Access to Group Discussion

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Peter Germann

unread,
Aug 20, 2009, 7:09:34 AM8/20/09
to f2b-...@googlegroups.com

Dear members of the F2B Group

 

I have today modified the setting of our Group page in order to give read-only access to everyone. Please communicate this to your community and encourage those interested to inquire for an invitation to join.

 

For the posting of content and for the uploading of documents to “Files” (Yes, you are allowed to upload…) group membership remains to be prerequisite.

 

Thanks Aage and Gary for voting on “Terminology and Site Definitions”. Those wishing to do so too, just hit “reply” at left bottom of my opening statement from August 17.

 

Kind regards, Peter Germann

 

Joan

unread,
Aug 20, 2009, 9:33:09 PM8/20/09
to F2B Group
Dear Peter,

I must apologise for not replying earlier. I have had the flu.

Thank you for taking my thoughts on the wording into account.

I agree with all three proposals in their Draft 3 form.

Kindest regards,

Joan McIntyre.



On Aug 20, 9:09 pm, "Peter Germann" <peterdgerm...@bluewin.ch> wrote:
> Dear members of the F2B Group
>
> I have today modified the setting of our Group page in order to give
> read-only access to everyone. Please communicate this to your community and
> encourage those interested to inquire for an invitation to join.
>
> For the posting of content and for the uploading of documents to "Files"
> (Yes, you are allowed to upload.) group membership remains to be

Joan McIntyre

unread,
Aug 21, 2009, 9:41:19 AM8/21/09
to f2b-...@googlegroups.com

Hi Peter,

 

Something I forgot in my previous email. In File 6.5.2.1 F2CL S-C 10 there is a spelling error in "relative to the CENTRE (corrected) of the circle" .

 

In the following paragraph, I was wondering about the wording "markers erected to display...". I think that perhaps the wording of "recommended markers to be erected every 1/8 of a lap interval….” and perhaps omit “to display” may be more concise. What are your thoughts?

 

Joan.

Peter G

unread,
Aug 24, 2009, 7:26:22 AM8/24/09
to F2B Group
Thank you, Joan.
I will correct CENTRE in the proposal to be submitted.

Regarding the phrase referring to the markers, what do you think about
this:

The diagram shows the recommended dimensions for Contest Flight
Circles and the recommended markers to be erected every 1/8th of a lap
interval indicating the height of the horizontal base which lies 1.5 m
above the center of the circle.

Kind regards

On 21 Aug, 15:41, "Joan McIntyre" <joa...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Something I forgot in my previous email. In File 6.5.2.1 F2CL S-C 10 there
> is a spelling error in "relative to the CENTRE (corrected) of the circle" .
>
> In the following paragraph, I was wondering about the wording "markers
> erected to display...". I think that perhaps the wording of "recommended
> markers to be erected every 1/8 of a lap interval.." and perhaps omit "to
> display" may be more concise. What are your thoughts?
>
> Joan.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: f2b-...@googlegroups.com [mailto:f2b-...@googlegroups.com] On
>
> Behalf Of Peter Germann
> Sent: Thursday, 20 August 2009 9:10 PM
> To: f2b-...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Access to Group Discussion
>
> Dear members of the F2B Group
>
> I have today modified the setting of our Group page in order to give
> read-only access to everyone. Please communicate this to your community and
> encourage those interested to inquire for an invitation to join.
>
> For the posting of content and for the uploading of documents to "Files"
> (Yes, you are allowed to upload.) group membership remains to be
> prerequisite.
>
> Thanks Aage and Gary for voting on "Terminology and Site Definitions". Those
> wishing to do so too, just hit "reply" at left bottom of my opening
> statement from August 17.
>
> Kind regards, Peter Germann- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Joan McIntyre

unread,
Aug 24, 2009, 8:21:24 PM8/24/09
to f2b-...@googlegroups.com
Hi Peter,

That sounds fine to me.

I have not yet had the opportunity to look at, in detail, the Clover
proposal. Can I get back to you on this?

Hope you are keeping well.

Best wishes,
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages