
> No, no, no... this is not the issue at all. My issue is not about loading
> stuff with findlib, it's about including a .cmo into another .cmo. I'd like
> to create a .cma with only a.ml, and not containing b.ml.
>
> It's not a toplevel issue, but a 'linking' issue.
>
> Thanks anyway.
>
> Guillaume.
>
>
>
>
> 2009/11/12 Guillaume Yziquel <guillaum...@citycable.ch>
You're getting my problem right. I'm working on the OCaml-R binding of
Maxence Guesdon.
The thing is, I have a r.ml file, where all the binding work is done.
However, in order to launch the shared library containing the code of
the R interpreter, some environment variables must be set up first.
Therefore I have a small R script, based on Dirk Eddelbuettel's littler
software, that generates an .ml file, rstdenv.ml, containing the
environment variables that need to be set up correctly.
Maybe it's trying to be a bit too pretty, but I do not like the name
Rstdenv for a module. I'd rather have R.Standard.env...
So I'm looking for a way to include a module as a submodule, without
having to link it to rstdenv.cmo, which I really do not want to be
available from the r.cma archive.
That's why I was wondering if there is a clean, camlish way, to
link-substitute code from one .cmo into another .cmo...
The -pack option is clearly overkill, camlp4 seems overkill too, m4 is
ugly, do not know camlmix. There's also a package from Gerd Stolpmann,
xstrp4 or something like that which could be useful. But as I want to
minimise dependencies on extra stuff, I was wondering if there was an
out-of-box obscure compiling option to do so.
All the best,
Guillaume Yziquel.
> 2009/11/12 Guillaume Yziquel <guillaum...@citycable.ch>
>
>> Philippe Veber a écrit :
_______________________________________________