Groups
Sign in
Groups
fa.analytic-philosophy
Conversations
About
Send feedback
Help
info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Learn more
fa.analytic-philosophy
Contact owners and managers
1–30 of 5674
Mark all as read
Report group
0 selected
Francisco de Assis Mariano
6/14/23
DIALETHEISM AND THE INEFFABILITY OF GOD - GRAHAM PRIEST: The Logic and Religion Webinar
Dear Colleague, You are invited to participate in the next session of the Logic and Religion Webinar
unread,
DIALETHEISM AND THE INEFFABILITY OF GOD - GRAHAM PRIEST: The Logic and Religion Webinar
Dear Colleague, You are invited to participate in the next session of the Logic and Religion Webinar
6/14/23
Bonaventura
3/21/23
Overkott proves Goldbach
Goldbach's conjecture, named after the mathematician Christian Goldbach, is an unproven statement
unread,
Overkott proves Goldbach
Goldbach's conjecture, named after the mathematician Christian Goldbach, is an unproven statement
3/21/23
Francisco de Assis Mariano
12/13/22
The Two Natures of Christ: The Logic and Religion Webinar, December 15
Dear Colleague, You are invited to participate in the next session of the Logic and Religion Webinar
unread,
The Two Natures of Christ: The Logic and Religion Webinar, December 15
Dear Colleague, You are invited to participate in the next session of the Logic and Religion Webinar
12/13/22
Francisco de Assis Mariano
9/13/22
Scriptural Reasoning on Language and Ultimate Truth in an Indian Religious Tradition: The Logic and Religion Webinar, September 15
Dear Colleague, You are invited to participate in the next session of the Logic and Religion Webinar
unread,
Scriptural Reasoning on Language and Ultimate Truth in an Indian Religious Tradition: The Logic and Religion Webinar, September 15
Dear Colleague, You are invited to participate in the next session of the Logic and Religion Webinar
9/13/22
Francisco de Assis Mariano
7/6/22
Parables and Brains: The Logic and Religion Webinar, July 7
Dear Colleague, You are invited to participate in the next session of the Logic and Religion Webinar
unread,
Parables and Brains: The Logic and Religion Webinar, July 7
Dear Colleague, You are invited to participate in the next session of the Logic and Religion Webinar
7/6/22
Francisco de Assis Mariano
6/7/22
Ibn Sina and Bolzano: Two Contingent Arguments. The Logic and Religion Webinar, Jun 9
Dear Colleague, You are invited to participate in the next session of the Logic and Religion Webinar
unread,
Ibn Sina and Bolzano: Two Contingent Arguments. The Logic and Religion Webinar, Jun 9
Dear Colleague, You are invited to participate in the next session of the Logic and Religion Webinar
6/7/22
Francisco de Assis Mariano
5/10/22
Studying Ontological Arguments with Computers: The Logic and Religion Webinar, May 12
Dear Colleague, You are invited to participate in the next session of the Logic and Religion Webinar
unread,
Studying Ontological Arguments with Computers: The Logic and Religion Webinar, May 12
Dear Colleague, You are invited to participate in the next session of the Logic and Religion Webinar
5/10/22
Francisco de Assis Mariano
4/11/22
Theist and Atheist Arguments in Indian Philosophy: The Logic and Religion Webinar, April 14
Dear Colleague, You are invited to participate in the next session of the Logic and Religion Webinar
unread,
Theist and Atheist Arguments in Indian Philosophy: The Logic and Religion Webinar, April 14
Dear Colleague, You are invited to participate in the next session of the Logic and Religion Webinar
4/11/22
Francisco de Assis Mariano
3/16/22
Panentheism and Panpsychism: The Logic and Religion Webinar, March 17
Dear Colleague, You are invited to participate in the next session of the Logic and Religion Webinar
unread,
Panentheism and Panpsychism: The Logic and Religion Webinar, March 17
Dear Colleague, You are invited to participate in the next session of the Logic and Religion Webinar
3/16/22
Casey M
9/7/21
great way for grad students and postdocs to make some extra cash
Dear Colleagues, Ran across this FREE excellent academic platform called figbox I would like to share
unread,
great way for grad students and postdocs to make some extra cash
