Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Helmut Richter
5 views
Skip to first unread message
peteolcott
Aug 7, 2019, 11:59:24 AM8/7/19
to
On 8/7/2019 10:23 AM, Mścisław Wojna-Bojewski wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 7, 2019 at 5:20:12 PM UTC+3, peteolcott wrote:
>> On 8/7/2019 1:16 AM, Helmut Richter wrote:> On Tue, 6 Aug 2019, peteolcott wrote:
>> >
>> >> You cannot simply jump into the middle of any ongoing dialogue and
>> >> have any clue about the mutual agreement that has transpired in-between.
>>
>> > A*dialogue* would have required more than one participant. In*this*
>> > thread after July 27 and before Jeff Barnett's comments, you are the only
>> > person answering you, with one exception on August 1. You managed to
>> > answer yourself 28 times. No one is interested in what you discuss with
>> > yourself or whether you have come to a mutual agreement with yourself.
>> >
>> > -- Helmut Richter
>>
>> The dialogue is between myself and William in sci.math
>
> If so, get the fuck out of here, i.e. sci.lang. You have no business here.
>
I really don't give a rat's ass about your opinion or any other
opinion including my own.
It is a verifiably necessary truth (thus impossibly false) that the
mathematical formalization of natural language semantics <is> linguistic.
If any of the semantics of linguistics groups were not dead I
would go there instead.
--
Copyright 2019 Pete Olcott All rights reserved
"Great spirits have always encountered violent
opposition from mediocre minds." Albert Einstein
> On Wednesday, August 7, 2019 at 5:20:12 PM UTC+3, peteolcott wrote:
>> On 8/7/2019 1:16 AM, Helmut Richter wrote:> On Tue, 6 Aug 2019, peteolcott wrote:
>> >
>> >> You cannot simply jump into the middle of any ongoing dialogue and
>> >> have any clue about the mutual agreement that has transpired in-between.
>>
>> > A*dialogue* would have required more than one participant. In*this*
>> > thread after July 27 and before Jeff Barnett's comments, you are the only
>> > person answering you, with one exception on August 1. You managed to
>> > answer yourself 28 times. No one is interested in what you discuss with
>> > yourself or whether you have come to a mutual agreement with yourself.
>> >
>> > -- Helmut Richter
>>
>> The dialogue is between myself and William in sci.math
>
> If so, get the fuck out of here, i.e. sci.lang. You have no business here.
>
I really don't give a rat's ass about your opinion or any other
opinion including my own.
It is a verifiably necessary truth (thus impossibly false) that the
mathematical formalization of natural language semantics <is> linguistic.
If any of the semantics of linguistics groups were not dead I
would go there instead.
--
Copyright 2019 Pete Olcott All rights reserved
"Great spirits have always encountered violent
opposition from mediocre minds." Albert Einstein
0 new messages