Has anybody here upgraded their 7AC with an O-200?
What STC did you use?
Any comments or suggestions about this upgrade?
Rob McDonald, Owen Sound, Ontario
1946 Aeronca Champ CF-RWQ
http://www.SunriseTechnical.ca
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.31/1130 - Release Date: 11/14/2007
_______________________________________________
Aeronca mailing list
Aer...@mail.westmont.edu
http://mail.westmont.edu/mailman/listinfo/aeronca
Cy Galley - Aeronca Aviators Club
Newsletter Editor & EAA TC
www.aeronca.org
Actively supporting Aeroncas every day
New e-mail address - cga...@mchsi.com
I gave some thought to that, but they are getting harder to find, and I am
told the cost of rebuilding them is higher than for the O-200. If I found a
good deal on a C85 or C90 I could change my mind.
Rob
While I think the C85/O-200 STCs sound interesting if I have to rebuild an
engine, I was hoping to find a running mid time engine that I don't have to
rebuild, and so save a little money.
Rob
>From: Tom Holmes <thomasth...@sbcglobal.net>
>Reply-To: aer...@westmont.edu
>To: aer...@westmont.edu
>Subject: Re: [f-AA] O-200 STC for Champ
Hi Carl,
I gave some thought to that, but they are getting harder to find, and I am
told the cost of rebuilding them is higher than for the O-200. If I found a
good deal on a C85 or C90 I could change my mind.
Rob
>From: Plain Carl
>Reply-To: aer...@westmont.edu
>To: aer...@westmont.edu
>Subject: Re: [f-AA] O-200 STC for Champ
>Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 06:07:35 -0800 (PST)
>
>Stick with the C85 or C90 to avoid the spar AD. Both can be modified to
>produce as many ponies as the O200. C90 is becoming more rare as time
>passes and C85 cranks are made of unobtainium, but the O200 crank can be
>substituted by STC. Early C90 cam can actually produce more usable HP than
>the later O200.
>
> PC
>
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.0/1135 - Release Date: 11/16/2007