Dear Colleagues, Ran across this FREE excellent academic platform called figbox I would like to share
9/7/21
olcott
5/22/21
Eliminating the pathological self-reference error of the halting theorem (V8)
In epistemology (theory of knowledge), a self-evident proposition is a proposition that is known to
unread,
Eliminating the pathological self-reference error of the halting theorem (V8)
In epistemology (theory of knowledge), a self-evident proposition is a proposition that is known to
5/22/21
olcott
,
Matt Faunce
12
4/27/21
Re: Knowledge defined to overcome the Gettier problem
On 4/27/2021 10:00 PM, Matt Faunce wrote: > olcott <No...@NoWhere.com> wrote: >> On 4/
unread,
Re: Knowledge defined to overcome the Gettier problem
On 4/27/2021 10:00 PM, Matt Faunce wrote: > olcott <No...@NoWhere.com> wrote: >> On 4/
4/27/21
disc...@iphone.bell.com
2
4/20/20
iPhone SUPER 80% discounts
*** iPhone SUPER-SPECIAL-DISCOUNT 80% OFF --- UNBEATABLE SUPER-PRICES !!! *** Save LOTS OF CASH on a
unread,
iPhone SUPER 80% discounts
*** iPhone SUPER-SPECIAL-DISCOUNT 80% OFF --- UNBEATABLE SUPER-PRICES !!! *** Save LOTS OF CASH on a
4/20/20
kill...@coronavirus.com
4/18/20
coronavirus COVID-19
coronavirus COVID-19 http://www.grex.org/~henced/coronavirus.html
unread,
coronavirus COVID-19
coronavirus COVID-19 http://www.grex.org/~henced/coronavirus.html
4/18/20
xyz9...@gmail.com
3/28/20
Fight the coronavirus 100% and save LOTS of CASH -- Combattez le coronavirus 100% et économisez BEAUCOUP d'ARGENT
Protect yourself and your loved ones ! KILL the coronavirus right now ! And save LOTS OF CASH New
unread,
Fight the coronavirus 100% and save LOTS of CASH -- Combattez le coronavirus 100% et économisez BEAUCOUP d'ARGENT
Protect yourself and your loved ones ! KILL the coronavirus right now ! And save LOTS OF CASH New
3/28/20
peteolcott
3
8/27/19
The Principle of Explosion is the Non Sequitur Error
On 8/27/2019 11:27 AM, peteolcott wrote: > When-so-ever symbolic logic diverges from the deductive
unread,
The Principle of Explosion is the Non Sequitur Error
On 8/27/2019 11:27 AM, peteolcott wrote: > When-so-ever symbolic logic diverges from the deductive
8/27/19
peteolcott
8/8/19
Provably unprovable eliminates incompleteness
"This sentence is unprovable" can be proven to be unprovable on the basis that its
unread,
Provably unprovable eliminates incompleteness
"This sentence is unprovable" can be proven to be unprovable on the basis that its
8/8/19
peteolcott
8/7/19
Re: Formal systems as a subset of the body of conceptual knowledge (acknowledgement that I am right_4)
On 8/7/2019 11:30 AM, William wrote: > On Wednesday, August 7, 2019 at 1:15:21 PM UTC-3,
unread,
Re: Formal systems as a subset of the body of conceptual knowledge (acknowledgement that I am right_4)
On 8/7/2019 11:30 AM, William wrote: > On Wednesday, August 7, 2019 at 1:15:21 PM UTC-3,
8/7/19
peteolcott
8/7/19
Re: Helmut Richter
On 8/7/2019 10:23 AM, Mścisław Wojna-Bojewski wrote: > On Wednesday, August 7, 2019 at 5:20:12 PM
unread,
Re: Helmut Richter
On 8/7/2019 10:23 AM, Mścisław Wojna-Bojewski wrote: > On Wednesday, August 7, 2019 at 5:20:12 PM
8/7/19
peteolcott
2
8/1/19
Tarski undefinability totally refuted by junior high school logic
On 5/22/2019 10:14 PM, peteolcott wrote: > Sound deductive inference necessitates true conclusions
unread,
Tarski undefinability totally refuted by junior high school logic
On 5/22/2019 10:14 PM, peteolcott wrote: > Sound deductive inference necessitates true conclusions
8/1/19
polcott
6/19/19
test
-- Copyright 2019 P Olcott All rights reserved "Great spirits have always encountered violent
unread,
test
-- Copyright 2019 P Olcott All rights reserved "Great spirits have always encountered violent
6/19/19
peteolcott
6/17/19
Proof that Wittgenstein is correct about Gödel
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/goedel-incompleteness/ The first incompleteness theorem states
unread,
Proof that Wittgenstein is correct about Gödel
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/goedel-incompleteness/ The first incompleteness theorem states
6/17/19
peteolcott
5/27/19
Is this simplest version of the Liar Paradox: ∃LP (LP ↔ ⊢¬LP) refutable?
LHS(LP) and RHS(⊢¬LP) of this expression: (LP ↔ ⊢¬LP) (1) If LP was true then the LHS would be true
unread,
Is this simplest version of the Liar Paradox: ∃LP (LP ↔ ⊢¬LP) refutable?
LHS(LP) and RHS(⊢¬LP) of this expression: (LP ↔ ⊢¬LP) (1) If LP was true then the LHS would be true
5/27/19
peteolcott
5/22/19
How can this possibly fail to partition True(x) from Untrue(x) for every formal system?
When we specify that True(x) is the consequences of the subset of the of conventional formal proofs
unread,
How can this possibly fail to partition True(x) from Untrue(x) for every formal system?
When we specify that True(x) is the consequences of the subset of the of conventional formal proofs
5/22/19
peteolcott
5/20/19
Refuting Tarski Undefinability in one sentence
When we specify that True(x) is the subset of the conventional formal proofs of mathematical logic
unread,
Refuting Tarski Undefinability in one sentence
When we specify that True(x) is the subset of the conventional formal proofs of mathematical logic
5/20/19
peteolcott
5/18/19
Refuting Gödel's 1931 Incompleteness Theorem in one sentence (v2)
HERE IS THE ONE SENTENCE: If the notion of True(x) is defined as provable from axioms and axioms are
unread,
Refuting Gödel's 1931 Incompleteness Theorem in one sentence (v2)
HERE IS THE ONE SENTENCE: If the notion of True(x) is defined as provable from axioms and axioms are
5/18/19
peteolcott
5/16/19
Refuting Gödel's 1931 Incompleteness Theorem in one sentence
If the notion of true is defined as provable from axioms and axioms are defined to be finite strings
unread,
Refuting Gödel's 1931 Incompleteness Theorem in one sentence
If the notion of true is defined as provable from axioms and axioms are defined to be finite strings
5/16/19
peteolcott
5/15/19
Defining a decidability decider that consistently decides decidability
I am going to explain this view in terms of the conventional notion of formal proofs of mathematical
unread,
Defining a decidability decider that consistently decides decidability
I am going to explain this view in terms of the conventional notion of formal proofs of mathematical
5/15/19
peteolcott
5/15/19
Deductively Sound Formal Proofs --- (v9)
In AI research the following can be used to anchor the notion of [truth conditional semantics] in a
unread,
Deductively Sound Formal Proofs --- (v9)
In AI research the following can be used to anchor the notion of [truth conditional semantics] in a
5/15/19
xilog
,
peteolcott
22
5/13/19
Opportunities arising from the refutation of Godel's incompleteness theorem
On 5/11/2019 5:41 AM, xilog wrote: > The material you refer to from Mendelson is standard and
unread,
Opportunities arising from the refutation of Godel's incompleteness theorem
On 5/11/2019 5:41 AM, xilog wrote: > The material you refer to from Mendelson is standard and
5/13/19