Roger –
Does the book also go into any discussion of their business acumen? The Wrights figured out early on what they had, and vigorously sought patents, and then even more vigorously defended those patents, even litigating against Glenn Curtiss.
Jerry E.
Yes, it’s always interested me how it was the French who really advanced aviation those first few years. Even today, we have aileron, fuselage, empennage – all French words, in the lexicon of aviation.
A native of Columbus, OH, my town, was Capt. Eddie Rickenbacker, whose 94th Pursuit Squadron was equipped with French Spad fighters, since the U.S. didn’t even have a fighter early in WW I.
But somehow, the French squandered their early lead in aviation development by the mid 1920s.
Richard – I’m heading to OSH in the morning. Are you going? We drive and have stayed at a place in Green Lake, WI for about the past 20 years.
If you’re going to OSH, maybe we can hook up for a chat.
Jerry
From: aeronca...@westmont.edu [mailto:aeronca...@westmont.edu]
On Behalf Of Richard Murray
Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2015 10:56 AM
To: aer...@westmont.edu
Subject: Re: [f-AA] ####The Wrights
Roger thanks for the review. It will be on my must read list. I marvel at how they handled the logistics of working in Dayton and traveling to the outer banks of North Carolina to do the flight testing.
Somewhere on U tube there is a video made from a movie film of a Wright Flyer aloft. One of the occupants is holding the camera. It’s amazing how much the canard moves up and down, and how the nose of the airplane pitched up and down in what would be described as level flight. The machine was horribly unstable.
What a rapid pace of development from 1903 to 1918, when Jennys, Fokkers, Spads, and Se5s were all true airplanes. An old friend, who died 30 years ago had a replica of a Fokker Triplane, true to the original drawings. The only difference was that his airplane had a modern engine. He said many times how unstable it was, and how it could never achieve anything close to hands off flying.
Drop me an email if you make it up.
The Caravelle was actually a joint British – French airplane. The nose and cockpit section are straight from the original jet airliner, the British Comet.
From: aeronca...@westmont.edu [mailto:aeronca...@westmont.edu] On Behalf Of danv...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2015 2:09 PM
To: aer...@westmont.edu
I used to do that.
Rod Machado suggested it.
Breaks up the day. A lot of fun.
Land O Matic is what Cessna called the spring steel main geared tricycle airplanes of the late 1950s and 60s – the 172 and 182 mainly.